FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

The Housing Profiteers

I reside in Orlando, a city laden with socio-economic facades which echo the theme park set pieces for which the city is best known – Shiny on the outside and hollow on the inside. If you tilt your head up in the downtown area you’ll see glossy clean structures that speak to affluence, but it’s difficult to ignore the contradictions on street level where homeless swallow their pride and beg for money, which is not unlike most American cities. It is not uncommon to observe homeless, near retirement age, bound to wheelchairs, who announce their desperation with pleas for help on crudely rendered signage in hopes a passerby will show more empathy than a system which contributed to their plight. I’m not sure what kind of society allows its older folks with physical impediments to beg for money on the street but it’s not one I endorse.

The vacancy rate in Orlando is near 18%, which prompts the immediate question why are there unused housing resources made for human beings to have shelter while people fight the elements just outside the walls. High priced condos and houses lay fallow all over the city, some owned by rentiers waiting for the next monied tourist to show up, others priced too high for a city whose median household income is a few thousand below the national median. The pattern of hoarding is common among the wealthy who’d rather watch a thing rot than sell it for less than they think it’s worth. Such actions raise demand in local markets and inflate housing costs for the lower classes, something the rich love because it means more money for them that they’ll never live to use, a worthy cause to be sure for their blind egos.

Since the 2008 housing bubble the price to income ratio has been climbing back to bubble territory. Americans have been led to believe when their house increases in value it benefits them, it doesn’t. Elevated housing costs have been shown to drive homelessness more than poverty rates. The effect of housing inflation also means increases in interest paid on the principle loan, private mortgage insurance rates, property insurance, realtor commissions, closing costs, and property taxes. It’s a lose lose lose lose lose lose for the people and a giant win for predatory capitalism.

The result for most is becoming “house poor” when costs inflate faster than incomes rise. It’s estimated around 76% of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck so one can imagine there are many in a constant state of anxiety wondering if they are going to make next month’s hefty mortgage or rent payment.

For those that took an Econ 101 course you may recall that housing is rife with inelastic demand which means that demand stays fairly constant even as prices inflate, this happens with any good or service that becomes a necessity, and since going homeless is pretty far down on the list of something most want it means consumers will pay until they can’t anymore. In a more ethical world all essential needs with high levels of inelastic demand would have some price controls built into the economic system to avoid predatory price gouging, as businesses tend to price goods according to the most they can suck out of you. Unfortunately, in our style of capitalism those with leverage are allowed to prey upon consumers with only a semblance of competition holding prices down.

There are a few major entities who directly benefit when housing prices are kept high, and some, if not all play a role in inflating prices.

The State

In Florida there are counties that do satellite surveillance on backyards to see if there is an unstated addition to a home or anything sitting on the property that might raise the property tax owed. There are people who sit around doing this all day as a job so it becomes evident they are aggressively seeking dollars which come in the form of elevated appraisal prices of homes so they may in turn collect more property tax. The state has a hand in establishing what has appraised value and then can reward itself for making that value higher.

Hedge funds/REITS

Hedge funds and real estate investment trusts (REITS) go around buying up commercial and residential real estate with the intent of raising demand in a market and selling off their holdings incrementally at a higher price due to said increased demand they helped create. The idea is simply to buy low and sell high, but hedge funds don’t need a roof over their head, people do. This is a reminder of the travails of neoliberal economics which features a detachment of all consequences for economic actions, they seek only profit with no regard for human problems. These outside investors weasel their way into communities and leech out capital from local populations.

Real Estate Industry

Realtors work on commission based on a percentage of the sale, thus they are always looking to close the biggest deal possible. The higher the price, the more they make, while everyone else loses in the long term with unaffordable housing. Six percent is a pretty standard commission rate and if you work out a little calculation on a the median home price of 188k they take 11k off the top when selling your home. With a median US per capita income of around 30k that means you’ll work for over 4 months of your life just so someone can sell you something without lifting a finger in real world production. That’s some magical salesmanship to be worth that price. These are paper pushers facilitating transactions that should be made straight forward and at low cost for all people who own real estate.

To boot, the National Association of Realtors (NAR) is routinely one of the biggest contributors to lobbying efforts currently ranking 2nd on the list of top lobbyists. Looking at their advocacy it looks like a mixed bag of more amoral neoliberal thinking, do what’s best for number one and disregard externalities. Classic middle-men. According to OpenSecrets NAR’s top outgoing receipts support politicians who are mostly a bunch of neocons, like this guy Sean Duffy – a Trump supporter and former reality star, another fine example of “the least among us” who rule over the people and rig the system for the wealthy.

It should be noted NAR also has an ethics section on their website, which is a funny thing for a bunch of people lobbying primarily for their own benefit. Supplanting democracy is evidently not unethical to capitalists.

I want to say this again for rhetorical effect – Supplanting democracy is not unethical to capitalists.

Banks

Banks artificially drive up demand by putting more “unqualified” buyers in the market raising market prices to the level of credit offered. Banks technically own most homes, as 70% are mortgaged, meaning 70% of the residential properties in the US are a few collective missed payments away from the banks owning it all outright. Homeowner equity destruction and slews of late payments aren’t all that unlikely if we see more layoffs after markets bottom out again, and if market trends continue that seems like a certainty at some point in the not too distant future.

Banks charge interest on properties where if the loan is carried to completion in a 30 year mortgage around double the initial purchase price will have been paid. But typically the cost of the initial labor and materials have been paid for numerous times over during the course of the most home’s existence, and like realtors, the banks didn’t lift a finger to build or maintain that structure. They put digital numbers into a computer and through the magic of fractional reserve banking property becomes a never ending money machine.

All these entities working in conjunction to drive up the cost of living and touting it as a good thing because your home price goes up. But for most Americans that means their debts go up and their ability to pay all their bills just plummeted. For everyone to have a roof over their head sweeping reform is needed, but as long as democracy is suppressed the suited and bejeweled parasites will continue to feast in the age of amoral opportunistic capitalism. Prices are elevated via a complex web of over legislated bullshit that serves only to hold the populace in place so a larger needle can be used to extract blood. Almost none of these entities provide much real world value to the people while draining the plebs’ bank accounts and causing housing insecurity for millions.

More articles by:
September 24, 2018
Jonathan Cook
Hiding in Plain Sight: Why We Cannot See the System Destroying Us
Gary Leupp
All the Good News (Ignored by the Trump-Obsessed Media)
Robert Fisk
I Don’t See How a Palestinian State Can Ever Happen
Barry Brown
Pot as Political Speech
Lara Merling
Puerto Rico’s Colonial Legacy and Its Continuing Economic Troubles
Patrick Cockburn
Iraq’s Prime Ministers Come and Go, But the Stalemate Remains
William Blum
The New Iraq WMD: Russian Interference in US Elections
Julian Vigo
The UK’s Snoopers’ Charter Has Been Dealt a Serious Blow
Joseph Matten
Why Did Global Economic Performance Deteriorate in the 1970s?
Zhivko Illeieff
The Millennial Label: Distinguishing Facts from Fiction
Thomas Hon Wing Polin – Gerry Brown
Xinjiang : The New Great Game
Binoy Kampmark
Casting Kavanaugh: The Trump Supreme Court Drama
Max Wilbert
Blue Angels: the Naked Face of Empire
Weekend Edition
September 21, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Alexandra Isfahani-Hammond
Hurricane Florence and 9.7 Million Pigs
Andrew Levine
Israel’s Anti-Semitism Smear Campaign
Paul Street
Laquan McDonald is Being Tried for His Own Racist Murder
Brad Evans
What Does It Mean to Celebrate International Peace Day?
Nick Pemberton
With or Without Kavanaugh, The United States Is Anti-Choice
Jim Kavanagh
“Taxpayer Money” Threatens Medicare-for-All (And Every Other Social Program)
Jonathan Cook
Palestine: The Testbed for Trump’s Plan to Tear up the Rules-Based International Order
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: the Chickenhawks Have Finally Come Back Home to Roost!
David Rosen
As the Capitalist World Turns: From Empire to Imperialism to Globalization?
Jonah Raskin
Green Capitalism Rears Its Head at Global Climate Action Summit
James Munson
On Climate, the Centrists are the Deplorables
Robert Hunziker
Is Paris 2015 Already Underwater?
Arshad Khan
Will Their Ever be Justice for Rohingya Muslims?
Jill Richardson
Why Women Don’t Report Sexual Assault
Dave Clennon
A Victory for Historical Accuracy and the Peace Movement: Not One Emmy for Ken Burns and “The Vietnam War”
W. T. Whitney
US Harasses Cuba Amid Mysterious Circumstances
Nathan Kalman-Lamb
Things That Make Sports Fans Uncomfortable
George Capaccio
Iran: “Snapping Back” Sanctions and the Threat of War
Kenneth Surin
Brexit is Coming, But Which Will It Be?
Louis Proyect
Moore’s “Fahrenheit 11/9”: Entertaining Film, Crappy Politics
Ramzy Baroud
Why Israel Demolishes: Khan Al-Ahmar as Representation of Greater Genocide
Ben Dangl
The Zapatistas’ Dignified Rage: Revolutionary Theories and Anticapitalist Dreams of Subcommandante Marcos
Ron Jacobs
Faith, Madness, or Death
Bill Glahn
Crime Comes Knocking
Terry Heaton
Pat Robertson’s Hurricane “Miracle”
Dave Lindorff
In Montgomery County PA, It’s Often a Jury of White People
Louis Yako
From Citizens to Customers: the Corporate Customer Service Culture in America 
William Boardman
The Shame of Dianne Feinstein, the Courage of Christine Blasey Ford 
Ernie Niemi
Logging and Climate Change: Oregon is Appalachia and Timber is Our Coal
Jessicah Pierre
Nike Says “Believe in Something,” But Can It Sacrifice Something, Too?
Paul Fitzgerald - Elizabeth Gould
Weaponized Dreams? The Curious Case of Robert Moss
Olivia Alperstein
An Environmental 9/11: the EPA’s Gutting of Methane Regulations
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail