FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

Applauding Plowshares Into Swords

About a week ago I attended a graduation convocation ceremony at the Iowa State  University’s College of Agriculture and Life Sciences in Ames Iowa. Within this event there were about 15 department and interdepartmental programs representing various majors from “Agricultural Systems Technology” to “Agronomy” to Environmental Science” to “Genetics” to “Animal Ecology” and beyond.

The majority of the time was spent listening to a faculty member recite the names of  the graduates and a short statement of each individual’s plans for the future as each  graduate present (many were not) crossed the stage to shake the hand of a departmental representative.

Most of the time when a student’s name and future plans were announced there was  mainly silence and generally when members of the audience did react it was in the form of small shouts, cheers, whistles from varied points within the massive, brutalist, concrete Hilton “Coliseum.”

Most of the graduates names were followed by an announcement of where they had  secured a job. Some had statements of ideological hopes for their dream job. Some had statements about continuing to farm. Some caused chuckles when they expressed an  idealism beyond mere employment. Some expressed a desire to, as one graduate put it, “Make the world a better place.” Several stated that they were going into the Peace Corps. One graduate wanted to work for MSF. The majority of responses from the members of the audience was muted and patient.

There were, however, three occasions which were distinctly different and it seemed  as if this convocation transformed into a loud swelling of religious fervor throughout the  audience. The first two expressions of widespread enthusiasm were in response to two different graduates from different degree programs and there was no stated request from anyone for what was, to me, an unexpectedly loud wave of celebratory shouts and  applause. The difference was that these two students were wearing military uniforms and both of their futures involved more involvement in the military. The third (and louder) expression of the fervor of the audience was at the end of the program and it was in response to the instruction of the Dean of the College for anyone who was in military  service to please stand up. In sum, these two graduates, out of at least a thousand  graduates present, both received two overwhelming loud endorsements from the audience.

These loud celebrations for the militarism for these two graduates left me feeling somewhat isolated, downtrodden, and questioning what kind of supposed democracy was I engulfed within. I was initially somewhat dismayed by the obvious corporatism connected to and driving the majority of future jobs for these graduates, but the reaction of the crowd in their earnest, celebratory lifting of militarism above all of the other plans and dreams spiked my sense of hopelessness at what I had previously supposed was going to be an unprejudiced celebration of diverse futures.

It was not the two graduating military students who left me feeling so greatly  dismayed. Their choice or desire to use the military was clearly a minority among the graduates and I have no knowledge of what motivated the military graduates.

It was, for me at least,  the very striking fact that, in the midst of an already very  strongly pronounced agricultural corporatism, that the audience – which was clearly comfortable with that corporatism – would rise, un-prodded, out of their patient confidence and enthusiastically endorse militarism even above their agricultural  corporatism. Then, the fact that the Dean of a College of “Agriculture and Life Sciences” would lead the audience to another, more focused celebration of the militarism of two students over all of the other graduates’ intentions was, for me, pathetic and shameful.

It is highly likely that Iowa State University is not alone in producing such a program for its graduates and their families. I do not want to ponder how many events similar to this may be occurring at this time of the year – every year.

As I reflected on this experience, I remembered the history of one of ISU’s most celebrated graduates. Henry A. Wallace. After years of trying to improve the plight of humanity through agricultural innovations and economic policies  which helped counter the gross abusiveness of Wall Street’s lies and plunder and after serving as Secretary of Agriculture, as Vice President, and as Secretary of Commerce, Wallace, under the rabid efforts of Truman era  bipartisan devotees of Cold War military expansion of hostilities, was gradually pushed out of the government when he tried to argue for less militarism and for  equal justice for all people.

Apparently, that same repudiation of reflective diplomacy and the enthusiasm for unquestioned militarism which ran roughshod over Henry A. Wallace about 70 years ago is now as compulsive at a University level as was the behavior of  Pavlov’s dog.

The so-called “heartland” is bleeding and it is, again, ready to take more blood.

More articles by:

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550

April 22, 2019
Melvin Goodman
The NYTs Tries to Rehabilitate Bloody Gina Haspel
Robert Fisk
After ISIS, a Divided Iraq, Wounded and Grief-Stricken
Binoy Kampmark
Julian Assange as Neuroses
John Laforge
Chernobyl’s Deadly Effects Estimates Vary
Kenneth Surin
Mueller Time? Not for Now
Cesar Chelala
Yemen: The Triumph of Barbarism
Kerron Ó Luain
What the “White Irish Slaves” Meme Tells Us About Identity Politics
Andy Piascik
Grocery Store Workers Take on Billion Dollar Multinational
Seiji Yamada – Gregory G. Maskarinec
Health as a Human Right: No Migrants Need Apply
Howard Lisnoff
Loose Bullets and Loose Cannons
Ricardo Alarcón de Quesada
Dreaming in Miami
Graham Peebles
Consuming Stuff: The Polluting World of Fashion
Robert Dodge
Earth Day: Our Planet in Peril
Weekend Edition
April 19, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Andrew Levine
What Will It Take For Trump to Get His Due?
Roy Eidelson
Is the American Psychological Association Addicted to Militarism and War?
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Time is Blind, Man is Stupid
Joshua Frank
Top 20 Mueller Report “Findings”
Rob Urie
Why Russiagate Will Never Go Away
Paul Street
Stephen Moore Gets Something Right: It’s Capitalism vs. Democracy
Russell Mokhiber
Why Boeing and Its Executives Should be Prosecuted for Manslaughter
T.J. Coles
The Battle for Latin America: How the U.S. Helped Destroy the “Pink Tide”
Ron Jacobs
Ho Chi Minh City: Nguyen Thai Binh Street
Dean Baker
Fun Fictions in Economics
David Rosen
Trump’s One-Dimensional Gender Identity
Kenn Orphan
Notre Dame: We Have Always Belonged to Her
Robert Hunziker
The Blue Ocean Event and Collapsing Ecosystems
Theodore C. Van Alst, Jr.
Paddy Wagon
Brett Wilkins
Jimmy Carter: US ‘Most Warlike Nation in History of the World’
John W. Whitehead
From Jesus Christ to Julian Assange: When Dissidents Become Enemies of the State
Nick Pemberton
To Never Forget or Never Remember
Stephen Cooper
My Unforgettable College Stabbings
Louis Proyect
A Leftist Rejoinder to the “Capitalist Miracle”
Louisa Willcox
Aldo Leopold’s Land Ethic and the Need for a New Approach to Managing Wildlife
Brian Cloughley
Britain Shakes a Futile Fist and Germany Behaves Sensibly
Jessicah Pierre
A Revolutionary Idea to Close the Racial Wealth Divide
George Burchett
Revolutionary Journalism
Dan Bacher
U.S. Senate Confirms Oil Lobbyist David Bernhardt as Interior Secretary
Nicky Reid
The Strange Success of Russiagate
Chris Gilbert
Defending Venezuela: Two Approaches
Todd Larsen
The Planetary Cost of Amazon’s Convenience
Kelly Martin
How the White House is Spinning Earth Day
Nino Pagliccia
Cuba and Venezuela: Killing Two Birds With a Stone
Matthew Stevenson
Pacific Odyssey: Guadalcanal and Bloody Ridge, Solomon Islands
David Kattenburg
Trudeau’s Long Winter
Gary Olson
A Few Comments on the recent PBS Series: Reconstruction: America After the Civil War
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail