FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Tulsi Gabbard Challenges “Shoot First, Ask Questions Later” Syria Policy

by

In response to a chemical weapon attack in Syria, the Trump Administration increase U.S. involvement in the war in Syria through airstrikes on the Syrian Government. Though the United Nations

The act received bipartisan support, despite the Hague’s Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons has not yet attributed the attack to the Syrian Government pending an investigation. At the United Nations Security Council, Italy’s Delegate Sebastiano Cardi called a military approach from the International Community in Syria “wrong and delusional” adding, “the solution will never be found through military means.” China, Japan, Bolivia, Uruguay, Egypt, and several other countries affirmed an investigation by the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons needed to be completed to confirm the attack.

In 2013, the United States, UK, and France attributed a Sarin Gas attack to the Syrian Government, only for the United Nations to debunk that claim, citing rebel forces conducted the attack, though the Syrian Government and ISIS have been known to use chemical weapons throughout the past six years of war, making a knee-jerk assessment irresponsible. Nor should the attack immediately elicit the United States overriding an International investigation and solution to increase its involvement in the war. The CIA has already funded Syrian rebels who have been known to work with terrorist groups to the tune of $1 billion annually for most of the war, and the Trump Administration has quietly been increasing U.S. troops on the ground in Syria. The Los Angeles Times interviewed a civilian on the ground in Syria where the airstrikes were conducted, who told them the attack was ““proof that the U.S. helps Daesh,” referring to ISIS.

“This administration has acted recklessly without care or consideration of the dire consequences of the United States attack on Syria without waiting for the collection of evidence from the scene of the chemical poisoning,” said Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI), an Iraq War Veteran and currently serving as a Major in Hawaii’s National Guard, in a statement, asserting she would support Assad’s prosecution and execution as a war criminal if the attacks were proven. “”A successful prosecution of Assad (at the International Criminal Court) will require collection of evidence from the scene of the incident, and I support the United Nation’s efforts in this regard. Without such evidence, a successful prosecution is impossible.” Gabbard warned that escalating military intervention would ” mean more dead civilians, more refugees, the strengthening of terrorists, and a possible nuclear war between the United States and Russia.”

Opposing the war in Syria and the increased U.S. involvement in the country’s civil war is being misconstrued by pro-war enthusiasts on both sides of the political aisle as pro-Putin or alt-right to reduce all anti-war sentiments on grounds of aligning with unpopular factions. Center for American Progress’ Neera Tanden and former DNC Chair turned corporate lobbyist Howard Dean criticized Gabbard for her anti-war stance, claiming she shouldn’t be in congress. Tanden’s Think Tank is funded by the military industrial complex through companies like Boeing and Lockheed Martin, who have used the think tank with other corporations in lieu of lobbyists to propagate their own agendas.

Rather, opposing an interventionist foreign policy is predicated on acknowledging the implications of U.S. meddling in foreign military conflicts and a historical awareness of the disastrous consequences it produces.

“I’m sorry to say our greatest challenge is trying to avoid a war with Russia. We’ve gotten to a point where that is a real possibility,” said Former Secretary of Defense under Bill Clinton, William J. Perry at a conference held by Stanford University in December 2016. “I would go one step farther than that and say that if we get in any kind of military conflict, even a relatively small military conflict, the danger of it escalating is great. The Russians knowing they are outgunned in conventional forces by the United States and NATO have made it quite clear they would move to what they call tactical nuclear weapons. Nobody who has thought about this problem seriously at all believes that once you go to tactical nuclear weapons there is any way of keeping that from escalating to a general nuclear war. So the greatest challenge we have today is avoiding that first step to a military conflict, because once that starts, nobody knows how to control the escalation.”

Unfortunately, the political climate has been hijacked by Clinton partisans and neo-con war hawks like Senator John McCain (R-AZ) who transmogrify any standard de-escalation or easing of tensions between the United States and another Nuclear super power as a dubious, evil conspiracy.

More articles by:

Michael Sainato’s writing has appeared in the Guardian, Miami Herald, Baltimore Sun, Denver Post, Buffalo News, the Hill, Alternet, and several other publications . Follow him on twitter: @MSainat1

January 17, 2018
Seiji Yamada
Prevention is the Only Solution: a Hiroshima Native’s View of Nuclear Weapons
Chris Welzenbach
Force of Evil: Abraham Polonsky and Anti-Capitalist Noir
Thomas Klikauer
The Business of Bullshit
Howard Lisnoff
The Atomized and Siloed U.S. Left
Martha Rosenberg
How Big Pharma Infiltrated the Boston Museum of Science
George Wuerthner
The Collaboration Trap
David Swanson
Removing Trump Will Require New Activists
Michael McKinley
Australia and the Wars of the Alliance: United States Strategy
Binoy Kampmark
Macron in China
Cesar Chelala
The Distractor-in-Chief
Ted Rall
Why Trump is Right About Newspaper Libel Laws
Mary Serumaga
Corruption in Uganda: Minister Sam Kutesa and Company May Yet Survive Their Latest Scandal
January 16, 2018
Mark Schuller
What is a “Shithole Country” and Why is Trump So Obsessed With Haiti?
Paul Street
Notes From a “Shithole” Superpower
Louisa Willcox
Keeper of the Flame for Wilderness: Stewart “Brandy” Brandborg
Mike Whitney
Trump’s Sinister Plan to Kill the Iranian “Nukes” Deal
Franklin Lamb
Kafkaesque Impediments to Challenging Iran’s Theocracy
Norman Solomon
Why Senator Cardin is a Fitting Opponent for Chelsea Manning
Fred Gardner
GI Coffeehouses Recalled: a Compliment From General Westmoreland
Brian Terrell
Solidarity from Central Cellblock to Guantanamo
Don Fitz
Bondage Scandal: Looking Beneath the Surface
Rob Seimetz
#Resist Co-opting “Shithole”
Ted Rall
Trump Isn’t Unique
January 15, 2018
Rob Urie
Democrats and the End(s) of Politics
Paul Tritschler
Killing Floor: the Business of Animal Slaughter
Mike Garrity
In Targeting the Lynx, the Trump Administration Defies Facts, Law, and Science Once Again
Thomas Hon Wing Polin
Hong Kong Politics: a Never-Ending Farce
Uri Avnery
Bibi’s Son (Or Three Men in a Car)
Dave Lindorff
Yesterday’s ‘Shithole Countries’ Can Become Classy Places Donald, and Vice Versa
Jeff Mackler
Lesser Evil Politics in Alabama
Jonah Raskin
Typewriters Still Smoking? An Interview with Underground Press Maven John Campbell McMillan
Jose-Antonio Orosco
Trump’s Comments Recall a Racist Past in Immigration Policy
David Macaray
Everything Seems to Be Going South
Kathy Kelly
41 Hearts Beating in Guantanamo
Weekend Edition
January 12, 2018
Friday - Sunday
George Burchett
Wormwood and a Shocking Secret of War: How Errol Morris Vindicated My Father, Wilfred Burchett
Roberto J. González
Starting Them Young: Is Facebook Hooking Children on Social Media?
Jeffrey St. Clair
Between the Null and the Void
Andrew Levine
Trump After Bannon: What Next?
John Davis
Mud-Slide
Ajamu Baraka
The Responsibility to Protect the World … from the United States
Robert Hunziker
Global Warming Stirs the Methane Monster
Paul Street
Lazy Liberals and “the Trump Effect”
Carmen Rodriguez
Trump’s Attack on Salvadoran Migrants
Mike Whitney
Oprah for President, Really?
Francisco Cabanillas
The Hurricane After Maria
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail