• Monthly
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $other
  • use PayPal


A generous CounterPuncher has offered a $25,000 matching grant. So for this week only, whatever you can donate will be doubled up to $25,000! If you have the means, please donate! If you already have done so, thank you for your support. All contributions are tax-deductible.

Trucks, ‘Terror’ and Israel

In some international circles, there has been great weeping, wailing and gnashing of teeth because a Palestinian man drove a truck into a group of Israeli soldiers, killing four of them.  The incident is being referred to as a ‘terror truck-ramming’, and the driver of the truck is being labelled as a terrorist.  Several of his relatives have been arrested, and it won’t be long before we hear of their homes being demolished by Israel.

The word ‘terrorism’ and all its related forms, conjure up feelings of fear, and whip many in the global community into a fervor of patriotism. After all, they may wonder in horror, why would anyone kill soldiers, those alleged heroes who defend their country against any and all who would do it harm? And, in the minds of those who choose to keep their heads in the sand, why pick on poor, besieged little Israel, that beacon of democracy in the Middle East that shares so many values with the mighty United States?

It is long past time for everyone to take a deep breath, and try, just for a minute, to look at those annoying little things called facts. Yes, this writer knows that sound bites are so much more titillating, but just for a moment, let’s put them aside and focus on reality.

First, nowhere, with the exception of Israel and a rapidly diminishing majority of the U.S. Congress, does anyone dispute that Israel occupies Palestine, and does so illegally. Just weeks ago, this was once again reiterated by the United Nations.

Second, nowhere is it written that an occupied people must simply roll over and die, and allow the occupation to continue.  Let’s look for a moment at international law. United Nations General Assembly Resolution A/RES/33/24 of 29 November 1978 reads, in part, as follows:

“Reaffirms the legitimacy of the struggle of peoples for independence, territorial integrity, national unity and liberation from colonial and foreign domination and foreign occupation by all available means, particularly armed struggle.”

Please take careful note of the phrase ‘by all available means’. Nowhere does it exclude driving a truck into a crowd of occupying soldiers.

Third, as of September, 2016, the most recent date for which information is available, 103 Palestinians, the vast majority of them unarmed, were killed by Israelis during 2016. No Israelis were killed by Palestinians during this same period of time.

Fourth, while most readers were, up until right this minute, unaware of the deaths of those 103 Palestinians, most have probably heard about the four soldiers who died, since Israeli deaths are newsworthy, but Palestinian deaths, apparently, aren’t.

Fifth, it must be remembered that Palestine has no army, no navy and no air force. Israel has an extremely powerful military system, including nuclear and chemical weapons, and is supported completely by the United States. No weapons the U.S. has are forbidden to Israel.

So, what can we learn from this? Simply put, violence committed by Palestinians against Israelis isn’t terrorism. It is legitimate resistance to illegal occupation.

Let’s take a short trip back in history, first to the earlier years of the current millennium. The U.S. occupied Iraq for a time, and the news was full of the violence perpetrated by ‘insurgents’. These ‘insurgents’ were Iraqis, fighting foreign occupation. Stepping back a little farther in history, we can look at a parallel. Would one say that the French, in World War II, resisting German occupation, were simply ‘insurgents’, fighting against the nation that had so generously conquered their country? Or were they, like the Iraqis fighting U.S. occupation, or Palestinians fighting Israeli occupation, actually freedom fighters, French patriots resisting the destruction of their country by a foreign power?

Now, back to current events. Israelis routinely destroy Palestinian homes to make room for illegal settlements, or to construct homes that only Israelis can live in. They have been violating Palestine’s borders for nearly 50 years, encroaching more and more on Palestinian land and claiming it for Israel, in violation of countless United Nations resolutions. The violation of the basic human rights of the Palestinians by Israel would take volumes to document.

Earlier this month, an Israeli soldier, Sgt. Elor Azaria, was convicted of manslaughter for killing Fattah Sharif, an unarmed Palestinian. This crime was captured on videotape. Mr. Sharif had been shot, and was lying immobile on the ground, bleeding, and was left there for several minutes. Mr. Azaria approached him, and shot him in the head, killing him. We will leave for another time the question of why this was ‘manslaughter’, and not first-degree murder, but at least he was convicted of something. Yet throughout Israel, calls are being made for him to be pardoned, even coming from Israeli Prime Murderer, Benjamin Netanyahu. Does this not say something about the conditions under which Palestinians live? When the occupying power wants to excuse a blatant murder of an unarmed Palestinian, does this not indicate the severity and brutality of the occupation?

How Israel will react to this current incident remains to be seen, but if past actions enable us to predict the future with any accuracy, it will probably mean an increase in violence toward the mainly-defenseless Palestinians.

In view of all this, the so-called truck-ramming incident cannot be seen as an act of ‘terror’. It was simply a legitimate act of resistance by an occupied people, striving for the self-determination that is enshrined in resolutions of the United Nations, and various other internationally-accepted laws.

Next week, the United States will inaugurate a new president, the erratic and irrational Donald Trump. His advisors have stated that peace in the Middle East will be dictated on Israel’s terms; his closest advisors are all Zionists, and his vice-president belongs to a so-called Christian denomination that believes the Bible should be used to determine certain national borders. The U.S. was never an honest or fair broker in the Palestine-Israel situation, and all such pretense has now been discarded. The international community must now step up; this will not be possible in the U.N. Security Council, where all resolutions favorable to justice and freedom for the Palestinians will be vetoed, but there are many other diplomatic methods to pressure Israel. The time is long past for this to happen, but with the farce of U.S. mediation now exposed, there may be no better opportunity for this to occur then now.

More articles by:

Robert Fantina’s latest book is Empire, Racism and Genocide: a History of US Foreign Policy (Red Pill Press).

Weekend Edition
October 18, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Stephen Cooper
Scientist vs. Cooper: The Interview, Round 3 
Susan Block
How “Hustlers” Hustles Us
Charles R. Larson
Review: Elif Shafak’s “10 Minutes 38 Seconds in This Strange World”
October 17, 2019
Steve Early
The Irishman Cometh: Teamster History Hits the Big Screen (Again)
Jonathan Cook
Israel Prepares to Turn Bedouin Citizens into Refugees in Their Own Country
Stan Cox
Healing the Rift Between Political Reality and Ecological Reality
Jeff Klein
Syria, the Kurds, Turkey and the U.S.: Why Progressives Should Not Support a New Imperial Partition in the Middle East
George Ochenski
The Governor, the Mining Company and the Future of a Montana Wilderness
Charles Pierson
Bret Stephens’ American Fantasy
Ted Rall
The First Thing We Do, Let’s Fire All the Cops
Jon Rynn
Saving the Green New Deal
Ajamu Baraka
Syria: Exposing Western Radical Collaboration with Imperialism
Binoy Kampmark
A Coalition of Support: Parliamentarians for Julian Assange
Thomas Knapp
The Down Side of Impeachment
Harvey Wasserman
What Really Happened to American Socialism?
Tom Engelhardt
American Brexit
October 16, 2019
Patrick Cockburn
How Turkey’s Invasion of Syria Backfired on Erdogan
Chitrangada Choudhury – Aniket Aga
How Cotton Became a Headache in the Age of Climate Chaos
Jack Rasmus
US-China Mini-Trade Deal: Trump Takes the Money and Runs
Michael Welton
Communist Dictatorship in Our Midst
Robert Hunziker
Extinction Rebellion Sweeps the World
Peter A. Coclanis
Donald Trump as Artist
Chris Floyd
Byzantium Now: Time-Warping From Justinian to Trump
Steve Klinger
In For a Dime, in For a Dollar
Gary Leupp
The Maria Ramirez Story
Kim C. Domenico
It Serves Us Right To Suffer: Breaking Down Neoliberal Complacency
Kiley Blackman
Wildlife Killing Contests are Unethical
Colin Todhunter
Bayer Shareholders: Put Health and Nature First and Stop Funding This Company!
Andrés Castro
Looking Normal in Kew Gardens
October 15, 2019
Victor Grossman
The Berlin Wall, Thirty Years Later
Raouf Halaby
Kurdish Massacres: One of Britain’s Many Original Sins
Robert Fisk
Trump and Erdogan have Much in Common – and the Kurds will be the Tragic Victims of Their Idiocy
Ron Jacobs
Betrayal in the Levant
Wilma Salgado
Ecuador: Lenin Moreno’s Government Sacrifices the Poor to Satisfy the IMF
Ralph Nader
The Congress Has to Draw the Line
William A. Cohn
The Don Fought the Law…
John W. Whitehead
One Man Against the Monster: John Lennon vs. the Deep State
Lara Merling – Leo Baunach
Sovereign Debt Restructuring: Not Falling Prey to Vultures
Norman Solomon
The More Joe Biden Stumbles, the More Corporate Democrats Freak Out
Jim Britell
The Problem With Partnerships and Roundtables
Howard Lisnoff
More Incitement to Violence by Trump’s Fellow Travelers
Binoy Kampmark
University Woes: the Managerial Class Gets Uppity
Joe Emersberger
Media Smears, Political Persecution Set the Stage for Austerity and the Backlash Against It in Ecuador
Thomas Mountain
Ethiopia’s Abiy Ahmed Wins Nobel Peace Prize, But It Takes Two to Make Peace
Wim Laven
Citizens Must Remove Trump From Office