FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

Los Angeles is Not a Democracy

It’s the reason why I learned to speak this language – Kamel Daoud

Democracy, power to the people, is a principled mode of production, distribution, and existence; a cultural and political form given to organic life. It has an obvious, recognizable, shape because it is an ethical process and has ethical aims, which it manifests in art, rights, social movements, spatial production, etc. Is Los Angeles a democracy? LA is in no way a democratic city today thanks to a massive racial equity and housing crisis. Nor is there a big chance that LA becomes a “progressive city” in the very near future but for drastic measures, and this is because of displacement. Neighborhood movements today are linked to the ability to even live in the neighborhood, and most folks are on their way out. LA is likely to elect an even more corporatist mayor than its current one in the next election for Mayoral office, thanks to displacement. Traditional capitalist models of growth are being applied everywhere, and hotels, and new boulevards have one real enemy: a recession that may becoming. Something needs to happen, and quickly. This historical event has to be giving a community the freedom to intervene directly on what causes it harm, to heal itself, and to have this freedom be at in the framework of an eventual democracy.

On a great day, mostly days of mass popular resistance like the days of the 2018 UTLA strike, for example, Los Angeles is an explosion of positive activity. Different communities express different humanities, priorities in a wide-ranging array of negotiations and interventions. On an average day, it is both a representative democracy (oligarchy) and representative economy, a massive producer of pain and anguish, homelessness, as much as it is a reputed producer of wealth.

Let’s take LA’s climate as an example of an absence of democracy. When it comes to the climate, representative government has been given the power to vote on our climate futures. In other words, when it comes to our climate future, unelected citizens are only free to vote on representation but are not free to do something about this crisis on our own terms. In other words, there is no real freedom (freedom in the left sense and not right nonsense), to quote philosopher Phillipe Van Parijs. In other words, there is negative freedom for most citizens to take governmental (hegemonic, legally brutal, definitive) action to stop the climate crisis.

Government. Los Angeles is first and foremost part of the Mediterranean biome, as a mass of land that harbors all kinds of life and its cultures. This ecological apriori escapes both the philosophy and practice of government in Los Angeles. Today, Los Angeles is an environmental catastrophe posing as a Mediterranean styled new America, replete with ideas, designs, traditions, and institutions that liberate with supposed mass culture freedom, found on a skateboard or drinking an organic smoothie. Instead, Los Angeles fails to live up to its potential. In order to do so, Los Angeles must begin with the ecological (law), and then make it its way to ethics and finally government that is grounded in law and ethics, as regeneration of this city. It must do this, or else.

Mike Davis points out that the last group “in power” to acknowledge the deep structures of Mediteranean biome ecology were the Franciscans. This was before the government of LA as we know it today. This is because the Franciscans were used to the biome in Europe. It is a biome of natural fires, earthquakes, etc. Despite this, the government of LA has allowed all sorts of enterprises to flourish that harm citizens in the biome such as dumping the oceans, building despite fault lines and fires etc. It’s no different when it comes to governing around the climate crisis and the lack of climate justice for brown and black LA, despite city council having approved the first Climate Mobilization Office in the country. For example, oil drilling, a killer, goes on in LA right next to tracts of homes.

Citizens of LA do not have the freedom, nor the democracy, to seriously intervene in this crisis, until further notice. Government by the people would found itself on given people the freedom (taking big money out of politics) to solve this crisis together. Freedom, and only real freedom to intervene can allow this to happen, democracy, while living a climate catastrophe.

 

More articles by:
bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550
Weekend Edition
December 06, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Jeffrey St. Clair
Eat an Impeachment
Matthew Hoh
Authorizations for Madness; The Effects and Consequences of Congress’ Endless Permissions for War
Jefferson Morley
Why the Douma Chemical Attack Wasn’t a ‘Managed Massacre’
Andrew Levine
Whatever Happened to the Obama Coalition?
Paul Street
The Dismal Dollar Dems and the Subversion of Democracy
Dave Lindorff
Conviction and Removal Aren’t the Issue; It’s Impeachment of Trump That is Essential
Ron Jacobs
Law Seminar in the Hearing Room: Impeachment Day Six
Linda Pentz Gunter
Why Do We Punish the Peacemakers?
Louis Proyect
Michael Bloomberg and Me
Robert Hunziker
Permafrost Hits a Grim Threshold
Joseph Natoli
What We Must Do
Evaggelos Vallianatos
Global Poison Spring
Robert Fantina
Is Kashmir India’s Palestine?
Charles McKelvey
A Theory of Truth From the South
Walden Bello
How the Battle of Seattle Made the Truth About Globalization True
Evan Jones
BNP Before a French Court
Norman Solomon
Kerry’s Endorsement of Biden Fits: Two Deceptive Supporters of the Iraq War
Torsten Bewernitz – Gabriel Kuhn
Syndicalism for the Twenty-First Century: From Unionism to Class-Struggle Militancy
Matthew Stevenson
Across the Balkans: From Banja Luka to Sarajevo
Thomas Knapp
NATO is a Brain Dead, Obsolete, Rabid Dog. Euthanize It.
Forrest Hylton
Bolivia’s Coup Government: a Far-Right Horror Show
M. G. Piety
A Lesson From the Danes on Immigration
Ellen Isaacs
The Audacity of Hypocrisy
Monika Zgustova
Chernobyl, Lies and Messianism in Russia
Manuel García, Jr.
From Caesar’s Last Breath to Ours
Binoy Kampmark
Going to the ICJ: Myanmar, Genocide and Aung San Suu Kyi’s Gamble
Jill Richardson
Marijuana and the Myth of the “Gateway Drug”
Muzamil Bhat
Srinagar’s Shikaras: Still Waters Run Deep Losses
Gaither Stewart
War and Betrayal: Change and Transformation
Farzana Versey
What Religion is Your Nationalism?
Clark T. Scott
The Focus on Trump Reveals the Democrat Model
Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
Do Bernie’s Supporters Know What “Not Me, Us” Means? Does Bernie?
Peter Harley
Aldo Leopold, Revisited
Winslow Myers
A Presidential Speech the World Needs to Hear
Christopher Brauchli
The Chosen One
Jim Britell
Misconceptions About Lobbying Representatives and Agencies
Ted Rall
Trump Gets Away with Stuff Because He Does
Mel Gurtov
Hong Kong, Xinjiang, and the Insecurity of China’s Leadership
Nicky Reid
Dennis Kucinich, Tulsi Gabbard and the Slow Death of the Democratic Delusion
Tom H. Hastings
Cross-Generational Power to Change
John Kendall Hawkins
1619: The Mighty Whitey Arrives
Julian Rose
Why I Don’t Have a Mobile Phone
David Yearsley
Parasitic Sounds
Elliot Sperber
Class War is Chemical War
December 05, 2019
Colin Todhunter
Don’t Look, Don’t See: Time for Honest Media Reporting on Impacts of Pesticides
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail