FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

Russophobia at Democratic Party Debate


Russophobia was on full display during Tuesday night’s Democratic Party debate, with ominous repercussions for the future of American foreign policy.

When asked what he would do to stand up to Russian President Vladimir Putin, Beto O’Rourke stated that we “must hold Russia accountable for invading the world’s greatest democracy and being able to do it thanks to Donald Trump, functionally with impunity so far, so much so that they are invading this democracy right now as we speak.”

O’Rourke’s betrayal narrative comes out of the right-wing playbook of the 1950s.

His comments also invert history.

The world’s supposedly greatest democracy, the United States, is the one who has invaded Russia before – in 1918 when the Woodrow Wilson administration sent troops in an attempt to overturn Russia’s Bolshevik revolution – and not vice versa.

This past July, a Clinton appointed Judge dismissed a lawsuit by the Democratic National Committee [DNC] against the Trump campaign and Julian Assange for lack of evidence of election meddling, stating that the DNC’s accusations were “totally divorced from the facts asserted in the organization’s own complaint.”

Two years earlier, the group Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity [VIPS] found based on the speed of communication that a supposed Russian hack of Hillary Clinton’s emails was actually a leak carried out on the East Coast of the United States.

The supposed social media disinformation campaign that helped sway American voters was also determined to have been carried out by a private company based in St. Petersburg, Internet Research Agency (IRA), whose connection to the Russian government has never been established.

Half of the IRA ads on Facebook were enacted after the 2016 election, and many were non-political while others actually supported Trump.

There is generally little publicly available evidence which suggests that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 election.

This did not stop Amy Klobuchar from claiming nonsensically that “Russia’s interference was much more serious than meddling; it rather constituted an invasion of U.S. elections.”

Klobuchar went on to state that Putin was “someone who has shot down planes over Ukraine, who has poisoned opponents.”

These two charges, however, have also never been corroborated.

The criminals who shot down a Malaysian airliner in July 2015 have never been linked to Putin and no one has been indicted or convicted in any court of law.

The Obama administration at the time blamed Russian backed separatists for blocking the investigation and removing evidence from the crash site and dead bodies, though the State Department refused to make public radar information that Secretary of State John Kerry said pointed to the location of the offending missile.

The New York Times further reported on a Ukrainian military assault that touched off a fire near the crash site that consumed plane debris that could have helped identify the reasons for the disaster, and destroyed fuselage fragments with shrapnel holes cited by investigators as possible evidence of an attack by Ukrainian jetfighters.

As far as poisoning, this is a reference to the deaths of KGB defector Sasha Litvinenko and attempted killing of former Russian spy Sergey Skirpal.

While there is a possibility that Putin was involved, there are also alternative theories which point to Putin being set up in black flag operations.

Amy Knight’s seriously researched book Orders to Kill: The Putin Regime and Political Murder (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) presents only circumstantial evidence and admits that proof of Putin’s culpability has not been established.

Cory Booker would have also made George Orwell proud on debate night.

Repeating the old Russophobic trope that Russians “only understand force,” Booker chastised President Trump for “turning the moral leadership of this country into a dumpster fire” by “partnering more with Putin” than with “[Angela] Merkel [German leader] and [Emmanuel] Macron [French leader].”

Booker continued: “we cannot allow Russia to not only interfere in the democracies of Ukraine and Latvia and Lithuania, but [also] in this democracy.”

Booker’s remarks were wrong on so many levels.

Trump’s administration has not partnered with Russia, but adopted a hard-line policy against it.

This past February, Trump pulled out of the Intermediate Nuclear Range Forces Treaty (INF) banning ground-based cruise missiles and missile launchers of mid-range.

Trump has also extended Russia sanctions and provided lethal assistance to the Ukrainian military as it assaulted separatist forces backed by Russia in Eastern Ukraine (Obama had only provided non-lethal military aid).

Booker’s claim about Russia interfering in the democracy of Ukraine is completely off-base and distorts recent history.

In February 2014, the United States and not Russia supported a blatant coup against Ukraine’s elected pro-Russian leader Viktor Yanukovych.

The U.S. State Department had previously provided over $5 billion dollars to Ukraine in an attempt top pry the country away from the Russian orbit.

Prominent American politicians gave out cookies to Maidan square protestors opposing Yanukovych who didn’t ultimately have enough signatures to pass an impeachment measure.

After Yanukovych fled for his life, Russia began to support separatist factions in the East who did not trust the post-coup government of Petro Poroshenko.

The latter had appointed far-right wing members of the Svoboda Party to its Cabinet and passed a language law that restricted the use of the Russian language.

In Latvia, meanwhile, an independent pro-Russian party showed strong support in elections held last fall. Lithuania is far from the perfect democracy that Booker depicts and has jailed many former communist party supporters and forced a significant percentage of its population to flee.

Swiss historian Guy Mettan wrote in his book Creating Russophobia: From The Great Religious Schism to Anti-Putin Hysteria (Clarity Press, 2017) that Russophobia resembles both anti-Semitism and Islamophobia in that it “exists first in the head of the one who looks, not in the victims alleged behavior or characteristics. [It is] a way of turning specific pseudo-facts into essential one-dimensional values, barbarity, despotism and expansionism in the Russian case in order to justify stigmatization and ostracism.”

The Democratic Party is currently divided between its progressive and corporatist wing.

O’Rourke, Klobuchar and Booker’s Russia-baiting reflects in part an attempt by the corporatists to try and channel popular enmity away from the domestic plutocrats who have rigged the American political-economy in their favor, and onto a phantom foreign enemy whose existence can be used to justify large-scale military expenditures.

Unfortunately, they face little pushback even from the progressives.

Elizabeth Warren, for example, has adopted a hard-line stance against Russia, as has Bernie Sanders.

He has routinely denounced Putin as an “anti-democratic authoritarian,” who engaged in “military adventurism in Ukraine and the Crimea,” and has supported regressive sanctions.

The one true progressive in the party willing to repudiate the dominant Russophobia, is Tulsi Gabbard.

During Tuesday’s debate, she boldly called out CNN and The New York Times for promoting neo-McCarthyite smears insinuating that she was some kind of “Russian asset” and “bot,” while also condemning U.S. support for jihadists in Syria.

Gabbard though is only polling at around two percent and stands little chance of winning the nomination.

The American electorate is very ill-informed about Russia and international affairs, and too few unfortunately will appreciate her visionary stance.

More articles by:

Jeremy Kuzmarov is the author of The Russians are Coming, Again: The First Cold War as Tragedy, the Second as Farce (Monthly Review Press, 2018) and Obama’s Unending Wars: Fronting for the Foreign Policy of the Permanent Warfare State (Atlanta: Clarity Press, 2019).

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550
November 13, 2019
Vijay Prashad
After Evo, the Lithium Question Looms Large in Bolivia
Charles Pierson
How Not to End a Forever War
Kenneth Surin
“We’ll See You on the Barricades”: Bojo Johnson’s Poundshop Churchill Imitation
Nick Alexandrov
Murder Like It’s 1495: U.S.-Backed Counterinsurgency in the Philippines
George Ochenski
Montana’s Radioactive Waste Legacy
Brian Terrell
A Doubtful Proposition: a Reflection on the Trial of the Kings Bay Plowshares 7
Nick Pemberton
Assange, Zuckerberg and Free Speech
James Bovard
The “Officer Friendly” Police Fantasy
Dean Baker
The Logic of Medical Co-Payments
Jeff Mackler
Chicago Teachers Divided Over Strike Settlement
Binoy Kampmark
The ISC Report: Russian Connections in Albion?
Norman Solomon
Biden and Bloomberg Want Uncle Sam to Defer to Uncle Scrooge
Jesse Jackson
Risking Lives in Endless Wars is Morally Wrong and a Strategic Failure
Manuel García, Jr.
Criminalated Warmongers
November 12, 2019
Nino Pagliccia
Bolivia and Venezuela: Two Countries, But Same Hybrid War
Patrick Cockburn
How Iran-Backed Forces Are Taking Over Iraq
Jonathan Cook
Israel is Silencing the Last Voices Trying to Stop Abuses Against Palestinians
Jim Kavanagh
Trump’s Syrian See-Saw: From Pullout to Pillage
Susan Babbitt
Fidel, Three Years Later
Dean Baker
A Bold Plan to Strengthen and Improve Social Security is What America Needs
ADRIAN KUZMINSKI
Trump’s Crime Against Humanity
Victor Grossman
The Wall and General Pyrrhus
Yoko Liriano
De Facto Martial Law in the Philippines
Ana Paula Vargas – Vijay Prashad
Lula is Free: Can Socialism Be Restored?
Thomas Knapp
Explainer: No, House Democrats Aren’t Violating Trump’s Rights
Wim Laven
Serve With Honor, Honor Those Who Serve; or Support Trump?
Colin Todhunter
Agrarian Crisis and Malnutrition: GM Agriculture Is Not the Answer
Binoy Kampmark
Walls in the Head: “Ostalgia” and the Berlin Wall Three Decades Later
Akio Tanaka
Response to Pete Dolack Articles on WBAI and Pacifica
Nyla Ali Khan
Bigotry and Ideology in India and Kashmir: the Legacy of the Babri Masjid Mosque
Yves Engler
Canada Backs Coup Against Bolivia’s President
November 11, 2019
Aaron Goings, Brian Barnes, and Roger Snider
Class War Violence: Centralia 1919
Steve Early - Suzanne Gordon
“Other Than Honorable?” Veterans With “Bad Paper” Seek Long Overdue Benefits
Peter Linebaugh
The Worm in the Apple
Joseph Natoli
In the Looming Shadow of Civil War
Robert Fisk
How the Syrian Democratic Forces Were Suddenly Transformed into “Kurdish Forces”
Patrick Cockburn
David Cameron and the Decline of British Leadership
Naomi Oreskes
The Greatest Scam in History: How the Energy Companies Took Us All
Fred Gardner
Most Iraq and Afghanistan Vets now Regret the Mission
Howard Lisnoff
The Dubious Case of Washing Machines and Student Performance
Nino Pagliccia
The Secret of Cuba’s Success: International Solidarity
Binoy Kampmark
Corporate Mammon: Amazon and the Seattle Council Elections
Kim C. Domenico
To Overthrow Radical Evil, Part II: A Grandmother’s Proposal
Marc Levy
Veterans’ Day: Four Poems
Weekend Edition
November 08, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Paul Street
The Real Constitutional Crisis: The Constitution
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail