Click amount to donate direct to CounterPunch
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $500
  • $other
  • use PayPal
DOUBLE YOUR DONATION!
We don’t run corporate ads. We don’t shake our readers down for money every month or every quarter like some other sites out there. We provide our site for free to all, but the bandwidth we pay to do so doesn’t come cheap. A generous donor is matching all donations of $100 or more! So please donate now to double your punch!
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Cash and Carrier: Trump and Pence Put on a Show

Donald Trump and Mike Pence deserve credit for putting on a great show around saving the jobs of 1,000 workers at Carrier, the Indiana-based air conditioner manufacturer that had planned to relocate the jobs to Mexico. They also deserve credit for saving the jobs. This action will make an enormous difference in the lives of 1,000 workers and their families, who faced bleak employment prospects if Carrier went ahead with its planned move.

But the deeper story is far from clear at this point.

First, on the deal itself, it was encouraging to see the President-elect going to bat for ordinary workers who were seeing their livelihoods threatened. It is easy to believe that workers losing their jobs at places like Carrier do not figure prominently in the minds of the politicians who negotiated trade deals like NAFTA. And there is one point that everyone should be clear on: The decision of manufacturing companies like Carrier to
riggedbakermove jobs overseas is not an accidental byproduct from these deals, it is the point of deals like NAFTA.

A major goal of NAFTA was to make it as easy as possible for companies to take advantage of lower-cost labor in Mexico. It prohibits the Mexican government from nationalizing factories, restricting the ability of companies to send profits home, or other measures that would make investing in Mexico unattractive.

But while Trump and Pence may have saved the jobs of 1,000 workers (apparently 400 jobs are still going to Mexico), it is not clear what the price to the state of Indiana or the US government is. It appears that vice president-elect and Indiana Gov. Mike Pence may have made some concessions, and perhaps Trump made promises as well.

Unfortunately, this is a team that does not believe in transparency. The people of Indiana are likely to find out how much these jobs cost them when the state needs to raise taxes or cut education spending to make up for a revenue shortfall due to the concessions. Only then will we be able to know whether Trump and Spence negotiated a good deal.

But the bigger issue will be the Trump administration’s overall agenda on trade. He is not going to bring back millions of manufacturing jobs by hectoring and deal-making one company at a time. And here the picture is very unclear.

Some of what Trump has said is good policy. China has at times deliberately acted to keep down the value of its currency against the dollar, as have other countries. Such currency management is the major cause of our trade deficit.

Trump can try to confront China on currency management, but he also complains they don’t respect copyrights on software and patents on drugs, along with many other sins. Trump can make headway on one of these issues, but certainly not all of them. He will have to set priorities. At this point we have no idea whether he will side with workers and place the priority on currency values, or whether he will focus on copyrights, patents and other issues important to American corporations.

This also gets to one of the major confusions that Trump perpetuated in his campaign. China and other countries didn’t “win” in their trade deals with the United States. We have major corporations like GE that love taking advantage of low-cost labor in China. The same is true of Walmart, with its low-cost supply chains that allow it to undersell competitors. These and other companies are big winners in the current pattern of trade with China and other developing countries.

Our trade negotiators weren’t suckers, as Trump seems to believe. They just weren’t working for the country’s blue-collar workers. We will have to see who they work for in a Trump administration.

The Carrier episode can be seen as the opening round in the Trump administration’s efforts to bring back millions of manufacturing jobs. Trump and Pence deserve credit for putting on a good show; we will need more information before we can assess the substance.

In the meantime, one thing we can be happy for is that at least 1,000 workers in Indiana and their families will be able to enjoy a nice holiday season. That is certainly good news.

This article originally appeared on CNN.

More articles by:

Dean Baker is the senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, DC. 

Weekend Edition
October 19, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Jason Hirthler
The Pieties of the Liberal Class
Jeffrey St. Clair
A Day in My Life at CounterPunch
Paul Street
“Male Energy,” Authoritarian Whiteness and Creeping Fascism in the Age of Trump
Nick Pemberton
Reflections on Chomsky’s Voting Strategy: Why The Democratic Party Can’t Be Saved
John Davis
The Last History of the United States
Yigal Bronner
The Road to Khan al-Akhmar
Robert Hunziker
The Negan Syndrome
Andrew Levine
Democrats Ahead: Progressives Beware
Rannie Amiri
There is No “Proxy War” in Yemen
David Rosen
America’s Lost Souls: the 21st Century Lumpen-Proletariat?
Joseph Natoli
The Age of Misrepresentations
Ron Jacobs
History Is Not Kind
John Laforge
White House Radiation: Weakened Regulations Would Save Industry Billions
Ramzy Baroud
The UN ‘Sheriff’: Nikki Haley Elevated Israel, Damaged US Standing
Robert Fantina
Trump, Human Rights and the Middle East
Anthony Pahnke – Jim Goodman
NAFTA 2.0 Will Help Corporations More Than Farmers
Jill Richardson
Identity Crisis: Elizabeth Warren’s Claims Cherokee Heritage
Sam Husseini
The Most Strategic Midterm Race: Elder Challenges Hoyer
Maria Foscarinis – John Tharp
The Criminalization of Homelessness
Robert Fisk
The Story of the Armenian Legion: a Dark Tale of Anger and Revenge
Jacques R. Pauwels
Dinner With Marx in the House of the Swan
Dave Lindorff
US ‘Outrage’ over Slaying of US Residents Depends on the Nation Responsible
Ricardo Vaz
How Many Yemenis is a DC Pundit Worth?
Elliot Sperber
Build More Gardens, Phase out Cars
Chris Gilbert
In the Wake of Nepal’s Incomplete Revolution: Dispatch by a Far-Flung Bolivarian 
Muhammad Othman
Let Us Bray
Gerry Brown
Are Chinese Municipal $6 Trillion (40 Trillion Yuan) Hidden Debts Posing Titanic Risks?
Rev. William Alberts
Judge Kavanaugh’s Defenders Doth Protest Too Much
Ralph Nader
Unmasking Phony Values Campaigns by the Corporatists
Victor Grossman
A Big Rally and a Bavarian Vote
James Bovard
Groped at the Airport: Congress Must End TSA’s Sexual Assaults on Women
Jeff Roby
Florida After Hurricane Michael: the Sad State of the Unheeded Planner
Wim Laven
Intentional or Incompetence—Voter Suppression Where We Live
Bradley Kaye
The Policy of Policing
Wim Laven
The Catholic Church Fails Sexual Abuse Victims
Kevin Cashman
One Year After Hurricane Maria: Employment in Puerto Rico is Down by 26,000
Dr. Hakim Young
Nonviolent Afghans Bring a Breath of Fresh Air
Karl Grossman
Irving Like vs. Big Nuke
Dan Corjescu
The New Politics of Climate Change
John Carter
The Plight of the Pyrenees: the Abandoned Guard Dogs of the West
Ted Rall
Brett Kavanaugh and the Politics of Emotion-Shaming
Graham Peebles
Sharing is Key to a New Economic and Democratic Order
Ed Rampell
The Advocates
Louis Proyect
The Education Business
David Yearsley
Shock-and-Awe Inside Oracle Arena
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail