FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

The Trump-Republican AHCA is Really Just Obamacare Lite–Single Payer Now!

Interesting.  Paul Krugman, in response to the newly unveiledTrump-Republican American Health Care Act (AHCA), lays out his support for preserving the private health insurance system as clear as day:

The structure of the Affordable Care Act comes out of a straightforward analysis of the logic of coverage. If you want to make health insurance available and affordable for almost everyone, regardless of income or health status, and you want to do this through private insurers rather than simply have single-payer (empahasis added), you have to do three things:

1/ Regulate insurers so they can’t refuse or charge high premiums to people with preexisting conditions

2/ Impose some penalty on people who don’t buy insurance, to induce healthy people to sign up and provide a workable risk pool

3/ Subsidize premiums so that lower-income households can afford insurance

After trumpeting (sorry) the usual private health insurer-Democratic Party PR shtick about expanding the limited numbers of those who were covered by the increasingly unaffordable (higher premiums and deductables), and unacessible (shrinking provider network) Obamacare private health insurance, Krugman comes out with the truth:

… the GOP proposal basically accepts the logic of Obamacare. It retains insurer regulation to prevent exclusion of people with preexisting conditions. It imposes a penalty on those who don’t buy insurance while healthy. And it offers tax credits to help people buy insurance. Conservatives calling the plan Obamacare 2.0 definitely have a point.

Voala: the Trump-Republican AHCA health insurance plan is nothing more than a worse version of what is essentially Obamacare, “Obamacare Lite.”

Krugman’s and the Democratic Party’s framing of the issue, which starts from the premise that the central position of the private health insurers in the health care system must be preserved, is precisely why we’re so quickly slipping backwards on health care (and everything else, for that matter).  Democratic Party and some left supporters of the Obamacare argued that the ACA was both “a step in the right direction” and “all that’s realistically possible” given the current political situation.  Now, by Krugman’s rightful admission, Trumpcare is really just a half step back from the Democrat’s “Unaffordable Care Act,” the UCA.

The problem isn’t whether the UCA (Obamacare) is a step forward or the AHCA (Trumpcare) a half step back from the corrupt, ineffective, and inefficient US private health insurance system.  It’s not whether the glass is “half full or half empty.”  The common Democratic-Republican approach to health care “reform,” with its inviolable premise of preserving the rapidly collapsing private health insurance system, is a glass half (or quarter) full of disgusting, undrinkable, dirty, and highly lethal water.

Despite corporate press reports of the recent increasing popularity of the UCA (Obamacare), in fact poor and working people can smell a rat and aren’t stupid.  They know that if you are really poor, even a subsidized Bronze Obamacare plan, with its $6,000 – $11,000 deductibles and a shrinking provider network, does not mean you have access to quality affordable health care.  And if you are “middle class” (i.e., barely scaping by) and don’t qualify for a an AHCA tax break or a direct UCA subsidy,  you will end up paying (should you actually get sick and need to use your health insurance) as much as $10,000 to $25,000 a year in premiums on top of the $6,000 – $11,000 cost of services in deductibles!

This is precisely the problem.  Once you get past the “lesser evilism, half full” framing of the issue, you can see that the Democratic Party’s approach to fighting for health care “reform” has been a political disaster.  Obamacare was a such an empty, unworkable, overly complicated, obviously reactionary boondoggle for the private insurers that Trump and the Republican’s didn’t hesitate to attack it head on and move immediately to repeal it.  The Trump-Republican’s Obamare Lite AHCA, by preserving some of the key parts of Obamacare, will effectively blunt whatever opposition there is to the repeal of the UCA.  Think about it: Trump and the Republicans would never dare mount such a direct attack on Medicare, the last meaningful health care reform from before the neoliberal era.  The lesser evilism, “take a half-step in the wrong direction” neoliberal Obamacare UCA approach to health care “reform” is a big part of the reason why the Democrats were beaten by Trump in the last election.

It’s time to break the cycle of lesser evilism in Left politics.  “Defend the ACA” is an ineffective political slogan.  A better, really the only effective political approach is: build a grass roots, militant movement for Single Payer Now!

Allan Miller lives in the San Francisco Bay Area leftydatageek at gmail.com

More articles by:
August 20, 2018
Carl Boggs
The Road to Disaster?
James Munson
“Not With a Bomb, But a Whimper” … Then More Bombs.
Jonathan Cook
Corbyn’s Labour Party is Being Made to Fail –By Design
Robert Fisk
A US Trade War With Turkey Over a Pastor? Don’t Believe It
Howard Lisnoff
The Mass Media’s Outrage at Trump: Why the Surprise?
Faisal Khan
A British Muslim’s Perspective on the Burkha Debate
Andrew Kahn
Inhumanity Above the Clouds
Dan Glazebrook
Trump’s New Financial War on the Global South
George Wuerthner
Why the Gallatin Range Deserves Protection
Ted Rall
Is Trump a Brand-New Weird Existential Threat? No.
Sheldon Richman
For the Love of Reason
Susie Day
Why Pundits Scare Me
Dean Baker
Does France’s Economy Need to Be Renewed?
Weekend Edition
August 17, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Daniel Wolff
The Aretha Dialogue
Nick Pemberton
Donald Trump and the Rise of Patriotism 
Joseph Natoli
First Amendment Rights and the Court of Popular Opinion
Andrew Levine
Midterms 2018: What’s There to Hope For?
Robert Hunziker
Hothouse Earth
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Running Out of Fools
Ajamu Baraka
Opposing Bipartisan Warmongering is Defending Human Rights of the Poor and Working Class
Paul Street
Corporate Media: the Enemy of the People
David Macaray
Trump and the Sex Tape
CJ Hopkins
Where Have All the Nazis Gone?
Daniel Falcone
The Future of NATO: an Interview With Richard Falk
Cesar Chelala
The Historic Responsibility of the Catholic Church
Ron Jacobs
The Barbarism of US Immigration Policy
Kenneth Surin
In Shanghai
William Camacaro - Frederick B. Mills
The Military Option Against Venezuela in the “Year of the Americas”
Nancy Kurshan
The Whole World Was Watching: Chicago ’68, Revisited
Robert Fantina
Yemeni and Palestinian Children
Alexandra Isfahani-Hammond
Orcas and Other-Than-Human Grief
Shoshana Fine – Thomas Lindemann
Migrants Deaths: European Democracies and the Right to Not Protect?
Paul Edwards
Totally Irrusianal
Thomas Knapp
Murphy’s Law: Big Tech Must Serve as Censorship Subcontractors
Mark Ashwill
More Demons Unleashed After Fulbright University Vietnam Official Drops Rhetorical Bombshells
Ralph Nader
Going Fundamental Eludes Congressional Progressives
Hans-Armin Ohlmann
My Longest Day: How World War II Ended for My Family
Matthew Funke
The Nordic Countries Aren’t Socialist
Daniel Warner
Tiger Woods, Donald Trump and Crime and Punishment
Dave Lindorff
Mainstream Media Hypocrisy on Display
Jeff Cohen
Democrats Gather in Chicago: Elite Party or Party of the People?
Victor Grossman
Stand Up With New Hope in Germany?
Christopher Brauchli
A Family Affair
Jill Richardson
Profiting From Poison
Patrick Bobilin
Moving the Margins
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail