FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Patrick Caddell; The Pollster Who ‘Got it Right’

by

“Despite everything we are told day and night – that the political battle in America is between Democrats and Republicans – two thirds of the American people believe that the battle lines are drawn between mainstream America and its ruling Political Class….This is something the political class and mainstream media refuse to recognize much less acknowledge.”

– Patrick Caddell, The real election surprise? The uprising of the American people, FOX News

What’s it going to take to get the political class to realize that people are fed up with the status quo?

Remember the Tea Party? Remember Occupy Wall Street? Remember how the American people voted for “change” in 2008 and then again in 2012?

Weren’t those all signs that the American people were ‘mad as hell’ with the self-serving policies of the Washington elites?

Change means change. It doesn’t mean eight years of splashy oratory accompanied by the greatest transfer of wealth in human history. That’s not what change means. That’s just more of the same.

Did Hillary promise to change the economy, change the direction of the country, or change Washington?

No, of course not, because everyone knows she’s a charter member of the corrupt political establishment, a well-paid lackey of Wall Street whose Foundation is a vast repository of illicit funds from foreign dignitaries, corporate chiefs and gangsters. That’s why Hillary’s braying about change never really convinced anyone, because they knew from experience that she’s a diehard insider who made her personal fortune cutting deals for access with other members of the ruling elite.

What Hillary promised voters was continuity, another four years of Barack Obama. That was her whole shtick. But people don’t want another four more years of Obama. In fact, in a recent survey, people were asked explicitly if we “should we continue with the same policies supported by Barack Obama”? People answered “No” by a resounding 25% margin.

And this is what’s so paradoxical about Obama. On the one hand, he’s still very popular (Gallup puts his public approval ratings at 57% which is quite high), but on the other hand, people know he’s done a crappy job, in fact, according to a recent survey, 70% of the American people think the country is “headed in the wrong direction.” Think about that for a minute. What it means, is that people still like the guy, they just don’t think he’s delivered the goods, which is why most people think he’s been “a disappointment.”

One can only assume that Obama’s failed presidency must have had a big impact on the election and –judging by the results of the congressional, senatorial and executive races– that impact was overwhelmingly negative. Obama’s lousy presidency hurt Hillary in ways that no analyst has yet explored.

But that’s not the main reason why voters rejected Hillary. The main reason has to do with a little matter we never talk about in America, class. Donald Trump was swept into office on a wave of class consciousness that annihilated Hillary’s hope for victory. The only pollster who seems to have figured out what was going on (and who predicted a Trump victory) was Patrick Caddell who explained it all in a brilliant article titled, “The real election surprise? The uprising of the American people”. Here’s an excerpt from the article:

“For more than two years the American people, in a great majority, from left to right, have been in revolt against the political class and the financial elites in America. …It is a peaceful uprising of a people who see a country in decline and see nothing but failure in the performance of their leadership institutions. And they have signaled their intent to take back their country and to reclaim their sovereignty.” Patrick Caddell, The real election surprise? The uprising of the American people, FOX News

So while all the other pollsters were crunching the numbers and examining trends, Caddell was looking for proof that we had entered a new “historic paradigm”, one that was marked less by party identification than it was by collective hatred for the corrupt political establishment and their deep-state puppetmasters. In this brave new world, a vote for Hillary was basically a vote for the status quo. Is it any wonder why Trump won?

Here’s a few questions that were asked in Caddell’s survey that help to shed light the pre-election mood of the country:

“Powerful interests from Wall Street banks to corporations, unions and political interest groups have used campaign and lobbying money to rig the system for them. They are looting the national treasury of billions of dollars at the expense of every man, woman and child. AGREE = 81%; DISAGREE = 13%…

The country is run by an alliance of incumbent politicians, media pundits, lobbyists and other powerful money interests for their own gain at the expense of the American people. AGREE = 87%; DISAGREE = 10%

The real struggle for America is not between Democrats and Republicans but between mainstream American and the ruling political elites. AGREE = 67%; DISAGREE = 24%.”

Which is closer to your opinion if (Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump) wins: the political elites and special interests win; the political elite and special interests lose.
By 65 percent to 35 percent voters said that if Hillary Clinton wins the political elites WIN. And by an opposite margin, the majority of voters said that by 57 percent to 43 percent the elites LOSE if Trump wins.

…when asked whether or not everyone in America plays by the same rules to get ahead or are there different rules for well-connected and people with money, a staggering 84 percent of voters picked the latter. Only 10 percent believed that everyone has an equal opportunity.

These over-arching attitudes provide the framework for today’s political revolt.” (“The real election surprise? The uprising of the American people”, FOX News)

This is excellent analysis given the fact that the vast majority of pundits and pollsters were completely befuddled by the election results. Drawing from his own long experience, Caddell could see that “something profound was happening in the collective consciousness of the American people” and that ” what had been assumed to be the static political system was about to be reconfigured in ways and that we still do not know fully.”

While I admire Caddell’s insights about the emerging class war across America, I’m not sure that he’s right when he says “the old rules of politics are collapsing”. The rules aren’t collapsing. What’s happening is that more people are simply aware of what’s going on and who their real enemies are, the bigshots in the deep-state establishment who have no political affiliation and who control just about everything. This new awareness or class consciousness is an essential part of understanding how the world works and who is screwing who, but it’s importance shouldn’t be exaggerated. No corporate honcho is going to end austerity or raise wages just because his employees figure out that they’re getting ripped off. It doesn’t work that way. The only way to end exploitation is by aligning with other people who have similar interests and who are willing to put themselves on the firing-line in order to get a square deal.

Trump’s not going to do that. He’s not going to fight the ‘power elite system’ that he wants to be a part of. And neither the Democrats or Republicans. Both parties are thoroughly marinated in corruption and joined at the hip with the big money. That should be obvious by now.

That means working people are going to have to find another way, a Plan B, otherwise, the American middle class is going to go the way of the Dodo.

More articles by:

MIKE WHITNEY lives in Washington state. He is a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion (AK Press). Hopeless is also available in a Kindle edition. He can be reached at fergiewhitney@msn.com.

CounterPunch Magazine

minimag-edit

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550

zen economics

Weekend Edition
June 23, 2017
Friday - Sunday
Jeffrey St. Clair
Democrats in the Dead Zone
Gary Leupp
Trump, Qatar and the Danger of Total Confusion
Andrew Levine
The “Democracies” We Deserve
Jeffrey St. Clair - Joshua Frank
The FBI’s “Operation Backfire” and the Case of Briana Waters
Rob Urie
Cannibal Corpse
Joseph G. Ramsey
Savage Calculations: On the Exoneration of Philando Castile’s Killer
John Wight
Trump’s Attack on Cuba
Dave Lindorff
We Need a Mass Movement to Demand Radical Progressive Change
Brian Cloughley
Moving Closer to Doom
David Rosen
The Sex Offender: the 21st Century Witch
John Feffer
All Signs Point to Trump’s Coming War With Iran
Jennifer L. Lieberman
What’s Really New About the Gig Economy?
Pete Dolack
Analyzing the Failures of Syriza
Vijay Prashad
The Russian Nexus
Mike Whitney
Putin Tries to Avoid a Wider War With the US
Gregory Barrett
“Realpolitik” in Berlin: Merkel Fawns Over Kissinger
Louis Yako
The Road to Understanding Syria Goes Through Iraq
Graham Peebles
Grenfell Tower: A Disaster Waiting to Happen
Ezra Rosser
The Poverty State of Mind and the State’s Obligations to the Poor
Ron Jacobs
Andrew Jackson and the American Psyche
Pepe Escobar
Fear and Loathing on the Afghan Silk Road
Lawrence Davidson
On Hidden Cultural Corruptors
Andre Vltchek
Why I Reject Western Courts and Justice
Christopher Brauchli
The Routinization of Mass Shootings in America
Missy Comley Beattie
The Poor Need Not Apply
Martin Billheimer
White Man’s Country and the Iron Room
Joseph Natoli
What to Wonder Now
Tom Clifford
Hong Kong: the Chinese Meant Business
Thomas Knapp
The Castile Doctrine: Cops Without Consequences
Nyla Ali Khan
Borders Versus Memory
Binoy Kampmark
Death on the Road: Memory in Tim Winton’s Shrine
Tony McKenna
The Oily Politics of Unity: Owen Smith as Northern Ireland Shadow Secretary
Nizar Visram
If North Korea Didn’t Exist US Would Create It
John Carroll Md
At St. Catherine’s Hospital, Cite Soleil, Haiti
Kenneth Surin
Brief Impressions of the Singaporean Conjucture
Paul C. Bermanzohn
Trump: the Birth of the Hero
Jill Richardson
Trump on Cuba: If Obama Did It, It’s Bad
Olivia Alperstein
Our President’s Word Wars
REZA FIYOUZAT
Useless Idiots or Useful Collaborators?
Clark T. Scott
Parallel in Significance
Louis Proyect
Hitler and the Lone Wolf Assassin
Julian Vigo
Theresa May Can’t Win for Losing
Richard Klin
Prog Rock: Pomp and Circumstance
Charles R. Larson
Review: Malin Persson Giolito’s “Quicksand”
David Yearsley
RIP: Pomp and Circumstance
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail