FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

On the Ascencion to the Throne of Obama

The US State Department publishes an annual list of state sponsors of terrorism. Perennially conspicuously absent that list is the US government itself. Perhaps that’s because the US government isn’t so much a state sponsor of terror as a state engaged in terror. In the event, it’s easily the biggest terrorist organization on the planet. It’s not even a contest. Events. The US government will this year spend officially $640 billion on its military. One might call it a monster. If in an alliterative mood, a military monster. Which it is. Those are only the baseline costs. There are many other hidden costs of the military gobbling up so many resources that infrastructure at home collapses.

I say at home, because most of these exorbitantly wasteful military outlays have nothing to do with investing in, say, military bases at home. On the contrary, the United States builds military bases overseas. Even the Pentagon can’t tell you how many. But it’s somewhere around 800. In over 130 countries. During the reign of the Bush regime before Obama, US Special Forces were active in about 60 countries. By the time Obama left office they were active in 130.

Is anybody paying attention? This is long past the military industrial complex Eisenhower warned of. A general let’s remember. It is so far past the military industrial complex that congressional would be another appropriate adjective. As would prison. The United States is an incarceral state. 2.3 million United Stateseans are already behind bars. About that many more are on probation or parole. Almost exclusively Black and Latino.

Actual costs of the US military are actually far greater than a mere $640 billion. If you can call that kind of money mere.

Thinking about specific war crimes of the US government one might be Bush’s invasion of Iraq in 2003. This was the text book definition of Nuremberg’s prohibition against a war of aggression. Nuremberg said that a war of aggression was “the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.” That’s what Bush did without two thoughts more for the citizens of Baghdad than how much oil stocks would soon soar. Indeed, the butchers in the Bush regime labeled the initial merciless bombardment of Baghdad “shock and awe.” Kind of like a football game except for without the forward passes and penalty flags. Hundreds of thousands perished under Bush’s onslaught. Probably about an equal number suffered a fate worse than death. Bush was troubled not a bit. He had maids to vacuum his carpets and ultimately that was the goal for Bush: a clean, orderly, neat home, with freshly vacuumed carpets. And carpet perfume if you have it please.

This mercilessness was on top of the previous merciless 12-year sanction regime on Iraq which ended only because Bush started bombing. He snickered. And snorted. And grimaced. And let Cheney do most of the talking antecedent. But ultimately it was Bush’s decision. As he himself said. Bush had the unmitigated arrogance and hubris to label himself the “decider.”| And shroud your eyes. That he was waging war on Islam because God  had instructed him to.

Those sanctions are estimated to have killed as many as 1.5 million Iraqis, half of them children. The Democrat Clinton presided over 2/3 of those sanctions, proving my historical assertion: the Republicans propose; and the Democrats dispose. In the midst of the misery and starvation, during which chlorine was prohibited as an import into Iraq because it was “dual use,” in Dick Cheney’s fancy use of the language, Lesley Stahl of 60 Minutes asked Secretary of State Madeline Albright whether the deaths of some at the time quarter million children was “worth it.” As if a horse regurgitating a carrot Albright mumbled essentially that it was indeed. She didn’t say “after all they are dusky hued.” But she meant as much. And in any event in the wrong economic class.

At this late date cause and effect have simply disappeared from US political calculations. You have to appreciate the magnitude of the crisis. This is in the context of the US government spending this year $640 billion on its military. That is a baseline number. There are costs at least twice that of military outlays hidden elsewhere. That $640 baseline is exactly twice what the Pentagon was spending on 9/11. And couldn’t protect their own headquarters from attack. But set that to side.

What that $640 billion represents is the continued windfall profits of war profiteers like Boeing, Lockheed Martin and BAE Systems. And that’s all it represents. Because it sure doesn’t represent anything resembling national security. On the contrary. They want you to beg the answer because it’s so obvious there isn’t one. How is it blowing up three alleged enemies and ten bystanders, creating 30 more enemies somehow increases our national security? Never mind the totality of victims of wanton US bloodletting.

I suppose Trump will get blamed for this too. Although the condition obtained before Trump took the oath of office. Let’s be honest. It was Obama’s doing. Or his regime’s at any rate. As we navigate this tangled web of nonsense, let’s remember that Obama’s first act as ex-POTUS was to frolic with billionaire nuclear energy investor Richard Branson in the Caribbean. Only a shade different from Hillary’s scheme to install a no-fly zone over Syria, tantamount to a declaration of war and regime change, Obama and NATO stationed troops that remain today with nuclear capable missile batteries against Russia’s western border in Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia. Clinton’s State Department, under the aegis of Undersecretary Victoria Nuland, married to notorious neocon Robert Kagan, engineered the coup of a democratically elected government in Ukraine. Total nick to the US Treasury? A paltry $5 billion. Meanwhile the homeless have nowhere to sleep in the depth of the Chicago winter. As if the injury weren’t enough, how about another? Victoria Nuland and Clinton’s State Department brought to power in Ukraine neo-Nazi thugs. And when the eastern, for those of you unfamiliar with a map that would be the two provinces of Crimea nearest to the motherland itself voted 95% in a referendum to return to Russia, Russia was accused of being an aggressor. On its own doorstep.

The liars in the State Department practice Hitler’s tactics: when lying go big. The bigger the lie the more likely to be believed. Never mind the history. And 1954. And the rest of the unknown hokum.

More articles by:

January 17, 2019
Stan Cox
That Green Growth at the Heart of the Green New Deal? It’s Malignant
David Schultz
Trump vs the Constitution: Why He Cannot Invoke the Emergencies Act to Build a Wall
Paul Cochrane
Europe’s Strategic Humanitarian Aid: Yemen vs. Syria
Tom Clifford
China: An Ancient Country, Getting Older
Greg Grandin
How Not to Build a “Great, Great Wall”
Ted Rall
Our Pointless, Very American Culture of Shame
John G. Russell
Just Another Brick in the Wall of Lies
Patrick Walker
Referendum 2020: A Green New Deal vs. Racist, Classist Climate Genocide
Kevin Zeese - Margaret Flowers
Uniting for a Green New Deal
Matt Johnson
The Wall Already Exists — In Our Hearts and Minds
Jesse Jackson
Trump’s Flailing will get More Desperate and More Dangerous
Andrew Stewart
The Green New Deal Must be Centered on African American and Indigenous Workers to Differentiate Itself From the Democratic Party: Part Three
January 16, 2019
Patrick Bond
Jim Yong Kim’s Mixed Messages to the World Bank and the World
John Grant
Joe Biden, Crime Fighter from Hell
Alvaro Huerta
Brief History Notes on Mexican Immigration to the U.S.
Kenneth Surin
A Great Speaker of the UK’s House of Commons
Elizabeth Henderson
Why Sustainable Agriculture Should Support a Green New Deal
Binoy Kampmark
Trump, Bolton and the Syrian Confusion
Jeff Mackler
Trump’s Syria Exit Tweet Provokes Washington Panic
Barbara Nimri Aziz
How Long Can Nepal Blame Others for Its Woes?
Glenn Sacks
LA Teachers’ Strike: When Just One Man Says, “No”
Cesar Chelala
Violence Against Women: A Pandemic No Longer Hidden
Kim C. Domenico
To Make a Vineyard of the Curse: Fate, Fatalism and Freedom
Dave Lindorff
Criminalizing BDS Trashes Free Speech & Association
Thomas Knapp
Now More Than Ever, It’s Clear the FBI Must Go
Binoy Kampmark
Dances of Disinformation: The Partisan Politics of the Integrity Initiative
Andrew Stewart
The Green New Deal Must be Centered on African American and Indigenous Workers to Differentiate Itself From the Democratic Party: Part Two
Edward Curtin
A Gentrified Little Town Goes to Pot
January 15, 2019
Patrick Cockburn
Refugees Are in the English Channel Because of Western Interventions in the Middle East
Howard Lisnoff
The Faux Political System by the Numbers
Lawrence Davidson
Amos Oz and the Real Israel
John W. Whitehead
Beware the Emergency State
John Laforge
Loudmouths against Nuclear Lawlessness
Myles Hoenig
Labor in the Age of Trump
Jeff Cohen
Mainstream Media Bias on 2020 Democratic Race Already in High Gear
Dean Baker
Will Paying for Kidneys Reduce the Transplant Wait List?
George Ochenski
Trump’s Wall and the Montana Senate’s Theater of the Absurd
Binoy Kampmark
Dances of Disinformation: the Partisan Politics of the Integrity Initiative
Glenn Sacks
On the Picket Lines: Los Angeles Teachers Go On Strike for First Time in 30 Years
Jonah Raskin
Love in a Cold War Climate
Andrew Stewart
The Green New Deal Must be Centered on African American and Indigenous Workers to Differentiate Itself From the Democratic Party
January 14, 2019
Kenn Orphan
The Tears of Justin Trudeau
Julia Stein
California Needs a 10-Year Green New Deal
Dean Baker
Declining Birth Rates: Is the US in Danger of Running Out of People?
Robert Fisk
The US Media has Lost One of Its Sanest Voices on Military Matters
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail