FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

Another Aptly Anti-Assange Article

The antithesis of all journalistic decency has finally come to the dead end which he has relentlessly pursued for more than a decade. Ecuador has withdrawn both Assange’s internet access and his accessibility to visitors for more than a month now. Naturally his enraged supporters are invoking a UN estimate of two weeks solitary confinement as torture. Yet most of my colleagues are celebrating the development, though leaving it to the less timid to do so in a professional capacity.

While his side disputes it, Ecuador maintains that Assange had promised to do no more political agitating when, for that reason, they cut off his internet once before. I don’t know about you, but if someone on a life support system that I oversee promises not to criticise my associates and then does precisely that, well, I am not about to go wobbly at the notion of pulling a tube or two, or perhaps mixing in a whiff of mustard gas with the oxygen for enhanced effect. I’m just kidding of course.

But it would be nice to hear a bit of a gurgle, and especially since his ilk prevailed upon on editors to retract my statement that he was charged with sex offences by the Swedes. He’s a monumental pain to get in a tangle with, so it’s no wonder they dropped the case soon after interviewing him. They should never even have had to travel to London for it, just as they rightly insisted for years with the additional point that it seemed legally impossible to do so. The complainants waited seven years for nothing after having complaints initially dismissed, reconsidered, sensitively cleansed of negations of any rape being involved, and then advanced by a new team bound by prior political solidarity. Perhaps it was this that enabled the group to subsequently prove so stolid and patient, even despite protest from a complainant, right to the final graceful bow due to foreseeable lack of cooperation from the accused. Though their cases and representations could not have been more excellent, mercifully the state of Sweden will at least be spared costs of file storage and whatever horror lurked around the corner. While some may naturally wonder why prosecutors should drop any case, for instance, against a viscous drug lord, just on account of lack of cooperation, this should only help clarify how Assange is in a criminal class of his own. One might sooner square off with a black hole. Indeed, the suffering of these two women, complete with needless protraction and final, devastating sidelining, pales beside the rest of what Julian Assange is no less patently or solely responsible for.

Don’t even get me started on his centrality in the real-life and successful conspiracy to release proof of the DNC discretely tilting against Bernie Sanders. Those who claim that Sanders had the numbers need to think again. After he was sidelined, election day began with the NYT giving Clinton a 95% chance of winning. Does anyone imagine the entire US intelligence community and media could be thrown that far from the truth without a scale of Russian interference that would ensure a Trump victory regardless of the opponent?

So here’s to Ecuador’s current president Lenin Moreno. Fortunately he is not overly accountable to his citizenry (which ironically includes Assange of late) to uphold the “defence of human rights” which most Ecuadorians somehow regard as relevant here. With increasing support of the US, as a result of security meetings just days before Assange’s little blackout, Moreno can clearly afford to trade off part of his base, even if it opens him to the hysterical charge of becoming persecutor-in-chief on behalf of foreign puppeteers. I can certainly verify that radicals in South America never tire of such themes, though only the likes of Telesur propagate them, and I’ve heard nothing unflattering about the role of the US in South America from a decent western source in decades.

We also need to be clear about the fact that nobody has ever detained Assange for political reasons, regardless of the express ruling to that effect by the UN. Most don’t even know of this risible ruling, since informed journalists have become increasingly jaded with the UN and its growing list of visceral embarrassments. From the moment Assange walked into the Ecuadorian embassy, when US officials derided the notion of being interested in apprehending him, till the Justice Department declared his arrest a high priority, and indeed to this very day, Julian Assange has been utterly free to skip out the embassy door and have his case heard on the matter of skipping bail (for the laughable reason of pursing rights to political asylum).

I suppose, in a strange way, I will miss the long, grinding spectacle of his demise. After all, I have dined out on it for years thanks to my regular observations concerning his depravity, as have the vast majority of my peers handling the topic under the employ of the most reputable publishers in history. But it concerns more than just cash and dignified camaraderie. I really feel like its coming to a sort of cosmic anticlimax. Surely there might be another engaging twist of some kind. Perhaps a medical emergency–I always did hope claims from visiting doctors were true and that Assange was suffering pain that could easily be treated in hospital. Is this enduring caricature of a psychotic vigilant really going to be quietly smothered beside Harrods? No loss if so, but he must have more entertainment potential left than that.

Yet it seems most realistic to consider the health stories a ploy to get the UK to relent on its refusal to assure that he will not be extradited to the US if he leaves the embassy. I do hope they keep doubling down on that refusal even as some public outrage is bound to stir now that he really is under the thumbscrews and Uncle Sam is “baying for his blood.” As a conscientious journalist I will strive to ensure that this particular fiend gets never gets any such reprieve. Nor do I think my “less churlish” colleagues would lend him any support, though they may certainly prefer being quiet to cheering current developments, lest that seem distasteful. But they sink in fashions’ wake because savagery is fast becoming hip and all can see a page of history coming down hard on Julian Assange. Clearly only fools will fight it.

More articles by:

Dr. Simon Floth is an Australian analytical philosopher whose recent academic roles include lecturing in metaphysics and logic at the University of New England. He was an early contributor to WikiLeaks, refining vision and experimenting in collaborative analysis. Since 2004 various independent sites have featured his political articles. 

March 21, 2019
Daniel Warner
And Now Algeria
Renee Parsons
The Supreme Court and Dual Citizenship
Eric Draitser
On Ilhan Omar, Assad Fetishism, and the Danger of Red-Brown “Anti-Imperialism”
Elizabeth Keyes
Broadway’s “Hamilton” and the Willing Suspension of Reality-Based Moral Consciousness
David Underhill
Optional Fatherhood Liberates Christians From Abortion Jihad
Nick Pemberton
Is Kamala Harris the Centrist We Need?
Dean Baker
The Wall Street Bailouts, Bernie and the Washington Post
Russell Mokhiber
The Boeing Blackout
William Astore
America’s Senior Generals Find No Exits From Endless War
Jeff Hauser – Eleanor Eagan
Boeing Debacle Shows Need to Investigate Trump-era Corruption
Ramzy Baroud
Uniting Fatah, Not Palestinians: The Dubious Role of Mohammed Shtayyeh
Nick Licata
All Southern States are Not the Same: Mississippi’s Challenge
Jesse Jackson
Trump’s Sly Encouragement of Lawless Violence
Cesar Chelala
Public Health Challenges in Latin America and the Caribbean
March 20, 2019
T.J. Coles
Countdown to “Full Spectrum Dominance”
W. T. Whitney
Re-Targeting Cuba: Why Title III of U.S. Helms-Burton Act will be a Horror Show
Kenneth Surin
Ukania’s Great Privatization Heist
Howard Lisnoff
“Say It Ain’t So, Joe:” the Latest Neoliberal from the War and Wall Street Party
Walter Clemens
Jailed Birds of a Feather May Sing Together
George Ochenski
Failing Students on Climate Change
Cesar Chelala
The Sweet Smell of Madeleine
Binoy Kampmark
Global Kids Strike
Nicky Reid
Where Have All the Flowers Gone?: Requiem for a Fictional Party
Elliot Sperber
Empedocles and You and Me 
March 19, 2019
Paul Street
Socialism Curiously Trumps Fascism in U.S. Political Threat Reporting
Jonah Raskin
Guy Standing on Anxiety, Anger and Alienation: an Interview About “The Precariat”
Patrick Cockburn
The Brutal Legacy of Bloody Sunday is a Powerful Warning to Those Hoping to Save Brexit
Robert Fisk
Turning Algeria Into a Necrocracy
John Steppling
Day of Wrath
Robin Philpot
Truth, Freedom and Peace Will Prevail in Rwanda
Victor Grossman
Women Marchers and Absentees
Binoy Kampmark
The Dangers of Values: Brenton Tarrant, Fraser Anning and the Christchurch Shootings
Jeff Sher
Let Big Pharma Build the Wall
Jimmy Centeno
Venezuela Beneath the Skin of Imperialism
Jeffrey Sommers – Christopher Fons
Scott Walker’s Failure, Progressive Wisconsin’s Win: Milwaukee’s 2020 Democratic Party Convention
Steve Early
Time for Change at NewsGuild?
March 18, 2019
Scott Poynting
Terrorism Has No Religion
Ipek S. Burnett
Black Lives on Trial
John Feffer
The World’s Most Dangerous Divide
Paul Cochrane
On the Ground in Venezuela vs. the Media Spectacle
Dean Baker
The Fed and the 3.8 Percent Unemployment Rate
Thomas Knapp
Social Media Companies “Struggle” to Help Censors Keep us in the Dark
Binoy Kampmark
Death in New Zealand: The Christchurch Shootings
Mark Weisbrot
The Reality Behind Trump’s Venezuela Regime Change Coalition
Weekend Edition
March 15, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Andrew Levine
Is Ilhan Omar Wrong…About Anything?
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail