FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Trump’s Terrifying War Agenda

The missile attack on a Syrian government airfield is an act of war and a violation of international law, using a fabricated pretext.  But in conjunction with the attack something even more menacing, and with terrifying far-reaching consequences,has appeared:  A new policy which represents the complete short-circuiting of the right of the American public, and of the U.S. Congress, to discuss and decide upon acts of war.

Decisions to go to war are decisions of life and death for human beings.  They are the most important deci sons any group of people, or any government, can make.  The U.S. constitution, for very good reason,reserves that power to a civilian body, namely the U.S. congress.   What’s more, the constitutional guarantees of free speech and free assembly allow for public discussion – and political actions such as demonstrations – when decisions of war or peace are being made.

Despite the progressive undermining of these rights in recent years, they had retained until now a certain weight.

Before the 2003 invasion of Iraq, for example, there was an extended period of public discussoin, and millions of people worldwide protested against the U.S. governments plan for the invasion, and the U.S. congress was consulted and passed an authorization of the attadk.

In 2013 the Obama regime was determined to directly attack Syria, using the pretext of supposed poison gas use by the Syrian government.   The U.S. congress was duly consulted for authorization, and when constituent messages from the U.S. public to Congress people ran up to eight-to-one against an attack, the plan was scrapped.

Now, however, the Trump regime has publicly proclaimed a new policy of what might be called ‘no pre announcing’ of warfare.  This policy short-circuits and eliminates the previously taken for granted notion that the public has a right to consider, and the Congress to deliberate, before acts of war take place.   Now the public and the Congress need *not* be consulted or even informed before acts of war are carried out by the U.S. military-security system in collaboration with whoever happens to be president.

Just prior to the attack on the Syrian airfield, Trumps press secretary announced: “I think the president has made it clear in the past and will reiterate that today, that he is not here to telegraph what we’re going to do. But rest assured that I think he has been speaking with his national security team this morning, and we will continue to have that discussion.”

Similarly, a Pentagon spokesperson recently stated: “In order to maintain tactical surprise, ensure operational security and force protection, the coalition will not routinely announce or confirm information about the capabilities, force numbers, locations,w or movement of forces in or out of Iraq and Syria.”

The U.S. working class, the vast majority of the U.S. population, has repeatedly shown that after 25 years of war in Afganistan, Iraq, Libya, and elsewhere it does not want further U.S. wars of aggression in the Middle East or elsewhere.   Behind the smokescreen of ‘protecting our forces’ or ‘maintaining operational effectiveness’ lies the reality:  Trumps government – in which military generals occupy all important military-related and security positions – seeks to completely remove the U.S. public, the U.S. congress, and the U.S. constitution from decisions of war and peace.

The policy of ‘no pre-announcing’ means that acts of war against Syria today, or against North Korea or another country tommorow, are to be decided only by military generals, NSA and CIA officials, and the president.  They are to be decided behind the backs of the American people, and made known to them only after the military action has begun, as accomplished facts which they can do nothing about.

This short-circuiting of the American peoples input on issues of war and peace must be resisted by every available means.  The Washington war criminals have already created too many flash points, any one of which can spiral out of control into war involving nuclear  armed powers.  U.S.-led Nato forces are currently threatenngly concentrating on the borders of Russia; U.S. provocations continue against China in the South China sea; and there are daily threats of military action against North Korea, to name just the danger points currently in the news.

In this situation, allowing Donald Trump, together with a group of military generals, and spooks from the CIA and NSA to sit in a room to decide on war and peace behind the backs of the American people is also to permit them to trigger not only new wars but  a nuclear war.  They must be stopped.

More articles by:

Eric Sommer is an international journalist.

April 19, 2018
Ramzy Baroud
Media Cover-up: Shielding Israel is a Matter of Policy
Vijay Prashad
Undermining Brazilian Democracy: the Curious Saga of Lula
Steve Fraser
Class Dismissed: Class Conflict in Red State America
John W. Whitehead
Crimes of a Monster: Your Tax Dollars at Work
Kenn Orphan
Whistling Past the Graveyard
Karl Grossman - TJ Coles
Opening Pandora’s Box: Karl Grossman on Trump and the Weaponization of Space
Colin Todhunter
Behind Theresa May’s ‘Humanitarian Hysterics’: The Ideology of Empire and Conquest
Jesse Jackson
Syrian Strikes is One More step Toward a Lawless Presidency
Michael Welton
Confronting Militarism is Early Twentieth Century Canada: the Woman’s International League for Peace and Freedom
Alycee Lane
On David S. Buckel and Setting Ourselves on Fire
Jennifer Matsui
Our Overlords Reveal Their Top ‘To Do’s: Are YOU Next On Their Kill List?
George Ochenski
Jive Talkin’: On the Campaign Trail With Montana Republicans
Kary Love
Is It Time for A Nice, “Little” Nuclear War?
April 18, 2018
Alan Nasser
Could Student Loans Lead to Debt Prison? The Handwriting on the Wall
Susan Roberts
Uses for the Poor
Alvaro Huerta
I Am Not Your “Wetback”
Jonah Raskin
Napa County, California: the Clash of Oligarchy & Democracy
Robert Hunziker
America’s Dystopian Future
Geoffrey McDonald
“America First!” as Economic War
Jonathan Cook
Robert Fisk’s Douma Report Rips Away Excuses for Air Strike on Syria
Jeff Berg
WW III This Ain’t
Binoy Kampmark
Macron’s Syria Game
Linn Washington Jr.
Philadelphia’s Top Cop Defends Indefensible Prejudice in Starbucks Arrest Incident
Katie Fite
Chaos in Urban Canyons – Air Force Efforts to Carve a Civilian Population War Game Range across Southern Idaho
Robby Sherwin
Facebook: This Is Where I Leave You
April 17, 2018
Paul Street
Eight Takeaways on Boss Tweet’s Latest Syrian Missile Spasm
Robert Fisk
The Search for the Truth in Douma
Eric Mann
The Historic 1968 Struggle Against Columbia University
Roy Eidelson
The 1%’s Mind Games: Psychology Gone Bad
John Steppling
The Sleep of Civilization
Patrick Cockburn
Syria Bombing Reveals Weakness of Theresa May
Dave Lindorff
No Indication in the US That the Country is at War Again
W. T. Whitney
Colombia and Cuba:  a Tale of Two Countries
Dean Baker
Why Isn’t the Median Wage for Black Workers Rising?
Linn Washington Jr.
Philadelphia’s Top Cop Defends Indefensible Prejudice in Starbucks Arrest Incident
C. L. Cook
Man in the Glass
Kary Love
“The Mob Boss Orders a Hit and a Pardon”
Lawrence Wittner
Which Nations Are the Happiest―and Why
Dr. Hakim
Where on Earth is the Just Economy that Works for All, Including Afghan Children?
April 16, 2018
Dave Lindorff
President Trump’s War Crime is Worse than the One He Accuses Assad of
Ron Jacobs
War is Just F**kin’ Wrong
John Laforge
Nuclear Keeps on Polluting, Long After Shutdown
Norman Solomon
Missile Attack on Syria Is a Salute to “Russiagate” Enthusiasts, Whether They Like It or Not
Uri Avnery
Eyeless in Gaza   
Barbara Nimri Aziz
Iraq Then, Syria Now
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail