Fidel Castro: Charismatic Revolutionary Leader Who Defied the Odds

Photo by Institute for Policy Studies | CC BY 2.0

Photo by Institute for Policy Studies | CC BY 2.0


Fidel Alejandro Castro Ruz (90), who passed away last week, was the son of a Spanish immigrant from Galicia, Spain.  A significant world personality in the second half of the 20th century, Castro was regarded, love him or hate him, as a superb fighter, athlete, strategist and orator (some of his speeches lasted for hours).  He is widely regarded as having been endowed with extraordinary intelligence. He also lived a charmed life, having dodged the bullet on numerous occasions. There have been reports of countless attempts on his life through CIA engineered plots.

After having been educated at the De Lasalle college at Santiago de Cuba, later by jesuits at the Colegio de Dolores in the same city and the Colegio de Belen, Castro graduated from the University of Havana as a lawyer and went on to become the charismatic architect of a revolution that overthrew the dictatorial regime of Fulgencio Batista and established a socialist state.  He held on to power until recently when the presidential reins were handed to his brother Raul Castro, now 85, who has promised to step down in 2018. While a student at school and university, Fidel Castro excelled at sports but was also involved in political activism often in support of the  Orthodox party led by Eduardo Chibás. The situation was volatile. Murders occured and student gangs played a prominent part.

In 1947, he participated in a failed  expedition to overthrow the Dominican Republic dictator, Rafael Leonidas Trujillo Molina.  While attending a student congress the following year, he was involved in an uprising in Bogota, Colombia known as the ‘bogatazo.’ In a country which was very much a US playground and well known for Mafia interests, Castro soon endeavoured to change the status quo represented by the Batista regime.  Together with others, including his brother Raul, he staged an abortive attack on the Moncada Barracks with a view to paving the way for a revolution. The date was 26th July 1953 which was to become a momentous one;  Castro would later insist on its being identified as the start of the Cuban revolution. The attack floundered and Castro, together with many others, was rounded up and arrested. While some of his comrades were executed, Castro was jailed for fifteen years. He was very lucky in that the lieutenant who took him prisoner, Pedro Sarria, simply refused to have him shot or handed over to the barracks commander who would otherwise have had him killed after having him subjected to the most gruesome torture, the kind of torture mentioned in Castro’s letters from prison.

While in prison, Castro was to write a formidable tract ‘History will absolve me,’ his self-defence at the trial which, later, was to have wide circulation throughout Cuba.  He read voraciously and helped set up a prison school. He was released in 1955 as a result of an amnesty and eventually went to Mexico where he met the Argentinean doctor turned revolutionary, Ernesto ‘Che’ Guevara.  A number of potential Cuban and other revolutionaries joined his clandestine movement – the 26th July Movement. Travelling to Cuba on board a rickety old yacht, The Granma, this band of revolutionaries landed on the island on 2nd December, 1956.  They were organised into different columns. They were dispersed by enemy action and many lost their lives.  From the original group of 82, only  eleven remained and retreated to the Sierra Maestre from where they launched their attacks. Gradually their numbers swelled as more locals joined their ranks.  Following captures of different localities, Castro and his companeros finally marched on Havana on January 8, 1959.  By then Batista had fled the country. Fidel was first appointed Commander of the armed forces and later Prime Minister. An agrarian reform was soon put into effect which broke up large landholdings for redistribution among peasants, some of whom were organised into cooperatives.

After having visited the USA, Castro signed a trade agreement with the Soviet Union. There followed a series of sanctions by the USA, especially following the liquidation of many of its Cuban assets and nationalisation of several of its oil refineries. When in NYC to address the UN, Castro and the Cuban delegation stayed at Harlem where links were forged between the Cuban struggle and that of the oppressed in other parts of the world, especially Afroamericans. The USA broke diplomatic relations with Cuba and also planned, through the CIA, in concert with Cuban exiles and Mafia bosses, an invasion, with a landing at the ‘Bahia de los cochinos’ (bay of pigs) which turned out to be an unmitigated disaster. Numerous attempts on Castro’s life were carried out.

With Cuba veering more strongly towards the Soviet orbit, matters with the USA came to a head especially when Khrushchev was allowed to deploy missiles on the island facing Florida, in retaliation to US missiles in Turkey and other places facing the Soviet Union. This tense situation was solved by the two superpowers behind Castro’s back. Earlier US President John Fitzgerald Kennedy had ordered an economic blockade of Cuba which has been maintained until very recently and was even consolidated following the collapse of the USSR in 1991. Castro had also broken relations with the Catholic Church because of its alleged connections with the Batista regime but the situation with the Vatican  thawed significantly towards the end of the 90s marked by the visit of Pope John Paul II to the country. By then the Church had been allowed back. Despite all the economic difficulties, the country, under Castro, made tremendous strides forward in education, medicine, science, sport, international exchange relations and sustainable development.

The Cuban revolution served as a promising source of hope not only to the impoverished people of Latin America but also to the rest of the Tricontinental World. The term was used in 1960 during Castro’s visit to the UN and subsequently Harlem in NYC. Castro’s notion of ‘tricontinental’ applied to the exploited and colonized populations of Latin America, Asia and Africa. A Tricontinental Conference was later held in Havana in 1966.   It offered a militant version of the ‘Third World’ alliance against continued western imperialist designs, an alliance that owes its origins to the Bandung Conference, which had taken place eleven years earlier.  The term ‘tricontinental’ captured a significant feature of the Cuban revolution–its “South-to- South” international ethos of cooperation and solidarity. Cuba played a significant role in the dismantling of Apartheid in South Africa, a point Nelson Mandela underlined. Cuba’s radical vision of “tricontinental” was, however, not merely determined by geographical boundaries. The link with the plight of Afro-Americans suggests that Castro and his collaborators were fully conscious of the existence of the ‘third world’ in the ‘first world.’ In 2004, Castro offered help to the ‘wretched and oppressed’ of the US. The oppressed Americans, on this occasion, were the impoverished of New Orleans.

This occurred in the immediate aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Castro offered to provide access to Cuba’s never ending supply of high quality doctors and health workers to assist those whose home and communities had been devastated by the storm. Some interpreted the humanitarian gesture as Castro’s ultimate insult to his mighty neighbour; and indeed US leaders must have regarded it so, promptly refusing the offer. This gesture was interpreted as signalling Cuba’s commitment to the global south, defined widely.      Under Castro’s leadership, Cuba placed its educational and medical facilities at the service of not only its own people and celebrities but also the common people of Africa, Asia and many other parts of the world. There emerged a series of bilateral, trilateral or multilateral agreements in the context of South-to-South cooperation, which contrasted with the more global and dominant models of hierarchical North-South relations, often denounced for maintaining former colonies in a colonial bind.  As an example of this ‘delinking’ process, Venezuelan oil at low prices and interest rates were exchanged, during the Chavez and Maduro years, for Cuban teachers, doctors and health workers. Cuba had Venezuelan literacy tutors trained in the ‘Yo si Puedo’ pedagogical method created by Cuban educator Leonela Realy. As a result, Cuba helped the Venezuela government enable one and a half million people learn to read and write. There are those who have expressed civil rights concerns regarding whether qualified personnel chosen for these exchanges had the option to decline work assignments abroad.

Like Nicaragua later, Cuba was forced to contend with overwhelming obstacles in its efforts to serve as a revolutionary model to other countries within the US intercontinental sphere of influence in the Americas. Despite all this, Cuba registered notable achievements, especially in preventive health and education. The Universidad de la Habana (University of Havana), although not recognized in the top flight of the now widely referred to world university rankings, has a medical school that is considered among the best in the world.  Many ambitious students from the formerly Anglo-colonized Caribbean are said to strive hard to learn Spanish in order to gain admission to this school.

The same applies to Cuba’s science centres, one of them lauded, in the late 80s, as a remarkable research institution of its kind. In 2000, Argentina’s former soccer superstar Diego Armando Maradona, like others, chose to go to Cuba for rehabilitation from a life threatening, drug-related illness.

According to a 2006 WWF (World Wildlife Federation) report, Cuba is the only country in the world with sustainable development. It combined high human development standards (high literacy and health indexes) with a low ecological footprint; this includes the rate of electricity consumed and carbon dioxide emitted per capita. In making use of old cars and other products, which are made to function thanks to some superb mechanics and technicians, Castro’s Cuba has militated against the prevalent ‘consumer culture ideology’ of obsolescence with its devastating planetary effects.

Some organizations counter these achievements and the statistics involved by pointing to Cuba’s poor standing in the human rights index.  This gives rise to several arguments regarding the extent of allowing civil liberties in a state of siege involving a sworn giant enemy lying next door. Cuba is not to be romanticized. Great poverty exists.  Prostitution, for example, was initially tackled head on by the revolutionary government, through educational and rehabilitation measures such as schools for prostitutes. It resurfaced, especially in tourist areas (similar to other countries), despite its illegality.

Cuba operated a strict policy of control over departures and arrivals of citizens from abroad. This was recently subject to revision, given that the situation has dramatically changed since the early days of the revolution when Cuba lost a huge percentage of its brainpower – doctors and other professionals – to the US. If anything, the small nation now proactively exports such power.

There is also an overproduction of qualified people without reciprocal economic investments to integrate them. It has been argued that one should not blame this solely on the infamous blockade.  In the view of many, he blockade had no justification in recent times, once the Soviet ‘threat’ to the USA was non existent.  Recently lifted, the blockade was condemned by several world figures.  One of them, the late Pope John Paul II, was himself a staunch opponent of Soviet communism and widely perceived to have been a catalyst for its overthrow.  The lifting of the blockade, for which even Pope Francis lobbied strongly, came to pass recently following the normalization of relations between the two countries. It remains to be seen whether the Donald Trump administration will respect Obama’s legacy with regard to US-Cuba relations.

This obituary is adapted from an entry on Castro by Peter Mayo in the Encyclopedia of Modern Political Thought, CQ Press (Sage), 2013.

More articles by:

January 17, 2019
Stan Cox
That Green Growth at the Heart of the Green New Deal? It’s Malignant
David Schultz
Trump vs the Constitution: Why He Cannot Invoke the Emergencies Act to Build a Wall
Paul Cochrane
Europe’s Strategic Humanitarian Aid: Yemen vs. Syria
Tom Clifford
China: An Ancient Country, Getting Older
Greg Grandin
How Not to Build a “Great, Great Wall”
Ted Rall
Our Pointless, Very American Culture of Shame
John G. Russell
Just Another Brick in the Wall of Lies
Patrick Walker
Referendum 2020: A Green New Deal vs. Racist, Classist Climate Genocide
Kevin Zeese - Margaret Flowers
Uniting for a Green New Deal
Matt Johnson
The Wall Already Exists — In Our Hearts and Minds
Jesse Jackson
Trump’s Flailing will get More Desperate and More Dangerous
Andrew Stewart
The Green New Deal Must be Centered on African American and Indigenous Workers to Differentiate Itself From the Democratic Party: Part Three
January 16, 2019
Patrick Bond
Jim Yong Kim’s Mixed Messages to the World Bank and the World
John Grant
Joe Biden, Crime Fighter from Hell
Alvaro Huerta
Brief History Notes on Mexican Immigration to the U.S.
Kenneth Surin
A Great Speaker of the UK’s House of Commons
Elizabeth Henderson
Why Sustainable Agriculture Should Support a Green New Deal
Binoy Kampmark
Trump, Bolton and the Syrian Confusion
Jeff Mackler
Trump’s Syria Exit Tweet Provokes Washington Panic
Barbara Nimri Aziz
How Long Can Nepal Blame Others for Its Woes?
Glenn Sacks
LA Teachers’ Strike: When Just One Man Says, “No”
Cesar Chelala
Violence Against Women: A Pandemic No Longer Hidden
Kim C. Domenico
To Make a Vineyard of the Curse: Fate, Fatalism and Freedom
Dave Lindorff
Criminalizing BDS Trashes Free Speech & Association
Thomas Knapp
Now More Than Ever, It’s Clear the FBI Must Go
Binoy Kampmark
Dances of Disinformation: The Partisan Politics of the Integrity Initiative
Andrew Stewart
The Green New Deal Must be Centered on African American and Indigenous Workers to Differentiate Itself From the Democratic Party: Part Two
Edward Curtin
A Gentrified Little Town Goes to Pot
January 15, 2019
Patrick Cockburn
Refugees Are in the English Channel Because of Western Interventions in the Middle East
Howard Lisnoff
The Faux Political System by the Numbers
Lawrence Davidson
Amos Oz and the Real Israel
John W. Whitehead
Beware the Emergency State
John Laforge
Loudmouths against Nuclear Lawlessness
Myles Hoenig
Labor in the Age of Trump
Jeff Cohen
Mainstream Media Bias on 2020 Democratic Race Already in High Gear
Dean Baker
Will Paying for Kidneys Reduce the Transplant Wait List?
George Ochenski
Trump’s Wall and the Montana Senate’s Theater of the Absurd
Binoy Kampmark
Dances of Disinformation: the Partisan Politics of the Integrity Initiative
Glenn Sacks
On the Picket Lines: Los Angeles Teachers Go On Strike for First Time in 30 Years
Jonah Raskin
Love in a Cold War Climate
Andrew Stewart
The Green New Deal Must be Centered on African American and Indigenous Workers to Differentiate Itself From the Democratic Party
January 14, 2019
Kenn Orphan
The Tears of Justin Trudeau
Julia Stein
California Needs a 10-Year Green New Deal
Dean Baker
Declining Birth Rates: Is the US in Danger of Running Out of People?
Robert Fisk
The US Media has Lost One of Its Sanest Voices on Military Matters