FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

Lessons in Witch-Hunting: a Warning for the State Department

A letter, signed by 18 Democrats of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, has made its way to Secretary of State John Kerry in an attempt to ward off a potential witch hunt of foreign affairs civil servants who worked on key Obama foreign policies. The letter comes on the heels of an allegedly unofficial request by President-elect Donald Trump to identify and name those within the Energy Department who had worked specifically on climate change.[1]

The letter asserts that any “retribution,” whether “illegal” or legal, yet “unethical,” against such personnel will be fought by the Democratic Party. That the future Trump administration was gearing up for a purge of the state department was made implicit.

More than a warning, the letter should serve as a lesson on how quickly, and seemingly official, a political assumption of bad faith, based on no substantial evidence, can take on an air of legitimacy. As a tweet by Representative Karen Bass of California last Thursday suggested, such plans for a purge were already underway. Americans, she pledged, needed to “Resist the Trump transition witch hunt at the State Department!”

Indeed, there has been no suggestion of a witch hunt in the state department or for the retribution of its employees for involvement in any Obama administration policies by the President-elect.

Nevertheless, the letter does serve to warn of the particular vulnerability Foreign Service officers and government civil servants face in an atmosphere of political recrimination, especially one that the President-elect has been a vocal part of.

The McCarthy era of personal attacks, recriminations for the “loss of China”, the intense fear and hatred of communism and the heated partisanship that plagued the early 1950’s destroyed a whole generation of Foreign Service officers. It resulted in the termination of thousands from government service under erroneous accusations of homosexuality, disloyalty, lewd behaviour, incompetence or for associating with communists.

That such charges were politically indefensible in their ambiguity made little difference. As the case of John S. Service – a 17-year state department veteran and China hand – is indicative of. Forced into unending security reviews due to McCarthyist charges of disloyalty, espionage and harbouring pro-communist sympathies, Service cleared each one (nine in all) until Truman was forced to change the loyalty criteria from “reasonable grounds” to “reasonable doubt”.

The board had found Service not guilty of disloyalty. But based “on a single episode which occurred six and a half years ago”, remarked Service, for which he had been “tried and unanimously acquitted at least nine times”, there was now, retroactively, ‘reasonable doubt’ as to his actions and therefore loyalty. He was summarily dismissed in 1950.

Indeed the list goes on. China hand John F. Melby was fired for an association with an “alleged” communist member, Lillian Hellman. John Carter Vincent was let go by Secretary of State John Foster Dulles on the grounds that there was reasonable doubt as to his conduct, which included (entirely reasonable) “studied criticism of the Chiang Kai-shek government”; “indifference to any evidence that the Chinese Communists were affiliated with or controlled by the USSR” (which proved true in 1959) and; his purported “close association with numerous persons who he had reason to believe were either Communists or Communist sympathizers,” (which was quiet normal, despite the implication).

O. Edmund Clubb was initially fired on the grounds that he had a very brief encounter with ex-communist Whittaker Chambers in 1932. John Paton Davies was fired by Dulles for a suggestion he made for a CIA operation into China using, among others, alleged communists.

The problem with such accusations was that once named there was almost nothing that could be done to counter such claims.

Such was the political atmosphere that it erased, almost in its entirety, the state department’s China experts. Those that weren’t persecuted and/or fired were shipped off to far away posts, in the hope to avoid McCarthy’s charges but nevertheless never to return to their area of expertise.

The implications of such attacks were irreversible. The Foreign Service, George F. Kennan wrote in 1957, had been “weakened beyond real hope of recovery”. John K. Fairbank wrote not long afterwards, the “widespread subpoena of China scholars had the public effect of inhibiting realistic thinking about China.” The most disastrous of consequences of this turn of events Fairbank stated, was that the results “carried over into unrealistic thinking about Chinese relations with Vietnam and helped to produce our difficulties there.

The encouragement by Eisenhower in 1953 of this purge had its grounding in an atmosphere similar to the one that exists today. Although Eisenhower wasn’t complicit in the emergence of the ‘retribution’ movement his endorsement of it, and his subsequent purges, proved to strengthen its legitimacy and longevity.

Not incidentally, the state department under the Eisenhower administration became devoid of any independent, critical thinking. China policy became moribund in its intransigence to any recognition of Communist China. It was to deny the recognition of reality, the Administration’s critics concluded at the time (including, for the most part, the allies), and therefore had no basis in sound policy.

In the State Department, one post from the Washington Post wrote, “Honest reporting” had become “verboten.” The Foreign Service officer “is given to understand that any enterprise on his part to find out, assay, and asses is taboo.”

The turmoil of Trump’s successful campaign has not devolved to such low levels of recrimination just yet. Although similarities, too an extent, exist today.

For instance there has been no language among Trump supporters considered too derogatory, too demeaning in describing their feelings toward former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. “Hang the b****,” was not a one-off slogan, nor was it the most offensive slur. That the president-elect was disposed to mouth and even encourage such vulgarity is indicative of a baser level of political skulduggery.

Does it yet suggest that such a witch hunt will become a feature of a Trump presidency? No. The letter to Kerry is itself an overreaction. No country has yet been “lost”. No anti-ideology has become so engrossing as anti-communism was in the 1950’s. And while the crusading [Senator Ted] Cruz offers a surrogacy for anti-Iran dealers and Israel lobby subjects he is no one issue man as Senator [Willliam F.] Knowland, Congressman [Walter] Judd, or Senator [Joseph] McCarthy were in 1953.

The letter was no less than a sore attempt to damage the credibility of the incoming president; to attach possibly the darkest of political pasts to his image. That it was unconvincing should not be surprising. Since the 20th century the Democrats have never been able to capture the populism, to garner the energy of the ‘mob,’ as the Republicans have. To outsmart Trump, the Democrats will need to do better.

The lesson of the 1950s however should be one that is not glossed over, forgotten or even used as a political tool. They should be studied so that they never occur again.

Notes.

[1] https://www.washingtonpost.com/r/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2016/12/15/Editorial-Opinion/Graphics/12.15.16._Rep._Engel_Letter_to_Secretary_Kerry_on_Non-Compliance.pdf

More articles by:

Adam Bartley is a Researcher and PhD candidate at RMIT University, Melbourne. Email: bartley.aa@gmail.com

March 19, 2019
Paul Street
Socialism Curiously Trumps Fascism in U.S. Political Threat Reporting
Jonah Raskin
Guy Standing on Anxiety, Anger and Alienation: an Interview About “The Precariat”
Patrick Cockburn
The Brutal Legacy of Bloody Sunday is a Powerful Warning to Those Hoping to Save Brexit
Robert Fisk
Turning Algeria Into a Necrocracy
John Steppling
Day of Wrath
Robin Philpot
Truth, Freedom and Peace Will Prevail in Rwanda
Victor Grossman
Women Marchers and Absentees
Binoy Kampmark
The Dangers of Values: Brenton Tarrant, Fraser Anning and the Christchurch Shootings
Jeff Sher
Let Big Pharma Build the Wall
Jimmy Centeno
Venezuela Beneath the Skin of Imperialism
Jeffrey Sommers – Christopher Fons
Scott Walker’s Failure, Progressive Wisconsin’s Win: Milwaukee’s 2020 Democratic Party Convention
Steve Early
Time for Change at NewsGuild?
March 18, 2019
Scott Poynting
Terrorism Has No Religion
Ipek S. Burnett
Black Lives on Trial
John Feffer
The World’s Most Dangerous Divide
Paul Cochrane
On the Ground in Venezuela vs. the Media Spectacle
Dean Baker
The Fed and the 3.8 Percent Unemployment Rate
Thomas Knapp
Social Media Companies “Struggle” to Help Censors Keep us in the Dark
Binoy Kampmark
Death in New Zealand: The Christchurch Shootings
Mark Weisbrot
The Reality Behind Trump’s Venezuela Regime Change Coalition
Weekend Edition
March 15, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Andrew Levine
Is Ilhan Omar Wrong…About Anything?
Kenn Orphan
Grieving in the Anthropocene
Jeffrey Kaye
On the Death of Guantanamo Detainee 10028
Stan Cox – Paul Cox
In Salinas, Puerto Rico, Vulnerable Americans Are Still Trapped in the Ruins Left by Hurricane Maria
Ben Debney
Christchurch, the White Victim Complex and Savage Capitalism
Eric Draitser
Did Dallas Police and Local Media Collude to Cover Up Terrorist Threats against Journalist Barrett Brown?
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Straighten Up and Fly Right
Jack Rasmus
Trump’s $34 Trillion Deficit and Debt Bomb
David Rosen
America’s Puppet: Meet Juan Guaidó
Jason Hirthler
Annexing the Stars: Walcott, Rhodes, and Venezuela
Samantha M. - Angelica Perkins
Our Green New Deal
Mel Gurtov
Trump’s Nightmare Budget
Steven Colatrella
The 18th Brumaire of Just About Everybody: the Rise of Authoritarian Strongmen and How to Prevent and Reverse It
Evaggelos Vallianatos
Riding the Wild Bull of Nuclear Power
Michael K. Smith
Thirty Years Gone: Remembering “Cactus Ed”
Dean Baker
In Praise of Budget Deficits
Howard Lisnoff
Want Your Kids to Make it Big in the World of Elite Education in the U.S.?
Brian Cloughley
Trump’s Foreign Policy is Based on Confrontation and Malevolence
John W. Whitehead
Pity the Nation: War Spending is Bankrupting America
Priti Gulati Cox
“Maria! Maria! It Was Maria That Destroyed Us!” The Human Story
Missy Comley Beattie
On Our Knees
Mike Garrity – Carole King
A Landscape Lewis and Clark Would Recognize is Under Threat
Robert Fantina
The Media-Created Front Runners
Tom Clifford
Bloody Sunday and the Charging of Soldier F
Ron Jacobs
All the Livelong Day      
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail