FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Confidentially and Corporately Conning

One of the most egregious examples of the belief in fascism which is now part of the  standard operating procedures of the faking USA and which is accepted as reasonable by the vast majority of voters (based on their repeated support for the Democrats and Republican purveyors of fascist controls) is the continuation of unwarranted spying on innocent people under the blatant fascism of what is called section 702 of title VII of the  Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) – which was passed in 2008 and has since then been reauthorized in 2012 and temporarily extended in 2017. This legislation has been used by the NSA to collect information about anyone and everyone without real oversight by the courts under the pretense that “foreign” threats require the abandoning of supposed constitutional protections. In essence, this law has determined that all people, both inside and outside of the faking USA, are undeserving foreigners.

As the congress tries to grapple with various schemes in order to reauthorized, possibly expand, or make permanent the violations (of the assumed civil liberties which the congress boasts about as being what makes their fakery SO exceptional) before their self-appointed deadline this spring, there are now small rumblings and speculations beginning to bubble up from the noxious gases which are underlying their exceptional swamp on the Potomac. The most common rumbling is of sounds which imply that the continuation of this law is unconstitutional and this sound is bubbling up from both the Democrat’s and the Republican’s outer edges.

There is another sound which is clearly coming from those who prefer to believe the delusion that the Republicans must be primarily blamed for whatever lousy version of this corruption they are going to force upon the poor Democrats. These voices seem to want us to swallow their partisan delusions and to ignore the history of how this abomination has been made possible through the participation of both corporate owned parties.

Here is a brief history with some especially pertinent, prominent facts.

FISA was passed into law in 1978 to protect people from unconstitutional spying by the  intelligence community. After September 11, 2001, there was a resurgence of illegal spying – with the cooperation of telecommunication corporations – which had been deliberately ignored for months until it became hard to ignore. In 2008, it became imperative for the congress to find a way to take these illegal corporate acts and to make them legal under the dubious designation of corporate immunity and the over-reach of the intelligence community both being necessary for “security.” FISA was then and continues to be gutted.

The votes to gut FISA in 2008 were bipartisan.

In the house of representatives, the vote in support of gutting FISA was 293 in favor and 129 against. Of the votes in favor, 105 were Democrats.

In the senate, the vote was 69 in favor of violating the constitution and 28 opposed. 21 Democrats supported violating your rights. This vote was made even more important because it was one of the most blatant early examples of how truly lacking in integrity were/are Barack Obama and his supporters. Obama had promised that he would filibuster any such corruption and then he voted in favor of it. Meanwhile, many of his supporters stated that they were appalled by his action, but that his corruption was not going to get in the way of their support for his “promising” future.

After the obstructing Obama was elected and the Democrats had control of both houses during his first term, the Democrats in the senate, led by Harry Reid, made sure that no legislation of any significance could pass in the senate without the approval of the minority Republicans. The Democrats insisted that any simple majority of votes would not be able to pass laws and there had to be enough support to over-ride a filibuster. The most salient aspect of this scheme was that the Democrats allowed legislation which had a majority of votes to be called failures and this simultaneously allowed votes of less than 50% to control the outcome.

By 2012, Obama and the duplicitous Democrats needed to help make sure that the previously illegal corruption they had helped protect and support in 2008 would be reauthorized.

Section 702 was continued by a vote of 301 to 118 in the house. 74 of the then 185 Democrats voting on the legislation were in favor.

In the Senate, the continuation of the corruption was passed by a vote of 73 to 23. Of the  votes in favor, 30 were Democrats.

In the fall of 2017, the Congress and Obama made sure that the corruption could continue into 2018 on a temporary extension. There is little reason to doubt that this was done in order to try to salvage the phony notion that the Democrats are the hapless victims of Republican obnoxiousness.

Here are some telling facts from recent times.

In 2008, 105 of 233 Democrats who voted in the house helped gut FISA protections. That is about 45% of the voting house Democrats openly colluding with Republicans.

In the Senate of 2008, 21 democrats joined with the Republicans to gut FISA safeguards.

In 2012, 74 of 111 House Democrats who voted supported continuing the corruption. That is about 40% of the democrat votes for collusion in the House.

In the Senate of 2012, 30 Democrat senators supported more corruption.

In 2008, the Democrats composed 53% (233 of 435) of the House.

In 2012, the Democrats composed 42% (185 of 435) of the House.

That is a reduction of about 21% in democrat numbers in the House from 2008 to 2012.

The key facts here is that even though their numbers were reduced by about 21% in 2012, their supporting votes for this fascist behavior in the house were only reduced by 5% of the overall democrat vote and, in the 2012 senate, the democrat support went up from 21 in 2008 to 30 votes in favor.

These numbers show an increase in the proportions of Democrat legislators who are aligned with their Republican colleagues in the continuation of fascist techniques. I suppose this could be called the Obama effect, but that would  be misleading because Obama is only another typical example of the faking and misleading techniques used by Democrats as they seek to enable the Republican’s shared agenda of imperial corporate domination.

Out of all of this deviousness, I am confident that the democrats will use their current pretense as the hapless lesser evils to oppose the lousy corruption of the Republicans and the smarmy vanity of Trump with a renewed vigor and with (or is it because of) the almost  guaranteed inability to make any positive difference. I have little doubt the Democrats will see  a resurgence in numbers after the election of 2018 and I have NO doubt that they will posture  and wring their bloody hands as they continue to enable similar awful predatory corruption  in league with their Republican allies.

More articles by:

December 18, 2018
Charles Pierson
Where No Corn Has Grown Before: Better Living Through Climate Change?
Evaggelos Vallianatos
The Waters of American Democracy
Patrick Cockburn
Will Anger in Washington Over the Murder of Khashoggi End the War in Yemen?
George Ochenski
Trump is on the Ropes, But the Pillage of Natural Resources Continues
Farzana Versey
Tribals, Missionaries and Hindutva
Robert Hunziker
Is COP24 One More Big Bust?
David Macaray
The Truth About Nursing Homes
Nino Pagliccia
Have the Russian Military Aircrafts in Venezuela Breached the Door to “America’s Backyard”?
Paul Edwards
Make America Grate Again
David Rosnick
The Impact of OPEC on Climate Change
Binoy Kampmark
The Kosovo Blunder: Moving Towards a Standing Army
Andrew Stewart
Shine a Light for Immigration Rights in Providence
December 17, 2018
Susan Abulhawa
Marc Lamont Hill’s Detractors are the True Anti-Semites
Jake Palmer
Viktor Orban, Trump and the Populist Battle Over Public Space
Martha Rosenberg
Big Pharma Fights Proposal to Keep It From Looting Medicare
David Rosen
December 17th: International Day to End Violence against Sex Workers
Binoy Kampmark
The Case that Dare Not Speak Its Name: the Conviction of Cardinal Pell
Dave Lindorff
Making Trump and Other Climate Criminals Pay
Bill Martin
Seeing Yellow
Julian Vigo
The World Google Controls and Surveillance Capitalism
ANIS SHIVANI
What is Neoliberalism?
James Haught
Evangelicals Vote, “Nones” Falter
Vacy Vlanza
The Australian Prime Minister’s Rapture for Jerusalem
Martin Billheimer
Late Year’s Hits for the Hanging Sock
Weekend Edition
December 14, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Andrew Levine
A Tale of Two Cities
Peter Linebaugh
The Significance of The Common Wind
Bruce E. Levine
The Ketamine Chorus: NYT Trumpets New Anti-Suicide Drug
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Fathers and Sons, Bushes and Bin Ladens
Kathy Deacon
Coffee, Social Stratification and the Retail Sector in a Small Maritime Village
Nick Pemberton
Praise For America’s Second Leading Intellectual
Robert Hunziker
The Yellow Vest Insurgency – What’s Next?
Patrick Cockburn
The Yemeni Dead: Six Times Higher Than Previously Reported
Nick Alexandrov
George H. W. Bush: Another Eulogy
Brian Cloughley
Principles and Morality Versus Cash and Profit? No Contest
Michael F. Duggan
Climate Change and the Limits of Reason
Victor Grossman
Sighs of Relief in Germany
Ron Jacobs
A Propagandist of Privatization
Robert Fantina
What Does Beto Have Against the Palestinians?
Richard Falk – Daniel Falcone
Sartre, Said, Chomsky and the Meaning of the Public Intellectual
Andrew Glikson
Crimes Against the Earth
Robert Fisk
The Parasitic Relationship Between Power and the American Media
Stephen Cooper
When Will Journalism Grapple With the Ethics of Interviewing Mentally Ill Arrestees?
Jill Richardson
A War on Science, Morals and Law
Ron Jacobs
A Propagandist of Privatization
Evaggelos Vallianatos
It’s Not Easy Being Greek
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail