The Trump-Republican AHCA is Really Just Obamacare Lite–Single Payer Now!

Interesting.  Paul Krugman, in response to the newly unveiledTrump-Republican American Health Care Act (AHCA), lays out his support for preserving the private health insurance system as clear as day:

The structure of the Affordable Care Act comes out of a straightforward analysis of the logic of coverage. If you want to make health insurance available and affordable for almost everyone, regardless of income or health status, and you want to do this through private insurers rather than simply have single-payer (empahasis added), you have to do three things:

1/ Regulate insurers so they can’t refuse or charge high premiums to people with preexisting conditions

2/ Impose some penalty on people who don’t buy insurance, to induce healthy people to sign up and provide a workable risk pool

3/ Subsidize premiums so that lower-income households can afford insurance

After trumpeting (sorry) the usual private health insurer-Democratic Party PR shtick about expanding the limited numbers of those who were covered by the increasingly unaffordable (higher premiums and deductables), and unacessible (shrinking provider network) Obamacare private health insurance, Krugman comes out with the truth:

… the GOP proposal basically accepts the logic of Obamacare. It retains insurer regulation to prevent exclusion of people with preexisting conditions. It imposes a penalty on those who don’t buy insurance while healthy. And it offers tax credits to help people buy insurance. Conservatives calling the plan Obamacare 2.0 definitely have a point.

Voala: the Trump-Republican AHCA health insurance plan is nothing more than a worse version of what is essentially Obamacare, “Obamacare Lite.”

Krugman’s and the Democratic Party’s framing of the issue, which starts from the premise that the central position of the private health insurers in the health care system must be preserved, is precisely why we’re so quickly slipping backwards on health care (and everything else, for that matter).  Democratic Party and some left supporters of the Obamacare argued that the ACA was both “a step in the right direction” and “all that’s realistically possible” given the current political situation.  Now, by Krugman’s rightful admission, Trumpcare is really just a half step back from the Democrat’s “Unaffordable Care Act,” the UCA.

The problem isn’t whether the UCA (Obamacare) is a step forward or the AHCA (Trumpcare) a half step back from the corrupt, ineffective, and inefficient US private health insurance system.  It’s not whether the glass is “half full or half empty.”  The common Democratic-Republican approach to health care “reform,” with its inviolable premise of preserving the rapidly collapsing private health insurance system, is a glass half (or quarter) full of disgusting, undrinkable, dirty, and highly lethal water.

Despite corporate press reports of the recent increasing popularity of the UCA (Obamacare), in fact poor and working people can smell a rat and aren’t stupid.  They know that if you are really poor, even a subsidized Bronze Obamacare plan, with its $6,000 – $11,000 deductibles and a shrinking provider network, does not mean you have access to quality affordable health care.  And if you are “middle class” (i.e., barely scaping by) and don’t qualify for a an AHCA tax break or a direct UCA subsidy,  you will end up paying (should you actually get sick and need to use your health insurance) as much as $10,000 to $25,000 a year in premiums on top of the $6,000 – $11,000 cost of services in deductibles!

This is precisely the problem.  Once you get past the “lesser evilism, half full” framing of the issue, you can see that the Democratic Party’s approach to fighting for health care “reform” has been a political disaster.  Obamacare was a such an empty, unworkable, overly complicated, obviously reactionary boondoggle for the private insurers that Trump and the Republican’s didn’t hesitate to attack it head on and move immediately to repeal it.  The Trump-Republican’s Obamare Lite AHCA, by preserving some of the key parts of Obamacare, will effectively blunt whatever opposition there is to the repeal of the UCA.  Think about it: Trump and the Republicans would never dare mount such a direct attack on Medicare, the last meaningful health care reform from before the neoliberal era.  The lesser evilism, “take a half-step in the wrong direction” neoliberal Obamacare UCA approach to health care “reform” is a big part of the reason why the Democrats were beaten by Trump in the last election.

It’s time to break the cycle of lesser evilism in Left politics.  “Defend the ACA” is an ineffective political slogan.  A better, really the only effective political approach is: build a grass roots, militant movement for Single Payer Now!

Allan Miller lives in the San Francisco Bay Area leftydatageek at gmail.com

More articles by:
Weekend Edition
March 16, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Michael Uhl
The Tip of the Iceberg: My Lai Fifty Years On
Bruce E. Levine
School Shootings: Who to Listen to Instead of Mainstream Shrinks
Mel Goodman
Caveat Emptor: MSNBC and CNN Use CIA Apologists for False Commentary
Paul Street
The Obama Presidency Gets Some Early High Historiography
Kathy Deacon
Me, My Parents and Red Scares Long Gone
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Rexless Abandon
Andrew Levine
Good Enemies Are Hard To Find: Therefore Worry
Jim Kavanagh
What to Expect From a Trump / Kim Summit
Ron Jacobs
Trump and His Tariffs
Joshua Frank
Drenched in Crude: It’s an Oil Free For All, But That’s Not a New Thing
Gary Leupp
What If There Was No Collusion?
Matthew Stevenson
Why Vietnam Still Matters: Bernard Fall Dies on the Street Without Joy
Robert Fantina
Bad to Worse: Tillerson, Pompeo and Haspel
Brian Cloughley
Be Prepared, Iran, Because They Want to Destroy You
Richard Moser
What is Organizing?
Scott McLarty
Working Americans Need Independent Politics
Rohullah Naderi
American Gun Violence From an Afghan Perspective
Sharmini Peries - Michael Hudson
Why Trump’s Tariff Travesty Will Not Re-Industrialize the US
Ted Rall
Democrats Should Run on Impeachment
Robert Fisk
Will We Ever See Al Jazeera’s Investigation Into the Israel Lobby?
Kristine Mattis
Superunknown: Scientific Integrity Within the Academic and Media Industrial Complexes
John W. Whitehead
Say No to “Hardening” the Schools with Zero Tolerance Policies and Gun-Toting Cops
Edward Hunt
UN: US Attack On Syrian Civilians Violated International Law
Barbara Nimri Aziz
Iraq Outside History
Wilfred Burchett
Vietnam Will Win: The Long Hard Road
Victor Grossman
Germany: New Faces, Old Policies
Medea Benjamin - Nicolas J. S. Davies
The Iraq Death Toll 15 Years After the US Invasion
Binoy Kampmark
Amazon’s Initiative: Digital Assistants, Home Surveillance and Data
Chuck Collins
Business Leaders Agree: Inequality Hurts The Bottom Line
Jill Richardson
What We Talk About When We Talk About “Free Trade”
Eric Lerner – Jay Arena
A Spark to a Wider Fire: Movement Against Immigrant Detention in New Jersey
Negin Owliaei
Teachers Deserve a Raise: Here’s How to Fund It
Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
What to Do at the End of the World? Interview with Climate Crisis Activist, Kevin Hester
Kevin Proescholdt
Secretary of Interior Ryan Zinke Attacks America’s Wilderness
Franklin Lamb
Syrian War Crimes Tribunals Around the Corner
Beth Porter
Clean Energy is Calling. Will Your Phone Company Answer?
George Ochenski
Zinke on the Hot Seat Again and Again
Lance Olsen
Somebody’s Going to Extremes
Robert Koehler
Breaking the Ice
Pepe Escobar
The Myth of a Neo-Imperial China
Graham Peebles
Time for Political Change and Unity in Ethiopia
Terry Simons
10 American Myths “Refutiated”*
Thomas Knapp
Some Questions from the Edge of Immortality
Louis Proyect
The 2018 Socially Relevant Film Festival
David Yearsley
Keaton’s “The General” and the Pernicious Myths of the Heroic South