FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Attitudes Towards Pets vs Attitudes Towards the Natural World

There’s a great chasm between the way humans treat pets and the way humans treat the living planet.  Everyday I think to myself why is this?

I also understand there are many humans that abuse their pets and carry that attitude with them in their abuse of the natural world, but I am not writing this for these assholes.  I am writing for the people who love their pets dearly but can’t equate that love with the natural world.

The pet industry was a 66.75 billion dollar industry in the United States in 2016 which was up 4% from 2015 (talk numbers like that to any vulture capitalist and they might mistake it for dirty talk). Only 40% of Americans do not own any pets.

These numbers speak for themselves but they also speak to the connections we make with our pets.  They are considered part of the family.  The get toys, beds, baths, gourmet food, etc.  We treat them this way because these are living beings with feelings, physical beauty, intelligence and emotions, emotions that include loving us unconditionally.  And I think the biggest thing we see in pets is their innocence.

Part of the reason you may say this love and innocence we feel doesn’t fully carry over to the natural world is because the other beings we interact with aren’t domesticated in our homes. I would agree with on that partly, but I’m not going to let you off the hook with that logic.

Any time there’s internet videos of humans connecting with other animals in nature these generate thousands if not millions of views.  People will comment how touched they are by the interaction but it seems to me this rush of emotions towards nature only last for a fleeting moment.

I think part of that reason is this….Genesis 1:28, “And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.”

What’s been grounded into civilized humans thought process for thousands of years is that humans are to “subdue” the planet and take “dominion” over it.  Which in turn has made humans think any other living beings are inferior. This inferiority complex has carried over to the extreme of any living being that is not a white heterosexual male needs to be controlled.

This human supremacist mindset has really dismissed the true intelligence and emotions of these animals and the natural world.  Human supremacy closes doors on attitudes towards life on this planet.  Not many people realize plants and trees also communicate and frankly not many people care.

The thing is we need to care.  We need to care about all of it.  All of it matters to maintain an ecosystem and habitats for life on this planet.  Humans have been indoctrinated for the need to pour their feelings out for and associate with life that is aesthetically pleasing to the eye.  Humans lust to have a direct connection with these easy on the eyes beings.

This is shown by the way women are treated in society.  Look at the difference between the way a woman that’s deemed “attractive” by society is treated and look at the way a woman that society has deemed is not attractive.  The “attractive” woman is treated like a sex object which may garner them certain privileges in society.  The “unattractive” woman is disgarded like used tin foil.  Unless that tin foil proves to be beneficial to serve our needs.

This attitude carries over to the natural world because unfortunately not all of the natural world is aesthetically pleasing to the eyes.

You hear plenty about saving the aesthetically pleasing looking Lions and Tigers but nothing about something not so aesthetically pleasing like the California Condor.  How many people care there’s under 450 California Condors left? And think about how many people care about how many Lions and Tigers are left.

People want the quick fix the quick connection.  That’s why pets are so appealing.  Entering into a relationship with the natural world takes time and patience. It’s something I am still working on and am nowhere near where I would like to be.  People don’t have time or the patience.

This is why people are more upset over the dog meat festivals in Asia than 2.7 Million Animals Killed by Federal Wildlife destruction Program in 2016, and 9 billion factory farm animals dying each year in the United States.

What people also feel when they see these internet videos of humans interacting with animals in nature is a lust.  A lust to one day be that human in the video to one day control that aesthetically pleasing on the eyes animal.

When I see videos of humans interacting with animals in nature.  I am amazed.  Not at the intelligence with the animal.  I am amazed the animal is willing to have a vulnerable moment with the human considering the horrible history our species has with theirs.  I believe these beings have an instinct engrained in them about the dangers humans pose to them because of our violent past and present.  I believe this to be especially true of the beings we can’t pet or that aren’t as cute as Fido or won’t lick our face like Fido does.  That’s why I am amazed at these animals having vulnerable moments with humans.

Finally, I feel a profound sadness that people think these things are amazing or special.  Is it amazing or special that humans can bound with pets?  No, because humans invest in pets, pets’ needs matter more than the natural world’s needs matter.  It’s sad to me people can’t wrap their heads around this.  It’s sad to know that if people invested as much time in the natural world as we did with our pets there would be not a lot of million hit YouTube videos of humans interacting with nature because humans would be in deep relationships with the natural world and people wouldn’t be behind a computer wasting away….they would be out in nature.

So I ask you to break from the “subdue” and have “dominion” over the Earth mindset.  Realize all life is sacred and all life is intelligent with feelings and needs.  Engage with the Earth be vulnerable with the Earth.  It’s ok to do this because we are part of the Earth, we are not the Earth.

Our species like most other species on this planet doesn’t have much time left.  So dare to be different and use that time wisely.

More articles by:

November 13, 2018
Patrick Cockburn
The Midterm Results are Challenging Racism in America in Unexpected Ways
Victor Grossman
Germany on a Political Seesaw
Cillian Doyle
Fictitious Assets, Hidden Losses and the Collapse of MDM Bank
Lauren Smith
Amnesia and Impunity Reign: Wall Street Celebrates Halliburton’s 100th Anniversary
Joe Emersberger
Moreno’s Neoliberal Restoration Proceeds in Ecuador
Carol Dansereau
Climate and the Infernal Blue Wave: Straight Talk About Saving Humanity
Dave Lindorff
Hey Right Wingers! Signatures Change over Time
Dan Corjescu
Poetry and Barbarism: Adorno’s Challenge
Patrick Bond
Mining Conflicts Multiply, as Critics of ‘Extractivism’ Gather in Johannesburg
Ed Meek
The Kavanaugh Hearings: Text and Subtext
Binoy Kampmark
Concepts of Nonsense: Australian Soft Power
November 12, 2018
Kerron Ó Luain
Poppy Fascism and the English Education System
Conn Hallinan
Nuclear Treaties: Unwrapping Armageddon
Robert Hunziker
Tropical Trump Declares War on Amazonia
John W. Whitehead
Badge of Shame: the Government’s War on Military Veterans
Will Griffin
Military “Service” Serves the Ruling Class
John Eskow
Harold Pinter’s America: Hard Truths and Easy Targets
Rob Okun
Activists Looking Beyond Midterm Elections
Binoy Kampmark
Mid-Term Divisions: The Trump Take
Dean Baker
Short-Term Health Insurance Plans Destroy Insurance Pools
George Wuerthner
Saving the Buffalohorn/Porcupine: the Lamar Valley of the Gallatin Range
Patrick Howlett-Martin
A Note on the Paris Peace Forum
Joseph G. Ramsey
Does America Have a “Gun Problem”…Or a White Supremacy Capitalist Empire Problem?
Weekend Edition
November 09, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Louis Proyect
Why Democrats Are So Okay With Losing
Andrew Levine
What Now?
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Chuck and Nancy’s House of Cards
Brian Cloughley
The Malevolent Hypocrisy of Selective Sanctions
Marc Levy
Welcome, Class of ‘70
David Archuleta Jr.
Facebook Allows Governments to Decide What to Censor
Evaggelos Vallianatos
The Zika Scare: a Political and Commercial Maneuver of the Chemical Poisons Industry
Nick Pemberton
When It Comes To Stone Throwing, Democrats Live In A Glass House
Ron Jacobs
Impeach!
Lawrence Davidson
A Tale of Two Massacres
José Tirado
A World Off Balance
Jonah Raskin
Something Has Gone Very Wrong: An Interview With Ecuadoran Author Gabriela Alemán
J.P. Linstroth
Myths on Race and Invasion of the ‘Caravan Horde’
Dean Baker
Good News, the Stock Market is Plunging: Thoughts on Wealth
David Rosen
It’s Time to Decriminalize Sex Work
Dan Glazebrook
US Calls for a Yemen Ceasefire is a Cynical Piece of Political Theatre
Jérôme Duval
Forced Marriage Between Argentina and the IMF Turns into a Fiasco
Jill Richardson
Getting Past Gingrich
Dave Lindorff
Not a Blue Wave, But Perhaps a Foreshock
Martha Rosenberg
Dangerous, Expensive Drugs Aggressively Pushed? You Have These Medical Conflicts of Interest to Thank
Will Solomon
Not Much of a Wave
Nicolas J S Davies
Why Yemeni War Deaths are Five Times Higher Than You’ve Been Led to Believe
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail