FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Trump’s Terrifying War Agenda

The missile attack on a Syrian government airfield is an act of war and a violation of international law, using a fabricated pretext.  But in conjunction with the attack something even more menacing, and with terrifying far-reaching consequences,has appeared:  A new policy which represents the complete short-circuiting of the right of the American public, and of the U.S. Congress, to discuss and decide upon acts of war.

Decisions to go to war are decisions of life and death for human beings.  They are the most important deci sons any group of people, or any government, can make.  The U.S. constitution, for very good reason,reserves that power to a civilian body, namely the U.S. congress.   What’s more, the constitutional guarantees of free speech and free assembly allow for public discussion – and political actions such as demonstrations – when decisions of war or peace are being made.

Despite the progressive undermining of these rights in recent years, they had retained until now a certain weight.

Before the 2003 invasion of Iraq, for example, there was an extended period of public discussoin, and millions of people worldwide protested against the U.S. governments plan for the invasion, and the U.S. congress was consulted and passed an authorization of the attadk.

In 2013 the Obama regime was determined to directly attack Syria, using the pretext of supposed poison gas use by the Syrian government.   The U.S. congress was duly consulted for authorization, and when constituent messages from the U.S. public to Congress people ran up to eight-to-one against an attack, the plan was scrapped.

Now, however, the Trump regime has publicly proclaimed a new policy of what might be called ‘no pre announcing’ of warfare.  This policy short-circuits and eliminates the previously taken for granted notion that the public has a right to consider, and the Congress to deliberate, before acts of war take place.   Now the public and the Congress need *not* be consulted or even informed before acts of war are carried out by the U.S. military-security system in collaboration with whoever happens to be president.

Just prior to the attack on the Syrian airfield, Trumps press secretary announced: “I think the president has made it clear in the past and will reiterate that today, that he is not here to telegraph what we’re going to do. But rest assured that I think he has been speaking with his national security team this morning, and we will continue to have that discussion.”

Similarly, a Pentagon spokesperson recently stated: “In order to maintain tactical surprise, ensure operational security and force protection, the coalition will not routinely announce or confirm information about the capabilities, force numbers, locations,w or movement of forces in or out of Iraq and Syria.”

The U.S. working class, the vast majority of the U.S. population, has repeatedly shown that after 25 years of war in Afganistan, Iraq, Libya, and elsewhere it does not want further U.S. wars of aggression in the Middle East or elsewhere.   Behind the smokescreen of ‘protecting our forces’ or ‘maintaining operational effectiveness’ lies the reality:  Trumps government – in which military generals occupy all important military-related and security positions – seeks to completely remove the U.S. public, the U.S. congress, and the U.S. constitution from decisions of war and peace.

The policy of ‘no pre-announcing’ means that acts of war against Syria today, or against North Korea or another country tommorow, are to be decided only by military generals, NSA and CIA officials, and the president.  They are to be decided behind the backs of the American people, and made known to them only after the military action has begun, as accomplished facts which they can do nothing about.

This short-circuiting of the American peoples input on issues of war and peace must be resisted by every available means.  The Washington war criminals have already created too many flash points, any one of which can spiral out of control into war involving nuclear  armed powers.  U.S.-led Nato forces are currently threatenngly concentrating on the borders of Russia; U.S. provocations continue against China in the South China sea; and there are daily threats of military action against North Korea, to name just the danger points currently in the news.

In this situation, allowing Donald Trump, together with a group of military generals, and spooks from the CIA and NSA to sit in a room to decide on war and peace behind the backs of the American people is also to permit them to trigger not only new wars but  a nuclear war.  They must be stopped.

More articles by:

Eric Sommer is an international journalist.

November 15, 2018
Kenneth Surin
Ukania: the Land Where the Queen’s Son Has His Shoelaces Ironed by His Valet
Evaggelos Vallianatos
Spraying Poisons, Chasing Ghosts
Anthony DiMaggio
In the Wake of the Blue Wave: the Midterms, Recounts, and the Future of Progressive Politics
Christopher Ketcham
Build in a Fire Plain, Get What You Deserve
Meena Miriam Yust
Today It’s Treasure Island, Tomorrow Your Neighborhood Store: Could Local Currencies Help?
Karl Grossman
Climate of Rage
Walter Clemens
How Two Demagogues Inspired Their Followers
Brandon Lee
Radical Idealism: Jesus and the Radical Tradition
Kim C. Domenico
An Anarchist Uprising Against the Liberal Ego
Elliot Sperber
Pythagoras in Queens
November 14, 2018
Charles Pierson
Unstoppable: The Keystone XL Oil Pipeline and NAFTA
Sam Bahour
Israel’s Mockery of Security: 101 Actions Israel Could Take
Cesar Chelala
How a Bad Environment Impacts Children’s Health
George Ochenski
What Tester’s Win Means
Louisa Willcox
Saving Romania’s Brown Bears, Sharing Lessons About Coxistence, Conservation
George Wuerthner
Alternatives to Wilderness?
Robert Fisk
Izzeldin Abuelaish’s Three Daughters were Killed in Gaza, But He Still Clings to Hope for the Middle East
Dennis Morgan
For What?
Dana E. Abizaid
The Government is Our Teacher
Bill Martin
The Trump Experiment: Liberals and Leftists Unhinged and Around the Bend
Rivera Sun
After the Vote: An Essay of the Man from the North
Jamie McConnell
Allowing Asbestos to Continue Killing
Thomas Knapp
Talkin’ Jim Acosta Hard Pass Blues: Is White House Press Access a Constitutional Right?
Bill Glahn
Snow Day
November 13, 2018
Patrick Cockburn
The Midterm Results are Challenging Racism in America in Unexpected Ways
Victor Grossman
Germany on a Political Seesaw
Cillian Doyle
Fictitious Assets, Hidden Losses and the Collapse of MDM Bank
Lauren Smith
Amnesia and Impunity Reign: Wall Street Celebrates Halliburton’s 100th Anniversary
Joe Emersberger
Moreno’s Neoliberal Restoration Proceeds in Ecuador
Carol Dansereau
Climate and the Infernal Blue Wave: Straight Talk About Saving Humanity
Dave Lindorff
Hey Right Wingers! Signatures Change over Time
Dan Corjescu
Poetry and Barbarism: Adorno’s Challenge
Patrick Bond
Mining Conflicts Multiply, as Critics of ‘Extractivism’ Gather in Johannesburg
Ed Meek
The Kavanaugh Hearings: Text and Subtext
Binoy Kampmark
Concepts of Nonsense: Australian Soft Power
November 12, 2018
Kerron Ó Luain
Poppy Fascism and the English Education System
Conn Hallinan
Nuclear Treaties: Unwrapping Armageddon
Robert Hunziker
Tropical Trump Declares War on Amazonia
John W. Whitehead
Badge of Shame: the Government’s War on Military Veterans
Will Griffin
Military “Service” Serves the Ruling Class
John Eskow
Harold Pinter’s America: Hard Truths and Easy Targets
Rob Okun
Activists Looking Beyond Midterm Elections
Binoy Kampmark
Mid-Term Divisions: The Trump Take
Dean Baker
Short-Term Health Insurance Plans Destroy Insurance Pools
George Wuerthner
Saving the Buffalohorn/Porcupine: the Lamar Valley of the Gallatin Range
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail