• Monthly
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $other
  • use PayPal

Spring Donation Drive

CounterPunch is a lifeboat piggybank-icon of sanity in today’s turbulent political seas. Please make a tax-deductible donation and help us continue to fight.
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

Two Years and Colombia’s Peace Agreement is in Shreds

Photo Source Ministerio de Defensa del Perú | CC BY 2.0

Having negotiated for four years, the Colombia government on November 24, 2016 signed a peace agreement with guerrillas of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia Photo Source SSatMIT16 | <a href=”https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/”>CC BY 2.0</a> (FARC). Over 50 years of civil war had ended. The war took 200,000 Colombian lives and displaced seven million from their land.

One of the parties did lay down arms. Otherwise implementation has been nil. A campaign to undo the settlement is gaining. The peace process is on life support.

1) Defenseless civilians are under siege. As of October 1, 2018, 343social leadersand human rights defenders had been assassinated over the course of 18 months. Between November 24, 2016 and August 20, 2018, 80 former guerrillaswere assassinated. Michel Forst is the United Nations Special Rapporteur for human rights. His visit to Colombia ended December 3.  He told reporters, “It’s more horrifyingthan anything I have seen in my life.”

2) The first agenda item to be negotiated was the use and control of land. In 1964 those concerns and fear of repression motivated a few small farmers to establish the FARC. Since the time of Simon Bolívar, land has been at the heart of political strife in Colombia. Despite the peace accord, restitution of stolen land, formalization of land titles, and funding for land reform are almost non-existent.

3) The fourth item on the six-point agenda was “Solution to the problem of illicit drugs.” Yet the government hasn’t provided farmers with funding and infrastructure essential for growing legal crops. Instead, coca production and the rural narco-trafficking economy have expanded.Increasingly, violent paramilitaries preside over drug-trade operations. They occupy areas once held by the FARC.

4) When wars end, prisoners of war go home. However, more than 500 FARC prisoners remain in Colombian prisons. Authorities have jailed lead FARC peace negotiator Jesús Santrich. He faces possible extradition to the United States on drug-dealing charges. They are probably false. Head FARC negotiator Iván Márquez is in hiding to avoid arrest.

5) Agenda item five was about victims of the armed conflict. Agreement on that point determined that combatants on both sides would have the opportunity to acknowledge responsibility for crimes they committed. Having done so, they could expect to be pardoned or in a few cases to be punished. In that instance principles of restorative justice would be applied.

The Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP) would hear the confessions and decide upon parson or punishment. Pardoned, ex-guerrillas would return to civilian life and state agents to their posts. The former would be able to enter regular politics and continue fighting for social justice there.

Colombia’s Congress is destroying the JEP. Spanish lawyer Enrique Santiago recently declared that “modifications [of the JEP] constitute alterations that break the Final Agreement” – hence the focus here on the JEP.

According to Santiago, legislation passed on July 18, 2018 creates “separate judicial treatment andprocedures for the military forces” and prohibits “investigation of alleged crimes committed by members of the armed forces or agents of the State.”  Now the Congress is considering further revisions of the JEP. There would be special judges to rule on “questions relating to members of the security forces, civil servants or third parties.” These last include paramilitaries.

And a revamped JEP would no longer recognize confessions by ex-combatants. It won’t matter that they take responsibility. Pardons will be unlikely. The incentive for ex-combatants to appear before the JEP disappears. That incentive was “the heart of the justice system created in the Peace Agreement,” Santiago insists. The JEP may end up looking like a regular court. Mere confession before the JEP wouldn’t suffice as a basis for judgment.

Santiago argues that “without agreements, life in society is not possible [and] social peace is jeopardized.”  This legal principle goes back to Roman law and is validated by centuries of legal practice. Ultimately, “neither the Congress of the Republic, nor any other state institution is authorized … to violate what has been agreed to.”

Santiago served as an advisor for the negotiators during the peace talks. He is secretary general of the Communist Party of Spain.

Former President ÁlvaroUribe and his followers are sabotaging the peace process. Their Democratic Center Party, founded by Uribe, holds power. Addressing the party’s convention in 2017,Fernando Londoño, a former interior minister andthe party’s honorary head,declared that “the first challenge for the Democratic Center will be that of going back and tearing apart that cursed paper called the final agreement.”

The turmoil is intrinsic to the nature of Colombian society. Nelson Lombrano Silva recently outlined characteristics. Writing for the Colombian Communist Party website, he castigated the Colombian state as “serving this filthy and immoral bourgeoisie.” Dominance of that sector signals “the inexorable decadence of capitalism in a state of extreme decomposition.” And “narco-trafficker number 82” is in charge. Lombrano is recalling Uribe’s place on an old U.S. list of Colombian drug traffickers. He offers more:

1) Attorney General Néstor Humberto Martínez holds a side job as advisor to the AVAL Group. That’s the holding company owned by Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo, Colombia’s richest man.

2) High level corruption is endemic. Sarmiento Angulo’s “dark dealings” with Brazil’s Odebrecht Corporation are typical.

3) The military budget skyrockets. Spending on education, health care, and agriculture dwindles.

4) “Gringo imperialists” dominate Colombia’s military. Their “21 bases” represent a “supreme act of treason to the country.”

5) The country’s nominal leader is a “simple caricature” of a president. That’s Iván Duque – former banker, senator, and Uribe aide.

6) And, “this rotten governing class takes not even the most elemental step without Uncle Sam’s approval.”

Indeed, “the most productive chapteryet in the history of U.S.-Colombian relations” is ahead. That’s the opinion, recently expressed, of veteran U.S. foreign policy operativesMack McLarty and John Negroponte. They mention that, “Colombia boasts a strongdemocracy, a vibrant economy and ever-improving prospects for peace.”

 

More articles by:

W.T. Whitney Jr. is a retired pediatrician and political journalist living in Maine.

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550

Weekend Edition
May 17, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Melvin Goodman
Trump and the Middle East: a Long Record of Personal Failure
Joan Roelofs
“Get Your Endangered Species Off My Bombing Range!”
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Slouching Towards Tehran
Paul Street
It’s Even More Terrible Than You Thought
Rob Urie
Grabby Joe and the Problem of Environmental Decline
Ajamu Baraka
2020 Elections: It’s Militarism and the Military Budget Stupid!
Andrew Levine
Springtime for Biden and Democrats
Richard Moser
The Interlocking Crises: War and Climate Chaos
Ron Jacobs
Uncle Sam Needs Our Help Again?
Eric Draitser
Elizabeth Warren Was Smart to Tell FOX to Go to Hell
Peter Bolton
The Washington Post’s “Cartel of the Suns” Theory is the Latest Desperate Excuse for Why the Coup Attempt in Venezuela has Failed
Doug Johnson Hatlem
Analysis of Undecideds Suggests Biden’s Support May be Exaggerated
Peter Lackowski
Eyewitness in Venezuela: a 14-year Perspective
Karl Grossman
Can Jerry Nadler Take Down Trump?
Howie Hawkins
Does the Climate Movement Really Mean What It Says?
Gary Leupp
Bolton and the Road to the War He Wants
Jill Richardson
Climate Change was No Accident
Josh Hoxie
Debunking Myths About Wealth and Race
David Barsamian
Iran Notes
David Mattson
Social Carrying Capacity Politspeak Bamboozle
Christopher Brauchli
The Pompeo Smirk
Louis Proyect
Trotsky, Bukharin and the Eco-Modernists
Martha Burk
Will Burning at the Stake Come Next?
John W. Whitehead
The Deadly Perils of Traffic Stops in America
Binoy Kampmark
The Christchurch Pledge and a Regulated Internet
David Rosen
Florida’s Sex Wars: the Battle to Decriminalize Sex Work
Ralph Nader
Trump: Importing Dangerous Medicines and Food and Keeping Consumers in the Dark
Brett Haverstick
America’s Roadless Rules are Not Protecting Public Wildlands From Development
Alan Macleod
Purity Tests Can be a Good Thing
Binoy Kampmark
Modern Merchants of Death: the NSO Group, Spyware and Human Rights
Kim C. Domenico
Anarchism & Reconciliation, Part II
Peter LaVenia
Game of Thrones and the Truth About Class (Spoiler Warning)
Manuel E. Yepe
The Options Trump Puts on the Table
Renee Parsons
The Pompeo/Bolton Tag Team
David Swanson
Where Lyme Disease Came From and Why It Eludes Treatment
Cesar Chelala
Lowering Your Risk of Alzheimer’s Disease
Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
Our Problems are Deeper than “Capitalism” (and “Socialism” Alone Can’t Solve Them)
Chris Zinda
Delegislating Wilderness
Robert Koehler
War’s Unanswered Questions
Robert P. Alvarez
Let Prison Inmates Vote
Barbara Nimri Aziz
A Novel We Can All Relate To
David Yearsley
Carmen’s Mother’s Day Lessons
Charles R. Larson
Review: Ziya Tong’s “The Reality Bubble”
Elliot Sperber
Pharaoh’s Dream
Elizabeth Keyes
Somewhere Beyond Corporate Media Yemenis Die
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail