Click amount to donate direct to CounterPunch
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $500
  • $other
  • use PayPal
Spring Fund Drive: Keep CounterPunch Afloat
CounterPunch is a lifeboat of sanity in today’s turbulent political seas. Please make a tax-deductible donation and help us continue to fight Trump and his enablers on both sides of the aisle. Every dollar counts!
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

The Democratic Blame Game

It’s been almost 5 months since I wrote these words on Counterpunch:  “This year, their (the Democrats) bete noir is Donald Trump, but they haven’t decided who to blame yet if they lose: Bernie Sanders or Jill Stein.”  Within a day of Hillary’s loss, Democratic apologists and their acolytes in the media started blaming others.  Both Rachel Madow and Paul Krugman blamed the loss on Jill Stein.  Not to be outdone, Time and Newsweek ran stories a few days later that blamed the loss on Bernie Sanders.  I don’t claim to be Nostradamus, but it looks like I hit the nail on the head with that prediction.  This blaming of others for Democratic failures isn’t anything new.  For the rest of your life you’ll be hearing the myth of how Ralph Nader prevented Al Gore from being elected president.  As if Al Gore would have transformed this country into the land of milk and honey.  This year the blame is spread out;  Jill Stein, Bernie Sanders, the F.B.I., Wikileaks and Russia.

If Trump is so bad (and I think he is), why didn’t Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party easily defeat him?  Nobody held a gun to Hillary’s head and told her not to go to Wisconsin during the fall campaign, even though Trump visited the state five times.  Hillary lost the election in at least six states that Obama carried twice (FL, PA, OH, MI, WI, IA).  She ran a lackluster campaign in the primaries in 2008, but decided that the inevitability factor was just to great to ignore and the Democratic Party bought into this thinking.  Truth be told, this really wasn’t hard to do.  I think the Democratic Party needs to change its name to:  Delusions R Us.

For many years, the Democratic Party has been pushing regressive neo-liberal policies.  They don’t do it as often as Republicans, so they call it progress.  Comparing themselves favorably to Republicans is somewhat of a cottage industry for Democrats.  It’s not enough to have support from the majority of the few newspapers left, or to gain coverage from television stations (that the government regulates, in the public interest), but since the spread of the Internet, many blogs pushing Democratic propaganda have flourished.  With the advent of social media, Democratic apparatchiks can spread this propaganda far and wide, with just the click of a mouse.

Since the Trump victory, there have been many calls for unity. After the election, Bill and Hillary appeared in public saying they wanted to bring the country together.  They were wearing purple and claiming that this was symbolic of blue and red coming together. The media and many people accepted this as fact, even though purple is the color of royalty and has been for thousands of years.  This might have been the abdication of the royal family, but it isn’t the end of neo-liberal Democratic policies.  Most of the calls for opposing Trump are little more than Democratic propaganda.  This includes cries from Bernie Sanders and ‘Our Revolution’.  Bernie endorsed Clinton in the recent election and is a Democrat in everything but name.  He caucuses with Democrats, has voted for their policies and endorsed Democratic candidates in the past.  It’s hard to see much disagreement in the policies Bernie wants and those favored by “Our Revolution”.  They are not the only ones on the left opposing Trump’s policies, but most of them are Democratic in origin.  You might consider yourself an Independent, maybe a Liberal or Progressive, but there is one thing I would like you to know:  Democrats aren’t your friends and they’re not your allies.  You are their vassal and, eventually, you will be treated like one and told to vote for their candidate.

The Democrats are nothing more than part of a two-party duopoly that rules this country.  Just because the Republican part of the duopoly is in power now, doesn’t mean the Democrats are going to change.  They haven’t done it in the past, they’re not doing it now and they probably won’t anytime in the future.  I feel the end the tyrannical two-party duopoly is the only thing that will help this country.  Joining Democrats or Democratic front organizations isn’t going to help change the course of the country, but  rejection of the duopoly will.  I think the Green Party is the best alternative.  Unlike the Democrats, the Green Party actually stands for something and has a vision for the future.  The Democrats foist neo-liberal programs on the populace, but every four years whine that they are the only thing stopping a Republican takeover of government.  Since that moment has arrived, it’s time to stop playing the Democrat’s game.

 

 

More articles by:
Weekend Edition
May 18, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Andrew Levine
The Donald, Vlad, and Bibi
Robert Fisk
How Long Will We Pretend Palestinians Aren’t People?
Jeffrey St. Clair
Wild at Heart: Keeping Up With Margie Kidder
Roger Harris
Venezuela on the Eve of Presidential Elections: The US Empire Isn’t Sitting by Idly
Michael Slager
Criminalizing Victims: the Fate of Honduran Refugees 
John Laforge
Don’t Call It an Explosion: Gaseous Ignition Events with Radioactive Waste
Carlo Filice
The First “Fake News” Story (or, What the Serpent Would Have Said)
Dave Lindorff
Israel Crosses a Line as IDF Snipers Murder Unarmed Protesters in the Ghetto of Gaza
Gary Leupp
The McCain Cult
Robert Fantina
What’s Wrong With the United States?
Jill Richardson
The Lesson I Learned Growing Up Jewish
David Orenstein
A Call to Secular Humanist Resistance
W. T. Whitney
The U.S. Role in Removing a Revolutionary and in Restoring War to Colombia
Rev. William Alberts
The Danger of Praying Truth to Power
Alan Macleod
A Primer on the Venezuelan Elections
John W. Whitehead
The Age of Petty Tyrannies
Franklin Lamb
Have Recent Events Sounded the Death Knell for Iran’s Regional Project?
Brian Saady
How the “Cocaine Mitch” Saga Deflected the Spotlight on Corruption
David Swanson
Tim Kaine’s War Scam Hits a Speed Bump
Norah Vawter
Pipeline Outrage is a Human Issue, Not a Political Issue
Mel Gurtov
Who’s to Blame If the US-North Korea Summit Isn’t Held?
Patrick Bobilin
When Outrage is Capital
Jessicah Pierre
The Moral Revolution America Needs
Binoy Kampmark
Big Dead Place: Remembering Antarctica
John Carroll Md
What Does It Mean to be a Physician Advocate in Haiti?
George Ochenski
Saving Sage Grouse: Another Collaborative Failure
Sam Husseini
To the US Government, Israel is, Again, Totally Off The Hook
Brian Wakamo
Sick of Shady Banks? Get a Loan from the Post Office!
Colin Todhunter
Dangerous Liaison: Industrial Agriculture and the Reductionist Mindset
Ralph Nader
Trump: Making America Dread Again
George Capaccio
Bloody Monday, Every Day of the Week
Barbara Nimri Aziz
Swing Status, Be Gone
Samantha Krop
Questioning Our Declaration on Human Rights
Morna McDermott
Classrooms, Not Computers: Stop Educating for Profit
Patrick Walker
Today’s Poor People’s Campaign: Too Important Not to Criticize
Julia Stein
Wrestling With Zionism
Clark T. Scott
The Exceptional President
Barry Barnett
The Family of Nations Needs to Stand Up to the US  
Robert Koehler
Two Prongs of a Pitchfork
Bruce Raynor
In an Age of Fake News, Journalists Should be Activists for Truth
Max Parry
The U.S. Won’t Say ‘Genocide’ But Cares About Armenian Democracy?
William Gudal
The History of Israel on One Page
Robert Jensen
Neither cis nor TERF
Louis Proyect
Faith or Action in a World Hurtling Toward Oblivion?
David Yearsley
The Ubiquitous Mr. Desplat
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail