Click amount to donate direct to CounterPunch
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $500
  • $other
  • use PayPal
DOUBLE YOUR DONATION!
We don’t run corporate ads. We don’t shake our readers down for money every month or every quarter like some other sites out there. We provide our site for free to all, but the bandwidth we pay to do so doesn’t come cheap. A generous donor is matching all donations of $100 or more! So please donate now to double your punch!
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Kirstjen Nielsen Just Wants to Protect You

Photo by AK Rockefeller | CC BY 2.0

“Mommy, what’s chutzpah?”

“Sweetie, chutzpah is when the head of Homeland Security says Americans are in danger from drones, but skips over all the people US drones have killed.”

Leo Rosten famously defined chutzpah as “that quality enshrined in a man who, having killed his mother and father, throws himself on the mercy of the court because he is an orphan.”  Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen showed off her chutzpah in an op-ed in the Washington Post: “The U.S. Isn’t Prepared for the Growing Threat of Drones.”  Nielsen begins by praising the wonders unmanned aerial drones can do, such as drones’ usefulness in rescue efforts, but adds that “the technology also has a dark side.” You don’t say.

Many people are already familiar with drones’ dark side, having experienced it first-hand.  Rafiq ur Rehman did.  A CIA drone killed Rafiq’s mother while she was gathering okra behind their home in Pakistan’s remote tribal regions.  The drone also wounded Rafiq and his two young children.

The US has conducted lethal drone strikes overseas since the days of the George W. Bush Administration.  American drones have killed people in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Libya, Somalia, Iraq, Syria, and Yemen.  None of these are countries with which the US is at war.

US drones have bombed wedding parties in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Yemen.  US drones have bombed funerals.  Many drone victims are children:  “fun-size” terrorists as some drone operators have called them.

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia uses armed drones in its three-year unprovoked war on Yemen.  Saudi Arabia gets the drones from the US.

So, it’s a bit rich that Secretary Nielsen frets that drones are a danger to Americans when the US has killed more people with drones than any other country.  You would not know it from her op-ed.  Her op-ed gives no hint that US drones have ever harmed a living soul, much less thousands of them.  No, Nielsen is worried about armed drones in the hands of foreigners.

At least 14 states currently possess weaponized drones (US, UK, Israel, Saudi Arabia, China, Iran, Italy, India, Pakistan, Nigeria, South Africa, Russia, and Turkey).  The Defense One website has reported that some experts predict that within a decade every nation will possess weaponized drones.  That prediction was made in 2014.

ISIS buys small drones off Amazon.com and jury-rigs them with explosives.  Hamas and Hezbollah also possess a few crude, small drones.  While other nations are unlikely to use drones inside the US, terrorist groups (including White Nationalists) very well might.

There is another possibility.  Secretary Nielsen is right when she warns that drones “can be used to spy on us, to threaten our critical infrastructure, or to attack crowds and public places.”  She does not say that it may be our own government at the controls.

Is this so unlikely?  The militarization of police continues apace. The Centre for the Study of the Drone at Bard College “estimate[s] that at least 910 state and local police, sheriff, fire, and emergency services in the U.S. have acquired drones.”

Police in North Dakota are now permitted to use drones carrying “non-lethal” weapons such as rubber bullets, tasers, or pepper spray.  Thus armed, drones can disperse even large crowds of political demonstrators.

So, it’s alarming that Secretary Nielsen wants even more power placed in government hands.  DHS, she writes, must have the ability to locate and neutralize evil foreign drones.  This means that Congress must give DHS the power “to access signals being transmitted between a nefarious drone and its ground controller to accurately geolocate both quickly.”  Ah, yes, more government monitoring of the rest of us.  What harm can come from that?

Kirstjen Nielsen Can’t Stay for Dessert

Nielsen loves drones, but she is best known for hating migrants.  As head of DHS, she has been a zealous enforcer and defender of Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ “zero tolerance” immigration policy.  You know, the policy which lets Trump break up migrant families and detain their children in locations so secret, even the Trump Administration doesn’t know where the kids are.

On June 19, Secretary Nielsen had to beat a hasty retreat from a Mexican restaurant in Washington DC. Nielsen had the ill fortune to choose the MXDC Cocina Mexicana on the same evening as the DC chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America.  The DSA drove her out with cries of “Shame on Nielsen, shame on Trump” and “No borders, no walls, sanctuary for all” and “Abolish ICE.”  Next time, Kirstjen, try the drive-thru.

Incredibly, two weeks later, the DHS head had the—yes, chutzpah—to tweet:  “Congratulations to the nearly 14,000 new American citizens sworn in across the country this Fourth of July!”

Nielsen’s two loves, of drones and of separating migrant families, are not entirely unrelated.  US drones separate families too, most often into tiny pieces.

US drones at the Mexican border keep a lookout for drug smugglers and migrants.  These drones are unarmed, but will they stay that way?  Ted Rall reminds us that “Obama attorney general Eric Holder said in 2013, and no legal expert challenged him, that the feds have the right to launch military drone strikes against American citizens on U.S. soil.”

Surely, unauthorized migrants shouldn’t have more legal protection than American citizens! If it’s OK for the US government to kill US citizens on US soil, then it’s OK for US drones to kill undocumented immigrants.  After all, they are “invading” our country.

Journalist Fintan O’Toole calls the rupturing of families and the throwing of babies into cages, “trial runs for fascism.” “Fascism,” O’Toole writes, “doesn’t arise suddenly in an existing democracy.”  It has to be introduced little by little.  “You have to … inure people to the acceptance of acts of extreme cruelty.”  President Donald Trump is an “ignoramus,” but “he has an acute understanding of one thing: test marketing.”  O’Toole describes Trump as thinking “let’s see how my fans feel about crying babies in cages.”  If babies in cages “sell,” the Administration can ratchet up the cruelty.

Trump’s next test run may be killing migrants with drones.  If that tests well, killer drones can be turned on other “undesirables,” like dirty Red un-American protesters.  That’s a small price to pay to Make America Great Again.

More articles by:

Charles Pierson is a lawyer and a member of the Pittsburgh Anti-Drone Warfare Coalition. E-mail him at Chapierson@yahoo.com.

Weekend Edition
October 19, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Jason Hirthler
The Pieties of the Liberal Class
Jeffrey St. Clair
A Day in My Life at CounterPunch
Paul Street
“Male Energy,” Authoritarian Whiteness and Creeping Fascism in the Age of Trump
Nick Pemberton
Reflections on Chomsky’s Voting Strategy: Why The Democratic Party Can’t Be Saved
John Davis
The Last History of the United States
Yigal Bronner
The Road to Khan al-Akhmar
Robert Hunziker
The Negan Syndrome
Andrew Levine
Democrats Ahead: Progressives Beware
Rannie Amiri
There is No “Proxy War” in Yemen
David Rosen
America’s Lost Souls: the 21st Century Lumpen-Proletariat?
Joseph Natoli
The Age of Misrepresentations
Ron Jacobs
History Is Not Kind
John Laforge
White House Radiation: Weakened Regulations Would Save Industry Billions
Ramzy Baroud
The UN ‘Sheriff’: Nikki Haley Elevated Israel, Damaged US Standing
Robert Fantina
Trump, Human Rights and the Middle East
Anthony Pahnke – Jim Goodman
NAFTA 2.0 Will Help Corporations More Than Farmers
Jill Richardson
Identity Crisis: Elizabeth Warren’s Claims Cherokee Heritage
Sam Husseini
The Most Strategic Midterm Race: Elder Challenges Hoyer
Maria Foscarinis – John Tharp
The Criminalization of Homelessness
Robert Fisk
The Story of the Armenian Legion: a Dark Tale of Anger and Revenge
Jacques R. Pauwels
Dinner With Marx in the House of the Swan
Dave Lindorff
US ‘Outrage’ over Slaying of US Residents Depends on the Nation Responsible
Ricardo Vaz
How Many Yemenis is a DC Pundit Worth?
Elliot Sperber
Build More Gardens, Phase out Cars
Chris Gilbert
In the Wake of Nepal’s Incomplete Revolution: Dispatch by a Far-Flung Bolivarian 
Muhammad Othman
Let Us Bray
Gerry Brown
Are Chinese Municipal $6 Trillion (40 Trillion Yuan) Hidden Debts Posing Titanic Risks?
Rev. William Alberts
Judge Kavanaugh’s Defenders Doth Protest Too Much
Ralph Nader
Unmasking Phony Values Campaigns by the Corporatists
Victor Grossman
A Big Rally and a Bavarian Vote
James Bovard
Groped at the Airport: Congress Must End TSA’s Sexual Assaults on Women
Jeff Roby
Florida After Hurricane Michael: the Sad State of the Unheeded Planner
Wim Laven
Intentional or Incompetence—Voter Suppression Where We Live
Bradley Kaye
The Policy of Policing
Wim Laven
The Catholic Church Fails Sexual Abuse Victims
Kevin Cashman
One Year After Hurricane Maria: Employment in Puerto Rico is Down by 26,000
Dr. Hakim Young
Nonviolent Afghans Bring a Breath of Fresh Air
Karl Grossman
Irving Like vs. Big Nuke
Dan Corjescu
The New Politics of Climate Change
John Carter
The Plight of the Pyrenees: the Abandoned Guard Dogs of the West
Ted Rall
Brett Kavanaugh and the Politics of Emotion-Shaming
Graham Peebles
Sharing is Key to a New Economic and Democratic Order
Ed Rampell
The Advocates
Louis Proyect
The Education Business
David Yearsley
Shock-and-Awe Inside Oracle Arena
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail