FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Death By Demigod

When I look at the state of affairs of American politics and the planet I realize like many people we are in desperate times.

We can sit back and analyze The Orange Barbarian’s every move as President and The Democrats making a mockery of the word “resistance”, or we can look at how this is playing out from 10,000 feet above.

The 10,000 foot view would show The United States has been making little progress in providing a fair and equal society for minorities, the poor, and ecosystems partly because American politics has become so polarizing.

This political polarization is tearing us apart and preventing us from working together.  The biggest reason for this polarization is the fact that people in each sphere of the political spectrum give others the status of Demigod.  These Demigods have also been self appointed and we have all allowed this.

The definition of a Demigod is a being with partial or lesser divine status, such as a minor deity, the offspring of a god and a mortal, or a mortal raised to divine rank.

What happens is a political thinker or someone in the political media puts out a book, podcast, or article that deeply affected us.  We do a little independent research into their work which solidifies our belief into the person and then bam….they are elevated to Demigod status.

We start taking every thought jettisoned from their brain as truth.  We stop our own independent research.  We lazily expect them to solve all our problems and show us how to live.  We find ourselves fitting into their paradigm on life instead of using their work to create our own paradigm.

This is the where the polarization occurs.  Once I find out you follow a certain political thinker or figure I instantly lash out at you and say well if you follow this person’s work that also means you subscribe to x, y, and z.

And you know what the biggest problem is…you fall for it and go on the defensive.  You do this because you have elevated the person to Demigod status and when I question your Demigod’s worldview, to you I am questioning your world.  This happens because you fail to follow up on the latest thoughts from your Demigod.  You fail to vigilantly conduct your own independent research.

If you continued with your own research with a goal of creating your own paradigm you would respond to my challenge by saying actually I only subscribe to x, not y and z or maybe you would subscribe to all three, but at least you independently came to that conclusion.  You wouldn’t respond to my challenge in such a polarizing way that would turn into a heated confrontation. Maybe if this happened more often things wouldn’t be so polarizing and we could work together and accomplish more.

What I am asking you to do is create your own paradigm and continue to question everything.  It’s ok to disagree with a political figure or thinker on an item.  That doesn’t mean you have to cut them off from your paradigm.

I want you to look at creating your paradigm like creating a meal.  What they should both should consist of is recipes.  Here’s an example of my political recipe that shapes my paradigm or worldview:

-2 cups of Guy McPherson, Derrick Jensen, Chris Hedges, Vince Emanuele, and Mike Sliwa

-A cup and a half of Paul Street, Jeffrey St Clair, Eric Draister, Dahr Jamail, and Gary Null

-A cup of Abby Martin, Robbie Martin, Utrice Leid, Jeremy Schahill, Ben Norton, Graham Hancock, Ralph Nader, Henry Giroux, Gerald Horne, and Kshama Sawant

-A tablespoon of Bernie Sanders, The Young Turks, and Tulsi Gabbard

-A pinch of the Democrat Party’s stance on a few social issues

And voila there you have my worldview.

As a writer and thinker all I hope for is to make it into your recipe somehow and someway.  I don’t care if it’s two cups of your recipe or just a pinch of your recipe.

And what I hope is you question my work and challenge me.  This is what is going to make me a better writer and thinker.  I also hope if you disagree with me on something it’s ok for us to agree to disagree, but let’s still interact because we can learn from one another.  We must realize we can have different dynamics in our lives then these Demigods and that’s ok.

Things are continuing to deteriorate.  Each year more species are going extinct, we are polluting more air, more water, and losing more habitat.  And still the capitalist elites our on a gluttony bender of solidifying systems that pillage the living planet like we have never seen before.

And at this point whatever future we have left as a species is going to call for us to work together, and help ease the suffering that is happening now and will continue to happen on epic proportions.

So I ask you all to ditch the Demigod mentality and recreate your recipes.

More articles by:
Weekend Edition
September 21, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Paul Street
Laquan McDonald is Being Tried for His Own Racist Murder
Brad Evans
What Does It Mean to Celebrate International Peace Day?
Alexandra Isfahani-Hammond
Hurricane Florence and 9.7 Million Pigs
Nick Pemberton
With or Without Kavanaugh, The United States Is Anti-Choice
Andrew Levine
Israel’s Anti-Semitism Smear Campaign
Jim Kavanagh
“Taxpayer Money” Threatens Medicare-for-All (And Every Other Social Program)
Jonathan Cook
Palestine: The Testbed for Trump’s Plan to Tear up the Rules-Based International Order
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: the Chickenhawks Have Finally Come Back Home to Roost!
David Rosen
As the Capitalist World Turns: From Empire to Imperialism to Globalization?
Jonah Raskin
Green Capitalism Rears Its Head at Global Climate Action Summit
James Munson
On Climate, the Centrists are the Deplorables
Robert Hunziker
Is Paris 2015 Already Underwater?
Arshad Khan
Will Their Ever be Justice for Rohingya Muslims?
Jill Richardson
Why Women Don’t Report Sexual Assault
Dave Clennon
A Victory for Historical Accuracy and the Peace Movement: Not One Emmy for Ken Burns and “The Vietnam War”
W. T. Whitney
US Harasses Cuba Amid Mysterious Circumstances
Nathan Kalman-Lamb
Things That Make Sports Fans Uncomfortable
George Capaccio
Iran: “Snapping Back” Sanctions and the Threat of War
Kenneth Surin
Brexit is Coming, But Which Will It Be?
Louis Proyect
Moore’s “Fahrenheit 11/9”: Entertaining Film, Crappy Politics
Ramzy Baroud
Why Israel Demolishes: Khan Al-Ahmar as Representation of Greater Genocide
Ben Dangl
The Zapatistas’ Dignified Rage: Revolutionary Theories and Anticapitalist Dreams of Subcommandante Marcos
Ron Jacobs
Faith, Madness, or Death
Bill Glahn
Crime Comes Knocking
Terry Heaton
Pat Robertson’s Hurricane “Miracle”
Dave Lindorff
In Montgomery County PA, It’s Often a Jury of White People
Louis Yako
From Citizens to Customers: the Corporate Customer Service Culture in America 
William Boardman
The Shame of Dianne Feinstein, the Courage of Christine Blasey Ford 
Ernie Niemi
Logging and Climate Change: Oregon is Appalachia and Timber is Our Coal
Jessicah Pierre
Nike Says “Believe in Something,” But Can It Sacrifice Something, Too?
Paul Fitzgerald - Elizabeth Gould
Weaponized Dreams? The Curious Case of Robert Moss
Olivia Alperstein
An Environmental 9/11: the EPA’s Gutting of Methane Regulations
Ted Rall
Why Christine Ford vs. Brett Kavanaugh is a Train Wreck You Can’t Look Away From
Lauren Regan
The Day the Valves Turned: Defending the Pipeline Protesters
Ralph Nader
Questions, Questions Where are the Answers?
Binoy Kampmark
Deplatforming Germaine Greer
Raouf Halaby
It Should Not Be A He Said She Said Verdict
Robert Koehler
The Accusation That Wouldn’t Go Away
Jim Hightower
Amazon is Making Workers Tweet About How Great It is to Work There
Robby Sherwin
Rabbi, Rabbi, Where For Art Thou Rabbi?
Vern Loomis
Has Something Evil This Way Come?
Steve Baggarly
Disarm Trident Walk Ends in Georgia
Graham Peebles
Priorities of the Time: Peace
Michael Doliner
The Department of Demonization
David Yearsley
Bollocks to Brexit: the Plumber Sings
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail