Click amount to donate direct to CounterPunch
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $500
  • $other
  • use PayPal
Spring Fund Drive: Keep CounterPunch Afloat
CounterPunch is a lifeboat of sanity in today’s turbulent political seas. Please make a tax-deductible donation and help us continue to fight Trump and his enablers on both sides of the aisle. Every dollar counts!
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Powder Keg: Manchester Terror Attack Could Lead to Yet Another Resurgence in Nationalist Hate

They acted fast. Hot on the news of the terrorist attack in Manchester, elements of Britain’s political right set about attempting to capitalise on the situation. The goal? Further their nationalist, anti-Muslim, xenophobic agenda over the blood and misery of innocent people.

The Daily Mail “journalist” Katie Hopkins stands out. Having engaged in all manner of xenophobic and downright callous declarations in the past, Hopkins has called for a “final solution” for British Islam. It’s not known if she really intended to imitate a certain Austrian statesman known for also holding a dim view of foreigners (Hopkins is not renowned for her intellect) but all the same, the rhetoric is unsettling.

She’s not alone. The notorious Tommy Robinson was eager to weigh in. For those lucky enough to have not heard of this titan of political erudition, Robinson is the former leader of the bizarrely named “English Defence League” (EDL), itself a now increasingly moribund collection of thugs and football hooligans seeking their latest buzz via far right politics and hate.

True to form, Robinson was quick to point out that the Manchester attack was symptomatic of the alleged problem of Islam in Britain. Rather than being intertwined with foreign policy, societal breakdown and the mounting fragmentation of the Middle East, the recent bloodshed was purely down to the presence of an Islamic community fully intermeshed with terrorism.  As mentioned, Robinson is a titan of political erudition. Let there be no further doubt.

Sarcasm aside, I won’t be surprising anyone by pointing out that British politics have lurched to the right. The careless, self-serving agenda of pundits like Robinson and Hopkins may thus not just be annoying but palpably dangerous. Indeed, the recent call for a snap election is largely predicated on machinations surrounding Brexit, itself a subject infected with nationalistic rhetoric. It’s no exaggerations that such sentiments have already turned into something far uglier, with racial hate crimes having proliferated across the nation in the wake of the EU referendum last year.

This led to some pretty grim scenarios. In addition to acts of verbal abuse and open harassment, the situation soon escalated, with violence against those deemed not suitably “British” taking place.  I don’t think it’s unreasonable to suggest that last night’s attack could have similar consequences. Reports are already coming in of a suspected arson attack on a Manchester Mosque. Partisanship and irresponsibility on the part of the media could escalate matters. Provocative, indeed shameless, remarks from various “journalists” could thus be incredibly perilous.

An easy rebuttal would be to point out that Tommy Robinson is just a lunatic. There’d be some sizeable logic behind this position. His political fortunes have been on the wane in recent years, with his dramatic departure from the EDL ensuring he casts a sad figure on Britain’s political landscape. All the same, he does retain some influence and he’ll no doubt seek to use the recent tragedy to pursue something of a personal and political resurgence. Being a part of a supposed “lunatic fringe” also doesn’t exactly make him harmless. The experience of the EDL points to the fact.

This isn’t the entire picture. Katie Hopkins herself writes for the Daily Mail, itself one of the largest circulating newspaper in the entire UK. To say there isn’t a meeting of minds between the editorship of such a paper and Katie’s incessant xenophobia would be a profound mistake. Hopes that the DM will finally part ways with Hopkin’s after her truly moronic “final solution” quip seem ill founded. If anything, such an esteemed paper will simply view the situation in Manchester as a means to further their incessantly low quality brand of tabloid propaganda. The truth, or indeed the consequences of failing to convey the truth, won’t be a priority for them.

In fact Katie’s Hitlerite rhetoric is quite appropriate. In addition to being a tried and tested platform for “conservative” politics in modernity, the Daily Mail’s early years saw it falling over itself active support the far-right, being a distinguished fan of both General Francisco Franco and the Nazi Fuhrer himself. In the former case, the DM was only to happy to publish Franco’s first-English language interview, with the esteemed officer going into some detail on the reasons behind his betrayal of his own government and the escalation of a war that ultimately killed hundreds of thousands of his own people.

Titled “General Franco Talks” the DM awarded the budding fascist the accolade of “commander in chief of the southern anti-red army”. No doubt pleased with such a grandiose title, Franco made an “appeal for the great nations for sympathy in our struggle against destructive Bolshevism”, in the process making the truly original analysis that “communism triumphant spells the destruction of western civilisation and religion”.

It didn’t end there. The DM’s then owner, Harold Harmsworth, went on to not only fraternise with Adolf Hitler, but actually endorsed Britain’s own variant of Nazism, headed by none other than Sir Oswald Mosley and his infamous British Union of Fascists. Harmsworth was hardly shy about displaying his enthusiasm for such a group, penning a DM article titled “Hurrah for the Blackshirts” and lauding Mosley for his “sound, common sense, Conservative doctrine”.

Times may have indeed changed for the Daily Mail. We are most certainly not living in the 1930s. All the same it’s important to know who we are dealing with here. The DM’s reputation for partisan conservatism has survived to this day. It is markedly unlikely that they will decide to swim against the stream of anti-Muslim rhetoric that is already pouring from the social media presence of individuals like Hopkins. If anything, they’ll attempt to bring such “insights” to a yet wider audience.

The fact that the man allegedly responsible for the Manchester atrocity, one Salman Abedi, was born in the UK won’t make much of a difference here. The details won’t matter. The wider truth won’t either. Unless checked with a suitable response from the left, there’s a very real risk of this situation could take a yet greater turn for the worse.

More articles by:

Daniel Read is a UK-based journalist specialising in human rights and international affairs. He originally studied journalism at Kingston University, London, prior to obtaining post-graduate degrees in both human rights and global politics. He blogs at uncommonsense.me and tweets at @DanielTRead.

Weekend Edition
May 25, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Melvin Goodman
A Major Win for Trump’s War Cabinet
Andrew Levine
Could Anything Cause the GOP to Dump Trump?
Pete Tucker
Is the Washington Post Soft on Amazon?
Conn Hallinan
Iran: Sanctions & War
Jeffrey St. Clair
Out of Space: John McCain, Telescopes and the Desecration of Mount Graham
John Laforge
Senate Puts CIA Back on Torture Track
David Rosen
Santa Fe High School Shooting: an Incel Killing?
Gary Leupp
Pompeo’s Iran Speech and the 21 Demands
Jonathan Power
Bang, Bang to Trump
Robert Fisk
You Can’t Commit Genocide Without the Help of Local People
Brian Cloughley
Washington’s Provocations in the South China Sea
Louis Proyect
Requiem for a Mountain Lion
Robert Fantina
The U.S. and Israel: a Match Made in Hell
Kevin Martin
The Libya Model: It’s Not Always All About Trump
Susie Day
Trump, the NYPD and the People We Call “Animals”
Pepe Escobar
How Iran Will Respond to Trump
Sarah Anderson
When CEO’s Earn 5,000 Times as Much as a Company’s Workers
Ralph Nader
Audit the Outlaw Military Budget Draining America’s Necessities
Chris Wright
The Significance of Karl Marx
David Schultz
Indict or Not: the Choice Mueller May Have to Make and Which is Worse for Trump
George Payne
The NFL Moves to Silence Voices of Dissent
Razan Azzarkani
America’s Treatment of Palestinians Has Grown Horrendously Cruel
Katalina Khoury
The Need to Evaluate the Human Constructs Enabling Palestinian Genocide
George Ochenski
Tillerson, the Truth and Ryan Zinke’s Interior Department
Jill Richardson
Our Immigration Debate Needs a Lot More Humanity
Martha Rosenberg
Once Again a Slaughterhouse Raid Turns Up Abuses
Judith Deutsch
Pension Systems and the Deadly Hand of the Market
Shamus Cooke
Oregon’s Poor People’s Campaign and DSA Partner Against State Democrats
Thomas Barker
Only a Mass Struggle From Below Can End the Bloodshed in Palestine
Binoy Kampmark
Australia’s China Syndrome
Missy Comley Beattie
Say “I Love You”
Ron Jacobs
A Photographic Revenge
Saurav Sarkar
War and Moral Injury
Clark T. Scott
The Shell Game and “The Bank Dick”
Seth Sandronsky
The State of Worker Safety in America
Thomas Knapp
Making Gridlock Great Again
Manuel E. Yepe
The US Will Have to Ask for Forgiveness
Laura Finley
Stop Blaming Women and Girls for Men’s Violence Against Them
Rob Okun
Raising Boys to Love and Care, Not to Kill
Christopher Brauchli
What Conflicts of Interest?
Winslow Myers
Real Security
George Wuerthner
Happy Talk About Weeds
Abel Cohen
Give the People What They Want: Shame
David Yearsley
King Arthur in Berlin
Douglas Valentine
Memorial Day
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail