FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

If the Democrats Were Decent

If the Democrats were decent on immigration, not deplorable, they would tell Trump supporters that ending US wars and predatory trade agreements would stop immigration, or most of it, because most people would rather stay home and speak their own languages instead of fleeing bombs and economic desperation. They would have demanded that their 2016 presidential candidate explain those realities to Trump supporters instead of calling them “a basket of deplorables.” They would demand that Trump keep his promises to stop the invasions of Middle Eastern nations and revoke the trade agreements impoverishing peoples of both the Global North and Global South.

If the Democrats were committed to their flagship feminist, gender-neutral, and anti-racist politics, they would extend them to the female, queer, and dark-skinned peoples under US military and/or economic siege in the Global South.

If the Democrats were traumatized by the human consequences of Trump’s election, they would shut up about Russia and start working on a long-term plan to get rid of the electoral college, which gives inordinate power to the less populous, typically red, states. If the electronic voting machines and the patchwork quilt of voting and tallying procedures are to be believed—a big if—then Hillary Clinton won three million more votes than Trump.

If the Democrats wanted to inspire trust in Hillary’s three million vote margin or in any future electoral outcomes, they would call for junking all the electronic voting machines and instituting secure, nationally uniform methods of casting and counting ballots: paper ballots counted by hand and safely stored to make recounts possible. They would thereby propose to preclude any future election hacking by Russians, Republicans, or other potential miscreants, including their fellow Democrats. They would turn more attention to ending voter suppression than to $100,000 worth of Facebook ads generated by a troll farm.

If the Democrats were alarmed by Trump’s obscene tax cuts, they and all their 2018 congressional candidates would be campaigning on a (sincere) promise to repeal them, not just a few parts of them. (They’re longtime champions of corporate tax cuts, so they won’t want to disturb them much if at all.) They would also be promising to repeal the obscene Bush tax cuts that Barack Obama and his Democratic congressional majority extended in 2010.

Of course they can’t repeal any tax cuts so long as Trump has veto power, but presumably they’re hoping to win congressional majorities this year and the White House in 2020. It’s often difficult to believe that the Democrats do want to win, but let’s presume, for the sake of argument, that they do.

If the Democrats were distressed by the dictatorial and/or totalitarian implication of Trump’s military parade, they would stop sending shrill e-mails and circulating change.org and moveon.org petitions calling him an “authoritarian” and get real. What could be more authoritarian than US wars in seven nations, 800 to 1000 US military bases on foreign soil, and five geographic commands spanning the globe, plus space and cyber commands? What could be more authoritarian than the orders that US presidents gave and the coercive measures they imposed on all the other leaders and peoples of the world long before Trump moved into The White House? What could be more authoritarian than Hillary Clinton ordering the execution of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, then cackling, “We came, we saw, he died”?

If the Democrats were concerned about the estimated $21 million expense of Trump’s parade, they would ask Congressmen Mark Veasey, D-TX, and Mike Cohen, D-TN, to cut the partisan grandstanding, withdraw the ridiculously hypocritical “Preventing the Allocation of Resources for Absurd Defense Expenditures (PARADE)” bill that they introduced to stop it, and then take on the far larger and equally absurd “defense” expenditures in this year’s $700 billion military budget.

If the Democrats were worried by both the expense and the military muscle-flexing of Trump’s parade, Veasey and Cohen and other Democrats would help their constituents and local governments cancel the Navy Blue Angels and Air Force Thunderbirds air shows that cost well over $70 million per year. (The Navy’s Blue Angels and the Air Force Thunderbirds each have an annual budget of $35 million, and that doesn’t include the cost of all the other daredevil flying squads dispatched to entice poor and unemployed young folks into joining the US occupation of the world.)

Every time one of the Blue Angels FA-18 Hornets or the Thunderbirds F-16 Fighting Falcons crashes, the taxpayers are out $29 million, and one or more of them crashes most every year. On the same day in 2016, a Blue Angel FA-18 crashed at one air show, a Thunderbird at another, for a total loss of $58 million.

Twenty-six Blue Angels pilots have died in the air shows or training accidents. An even longer list of Thunderbird fatalities includes 19 who died in one day when a Thunderbirds’ C-123 Provider, a supportive cargo plane, crashed during an exhibition near Boise, Idaho.

A little-known fact about the Blue Angels and Thunderbirds air shows is that they’re not imposed on local communities, as most people seem to believe. Mayors, city councils, county boards of supervisors, and/or voters are free to cancel them anytime. The City and County of San Francisco hasn’t elected a Republican to any office since who knows when, but it has one of the nation’s most extravagant Fleet Week and Blue Angels air shows.

If the Democrats gave a damn about most Americans, not just elites, they would have long since heeded Dr. King’s words: “A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.If they cared about other people or the planet, they would have done whatever they could to shut down the trillion-dollar, nuclear weapons upgrade first proposed by President Obama.

If the Democrats had any interest in peace, more than a handful of them would have voted against the $1.4 trillion 2018-2019 war and weapons budget. (That’s $1.4 trillion prior to the supplemental war and weapons appropriations bills that always follow passage of the annual budget.) However, there’s no hypocrisy in that, because the Democrats haven’t  pretended to care about peace for a long time. I can’t even remember a time when they did.

More articles by:

Ann Garrison is an independent journalist who also contributes to the San Francisco Bay View, Global Research, the Black Agenda Report and the Black Star News, and produces radio for KPFA-Berkeley and WBAI-New York City.  In 2014, she was awarded the Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza Democracy and Peace Prize by the Womens International Network for Democracy and Peace.  She can be reached at ann@afrobeatradio.com.

November 15, 2018
Kenneth Surin
Ukania: the Land Where the Queen’s Son Has His Shoelaces Ironed by His Valet
Evaggelos Vallianatos
Spraying Poisons, Chasing Ghosts
Anthony DiMaggio
In the Wake of the Blue Wave: the Midterms, Recounts, and the Future of Progressive Politics
Christopher Ketcham
Build in a Fire Plain, Get What You Deserve
Meena Miriam Yust
Today It’s Treasure Island, Tomorrow Your Neighborhood Store: Could Local Currencies Help?
Karl Grossman
Climate of Rage
Walter Clemens
How Two Demagogues Inspired Their Followers
Brandon Lee
Radical Idealism: Jesus and the Radical Tradition
Kim C. Domenico
An Anarchist Uprising Against the Liberal Ego
Elliot Sperber
Pythagoras in Queens
November 14, 2018
Charles Pierson
Unstoppable: The Keystone XL Oil Pipeline and NAFTA
Sam Bahour
Israel’s Mockery of Security: 101 Actions Israel Could Take
Cesar Chelala
How a Bad Environment Impacts Children’s Health
George Ochenski
What Tester’s Win Means
Louisa Willcox
Saving Romania’s Brown Bears, Sharing Lessons About Coxistence, Conservation
George Wuerthner
Alternatives to Wilderness?
Robert Fisk
Izzeldin Abuelaish’s Three Daughters were Killed in Gaza, But He Still Clings to Hope for the Middle East
Dennis Morgan
For What?
Dana E. Abizaid
The Government is Our Teacher
Bill Martin
The Trump Experiment: Liberals and Leftists Unhinged and Around the Bend
Rivera Sun
After the Vote: An Essay of the Man from the North
Jamie McConnell
Allowing Asbestos to Continue Killing
Thomas Knapp
Talkin’ Jim Acosta Hard Pass Blues: Is White House Press Access a Constitutional Right?
Bill Glahn
Snow Day
November 13, 2018
Patrick Cockburn
The Midterm Results are Challenging Racism in America in Unexpected Ways
Victor Grossman
Germany on a Political Seesaw
Cillian Doyle
Fictitious Assets, Hidden Losses and the Collapse of MDM Bank
Lauren Smith
Amnesia and Impunity Reign: Wall Street Celebrates Halliburton’s 100th Anniversary
Joe Emersberger
Moreno’s Neoliberal Restoration Proceeds in Ecuador
Carol Dansereau
Climate and the Infernal Blue Wave: Straight Talk About Saving Humanity
Dave Lindorff
Hey Right Wingers! Signatures Change over Time
Dan Corjescu
Poetry and Barbarism: Adorno’s Challenge
Patrick Bond
Mining Conflicts Multiply, as Critics of ‘Extractivism’ Gather in Johannesburg
Ed Meek
The Kavanaugh Hearings: Text and Subtext
Binoy Kampmark
Concepts of Nonsense: Australian Soft Power
November 12, 2018
Kerron Ó Luain
Poppy Fascism and the English Education System
Conn Hallinan
Nuclear Treaties: Unwrapping Armageddon
Robert Hunziker
Tropical Trump Declares War on Amazonia
John W. Whitehead
Badge of Shame: the Government’s War on Military Veterans
Will Griffin
Military “Service” Serves the Ruling Class
John Eskow
Harold Pinter’s America: Hard Truths and Easy Targets
Rob Okun
Activists Looking Beyond Midterm Elections
Binoy Kampmark
Mid-Term Divisions: The Trump Take
Dean Baker
Short-Term Health Insurance Plans Destroy Insurance Pools
George Wuerthner
Saving the Buffalohorn/Porcupine: the Lamar Valley of the Gallatin Range
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail