FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

The Intersection Many Missed in Smollett’s Case

In this age of intersectionality in social justice movements, it’s clear that Jussie Smollet’s case has lacked true intersectional understanding in the period since the Chicago Police Department made their accusations against him.

It has been telling to witness how many people, activists and media alike, took the CPD’s statements as truth and turned on Smollett.

Smollett grew up in a family that has close ties to Angela Davis and the Black Panther Party and has been an activist and artist since his childhood.  He has been outspoken about many of President’s Trump’s policies, and taught songwriting in Illinois prisons.  He is a Black Gay artist who speaks out.

The Chicago Police Department, on the other hand, has a long history to indicate its statements should not be trusted automatically.  From the murder of Fred Hampton, to numerous inexcusable murders of young Black men caught on film which police officers initially lied about, to the fact that they can’t seem to figure out how to do anything to lessen the rate by which Black children are murdering each other in the streets of the city, their history shows an ongoing issue with honesty, capability, and transparency that not been rectified.

Yet, when they came out with their version of what happened in Smollett’s case, people responded like the truth had been revealed.  This, despite the consciousness that Black Lives Matters has raised in recent years.  This, despite the unconvincing evidence CPD has released.  This, simply because they are the authority speaking the truth, and a Black man facing that is muted until completely slandered, innocent or not.  Many in the Black community also turned on Smollett quickly, and his employer cut him from the last episodes of the season, demonstrating the ingrained nature of America’s deference to authority, whether that authority has a history of corruption or not.

The Evidence Is Not Convincing

The evidence the CPD have presented in the case hinge on the words of two brothers.  Chicago news stations released footage showing the brothers buying ski masks, which are common in Chicago winters, and a red hat, which Smollett never stated the attackers were wearing.  The police say they also have video evidence of the brothers leaving the scene, getting in a cab, text messages detailing the plans of a staged attack, etc, none of which has not been publicly shown.  All that has been released is a grainy photo of two people who are impossible to identify.  It’s not even clear in the photo if the people are wearing ski masks, though neither appears to be wearing a baseball hat.  The fact that bleach was found in the brother’s home was reported as damning evidence.

CPD’s story has changed.  Initially they said they considered Smollett a victim.  “Superintendent Eddie Johnson, said during an appearance on WLS-TV that…Smollett has been ‘very cooperative and we have no reason at this point to think he’s not being genuine with us.'”  But after deciding to prosecute him, “Chicago’s police chief said they were suspicious when ‘Empire’ star Jussie Smollett first told detectives that two masked men taunted him with racist and homophobic slurs before beating him and looping a noose around his neck. ‘From the very beginning we had some questions about it,’ Chicago Police Superintendent Eddie Johnson.”

This is damning testimony.  How can police accurately investigate a case they do not believe?

What is particularly absurd about the CPD’s case against Smollett is the motive they say they have discovered: that Smollett wanted more money for his work on Empire, something denied by both Smollett and Empire.  There is no evidence for this whatsoever, yet CPD speaks as though they have read Smollett’s mind and ascertained his true nature.  In fact they said, “When we discovered the actual motive, quite frankly, it pissed everybody off.”  The truth is they did not ‘discover’ the ‘actual’ motive.

In fact, if CPD’s accusations are correct and Smollett made up this attack for attention, why was it his 60 year old friend who called the police and convinced him to file a police report in the first place?

The police say they have evidence but they have not shown it publicly.  Therefore, innocent until proven guilty must stand.  Not innocent until the police say you’re guilty, or innocent until the media says you are, because then a huge portion of the country will never get justice.  Railroading someone into prison is not a hard thing to do.

Intersectionality Means Understanding Nuance

Though many have called the evidence CPD presented as “overwhelming,” this brings us to the deeper part of the intersection that many are missing and which needs to be kept in mind – the history of dirty tactics in the prosecution of Black men.

Initially the Osundairo’s lawyer said “they’re all very cordial with each other, so they’re baffled why they are people of interest.”  However, “at hour 47 – one hour before police had to either charge the men or release them – Johnson said the two confessed to what they had done. They were subsequently released without being charged.”  This seems strange.

If you’re not familiar with how Black men are prosecuted in this country, it can feel like wading into a muck of poison to hear even snippets of it.  This is a country where Black men clearly have an unwanted intimacy with the criminal justice system and where the majority of federal cases don’t even go to trial – “Ninety-seven percent of federal convictions and ninety-four percent of state convictions are the results of guilty pleas.”  Instead, people plead guilty en masse to get a lesser sentence.  The implications here are enormous.

This is a country where ‘snitching’ – as it is well-known in the Black community – can get you reduced time.  There is an organized though quiet official system where giving accurate or inaccurate information about your peers can get years shaved off your sentence, or no sentence at all, among other perks.  In such a system, where ‘testimony’ holds such deep weight, the problem is obvious.

“Snitching has become so commonplace that in the past five years at least 48,895 federal convicts — one of every eight — had their prison sentences reduced in exchange for helping government investigators, a USA TODAY examination of hundreds of thousands of court cases found.”

This is not written to accuse the police of anything in particular, to say that the Osundairo’s testimony is inaccurate, or to say that Smollett is absolutely innocent.  But innocent until proven guilty is a basic standard that must be adhered to.  Otherwise, confusion and abuse of power will reign and people will continue to be easily manipulated in countless ways.

More articles by:
bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550
September 18, 2019
Liam Kennedy
Boris Johnson: Elitist Defender of Britain’s Big Banks
September 17, 2019
Mario Barrera
The Southern Strategy and Donald Trump
Robert Jensen
The Danger of Inspiration in a Time of Ecological Crisis
Dean Baker
Health Care: Premiums and Taxes
Dave Lindorff
Recalling the Hundreds of Thousands of Civilian Victims of America’s Endless ‘War on Terror’
Binoy Kampmark
Oiling for War: The Houthi Attack on Abqaiq
Susie Day
You Say You Want a Revolution: a Prison Letter to Yoko Ono
Rich Gibson
Seize Solidarity House
Laura Flanders
From Voice of America to NPR: New CEO Lansing’s Glass House
Don Fitz
What is Energy Denial?
Dan Bacher
Governor Newsom Says He Will Veto Bill Blocking Trump Rollback of Endangered Fish Species Protections
Thomas Knapp
Election 2020: Time to Stop Pretending and Start Over
W. Alejandro Sanchez
Inside the Syrian Peace Talks
Elliot Sperber
Mickey Mouse Networks
September 16, 2019
Sam Husseini
Biden Taking Iraq Lies to the Max
Paul Street
Joe Biden’s Answer to Slavery’s Legacy: Phonographs for the Poor
Paul Atwood
Why Mattis is No Hero
Jonathan Cook
Brexit Reveals Jeremy Corbyn to be the True Moderate
Jeff Mackler
Trump, Trade and China
Robert Hunziker
Fukushima’s Radioactive Water Crisis
Evaggelos Vallianatos
The Democrats and the Climate Crisis
Michael Doliner
Hot Stuff on the Afghan Peace Deal Snafu
Nyla Ali Khan
Spectacles of the Demolition of the Babri Masjid in Uttar Pradesh and the Revocation of the Autonomous Status of Kashmir
Stansfield Smith
Celebrating 50 Years of Venceremos Brigade solidarity with the Cuban Revolution
Tim Butterworth
Socialism Made America Great
Nick Licata
Profiles in Courage: the Tories Have It, the Republicans Don’t
Abel Prieto
Cubanness and Cuban Identity: the Importance of Fernando Ortiz
Robert Koehler
Altruists of the World Unite!
Mel Gurtov
Farewell, John Bolton
Weekend Edition
September 13, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Paul Street
The Age of Constitutional Coups
Rob Urie
Bernie Sanders and the Realignment of the American Left
Anthony DiMaggio
Teaching the “War on Terror”: Lessons for Contemporary Politics
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: They Are the Walrus
T.J. Coles
Jeremy Corbyn: Electoral “Chicken” or Political Mastermind?
Joseph Natoli
The Vox Populi
Sasan Fayazmanesh
The Pirates of Gibraltar
John Feffer
Hong Kong and the Future of China
David Rosen
The Likely End to Roe v. Wade?
Ishmael Reed
When You Mess With Creation Myths, the Knives Come Out
Michael Hudson
Break Up the Democratic Party?
Paul Tritschler
What If This is as Good as It Gets?
Jonah Raskin
Uncensored Tony Serra: Consummate Criminal Defense Lawyer
Ryan Gunderson
Here’s to the Last Philosophes, the Frankfurt School
Michael T. Klare
The Pompeo Doctrine: How to Seize the Arctic’s Resources, Now Accessible Due to Climate Change (Just Don’t Mention Those Words!)
Luke O'Neil
I Would Want To Drink Their Blood: God Will Punish Them
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail