FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Powder Keg: Manchester Terror Attack Could Lead to Yet Another Resurgence in Nationalist Hate

They acted fast. Hot on the news of the terrorist attack in Manchester, elements of Britain’s political right set about attempting to capitalise on the situation. The goal? Further their nationalist, anti-Muslim, xenophobic agenda over the blood and misery of innocent people.

The Daily Mail “journalist” Katie Hopkins stands out. Having engaged in all manner of xenophobic and downright callous declarations in the past, Hopkins has called for a “final solution” for British Islam. It’s not known if she really intended to imitate a certain Austrian statesman known for also holding a dim view of foreigners (Hopkins is not renowned for her intellect) but all the same, the rhetoric is unsettling.

She’s not alone. The notorious Tommy Robinson was eager to weigh in. For those lucky enough to have not heard of this titan of political erudition, Robinson is the former leader of the bizarrely named “English Defence League” (EDL), itself a now increasingly moribund collection of thugs and football hooligans seeking their latest buzz via far right politics and hate.

True to form, Robinson was quick to point out that the Manchester attack was symptomatic of the alleged problem of Islam in Britain. Rather than being intertwined with foreign policy, societal breakdown and the mounting fragmentation of the Middle East, the recent bloodshed was purely down to the presence of an Islamic community fully intermeshed with terrorism.  As mentioned, Robinson is a titan of political erudition. Let there be no further doubt.

Sarcasm aside, I won’t be surprising anyone by pointing out that British politics have lurched to the right. The careless, self-serving agenda of pundits like Robinson and Hopkins may thus not just be annoying but palpably dangerous. Indeed, the recent call for a snap election is largely predicated on machinations surrounding Brexit, itself a subject infected with nationalistic rhetoric. It’s no exaggerations that such sentiments have already turned into something far uglier, with racial hate crimes having proliferated across the nation in the wake of the EU referendum last year.

This led to some pretty grim scenarios. In addition to acts of verbal abuse and open harassment, the situation soon escalated, with violence against those deemed not suitably “British” taking place.  I don’t think it’s unreasonable to suggest that last night’s attack could have similar consequences. Reports are already coming in of a suspected arson attack on a Manchester Mosque. Partisanship and irresponsibility on the part of the media could escalate matters. Provocative, indeed shameless, remarks from various “journalists” could thus be incredibly perilous.

An easy rebuttal would be to point out that Tommy Robinson is just a lunatic. There’d be some sizeable logic behind this position. His political fortunes have been on the wane in recent years, with his dramatic departure from the EDL ensuring he casts a sad figure on Britain’s political landscape. All the same, he does retain some influence and he’ll no doubt seek to use the recent tragedy to pursue something of a personal and political resurgence. Being a part of a supposed “lunatic fringe” also doesn’t exactly make him harmless. The experience of the EDL points to the fact.

This isn’t the entire picture. Katie Hopkins herself writes for the Daily Mail, itself one of the largest circulating newspaper in the entire UK. To say there isn’t a meeting of minds between the editorship of such a paper and Katie’s incessant xenophobia would be a profound mistake. Hopes that the DM will finally part ways with Hopkin’s after her truly moronic “final solution” quip seem ill founded. If anything, such an esteemed paper will simply view the situation in Manchester as a means to further their incessantly low quality brand of tabloid propaganda. The truth, or indeed the consequences of failing to convey the truth, won’t be a priority for them.

In fact Katie’s Hitlerite rhetoric is quite appropriate. In addition to being a tried and tested platform for “conservative” politics in modernity, the Daily Mail’s early years saw it falling over itself active support the far-right, being a distinguished fan of both General Francisco Franco and the Nazi Fuhrer himself. In the former case, the DM was only to happy to publish Franco’s first-English language interview, with the esteemed officer going into some detail on the reasons behind his betrayal of his own government and the escalation of a war that ultimately killed hundreds of thousands of his own people.

Titled “General Franco Talks” the DM awarded the budding fascist the accolade of “commander in chief of the southern anti-red army”. No doubt pleased with such a grandiose title, Franco made an “appeal for the great nations for sympathy in our struggle against destructive Bolshevism”, in the process making the truly original analysis that “communism triumphant spells the destruction of western civilisation and religion”.

It didn’t end there. The DM’s then owner, Harold Harmsworth, went on to not only fraternise with Adolf Hitler, but actually endorsed Britain’s own variant of Nazism, headed by none other than Sir Oswald Mosley and his infamous British Union of Fascists. Harmsworth was hardly shy about displaying his enthusiasm for such a group, penning a DM article titled “Hurrah for the Blackshirts” and lauding Mosley for his “sound, common sense, Conservative doctrine”.

Times may have indeed changed for the Daily Mail. We are most certainly not living in the 1930s. All the same it’s important to know who we are dealing with here. The DM’s reputation for partisan conservatism has survived to this day. It is markedly unlikely that they will decide to swim against the stream of anti-Muslim rhetoric that is already pouring from the social media presence of individuals like Hopkins. If anything, they’ll attempt to bring such “insights” to a yet wider audience.

The fact that the man allegedly responsible for the Manchester atrocity, one Salman Abedi, was born in the UK won’t make much of a difference here. The details won’t matter. The wider truth won’t either. Unless checked with a suitable response from the left, there’s a very real risk of this situation could take a yet greater turn for the worse.

More articles by:

Daniel Read is a UK-based journalist specialising in human rights and international affairs. He originally studied journalism at Kingston University, London, prior to obtaining post-graduate degrees in both human rights and global politics. He blogs at uncommonsense.me and tweets at @DanielTRead.

January 16, 2019
Patrick Bond
Jim Yong Kim’s Mixed Messages to the World Bank and the World
John Grant
Joe Biden, Crime Fighter from Hell
Alvaro Huerta
Brief History Notes on Mexican Immigration to the U.S.
Kenneth Surin
A Great Speaker of the UK’s House of Commons
Elizabeth Henderson
Why Sustainable Agriculture Should Support a Green New Deal
Binoy Kampmark
Trump, Bolton and the Syrian Confusion
Jeff Mackler
Trump’s Syria Exit Tweet Provokes Washington Panic
Barbara Nimri Aziz
How Long Can Nepal Blame Others for Its Woes?
Glenn Sacks
LA Teachers’ Strike: When Just One Man Says, “No”
Cesar Chelala
Violence Against Women: A Pandemic No Longer Hidden
Kim C. Domenico
To Make a Vineyard of the Curse: Fate, Fatalism and Freedom
Dave Lindorff
Criminalizing BDS Trashes Free Speech & Association
Thomas Knapp
Now More Than Ever, It’s Clear the FBI Must Go
Binoy Kampmark
Dances of Disinformation: The Partisan Politics of the Integrity Initiative
Andrew Stewart
The Green New Deal Must be Centered on African American and Indigenous Workers to Differentiate Itself From the Democratic Party: Part Two
Edward Curtin
A Gentrified Little Town Goes to Pot
January 15, 2019
Patrick Cockburn
Refugees Are in the English Channel Because of Western Interventions in the Middle East
Howard Lisnoff
The Faux Political System by the Numbers
Lawrence Davidson
Amos Oz and the Real Israel
John W. Whitehead
Beware the Emergency State
John Laforge
Loudmouths against Nuclear Lawlessness
Myles Hoenig
Labor in the Age of Trump
Jeff Cohen
Mainstream Media Bias on 2020 Democratic Race Already in High Gear
Dean Baker
Will Paying for Kidneys Reduce the Transplant Wait List?
George Ochenski
Trump’s Wall and the Montana Senate’s Theater of the Absurd
Binoy Kampmark
Dances of Disinformation: the Partisan Politics of the Integrity Initiative
Glenn Sacks
On the Picket Lines: Los Angeles Teachers Go On Strike for First Time in 30 Years
Jonah Raskin
Love in a Cold War Climate
Andrew Stewart
The Green New Deal Must be Centered on African American and Indigenous Workers to Differentiate Itself From the Democratic Party
January 14, 2019
Kenn Orphan
The Tears of Justin Trudeau
Julia Stein
California Needs a 10-Year Green New Deal
Dean Baker
Declining Birth Rates: Is the US in Danger of Running Out of People?
Robert Fisk
The US Media has Lost One of Its Sanest Voices on Military Matters
Vijay Prashad
5.5 Million Women Build Their Wall
Nicky Reid
Lessons From Rojava
Ted Rall
Here is the Progressive Agenda
Robert Koehler
A Green Future is One Without War
Gary Leupp
The Chickens Come Home to Roost….in Northern Syria
Glenn Sacks
LA Teachers’ Strike: “The Country Is Watching”
Sam Gordon
Who Are Northern Ireland’s Democratic Unionists?
Weekend Edition
January 11, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Richard Moser
Neoliberalism: Free Market Fundamentalism or Corporate Power?
Paul Street
Bordering on Fascism: Scholars Reflect on Dangerous Times
Joseph Majerle III – Matthew Stevenson
Who or What Brought Down Dag Hammarskjöld?
Jeffrey St. Clair - Joshua Frank
How Tre Arrow Became America’s Most Wanted Environmental “Terrorist”
Andrew Levine
Dealbreakers: The Democrats, Trump and His Wall
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail