FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Trump’s Terrifying War Agenda

The missile attack on a Syrian government airfield is an act of war and a violation of international law, using a fabricated pretext.  But in conjunction with the attack something even more menacing, and with terrifying far-reaching consequences,has appeared:  A new policy which represents the complete short-circuiting of the right of the American public, and of the U.S. Congress, to discuss and decide upon acts of war.

Decisions to go to war are decisions of life and death for human beings.  They are the most important deci sons any group of people, or any government, can make.  The U.S. constitution, for very good reason,reserves that power to a civilian body, namely the U.S. congress.   What’s more, the constitutional guarantees of free speech and free assembly allow for public discussion – and political actions such as demonstrations – when decisions of war or peace are being made.

Despite the progressive undermining of these rights in recent years, they had retained until now a certain weight.

Before the 2003 invasion of Iraq, for example, there was an extended period of public discussoin, and millions of people worldwide protested against the U.S. governments plan for the invasion, and the U.S. congress was consulted and passed an authorization of the attadk.

In 2013 the Obama regime was determined to directly attack Syria, using the pretext of supposed poison gas use by the Syrian government.   The U.S. congress was duly consulted for authorization, and when constituent messages from the U.S. public to Congress people ran up to eight-to-one against an attack, the plan was scrapped.

Now, however, the Trump regime has publicly proclaimed a new policy of what might be called ‘no pre announcing’ of warfare.  This policy short-circuits and eliminates the previously taken for granted notion that the public has a right to consider, and the Congress to deliberate, before acts of war take place.   Now the public and the Congress need *not* be consulted or even informed before acts of war are carried out by the U.S. military-security system in collaboration with whoever happens to be president.

Just prior to the attack on the Syrian airfield, Trumps press secretary announced: “I think the president has made it clear in the past and will reiterate that today, that he is not here to telegraph what we’re going to do. But rest assured that I think he has been speaking with his national security team this morning, and we will continue to have that discussion.”

Similarly, a Pentagon spokesperson recently stated: “In order to maintain tactical surprise, ensure operational security and force protection, the coalition will not routinely announce or confirm information about the capabilities, force numbers, locations,w or movement of forces in or out of Iraq and Syria.”

The U.S. working class, the vast majority of the U.S. population, has repeatedly shown that after 25 years of war in Afganistan, Iraq, Libya, and elsewhere it does not want further U.S. wars of aggression in the Middle East or elsewhere.   Behind the smokescreen of ‘protecting our forces’ or ‘maintaining operational effectiveness’ lies the reality:  Trumps government – in which military generals occupy all important military-related and security positions – seeks to completely remove the U.S. public, the U.S. congress, and the U.S. constitution from decisions of war and peace.

The policy of ‘no pre-announcing’ means that acts of war against Syria today, or against North Korea or another country tommorow, are to be decided only by military generals, NSA and CIA officials, and the president.  They are to be decided behind the backs of the American people, and made known to them only after the military action has begun, as accomplished facts which they can do nothing about.

This short-circuiting of the American peoples input on issues of war and peace must be resisted by every available means.  The Washington war criminals have already created too many flash points, any one of which can spiral out of control into war involving nuclear  armed powers.  U.S.-led Nato forces are currently threatenngly concentrating on the borders of Russia; U.S. provocations continue against China in the South China sea; and there are daily threats of military action against North Korea, to name just the danger points currently in the news.

In this situation, allowing Donald Trump, together with a group of military generals, and spooks from the CIA and NSA to sit in a room to decide on war and peace behind the backs of the American people is also to permit them to trigger not only new wars but  a nuclear war.  They must be stopped.

More articles by:

Eric Sommer is an international journalist.

Weekend Edition
June 22, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Karl Grossman
Star Wars Redux: Trump’s Space Force
Andrew Levine
Strange Bedfellows
Jeffrey St. Clair
Intolerable Opinions in an Intolerant Time
Paul Street
None of Us are Free, One of Us is Chained
Edward Curtin
Slow Suicide and the Abandonment of the World
Celina Stien-della Croce
The ‘Soft Coup’ and the Attack on the Brazilian People 
James Bovard
Pro-War Media Deserve Slamming, Not Sainthood
Louisa Willcox
My Friend Margot Kidder: Sharing a Love of Dogs, the Wild, and Speaking Truth to Power
David Rosen
Trump’s War on Sex
Mir Alikhan
Trump, North Korea, and the Death of IR Theory
Christopher Jones
Neoliberalism, Pipelines, and Canadian Political Economy
Barbara Nimri Aziz
Why is Tariq Ramadan Imprisoned?
Robert Fantina
MAGA, Trump Style
Linn Washington Jr.
Justice System Abuses Mothers with No Apologies
Martha Rosenberg
Questions About a Popular Antibiotic Class
Ida Audeh
A Watershed Moment in Palestinian History: Interview with Jamal Juma’
Edward Hunt
The Afghan War is Killing More People Than Ever
Geoff Dutton
Electrocuting Oral Tradition
Don Fitz
When Cuban Polyclinics Were Born
Ramzy Baroud
End the Wars to Halt the Refugee Crisis
Ralph Nader
The Unsurpassed Power trip by an Insuperable Control Freak
Lara Merling
The Pain of Puerto Ricans is a Profit Source for Creditors
James Jordan
Struggle and Defiance at Colombia’s Feast of Pestilence
Tamara Pearson
Indifference to a Hellish World
Kathy Kelly
Hungering for Nuclear Disarmament
Jessicah Pierre
Celebrating the End of Slavery, With One Big Asterisk
Rohullah Naderi
The Ever-Shrinking Space for Hazara Ethnic Group
Binoy Kampmark
Leaving the UN Human Rights Council
Nomi Prins 
How Trump’s Trade Wars Could Lead to a Great Depression
Robert Fisk
Can Former Lebanese MP Mustafa Alloush Turn Even the Coldest of Middle Eastern Sceptics into an Optimist?
Franklin Lamb
Could “Tough Love” Salvage Lebanon?
George Ochenski
Why Wild Horse Island is Still Wild
Ann Garrison
Nikki Haley: Damn the UNHRC and the Rest of You Too
Jonah Raskin
What’s Hippie Food? A Culinary Quest for the Real Deal
Raouf Halaby
Give It Up, Ya Mahmoud
Brian Wakamo
We Subsidize the Wrong Kind of Agriculture
Patrick Higgins
Children in Cages Create Glimmers of the Moral Reserve
Patrick Bobilin
What Does Optimism Look Like Now?
Don Qaswa
A Reduction of Economic Warfare and Bombing Might Help 
Robin Carver
Why We Still Need Pride Parades
Jill Richardson
Immigrant Kids are Suffering From Trauma That Will Last for Years
Thomas Mountain
USA’s “Soft” Coup in Ethiopia?
Jim Hightower
Big Oil’s Man in Foreign Policy
Louis Proyect
Civilization and Its Absence
David Yearsley
Midsummer Music Even the Nazis Couldn’t Stamp Out
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail