FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Urgent Next Steps in the Anti-Trump Movement

Trump’s presidency takes gruesome shape with every vile appointee. Each choice signals an intent to follow through with sinister campaign promises, threatening every demographic of working people.

His appointments are a hodgepodge of the right-wing fringe, the “loyalists” who endorsed Trump early because they had nothing to lose: their extremist, unhinged views made them irrelevant wing-nuts of the establishment, destined for obscurity.

Now these reactionaries have been elevated to the highest levels of power, in charge of federal agencies that exercise an Orwellian authority bestowed upon them by the Obama-Bush surveillance state. They are a menacing crew now in control of omnipotent institutions.

For example, Trump’s chief strategist, Steven Bannon, will help run the White House after spending years promoting the white supremacist movement, that he euphemistically calls “Alt Right.” Although he doesn’t call himself a white supremacist, Bannon was a lead publicist for the neo-Nazi movement and is therefore, by definition, a crucially important white supremacist leader.

Trump’s pick for Attorney General, Jeff Sessions, will be responsible for dispensing justice at the federal level. And he’s a known racist, having been denied past court appointments because of his overt racism. Meanwhile, the new head of the CIA will be a raging Islamophobe who uses “crusader”-like language in describing the battle between Islam and Christianity.

Trump’s future pick for Director of Homeland Security is likely to share the anti-immigrant nightmare vision he campaigned on, while his unnamed Labor Secretary will certainly be anti-union and thus anti-working people.

And of course Trump will get to appoint Supreme Court judges who inevitably will be anti LGBTQ, anti-labor, anti-civil rights, anti-women’s rights, and pro-corporation.

This collective assault against the working class requires a collective response, lest each section be attacked and defeated individually. No single demographic is capable of defeating the machinery of state power that Trump will inherit. Although there are pockets of spontaneous organizing everywhere, combining these struggles requires intention and coordination, i.e. leadership.

A united front response to Trump is possible, but won’t happen by itself. Building these anti-Trump coalitions on the local level, immediately, will require organizers proactively reaching out to other groups for collective action.

Forming local anti-Trump coalitions can be done quickly, and after that, national coordination is just a Facebook search away. A large movement can quickly spring into action that carries momentum past the inauguration date, creating a lasting protection for those targeted by Trump.

A crucial first step of organizing is assessing the potential in a situation. This is a unique moment that should be exploited to the maximum degree. Social movement energy is rare, and the unique opportunities it affords –– if effective coalitions can be formed — should be taken advantage of. The special energy allows goals that were too radical pre-Trump to be achieved in weeks, if the energy is organized and funneled effectively.

What are the demands of the anti-Trump movement? Being “against Trump” is what currently unifies this movement, though without specific demands. Revolutions often begin with a population simply being against a ruler (see the Egyptian revolution and the current revolution in South Korea).

Therefore, “Stop Trump” is a fine demand for the moment. Full-scale opposition and resistance is what’s needed, by any effective means necessary. Trump didn’t win the popular vote, and there is widespread fraud detected in swing states, as Jill Stein’s recount effort in Wisconsin has the potential to help prove. Ultimately the legal legitimacy matters less than the population’s willingness to accept him as their president.

If nationally coordinated, pre-inauguration protests were organized weekly that demanded Stop Trump, it’s possible that millions of people would respond. At the moment anything is possible: stopping Trump is an achievable demand if the movement grows wings.

But even if a best-case scenario isn’t achieved — smashing Trump’s presidency — the working class would benefit immensely from merely practicing collective action. In the same way that soldiers endlessly march in formation during boot camp — in order to attack collectively in war time — working people need to practice working together in coalitions, and practice the art of organizing mass demonstrations and other mass actions. Giving people the chance to hone their organizing skills and experience their collective power can lay the foundations for bigger and bolder actions, accompanied by bigger and bolder demands, creating a stronger more self-confident working class that isn’t scared of Trump, but acts as a constant threat to his administration. The reason that France still has a 35-hour workweek is because the French corporate establishment is terrified of its working class.

Such a movement also needs locally achievable goals, which can serve as a way help provide protection to a Trump Presidency, creating a firewall between national agencies and local governments. If the movement only provides a place to let off steam instead of winning demands and consolidating power locally, a hopelessness can creep in as Trump’s grip tightens.

Trump has stirred a broader layer of people into action, and they must be shown a pathway that leads to real victories. If organizers create mobilizing space — combined with inspiring demands — it’s possible that a large number of people will respond positively, putting enormous pressure on government institutions, potentially to the point of breaking them.

This call and response tactic has been successful in various revolutions: the organizers in Egypt demanded the fall of the dictator, and within weeks millions of people responded to the call that quickly brought down Mubarak. Today in South Korea a similar dynamic is happening: a call was made five weeks ago for the downfall of the president, and the weekly protest grows bigger every week, the last one attended by 1.5 million people. The social movement in Korea became revolutionary overnight, and the president is now widely considered to be doomed.

An immediate danger facing the anti-Trump movement is inaction. People are scared and need hope. Processing our fears and anxieties must be followed by action in order to actually reassure the populations Trump is targeting. The organized power of the state must be met with the organized power of the people, not endless analysis and critiquing.

Some groups are adopting the suicidal strategy of “hunkering down,” instead of adopting an action plan to fight back, hoping in vain they can weather a four-year storm. Other groups are trying to predict Trump’s actions in order to react to them. Planning for worse case scenarios is of course appropriate — especially for the most vulnerable populations — but the current moment demands that we act preemptively, while the wind is at our back.

Sitting on the sidelines during this moment is inexcusable for leaders of organizations. Making demands for a 3rd party, although necessary, is sorely insufficient. The people need immediate next steps. The valid fears of millions of people are best met with bold action proposals that include ways for rank-and-file members to participate in the planning and execution of these plans. The people organized and mobilized is ultimately our only security.

What are some possible next steps for organizing?

1. Plan a weekly demonstration until inauguration day, seeking out labor and community groups and groups such as Black Lives Matter that will co-sponsor the demonstrations; ask that co-sponsoring organizations help plan and do outreach for the demonstrations, making them as big as possible. Reach out to groups in the region or nationally to coordinate the actions.

2. Make local demands. Several regions are demanding that local city councils declare “sanctuary cities,” which has historically meant that city law enforcement does not cooperate with immigration enforcement. Students have been demanding that their high schools, colleges and universities become “sanctuary schools.” By winning local demands, the local movement is strengthened and more demands can be raised as the leverage of the movement grows.

3. Expand the definition of sanctuary cities to include united front demands, such as bold police accountability measures, rent control and other tenant protections, free day care, universal health care, a public jobs program, bold climate change legislation, the rejection of charter schools, taxing the rich to pay for making public colleges and universities free, so that government is made to serve the people and local people feel more secure in their homes and work as they enter the insecurity that a post-Trump world implies.

4. . Keep local jurisdictions safe from Trumpism by demanding that no local authorities cooperate with any Trump-led agency, or demanding that city council declare Trump a “Persona Non Grata” (an unwelcome person), who will receive no public funds such as police assistance if he enters the city. Creative demands of this sort have the potential to inspire people into action, and inspiration is the jet fuel of social movements.

Community leaders must take advantage of this movement, not only to build and strengthen their own organizations but to lead the broader movement into a real fighting force able to resist Trump, or dethrone him. Anything is possible with the harnessed power of a social movement, and the best-case possibilities should be the aim, accompanied by a strategic action plan to reach the goal.

A danger facing the movement is inauguration day, where a giant nationwide protest seems to be taking shape. If this enormous demonstration is a “one off” event, demoralization may set in, as it did in 2003 when the enormous antiwar demonstrations ended after the war began. But if weekly national protests begin before the inauguration, it’s possible that enough momentum may carry the movement past inauguration.

Real movement energy exists, and it can be ignored, seized, or squandered. Leaders of labor and community groups have a duty to defend their members and the broader community, by any means necessary, and to step up into the public arena to help strengthen this anti-Trump movement and help lead it to victory.

Victory is possible, but only through sustained, mass collective action. Ongoing demonstrations of millions of people can lead to citywide general strikes and beyond, while coordinated student walkouts can lead to occupations, creating a “dual power” dynamic, where working people began to directly exercise power over public institutions via mass direct action. Direct democracy can be produced out of a mass, revolutionary movement.

The era of social stability has ended, as we are entering a period of political-economic instability. The best protection for the working family in this context is a powerful, organized movement of working people who are dedicated to defending one another.

More articles by:

Shamus Cooke is a member of the Portland branch of Democratic Socialists of America. He can be reached at shamuscooke@gmail.com

December 19, 2018
Carl Boggs
Russophobia and the Specter of War
Jonathan Cook
American Public’s Backing for One-State Solution Falls on Deaf Ears
Daniel Warner
1968: The Year That Will Not Go Away
Arshad Khan
Developing Country Issues at COP24 … and a Bit of Good News for Solar Power and Carbon Capture
Kenneth Surin
Trump’s African Pivot: Another Swipe at China
Patrick Bond
South Africa Searches for a Financial Parachute, Now That a $170 Billion Foreign Debt Cliff Looms
Tom Clifford
Trade for Hostages? Trump’s New Approach to China
Binoy Kampmark
May Days in Britain
John Feffer
Globalists Really Are Ruining Your Life
John O'Kane
Drops and the Dropped: Diversity and the Midterm Elections
December 18, 2018
Charles Pierson
Where No Corn Has Grown Before: Better Living Through Climate Change?
Evaggelos Vallianatos
The Waters of American Democracy
Patrick Cockburn
Will Anger in Washington Over the Murder of Khashoggi End the War in Yemen?
George Ochenski
Trump is on the Ropes, But the Pillage of Natural Resources Continues
Farzana Versey
Tribals, Missionaries and Hindutva
Robert Hunziker
Is COP24 One More Big Bust?
David Macaray
The Truth About Nursing Homes
Nino Pagliccia
Have the Russian Military Aircrafts in Venezuela Breached the Door to “America’s Backyard”?
Paul Edwards
Make America Grate Again
David Rosnick
The Impact of OPEC on Climate Change
Binoy Kampmark
The Kosovo Blunder: Moving Towards a Standing Army
Andrew Stewart
Shine a Light for Immigration Rights in Providence
December 17, 2018
Susan Abulhawa
Marc Lamont Hill’s Detractors are the True Anti-Semites
Jake Palmer
Viktor Orban, Trump and the Populist Battle Over Public Space
Martha Rosenberg
Big Pharma Fights Proposal to Keep It From Looting Medicare
David Rosen
December 17th: International Day to End Violence against Sex Workers
Binoy Kampmark
The Case that Dare Not Speak Its Name: the Conviction of Cardinal Pell
Dave Lindorff
Making Trump and Other Climate Criminals Pay
Bill Martin
Seeing Yellow
Julian Vigo
The World Google Controls and Surveillance Capitalism
ANIS SHIVANI
What is Neoliberalism?
James Haught
Evangelicals Vote, “Nones” Falter
Vacy Vlanza
The Australian Prime Minister’s Rapture for Jerusalem
Martin Billheimer
Late Year’s Hits for the Hanging Sock
Weekend Edition
December 14, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Andrew Levine
A Tale of Two Cities
Peter Linebaugh
The Significance of The Common Wind
Bruce E. Levine
The Ketamine Chorus: NYT Trumpets New Anti-Suicide Drug
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Fathers and Sons, Bushes and Bin Ladens
Kathy Deacon
Coffee, Social Stratification and the Retail Sector in a Small Maritime Village
Nick Pemberton
Praise For America’s Second Leading Intellectual
Robert Hunziker
The Yellow Vest Insurgency – What’s Next?
Nick Alexandrov
George H. W. Bush: Another Eulogy
Patrick Cockburn
The Yemeni Dead: Six Times Higher Than Previously Reported
Brian Cloughley
Principles and Morality Versus Cash and Profit? No Contest
Michael F. Duggan
Climate Change and the Limits of Reason
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail