FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

The Hillary Push: Manipulation You Can Believe In

It’s underway: the non-stop, 100% focus on the disgusting misogynistic acts of Donald Trump, to the total exclusion of all other issues. U.S.-supported Saudi attacks in Yemen kill hundreds of civilians, including children. New studies show that all-out climate disaster is even closer than we feared. Poverty holds millions of people in its grip. But none of this is even mentioned. And with the election less than a month away, there is virtually no discussion of Hillary Clinton’s despicable record and positions.

The One Percent interests that long for Hillary to be President are doubtlessly thrilled with how things are going. It’s not just that vital issues are being ignored. It’s also that the screws are being tightened on anyone who would consider not voting for Hillary. The wealthy beneficiaries of business-as-usual must be enjoying the spectacle of “progressives” attacking anyone straying from the One Percent script. A friend of mine was called “idiotic” the other day when she mentioned possibly voting for a third party candidate, for example.   I personally was labeled “puerile” for pointing out that submission to the manipulation that surrounds us only makes things worse.

I had explained that it’s not just that a vacuum on the left creates an opening for right-wing narcissists like Trump. It’s also that the Democratic Party proactively promotes the rise of such Neanderthals to head the Republican ticket. A leaked DNC memo lists Donald Trump as someone Democrats should “elevate”. It suggests encouraging the press to cover Trump and others like him.   The DNC understands that the best way to scare people into voting for someone they dislike is to get the other mainstream party to run someone even worse. And if this strategy unleashes malevolent forces on society, well that’s just collateral damage.

We’re told to ignore that leaked memo. We’re also told to pay no attention to how the DNC undermined Bernie Sanders, a candidate who was much more capable of defeating Trump according to polls than Hillary. And we’re supposed to reject third party candidates as not viable without thinking about the role played by the Democratic and Republican Parties in undercutting their viability. The Presidential debate “Commission” controlled by the two corporate parties kept third party candidates out of the debates, for instance.

The lies, confusion and hypocrisy are in full swing. Take Hillary Clinton’s environmental record and positions, for example. They’re abysmal, yet big environmental groups have endorsed her and they pretend she’s an environmental leader. We need to mobilize immediately to reverse global warming, but Hillary Clinton is the queen of fracking, having actively promoted it around the world as Secretary of State. She’s committed to the delusional “all of the above” energy strategy and has identified repairing and replacing oil and gas infrastructure as a top priority. She’s a promoter of natural gas “as a bridge” to renewables, an approach which has been debunked as utter nonsense. Just as Barack Obama’s expansion of fossil fuel extraction and infrastructure locked us into fossil fuels and undercut renewables, so will Hillary’s. And she has appointed oil industry darling Ken Salazar as her transition chief, giving him a lead role in filling her cabinet.

Hillary promises to continue Obama’s “leadership” on other environmental issues as well, even though it’s been leadership in the wrong direction. Under Obama, the White House has derailed and weakened more environmental regulations than under George W. Bush. The EPA has approved GMOs, pollinator-threatening pesticides, and all sorts of other nasty chemicals. Obama has championed corporate-drafted, environmentally-destructive “trade” agreements that extend and enshrine the worst elements of NAFTA and other existing agreements.

These and other actions have made Obama one of the most aggressively anti-environmental Presidents ever and Hillary Clinton will continue on that path. Meanwhile environmental groups pretend that the Democrats are our environmental saviors and we’re all supposed to smile and clap obediently.

These same dynamics play out on other vital issues. If you want more wars, Hillary’s a great choice for you. If you want to ensure that the insurance industry boondoggle known as the Affordable Care Act will never be replaced by actual health care via a universal single payer system, you can count on Hillary. And if the destruction of basic rights like due process and privacy is your cup of tea, under Hillary there will be plenty to go around. These are just examples of the unacceptable Obama legacy that Hillary has pledged to continue.

But no, it’s “puerile” to even consider not voting for Hillary Clinton and the One Percent-serving, war-mongering, environmentally-destructive, rights-destroying, mass incarcerating, immigrant-deporting Democratic Party. According to voices coming at us from every direction, only women-haters and fools would refuse to bow their heads and vote for Clinton since her opponent is so appalling.

But here’s the truth. For decades, in poll after poll, disgust with corporate control over our democracy has been nearly universal. Far more people now identify as Independent than Democrat or Republican. Sixty-nine percent of 18 to 29 year olds and 50 percent of 30 to 49 year olds in the U.S. would now vote for a socialist. We are actually very close to being able to build the movement for economic and political democracy that we need, including but not limited to a political party of the 99%. That’s why we’re being subjected to the charade that characterizes this election season. Only through intense manipulation, and only by pitting an outrageous bigot against a right wing militaristic corporate hack like Hillary Clinton, can those who have been pushing humanity towards the brink of disaster maintain control.

Those who are being maligned for refusing to vote for the candidates of either Wall Street party should take hope. Change is coming. The forces committed to maintaining the 1%-serving status quo can only win by manipulation and coercion. And only if we let them. If ever there was a time to organize rather than mourn, this is it.

More articles by:

Carol Dansereau is a long-time environmental attorney and organizer, and the author of What It Will Take. Rejecting Dead-ends and False Friends in the Fight for the Earth.  

January 15, 2019
Patrick Cockburn
Refugees Are in the English Channel Because of Western Interventions in the Middle East
Howard Lisnoff
The Faux Political System by the Numbers
Lawrence Davidson
Amos Oz and the Real Israel
John W. Whitehead
Beware the Emergency State
John Laforge
Loudmouths against Nuclear Lawlessness
Myles Hoenig
Labor in the Age of Trump
Jeff Cohen
Mainstream Media Bias on 2020 Democratic Race Already in High Gear
Dean Baker
Will Paying for Kidneys Reduce the Transplant Wait List?
George Ochenski
Trump’s Wall and the Montana Senate’s Theater of the Absurd
Binoy Kampmark
Dances of Disinformation: the Partisan Politics of the Integrity Initiative
Glenn Sacks
On the Picket Lines: Los Angeles Teachers Go On Strike for First Time in 30 Years
Jonah Raskin
Love in a Cold War Climate
Andrew Stewart
The Green New Deal Must be Centered on African American and Indigenous Workers to Differentiate Itself From the Democratic Party
January 14, 2019
Kenn Orphan
The Tears of Justin Trudeau
Julia Stein
California Needs a 10-Year Green New Deal
Dean Baker
Declining Birth Rates: Is the US in Danger of Running Out of People?
Robert Fisk
The US Media has Lost One of Its Sanest Voices on Military Matters
Vijay Prashad
5.5 Million Women Build Their Wall
Nicky Reid
Lessons From Rojava
Ted Rall
Here is the Progressive Agenda
Robert Koehler
A Green Future is One Without War
Gary Leupp
The Chickens Come Home to Roost….in Northern Syria
Glenn Sacks
LA Teachers’ Strike: “The Country Is Watching”
Sam Gordon
Who Are Northern Ireland’s Democratic Unionists?
Weekend Edition
January 11, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Richard Moser
Neoliberalism: Free Market Fundamentalism or Corporate Power?
Paul Street
Bordering on Fascism: Scholars Reflect on Dangerous Times
Joseph Majerle III – Matthew Stevenson
Who or What Brought Down Dag Hammarskjöld?
Jeffrey St. Clair - Joshua Frank
How Tre Arrow Became America’s Most Wanted Environmental “Terrorist”
Andrew Levine
Dealbreakers: The Democrats, Trump and His Wall
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Que Syria, Syria
Dave Lindorff
A Potentially Tectonic Event Shakes up the Mumia Abu-Jamal Case
Nick Pemberton
There Are More Important Things Than The Truth
Brian Cloughley
How Trump’s Insults and Lies are Harming America
David Rosen
Sexual Predators in the Era of Trump
Tamara Pearson
Everything the Western Mainstream Media Outlets Get Wrong When Covering Poor Countries
Richard E. Rubenstein
Trump vs. the Anti-Trumps: It’s the System That Needs Changing Not Just the Personnel
Christopher Ketcham
A Walk in the Woods, Away from the Screens
Basav Sen
Democrats Failed Their First Big Test on Climate
Lauren Smith
Nicaragua – The Irony of the NICA Act Being Signed into Law by Trump
Joseph Natoli
Will Trumpism Outlive Trump?
Olivia Alperstein
The EPA Rule Change That Could Kill Thousands
Medea Benjamin – Alice Slater
The New Congress Needs to Create a Green Planet at Peace
Caoimhghin Ó Croidheáin
Cuba: Trump Turns the Vise
Ramzy Baroud
When Bolsonaro and Netanyahu Are ‘Brothers’: Why Brazil Should Shun the Israeli Model
Mitchell Zimmerman
Government by Extortion
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail