FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

Goodbye Plato and Jefferson, Hello Lenin!

Both Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin would be pleased if they could see how their doctrines have been realized in the United States. As I learned at Moscow State University in the 1950s, dialectical materialism (“diamat”) holds that the economic base—who owns what—determines the political, social, and cultural superstructure. The superstructure spawns a false ideology—an illusion that the present arrangement between haves and have-nots is inevitable and as good as it gets. The superstructure creates an educational system and mass media that foster this illusion. Institutions of government may appear to serve the people, but they are tools of those who own the means of production and control workers and farmers.

This Marxist vision has been validated by many trends in the United States.  Ronald Reagan’s defense outlays pleased the military-industrial complex; his tax cuts, de-regulation of industry, and anti-welfare policies benefited the upper classes while harming most Americans.  Like Reagan, George W. Bush also spent wildly on defense, widened the gaps between rich and poor, and broadened the budget gap.  Meanwhile, the Supreme Court increasingly acted as a servant for the ruling elites. It threw the 2000 election to George W. Bush—the first of two recent elections when a Republican became president despite losing the popular vote. In 2010 the court ruled that the government may not limit what non-profit and for-profit corporations and unions spend on “electioneering communication.” In summer 2018 the court ruled that racial gerrymandering is legal and that the president may ban the entry of all people from five Muslim countries plus North Korea and Venezuela. The court also voted 5/4 to gut public sector unions.

With the highest court in the pocket of the administration, where can critics turn to challenge policies they see as unjust or downright crazy?  For Marxists, there is a bright side: “The worse, the better.”The court’s decisions can be expected to intensify the contradictions destined to explode capitalist society and lead to socialism.

What does Leninism add to Marxism?  While Karl Marx expected the forces of materialism to destroy capitalism, Lenin shunned any form of determinism. Politics, he argued, is a fight to the death—kto kovo, or “who will do in whom?”  What is ethics in politics according to Lenin? Not some commandment that flashes down from heaven, but anything that promotes Communist objectives.  (So sensitive was Lenin’s view of morality that my academic adviser in Moscow tried to keep the relevant document from me—a speech by Lenin in 1920 to Young Communists, which I remembered reading in a Columbia University library.)

Kto kovo? Who whom? Lenin would not have been surprised by the amoral, zero-sum campaign waged by Republican leaders against Democrats since the Richard Nixon years. In 1968, for example, candidate Nixon and Henry Kissinger scuttled talks to end the Vietnam War, an outcome that would have helped Democrat Hubert H. Humphrey to win the presidency in November. Nixon also opened a “Southern strategy” to convince southern whites that Republicans would perform better than Democrats at keeping down blacks–an approach later adopted and embellished by presidential candidates Reagan and George H. W. Bush.   In 1994 Republican Congressman Dr. Newt Gingrich (Tulane Ph.D.,1971) proclaimed a “Contract with America” calling for lower taxes. The contract’s demagogic slogans, fine-tuned by the Heritage Foundation, helped Republicans regain control of the House of Representatives for the first time since 1952.  Like Donald Trump in later years, Gingrich strongly influenced Republicans despite a troubled personal story involving debt, philandering, and double-dealing.

Senator Mitch McConnell deepened the struggle in 2008 by committing Republicans to making the incoming Obama administration fail at whatever it assayed. Republicans proceeded to throttle many Obama initiatives.  Members of what used to be the Grand Old Party continue striving to weaken if not kill the Affordable Care Act. McConnell’ supreme victory, however, was preventing Senate deliberations on Obama’s recommendation for the ninth judge on the Supreme Court. A year later, with Republicans controlling all branches of government, the Senate is now asked to approve a Trump nominee for the Supreme Court whose presence will probably assure a conservative majority for decades.

These tricks and dirty tricks break with democratic principles and can shape America’s future. They have been aided and abetted by a leading follower of Lenin, former KGB agent Vladimir Putin. True to Lenin’s operational code, Putin has used every tool and trick to advance his objectives—from the Kremlin and Crimea to the White House. Reversing Karl Marx’s expectations, however, Putin—somewhat like Trump–has used politics to influence and profit from his country’s economic base. Blending political and economic power, both Putin and Trump have sought to create a false ideology for their subjects.

The big picture sketched here needs to be qualified. Some Democrats also play hardball, though stopping far short of the no-holds-barred tactics embraced by top Republicans.  George Soros and Michael Bloomberg as well as the Koch brothers use their wealth to try and shape U.S. politics. Can voters be brain-washed?  Fox News has become an arm of the Trump administration, but America’s major newspapers and some TV channels still strive to report true—not false—news.  Nonetheless, the fact that a third to half of American voters still support President Trump no matter what he says or does—even if it hurts their interests, shows that the basics of Marxism, aided by some Leninist tactics, have permeated American life and may be hard to erase.

Commenting on these thoughts, Boston University historian Igor Lukes notes that Plato argued that only the most exquisitely educated among us should govern. Lenin, in sharp contrast, said that “revolutionary sailors” can master the art of government in twenty-four hours. Trump acts like one of Lenin’s revolutionary sailors, confident that being president is not much different from buying and disowning a casino. The president  and his backers  may not grasp that they are the revolutionaries who have come up from the street and may lack the know-how and skills to run  a huge and multifaceted government.  While Trump and most of his cronies may be incompetent, they have survived more than a year already. Good-bye Plato, hello Lenin!

More articles by:

Walter Clemens is Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Boston University and Associate, Harvard University Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies. He wrote Complexity Science and World Affairs (SUNY Press, 2013).

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550
Weekend Edition
August 16, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Paul Street
Uncle Sam was Born Lethal
Jennifer Matsui
La Danse Mossad: Robert Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein
Rob Urie
Neoliberalism and Environmental Calamity
Stuart A. Newman
The Biotech-Industrial Complex Gets Ready to Define What is Human
Nick Alexandrov
Prevention Through Deterrence: The Strategy Shared by the El Paso Shooter and the U.S. Border Patrol
Jeffrey St. Clair
The First Dambuster: a Coyote Tale
Eric Draitser
“Bernie is Trump” (and other Corporate Media Bullsh*t)
Nick Pemberton
Is White Supremacism a Mental Illness?
Jim Kavanagh
Dead Man’s Hand: The Impeachment Gambit
Andrew Levine
Have They No Decency?
David Yearsley
Kind of Blue at 60
Ramzy Baroud
Manifestos of Hate: What White Terrorists Have in Common
Evaggelos Vallianatos
The War on Nature
Martha Rosenberg
Catch and Hang Live Chickens for Slaughter: $11 an Hour Possible!
Neve Gordon
It’s No Wonder the Military likes Violent Video Games, They Can Help Train Civilians to Become Warriors
Yoav Litvin
Israel Fears a Visit by Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib
Susan Miller
That Debacle at the Border is Genocide
Ralph Nader
With the Boeing 737 MAX Grounded, Top Boeing Bosses Must Testify Before Congress Now
Victor Grossman
Warnings, Ancient and Modern
Meena Miriam Yust - Arshad Khan
The Microplastic Threat
Kavitha Muralidharan
‘Today We Seek Those Fish in Discovery Channel’
Louis Proyect
The Vanity Cinema of Quentin Tarantino
Bob Scofield
Tit For Tat: Baltimore Takes Another Hit, This Time From Uruguay
Nozomi Hayase
The Prosecution of Julian Assange Affects Us All
Ron Jacobs
People’s Music for the Soul
John Feffer
Is America Crazy?
Jonathan Power
Russia and China are Growing Closer Again
John W. Whitehead
Who Inflicts the Most Gun Violence in America? The U.S. Government and Its Police Forces
Justin Vest
ICE: You’re Not Welcome in the South
Jill Richardson
Race is a Social Construct, But It Still Matters
Dean Baker
The NYT Gets the Story on Automation and Inequality Completely Wrong
Nino Pagliccia
Venezuela Retains Political Control After New US Coercive Measures
Gary Leupp
MSNBC and the Next Election: Racism is the Issue (and Don’t Talk about Socialism)
R. G. Davis
Paul Krassner: Investigative Satirist
Negin Owliaei
Red State Rip Off: Cutting Worker Pay by $1.5 Billion
Christopher Brauchli
The Side of Trump We Rarely See
Curtis Johnson
The Unbroken Line: From Slavery to the El Paso Shooting
Jesse Jackson
End Endless War and Bring Peace to Korea
Adolf Alzuphar
Diary: What About a New City Center?
Tracey L. Rogers
Candidates Need a Moral Vision
Nicky Reid
I Was a Red Flag Kid
John Kendall Hawkins
The Sixties Victory Lap in an Empty Arena
Stephen Cooper
Tony Chin’s Unstoppable, Historic Career in Music
Charles R. Larson
Review: Bruno Latour’s Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime
Elizabeth Keyes
Haiku Fighting
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail