FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Think Tank Berkeley

Last week, Gene Bernardi and I went to the Berkeley, California, City Council meeting.  We were there to represent Veterans for Peace, East Bay chapter, and speak against the city buying a tank.  Of course they’re not calling it a “tank” — that wouldn’t go over very well.  So officially it’s a “Reinforced Panel Van.”  A photo of it was projected on a huge screen for us all to see.  It was white and looked like a regular family van, and that was their selling point — that it didn’t actually look like a military assault vehicle.  Nevertheless, this is part of Homeland Security’s police militarization program.

The tank issue was placed right after the consent items and so it came up relatively early, sometime between 8 and 9 p.m.  In the past, items such as this, ones that drew a lot of public opposition, were often delayed until as late as midnight, when many had gone home.  But now we have a new mayor, Jesse Arreguin, and new council, with a new way of doing things after many long years of centrist Democrats, now replaced by progressive Democrats.  This was one of the few bright spots in the recent election.

Twenty or thirty people spoke. Russell Bates and Andrea Prichett from Berkeley CopWatch were there; so were many other local activists.  Steve Martinot and JP Massar spoke, as did many others.  Cynthia Johnson ceded time to Gene Bernardi.

Gene pointed out that the city was putting the cart before the horse, that before acquiring military hardware, the council needed a full public discussion on Berkeley’s participation in police militarization programs, especially in light of the recent national election.

As I was standing in line, waiting to speak, I overheard audience members talking about how this was “not a tank,” and it really hit me how effectively the promoters of that vehicle were downplaying its military functions, passing it off as an innocuous passenger vehicle, bullet-proofed for safety.

Then it was my turn. “We don’t need a tank, please don’t buy one,” I said.  “There are numerous words for armored vehicles, such as half-tracks, armored cars, armored personnel carriers.  It’s officially called a ‘van,’ but let’s not get hung up on nomenclature.  It’s a tank!   Call it what you want, it’s an urban assault vehicle!  That’s a tank.  A tank is a tank is a tank. And we don’t need a tank.”

More speakers.  Two or three actually spoke in favor of buying the vehicle.  Their argument was that it would make police feel safer.  One person said she “felt sorry for the police” because they didn’t have enough equipment.  They also needed dogs, she said.

The overwhelming majority spoke against acquiring it.  Several pointed out that the best way to ensure police safety is good community relations.  Others attacked the wrong-headedness of  applying military solutions to social problems.  People wondered what strings might be attached, that the city might become tied in with other Homeland Security actions.  The example of Standing Rock was cited, relating to the use of military equipment against peaceful protesters.  Others agonized about the waste of $80,000, which could be better used on better things, housing the homeless, for example. (The full price of the tank is $205,373; Homeland Security would pay the balance.)

After public comment, the councilmembers held their discussion, which was surprisingly brief.  The councilmember who spoke longest was Chris Worthington; he’s been around a long time and has always been really good.  But tonight I couldn’t believe what I heard him saying, that the vehicle was acceptable because it didn’t look military.  It didn’t have the shape of a tank, and it wasn’t painted in camouflage, so it would be appropriate for our community.  “I’m in favor of it,” he said.

Other councilmembers also spoke in favor, saying one after another that it would give police greater safety.  Everyone would be safer with this vehicle.

When it came to a vote, only one councilperson voted against the tank. That was Cheryl Davila.  Some years ago, she had been appointed to a commission by former Councilmember Darryl Moore, who later fired her for proposing divestment from Israel.  In this year’s election Davila ran against Moore, and won.

So this is Berkeley’s new progressive council?  I remember the last time a tank was proposed, a couple of years ago, Councilmember Max Anderson shook his head and demanded, “What do you want a tank for?”  (The police were quite openly presenting the vehicle as a piece of military equipment that time, which was probably why it was rejected.)  Councilmember Anderson was great that evening.  But he wasn’t there tonight.  He’s gone now, retired after 27 years on the council.  I miss him.

More articles by:

December 18, 2018
Charles Pierson
Where No Corn Has Grown Before: Better Living Through Climate Change?
Evaggelos Vallianatos
The Waters of American Democracy
Patrick Cockburn
Will Anger in Washington Over the Murder of Khashoggi End the War in Yemen?
George Ochenski
Trump is on the Ropes, But the Pillage of Natural Resources Continues
Farzana Versey
Tribals, Missionaries and Hindutva
Robert Hunziker
Is COP24 One More Big Bust?
David Macaray
The Truth About Nursing Homes
Nino Pagliccia
Have the Russian Military Aircrafts in Venezuela Breached the Door to “America’s Backyard”?
Paul Edwards
Make America Grate Again
David Rosnick
The Impact of OPEC on Climate Change
Binoy Kampmark
The Kosovo Blunder: Moving Towards a Standing Army
Andrew Stewart
Shine a Light for Immigration Rights in Providence
December 17, 2018
Susan Abulhawa
Marc Lamont Hill’s Detractors are the True Anti-Semites
Jake Palmer
Viktor Orban, Trump and the Populist Battle Over Public Space
Martha Rosenberg
Big Pharma Fights Proposal to Keep It From Looting Medicare
David Rosen
December 17th: International Day to End Violence against Sex Workers
Binoy Kampmark
The Case that Dare Not Speak Its Name: the Conviction of Cardinal Pell
Dave Lindorff
Making Trump and Other Climate Criminals Pay
Bill Martin
Seeing Yellow
Julian Vigo
The World Google Controls and Surveillance Capitalism
ANIS SHIVANI
What is Neoliberalism?
James Haught
Evangelicals Vote, “Nones” Falter
Vacy Vlanza
The Australian Prime Minister’s Rapture for Jerusalem
Martin Billheimer
Late Year’s Hits for the Hanging Sock
Weekend Edition
December 14, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Andrew Levine
A Tale of Two Cities
Peter Linebaugh
The Significance of The Common Wind
Bruce E. Levine
The Ketamine Chorus: NYT Trumpets New Anti-Suicide Drug
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Fathers and Sons, Bushes and Bin Ladens
Kathy Deacon
Coffee, Social Stratification and the Retail Sector in a Small Maritime Village
Nick Pemberton
Praise For America’s Second Leading Intellectual
Robert Hunziker
The Yellow Vest Insurgency – What’s Next?
Patrick Cockburn
The Yemeni Dead: Six Times Higher Than Previously Reported
Nick Alexandrov
George H. W. Bush: Another Eulogy
Brian Cloughley
Principles and Morality Versus Cash and Profit? No Contest
Michael F. Duggan
Climate Change and the Limits of Reason
Victor Grossman
Sighs of Relief in Germany
Ron Jacobs
A Propagandist of Privatization
Robert Fantina
What Does Beto Have Against the Palestinians?
Richard Falk – Daniel Falcone
Sartre, Said, Chomsky and the Meaning of the Public Intellectual
Andrew Glikson
Crimes Against the Earth
Robert Fisk
The Parasitic Relationship Between Power and the American Media
Stephen Cooper
When Will Journalism Grapple With the Ethics of Interviewing Mentally Ill Arrestees?
Jill Richardson
A War on Science, Morals and Law
Ron Jacobs
A Propagandist of Privatization
Evaggelos Vallianatos
It’s Not Easy Being Greek
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail