FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

Xi, Modi and the Thucydides Trap

Beijing.

This is the Thucydides Trap with a twist. An emerging power, China, has risen and India, once the established power, is emerging. The world’s attention may be focused on the handshake and meeting of two Korean leaders but another summit is taking place that also has the potential to transform global politics. India’s prime minister Narendra Modi and China’s president Xi Jinping will also shake hands to the clicking and whirling of the cameras before heading for talks in a Wuhan villa which was a favourite haunt of Mao Zedong.

Situated on t the bank of the East Lake, the villa is sheltered by pine, bamboo and plum trees. Picturesque? Certainly. Conducive to success? Hopefully. But what is success?  As in Korea, the location is highly symbolic. Wuhan is a city located in central China on the Yangtse river and is a massive transport hub. The “Chicago of China” symbolizes China’s commercial clout. Trade matters.  Growing at nearly three times the pace of US-China, trade between China and India is blossoming.

Tariff threats against China and growing protectionism in the US, has been one of the drivers of a summit that prides itself on its informality.

Important yes, but that is not why they are meeting. The Doklam military standoff between Indian and Chinese troops in their border’s Sikkim sector is the real reason. India and China seemed clutched in a deadly embrace last year in their most serious border crisis in the last three decadesChina’s media was issuing near-daily threats of war, as both sides built up forces on the edge of the tiny kingdom of Bhutan.  China has since built up its forces there, while India has increased its own presence. It may be a rocky outcrop, but militarily it resembles a tinder box.

Like events on the Korean peninsula, it seemed highly unlikely that Modi and Xi would be meeting at an informal summit. After the border dispute was defused, not, however, resolved, in August, Modi and Xi used the Brics summit in September, alongside the leaders of Russia, Brazil and South Africa, to establish what in China is called a contact mechanism. Basically, an agreement to meet and discuss issues.

A flurry of high-level visits to China followed, including by India’s foreign secretary, national security adviser, foreign minister and defence minister.

China is a dry land, with inadequate water resources. Much of its limited supply originates in Tibet making the autonomous region in China an area of strategic importance. In February, the Indian government sent out a private note asking officials to keep away from events marking the 60th anniversary of the Dalai Lama’s exile, to India, from Tibet. This was greatly appreciated in Beijing.

China’s Belt and Road Initiative, which India has not endorsed and is viewed with deep suspicion in New Delhi, has been a contentious issue between the two countries. China views the Indo-Pacific strategy involving what is called the quad; Japan, India, Australia and the US with equal suspicion.

Korea too plays a role as India believes that Beijing will improve ties both with Washington, if the North Korean crisis is dealt with, and with Moscow, because of the rupture in West-Russia relations. All this, India believes would be at its cost.

India is also responding on the sea to what it believes is China’s maritime encroachment. Djibouti, on the Horn of Africa, now hosts a Chinese base and Beijing is deepening its involvement in the island nations to India’s south.

The Indian navy has recently signed agreements giving it access to the facilities of the United States, France and Oman.

Back to the Thucydides trap, where an emerging power threatens an established one. Normally applied to China-US ties it is a factor in New Delhi’s and Beijing’s thinking. While Chinese trade and military might are more powerful than India’s, India does view itself as the established if not de facto power in the region. In the West, people see the world as changing. In the East, it has changed. Xi and Modi are meeting to discuss ways to better manage this change.  One other aspect of this meeting needs to be mentioned. Not since 1945, has a meeting of such potential significance between powerful rivals taken place without the direct or indirect involvement of the US.

More articles by:

Tom Clifford is a freelance journalist and can be reached at: cliffordtomsan@hotmail.com.

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550

June 17, 2019
Patrick Cockburn
The Dark Side of Brexit: Britain’s Ethnic Minorities Are Facing More and More Violence
Linn Washington Jr.
Remember the Vincennes? The US’s Long History of Provoking Iran
Geoff Dutton
Where the Wild Things Were: Abbey’s Road Revisited
Nick Licata
Did a Coverup of Who Caused Flint Michigan’s Contaminated Water Continue During Its Investigation? 
Binoy Kampmark
Julian Assange and the Scales of Justice: Exceptions, Extraditions and Politics
John Feffer
Democracy Faces a Global Crisis
Louisa Willcox
Revamping Grizzly Bear Recovery
Stephen Cooper
“Wheel! Of! Fortune!” (A Vegas Story)
Daniel Warner
Let Us Laugh Together, On Principle
Brian Cloughley
Trump Washington Detests the Belt and Road Initiative
Weekend Edition
June 14, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Michael Hudson
Trump’s Trade Threats are Really Cold War 2.0
Bruce E. Levine
Tom Paine, Christianity, and Modern Psychiatry
Jason Hirthler
Mainstream 101: Supporting Imperialism, Suppressing Socialism
T.J. Coles
How Much Do Humans Pollute? A Breakdown of Industrial, Vehicular and Household C02 Emissions
Andrew Levine
Whither The Trump Paradox?
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: In the Land of 10,000 Talkers, All With Broken Tongues
Pete Dolack
Look to U.S. Executive Suites, Not Beijing, For Why Production is Moved
Paul Street
It Can’t Happen Here: From Buzz Windrip and Doremus Jessup to Donald Trump and MSNBC
Rob Urie
Capitalism Versus Democracy
Richard Moser
The Climate Counter-Offensive: Secrecy, Deception and Disarming the Green New Deal
Naman Habtom-Desta
Up in the Air: the Fallacy of Aerial Campaigns
Ramzy Baroud
Kushner as a Colonial Administrator: Let’s Talk About the ‘Israeli Model’
Mark Hand
Residents of Toxic W.Va. Town Keep Hope Alive
John Kendall Hawkins
Alias Anything You Please: a Lifetime of Dylan
Linn Washington Jr.
Bigots in Blue: Philadelphia Police Department is a Home For Hate
David Macaray
UAW Faces Its Moment of Truth
Brian Cloughley
Trump’s Washington Detests the Belt and Road Initiative
Horace G. Campbell
Edward Seaga and the Institutionalization of Thuggery, Violence and Dehumanization in Jamaica
Graham Peebles
Zero Waste: The Global Plastics Crisis
Michael Schwalbe
Oppose Inequality, Not Cops
Ron Jacobs
Scott Noble’s History of Resistance
Olivia Alperstein
The Climate Crisis is Also a Health Emergency
David Rosen
Time to Break Up the 21st Century Tech Trusts
George Wuerthner
The Highest Use of Public Forests: Carbon Storage
Ralph Nader
It is Time to Rediscover Print Newspapers
Nick Licata
How SDS Imploded: an Inside Account
Rachel Smolker – Anne Peterman
The GE American Chestnut: Restoration of a Beloved Species or Trojan Horse for Tree Biotechnology?
Sam Pizzigati
Can Society Survive Without Empathy?
Manuel E. Yepe
China and Russia in Strategic Alliance
Patrick Walker
Green New Deal “Climate Kids” Should Hijack the Impeachment Conversation
Colin Todhunter
Encouraging Illegal Planting of Bt Brinjal in India
Robert Koehler
The Armed Bureaucracy
David Swanson
Anyone Who’d Rather Not be Shot Should Read this Book
Jonathan Power
To St. Petersburg With Love
Marc Levy
How to Tell a Joke in Combat
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail