Click amount to donate direct to CounterPunch
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $500
  • $other
  • use PayPal
DOUBLE YOUR DONATION!
We don’t run corporate ads. We don’t shake our readers down for money every month or every quarter like some other sites out there. We provide our site for free to all, but the bandwidth we pay to do so doesn’t come cheap. A generous donor is matching all donations of $100 or more! So please donate now to double your punch!
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Does the Goldwater Rule Apply to Governments?

Perhaps you heard of the Goldwater Rule, which the American Psychiatric Association promulgated in 1973. It prohibits members (I am not one, though I am a psychiatrist) from diagnosing public figures whom they have not examined. However, it does not prohibit shrinks from diagnosing the psychopathology of governments, which I do below.

But first a related anecdote. During the initial months of my psychiatric residency, I attempted to treat one of the most frightening patients I have encountered. When police apprehended him, they discovered that this obviously disturbed man with a past history of violent crime was driving about the city with a huge arsenal of loaded firearms. He smiled as he confided to me in the hospital that he wanted to kill people and saw nothing wrong with that. He appeared neither angry nor agitated, and conversed with me as agreeably as if we were long-time members of the same bowling team sharing a beer. However, he revealed paranoid delusions about feds bugging him and poisoning his water—revealed, that is, when his sentences sufficiently followed one another so that I could discern their meaning. The antipsychotic drugs that I prescribed changed his thinking to the degree that an ant changes the path of a speeding Lamborghini.

Baffled about how to treat this man, I consulted a supervisor, a world-renowned specialist in the psychotherapy of people so severely ill that no one else would dream of offering them talk therapy. I expected brilliant counsel about psychotherapeutic tactics. Instead what he recommended was, “Lock him up and throw away the key.”

Why did he conclude that? Because this patient expressed a particularly explosive mixture of psychotic paranoia and violent psychopathy. If you are paranoid, you fear harm from others. Many paranoids do not act upon those fears in an aggressive manner because they appreciate the consequences of their actions. That is, they could harm others and/or be hospitalized, jailed, or physically harmed themselves. However, if they are also psychopathic, they don’t care about the consequences; they lack the capacity for empathy and view others as mere instruments for gratifying their own needs. So if a paranoid psychopath fears harm from others, s/he is more likely to harm them proactively, no problem.

That brings us to the United States government in 2017. (I will refer to it as the USG to distinguish it from the general U.S. citizenry.) In my psychiatric practice, I minimize drugs in favor of talk therapy and other natural treatments for mental health problems (www.greenpsychiatrist.com). I believe that people are most likely to get well when treatment is collaborative and when it emphasizes the strengthening of their inner self-healing resources. However, if the USG were my patient, I would immediately hospitalize it on a locked unit, isolate it in a padded seclusion room, and order shock treatment. I would do this for the same reasons that my supervisor voiced his recommendation.

As one of many examples, the USG continues to demonize, threaten, and sanction Russia for its supposed meddling in our 2016 election. This despite the lack of any evidence available to the public to support these claims. True, some intelligence officials have alleged such Russian misconduct, but if you are gullible enough to trust these professional liars without supportive evidence, you may want to visit Bernie Madoff in prison to ask him to recommend investments.

But suppose Russians did try to influence our elections? The nerve of them. Who do they think they are, Israel? Besides, election-meddling is the least of their sins. Twenty-eight pages of a congressional report implicate Russia in the 911 attacks. Oh, sorry, that was Saudi Arabia, whereas Russia offered to help us. Thank God we can tell our friends from our enemies. Anyway, it’s not only in our elections that Russia interfered. In recent decades, Russia has tried to influence every national election on earth, haven’t they. And what about all the governments they overthrew or tried to overthrow in their quest for world domination: the Phillipines, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Cuba, Iran, Guatemala, Vietnam, Chile, Haiti, Indonesia, Honduras, Iraq, Libya, Ukraine, Syria, to name just a few … What? That wasn’t Russia? Never mind. In fact, wasn’t it the USG that actively intervened in Russian elections in 1996 to ensure the Presidency of Boris Yeltsin? But that’s all right because the U.S. is the exceptional country and can do what it wants.

You see where I am going with this. The USG is deranged. It justifies its aggressions by claiming an exceptional status and by citing external threats, most of which it invents, provokes, or aggravates. Then it attacks what it has created in others. This circular process resembles the psychological projection that paranoid individuals favor (i.e. I am good and you are bad because you represent those bad attributes that I cannot acknowledge in myself). Homophobia and racism are other examples of projection.

The projections of paranoid people can intensify when stressors overwhelm them and threaten mental breakdown. We find such breakdown in the U.S. in the inability of its government to solve any of the problems—financial, medical, environmental, educational, racial, etc.—that bedevil 99 percent of its populace. Because of its abdication of responsibility toward Americans, the USG senses the growing threat to it from within. How long before citizen armies storm its gates with pitchforks and AK-47s and cell phone cameras?

Accordingly, faced with this gathering internal threat that it neither cares to resolve nor knows how, the USG projects onto the external world the specter of seemingly ubiquitous existential threat with an escalating sense of urgency. Be afraid, it proclaims, of evil Iran, Satanic Russia, crazy North Korea, greedy China, Kremlin apologists lurking under every bed, and airline terrorists hiding explosives in their jock straps. In this manner the USG excuses its invasions, bombings, and plunder.

(By the way, some, possibly most of the USG’s proclaimed projections are shams. It fear-mongers its citizens not only to justify its aggressions abroad, but to expedite its unconstitutional domestic transgressions and financial rape of the common folks at home. The USG is more psychopath than true paranoid. It admonishes us to look over there at that shiny alien object, the demon Putin, and not here at our incompetent and venal government officials, our financial woes, the desecration of our environment, and the general decline in the quality of our lives. After all, fear mongering is a tactic deployed by untold aggressors throughout history. Hitler, for one, expressed alarm about non-existent threats to Germany from Poland, Russia, and others in order to justify his subsequent invasions.)

But true paranoia, though usually counterproductive, is not entirely bad. If you suddenly deprive paranoids of their crazy projections without strengthening their ability to handle reality, their minds may disintegrate further. Paranoia is both a problem and a defense against deeper problems. Accordingly, if you directly challenge a paranoid’s delusions, s/he will defend them and likely become more paranoid toward you. So I expect this post to elicit hostile and irrational responses from those who cannot acknowledge the reality of what the U.S has become.

But there is potential good news. Given all the revelations about the USG’s misdeeds, it may be a sign of mental health if Americans become more paranoid about those who claim to govern them.

Steven Goldsmith, MD is the author of The Healing Paradox and can be found at www.steven-goldsmith.com and on Facebook.

More articles by:
October 23, 2018
Patrick Cockburn
The Middle East, Not Russia, Will Prove Trump’s Downfall
Ipek S. Burnett
The Assault on The New Colossus: Trump’s Threat to Close the U.S.-Mexican Border
Mary Troy Johnston
The War on Terror is the Reign of Terror
Maximilian Werner
The Rhetoric and Reality of Death by Grizzly
David Macaray
Teamsters, Hells Angels, and Self-Determination
Jeffrey Sommers
“No People, Big Problem”: Democracy and Its Discontents In Latvia
Dean Baker
Looking for the Next Crisis: the Not Very Scary World of CLOs
Binoy Kampmark
Leaking for Change: ASIO, Jakarta, and Australia’s Jerusalem Problem
Chris Wright
The Necessity of “Lesser-Evil” Voting
Muhammad Othman
Daunting Challenge for Activists: The Cook Customer “Connection”
Don Fitz
A Debate for Auditor: What the Papers Wouldn’t Say
October 22, 2018
Henry Giroux
Neoliberalism in the Age of Pedagogical Terrorism
Melvin Goodman
Washington’s Latest Cold War Maneuver: Pulling Out of the INF
David Mattson
Basket of Deplorables Revisited: Grizzly Bears at the Mercy of Wyoming
Michelle Renee Matisons
Hurricane War Zone Further Immiserates Florida Panhandle, Panama City
Tom Gill
A Storm is Brewing in Europe: Italy and Its Public Finances Are at the Center of It
Suyapa Portillo Villeda
An Illegitimate, US-Backed Regime is Fueling the Honduran Refugee Crisis
Christopher Brauchli
The Liars’ Bench
Gary Leupp
Will Trump Split the World by Endorsing a Bold-Faced Lie?
Michael Howard
The New York Times’ Animal Cruelty Fetish
Alice Slater
Time Out for Nukes!
Geoff Dutton
Yes, Virginia, There are Conspiracies—I Think
Daniel Warner
Davos in the Desert: To Attend or Not, That is Not the Question
Priti Gulati Cox – Stan Cox
Mothers of Exiles: For Many, the Child-Separation Ordeal May Never End
Manuel E. Yepe
Pence v. China: Cold War 2.0 May Have Just Begun
Raouf Halaby
Of Pith Helmets and Sartorial Colonialism
Dan Carey
Aspirational Goals  
Wim Laven
Intentional or Incompetence—Voter Suppression Where We Live
Weekend Edition
October 19, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Jason Hirthler
The Pieties of the Liberal Class
Jeffrey St. Clair
A Day in My Life at CounterPunch
Paul Street
“Male Energy,” Authoritarian Whiteness and Creeping Fascism in the Age of Trump
Nick Pemberton
Reflections on Chomsky’s Voting Strategy: Why The Democratic Party Can’t Be Saved
John Davis
The Last History of the United States
Yigal Bronner
The Road to Khan al-Akhmar
Robert Hunziker
The Negan Syndrome
Andrew Levine
Democrats Ahead: Progressives Beware
Rannie Amiri
There is No “Proxy War” in Yemen
David Rosen
America’s Lost Souls: the 21st Century Lumpen-Proletariat?
Joseph Natoli
The Age of Misrepresentations
Ron Jacobs
History Is Not Kind
John Laforge
White House Radiation: Weakened Regulations Would Save Industry Billions
Ramzy Baroud
The UN ‘Sheriff’: Nikki Haley Elevated Israel, Damaged US Standing
Robert Fantina
Trump, Human Rights and the Middle East
Anthony Pahnke – Jim Goodman
NAFTA 2.0 Will Help Corporations More Than Farmers
Jill Richardson
Identity Crisis: Elizabeth Warren’s Claims Cherokee Heritage
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail