FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

A Progressive Agenda

We will never move forward as a true progressive movement if we insist on personalizing the struggle and defining our position as anti-Trump.  The man was elected because he channelled real frustrations, and insofar as Trump’s policies attempt to address these frustrations we shouldn’t dismiss them before developing a reasoned critique as well as an alternative position that deals with the underlying causes of the frustration.

Take the issue of people who enter the country illegally.  The anti-Trump view is that immigration is good and that immigrants perform many jobs that Americans aren’t willing to do while at the same time providing cheap goods and services.  If you already have a job that pays a living wage this is a compelling argument and there is certainly truth in it, but isn’t it also true that illegal immigration artificially lowers pay in certain sectors, and it’s this lower pay that shuts out job opportunities for Americans?

Trump’s policies may appear to his supporters to address the problem of jobs, but by kicking out immigrants and throwing a lower-tax bone to corporations who will have to pay workers more, the solution creates more problems than it solves.  It will result in further wealth inequality and a toxic, xenophobic atmosphere.

Trump’s election shows that the problem is seen by a significant portion of the population to be real enough.  As America’s real economy continues to be hollowed-out by militarization and financialization the number of economic losers will continue to grow, and the battle over the remaining low-skilled jobs will only become more fierce.  So by failing to address the consequences of illegal immigration, the anti-Trump position will result in the same anti-immigrant hatred that we malign Trump for creating.

There is no doubt that the root problem is systemic.  It is the result of corporations who are legally bound to increase profits and ignore externalities like the country falling apart, and of a compromised government where any move to prevent illegal immigration or offer a pathway to citizenship is lobbied out of existence.  The socialist response is to tax the piles of cash corporations are sitting on and redistribute the money to economic losers so that they are compensated for their loss.  But this Danegeld approach doesn’t address the underlying issues, and it results in a bloated government papering over a situation that is unsustainable in the long run.

To address the government side of the problem real steps must be taken to prevent illegal immigration – even including a wall if that’s proven to be effective.  But a humane path to citizenship must also be put in place for those already in the country.  Corporations will not be happy because they’ll lose cheap labor, immigrants who entered the country legally may be resentful, and many Trump supporters will object to the laxity afforded these ‘illegals’; but this solution responds to the immediate concerns Trump claims he speaks for in the only way that is morally acceptable.  It’s also an agenda that progressives could unite behind with some hope of success in the short- to medium-term by appealing to reasonable people on both sides of the fence.

Addressing the more fundamental corporate side of the problem is more difficult and requires us to commit a heresy that no current political party is willing to do.  As long as strategies and decisions in our corporations are formulated by a small clique of upper-management executives and enforced in a top-down manner, our work lives are destined to be spent as subjects in an authoritarian system where income inequality will always predominate no matter what temporary gains the government or unions might secure.

Worker-owned and managed companies are the only kind that can provide a democratic, bottom-up decision-making process to guarantee against wealth inequality.  And it is the rare worker-owned cooperative that will decide to replace themselves with illegal immigrants or export their jobs overseas.  Professor Richard Wolff has dedicated himself to getting the message out about the benefits of this system, and the time is right for progressives to start listening.

Just as Bernie Sanders opened the possibility of Socialism to Americans, we must now be prepared to consider this more radical solution to capitalism’s failings.  It’s an approach that responds to the frustrations Trump has managed to channel in a way that makes a clean break with the greedy, narcissistic assumptions underlying his prescriptions.  And it’s a winning concept with the potential to unite people under the flag of a new progressive party.

Steve Cooper is an American ex-pat living in France.

More articles by:

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550

April 18, 2019
Gerald Sussman
Russiagate is Dead! Long Live Russiagate!
Lance Olsen
Perverse Housing Policy Perverts Forest Policy
Richard Ward
All Will be Punished
Jonathan Cook
Annexation of West Bank May Provide Key to Unlocking Netanyahu’s Legal Troubles
Judith Deutsch
People Music: Malignant Phallic Narcissism v. Being Ordinary
Jan Oberg
The Iran Floods and US Sanctions: 10 Million at Risk, But Who Cares?
Manuel E. Yepe
Assange: Between Gratitude and Betrayal
Ralph Nader
Children’s Moral Power Can Challenge Corporate Power on Climate Crisis
ADRIAN KUZMINSKI
Your Check is in the Mail
Binoy Kampmark
The European Union and Refugees in the Mediterranean
Arnold R. Isaacs
Looking Back at 1919: Immigration, Race, and Women’s Rights, Then and Now
Andrew Moss
Immigration and the Shock Doctrine
Michael Howard
Assange and the Cowardice of Power
Jesse Jackson
Making Wall Street Pay for the Financial Crisis
Mel Gurtov
At Risk—the Idea of America
April 17, 2019
James Bovard
Washington’s Biggest Fairy Tale: “Truth Will Out”
Yoav Litvin
The Ilhan Omar Gambit: Anti-Semitism as a Reactionary Political Tool
Evaggelos Vallianatos
Hawai’i in Trouble
Vijay Prashad
To Ola Bini, a Political Prisoner Caught Up in the Assange Debacle
Hans Muilerman and Jonathan Latham
EU Threatens to Legalize Human Harm From Pesticides
Binoy Kampmark
Delegitimising Journalism: The Effort to Relabel Julian Assange
Jack Rasmus
Trump Whacks the Middle Class
Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
The Burning Cathedral and the Dead Turtle
Kenneth Surin
Insurgencies in Malaysia and Vietnam: Boyhood Reflections
Rev. William Alberts
Opening Tombs and Resurrecting Lives
Tom Engelhardt
How the U.S. Military Feeds at the Terror Trough
Norman Solomon
The Toxic Lure of “Guns and Butter”
George Wuerthner
How to Stop Grazing on Public Lands: Buy Out the Permits
George Ochenski
Vote-Trading for Big Coal
John Stanton
The Price of Participating in Society is the Sacrifice of Privacy and Self
April 16, 2019
Richard Rubenstein
Julian and Martin: Reflections on the Arrest of Assange
Geoff Dutton
Talking Trash: Unfortunate Truths About Recycling
Kenn Orphan
A Land Uncharted: the Persecution of Julian Assange
Patrick Cockburn
Netanyahu’s Victory in Israel Tells Us About the Balance of Power in the Middle East
Robert Fisk
No More Excuses: Israeli Voters Have Chosen a Country that Will Mirror the Brutal Regimes of its Arab Neighbours
Jonah Raskin
The French (Bread) Connection in a Bourgeois California Town
Denis Rogatyuk
The Ordeal of Julian Assange
David Swanson
Exporting Dictators
Ted Rall
Self-Censorship is Credibility Suicide
Robert Koehler
War Crimes and National Security
Lee Ballinger
None Dare Call It Fascism
April 15, 2019
Bruce Neuburger
The Border, Trumpian Madness and the Clash of Demographics
Patrick Cockburn
Calling Assange a Narcissist Misses the Point
Conn Hallinan
Diego Garcia: The “Unsinkable Carrier” Springs a Leak
Dan Corjescu
State of Apocalyptic Nature: A Contract with Gaia
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail