Click amount to donate direct to CounterPunch
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $500
  • $other
  • use PayPal

If you are able to donate $100 or more for our Annual Fund Drive, your donation will be matched by another generous CounterPuncher! These are tough times. Regardless of the political rhetoric bantered about the airwaves, the recession hasn’t ended for most of us. We know that money is tight for many of you. But we also know that tens of thousands of daily readers of CounterPunch depend on us to slice through the smokescreen and tell it like is. Please, donate if you can!


Will Donald Trump Be Undone By His Own Words?


Nobody wrote about words better –and more beautifully- than Pablo Neruda, the late Chilean poet. In a short segment of his Memoirs Neruda wrote, “You can say anything you want, yessir, but it’s the words that sing, they soar and descend . . . I bow to them . . . I love them, I cling to them, I run them down, I bite into them, I melt them down . . . I leave them in my poem like stalactites, like slivers of polished wood, like coals, pickings from a shipwreck, gifts from the waves . . . Everything exists in the word . . .” And nobody has misused them more than President Donald J. Trump.

Words can be used to punish, to threaten, to influence, to undermine, to mock, to trivialize and to abuse, among other objectives. Throughout the run for the presidency, and since becoming President, Donald Trump has made use of almost all of those characteristics, usually in the most negative sense.

Language is a powerful tool. In his book The Political Mind, the noted linguist and author George Lakoff wrote, “Language gets its power because it is defined relative to frames, prototypes, metaphors, narratives, images and emotions. Part of its power comes from its unconscious aspects: we are not consciously aware of all that evokes in us, but it is there, hidden, always at work”.

One of Donald Trump’s tactical moves is to apply nicknames to his adversaries. Who can forget his calling Marco Rubio “Little Marco”?; or Hillary Clinton “Crooked Hillary”?; or Bernie Sanders “Crazy Bernie”?; or Jeb Bush “Low-energy Jeb”?; or Ted Cruz “Lying Ted”?; or Elizabeth Warren “Goofy Elizabeth Warren”? By calling them names, he wanted to brand them, to create a negative narrative about his opponents.

That explains why, like a circus barker, he keeps repeating platitudes, although he must know how far away from reality they may be. Win is one of his favorite words. At a rally in Albany, New York, in April 2016, he said, “We’re going to win so much you may even be tired of winning. And you’ll say, ‘Please, please. It’s too much winning. We can’t take it anymore. Mr. President, it’s too much’. And I’ll say, No, it isn’t!” So far, however, his presidency has proven to be a banquet of losses.

Becoming President didn’t deter him from continuing to use language to further his aims. When Kay Ryssdal, an American radio journalist, asked Lakoff how he had predicted that Trump would win the election, he explained, “Based on what he was saying, how he was saying it, and how he very cleverly managed to manipulate other people’s brains to his advantage as a super salesman, which he’s been doing for 50 years. And he instinctively knows exactly how to do that. He knows what to say, and those tweets that he gives are entirely strategic. There are four types. Each of them fits a strategy, you know, and he has an advantage when other people think that he’s just crazy or stupid.”

Donald Trump likes to boast about his accomplishments. “I went to an Ivy League school. I’m highly educated. I know words. I have the best words, but there is no better word than stupid. Right?”

The President probably never imagined that his own words could be used to define him. Rex Tillerson, his Secretary of State, reportedly called him a “moron”, a charge that Tillerson refused to deny. When asked whether he had indeed referred to Trump as a “moron,” Tillerson said: “I’m not going to deal with petty stuff like that.”

More courageous was Lin-Manuel Miranda, the creator and star of “Hamilton” one of Broadway’s great successes. Miranda was dismayed at the Trump administration’s ineffective relief efforts to Puerto Rico after Hurricane María hit the island, and of Trump’s personal attacks against Carmen Yulín Cruz, the mayor of San Juan, Puerto Rico’s capital city. Miranda counterattacked, using the President’s favorite weapon. “You’re going straight to hell, Donald Trump. No long lines for you. Someone will say, “‘Right this way, sir. They’ll clear a path,’” Miranda tweeted.

At the end, it is possible that Trump will be undone by his words, carelessly used. The Bard of Avon seems to have presaged this possibility when he wrote, “Words without thoughts never to heaven go.”

More articles by:

Dr. Cesar Chelala is a co-winner of the 1979 Overseas Press Club of America award for the article “Missing or Disappeared in Argentina: The Desperate Search for Thousands of Abducted Victims.”

October 23, 2017
Jack Heyman
Puerto Rico and the Jones Act Conundrum
Howard Lisnoff
Will the Military Throw the Book at Bowe Bergdahl?
Robert Hunziker
Hidden Danger of Ecological Collapse
Sheldon Richman
Dying for the Empire is Not Heroic
Dimitris Konstantakopoulos
Careening Toward Nuclear War: the Political Paralysis of Europe, Russia and China
Jeff Berg
Looking for a Glass of Water and a Place to Shit
Yoav Litvin
The Art of Trolling – an Analysis of a Toxic Trend
Sarah Browning
There’s No Defense for Founding Fathers Who Practiced Slavery
Chuck Collins
An Independent Thinker’s Guide to the Tax Debate
Elliott Adams
Congress Can Stop War with North Korea
Jesselyn Radack – Kathleen McClellan
Insider Threat Program Training and Trump’s War on Leaks
Rosemary Mason - Colin Todhunter
The Global Food and Health Crisis: Monsanto’s Science is Bogus
Thomas Knapp
Hillary Clinton: Cold Creepiness with a Side of Corruption
Mel Gurtov
The Tragedy of American Foreign Policy
Weekend Edition
October 20, 2017
Friday - Sunday
John Pilger
Clinton, Assange and the War on Truth
Michael Hudson
Socialism, Land and Banking: 2017 Compared to 1917
Jeffrey St. Clair
A Day in the Life of CounterPunch
Paul Street
The Not-So-Radical “Socialist” From Vermont
Jason Hirthler
Censorship in the Digital Age
Jonathan Cook
Harvey Weinstein and the Politics of Hollywood
Andrew Levine
Diagnosing the Donald
Michelle Renee Matisons
Relocated Puerto Rican Families are Florida’s Latest Class War Targets
Richard Moser
Goldman Sachs vs. Goldman Sachs?
David Rosen
Male Sexual Violence: As American as Cherry Pie
Mike Whitney
John Brennan’s Police State USA
Robert Hunziker
Mr. Toxicity Zaps America
Peter Gelderloos
Catalan Independence and the Crisis of Democracy
Robert Fantina
Fatah, Hamas, Israel and the United States
Edward Curtin
Organized Chaos and Confusion as Political Control
Patrick Cockburn
The Transformation of Iraq: Kurds Have Lost 40% of Their Territory
CJ Hopkins
Tomorrow Belongs to the Corporatocracy
Bill Quigley
The Blueprint for the Most Radical City on the Planet
Brian Cloughley
Chinese Dreams and American Deaths in Africa
John Hultgren
Immigration and the American Political Imagination
Thomas Klikauer
Torturing the Poor, German-Style
Gerry Brown
China’s Elderly Statesmen
Pepe Escobar
Kirkuk Redux Was a Bloodless Offensive, Here’s Why
Jill Richardson
The Mundaneness of Sexual Violence
Caoimhghin Ó Croidheáin
The Choreography of Human Dignity: Blade Runner 2049 and World War Z
Missy Comley Beattie
Bitch, Get Out!!
Andre Vltchek
The Greatest Indonesian Painter and “Praying to the Pig”
Ralph Nader
Why is Nobelist Economist Richard Thaler so Jovial?
Ricardo Vaz
Venezuela Regional Elections: Chavismo in Triumph, Opposition in Disarray and Media in Denial
Kevin Zeese - Margaret Flowers
NAFTA Talks Falter, Time To Increase Pressure
GD Dess
Why We Shouldn’t Let Hillary Haunt Us … And Why Having a Vision Matters