FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

The Battle for Mercosur

What does it mean to lead Mercosur, a valuable customs union that includes Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay and Venezuela? Judging by the organization’s recent crisis, a lot.

Mercosur, translated as the Southern Common Market, was established in 1991 after an agreement between Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay. The environment, at the time, saw governments embrace neoliberalism after years of polarization and military governments. Conservative-led governments saw deregulation and free markets as paths to prosperity and a welcomed relief to decades of debt mismanagement.

The bloc’s creation upheld the commitment to free trade and open markets, a new chapter in Latin America’s economy. The New York Times, in 1994, noted how markets under the “old, Balkanized South America” suffered from problems such as tariffs, poor transportation routes and nationalism.

In addition, the bloc was originally set up to counter the North American Free Trade Agreement. Yet these plans were scraped after Mercosur became more profitable and attractive to foreign investors. There was even talk of creating a common currency, similar to the euro, as well as admitting members such as Chile and Venezuela.

However, these plans did not happen after the economic crises in the 1990s with Mexico’s peso crisis as one example. Furthermore, members could not work together and lead in unison, with countries like Brazil and Argentina acting on their own.

Incidentally, it was these crises that led members in the 2000s, as the “pink tide” began, to look toward Mercosur as a solution to their woes. Leftist leaders, such as Hugo Chávez and Néstor Kirchner, sought a closer relationship with each other and redefine the group. With full support of all members, Venezuela was admitted as a full member in 2012. Bolivia was admitted in 2015, although not as a full member.

 

New agreements with South American countries were signed, ties grew stronger and regional growth soared. Despite not accomplishing some of their plans, such as a long-overdue agreement with the European Union, the bloc became a valuable source of profit for members.

The bloc is still useful for members even after a shift toward the right among members. In March, Uruguayan Foreign Minister Rodolfo Nin Novoa, while reflecting on Mercosur’s 25th anniversary, said the group’s goal is still economic development for all members. Yet, he also warned about challenges that could threaten it. In just three months, it faced one of these challenges.

The Blame Game

It first began in May, as Uruguay prepared to pass the president-pro-tempore seat to Venezuela by the end of June. Every six months, each nation becomes the head of Mercosur, based on alphabetical order. This position allows a nation to act as leader when dealing with free trade negotiations. Uruguay, which held the position in January, needed to relinquish its title for Venezuela.

But Argentina, Paraguay, and Brazil fiercely opposed this. Their arguments against Venezuela’s new role cited the country’s failure to follow the union’s rules as well as concerns about the government’s stance against its opposition.

Uruguay dismissed any talk of a schism developing in the union. Its president, Tabaré Vázquez, from the left-wing Frente Amplio (Broad Front) coalition, vowed to transfer the presidential seat to Venezuela by the end of June without controversy.

But this never happened. Uruguay met multiple times with representatives from other countries. Paraguay, Argentina, and Brazil, notably a country that ensured Venezuela’s membership to Mercosur, fought against the leader of the Latin American pink tide.

As weeks passed without resolution, members became frustrated. Eladio Loizaga, Paraguay’s Foreign Minister, blamed Uruguay for the crisis by siding with Venezuela. Venezuelan Foreign Minister Delcy Rodriguez chided Paraguay and Brazil for “bad manners” in opposing the change.

Uruguay kept its composure amid conflicts among members. Nin Novoa pledged to, once again, transfer the president-pro-tempore seat, this time on August 1. Of course, the country recognized not all the members would be on the same page. After all, conservative-led nations outnumbered the leftist ones. But it could not risk further heightening tensions as most of the region sought a return to strong economic growth experienced a decade ago.

Negotiations still continued among members who publically and privately argued against the transfer. On August 1, it was only Uruguay that officially recognized Venezuela as the official leader of Mercosur. The other members objected to the new president pro tempore.

Paraguay, on July 30, publically said it would not accept Venezuela’s presidency and preferred Argentina instead. Brazilian Foreign Minister José Serra, a close adviser to President Michel Temer, believed Uruguay abandoned Mercosur by giving away the presidency. Argentinian Foreign Minister Susana Malcorra blamed Uruguay for putting Mercosur “in limbo.”

Nicolas Maduro, a few days after receiving the presidency, sharply criticized his opponents by calling Argentina, Paraguay and Brazil the “triple alliance of tortures.”

Such rhetoric was seen as revoking the days of the barbaric military governments, which would only deepen the schism in Mercosur. Paraguay, in response to Maduro’s triple alliance comment, said relations with Venezuela are “frozen.” In response, Venezuela accused Loizago of participating in Operation Condor, a bloody and repressive history in Latin America that led to hundreds of thousands killed.

In response to Maduro’s comments, Nin Novoa felt disappointed and said it wouldn’t alleviate the situation. Moreover, he defended Uruguay by saying it did what it needed to do and wanted to move on.

In August, a potentially damaging diplomatic incident occurred. In the summer, Serra visited Uruguay to persuade the country to not give the president to Venezuela. This, Nin Novoa explained, was an attempt to “buy” Uruguay’s vote, an accusation at a conservative government struggling to establish legitimacy after former President Dilma Rousseff’s questionable ouster.

Brazil became furious and summoned Uruguay’s ambassador over the comments. Strangely, this ended without a significant break in relations between the two countries. In fact, both said a misunderstanding took place and sought to move forward.

Meanwhile, Paraguay, which withdrew its ambassador to Caracas, suggested a Mercosur not only without Venezuela, but also Uruguay after the debacle.

Argentina suggested a collegiate presidency, which would centralize power among all members, until December. Then, in January, Argentina would govern Mercosur. Initially, Uruguay favored this if Venezuela accepted. But Nin Novoa quickly rejected it as he recognized Venezuela would never favor such a change.

Nin Novoa, while reflecting on the crisis in an August 1 interview with the Uruguayan outlet El Pais, acknowledged the situation as “grave.”

Blocking the Leader

Weeks passed without any resolution. Serra charged Uruguayan officials for creating doubt about Mercosur’s effectiveness. Nin Novoa reiterated it was not Uruguay’s responsibility to deal with the mess. He also criticized Venezuela for failure to collaborate more in the organization, which kept the country as a neutral in the dispute.

Then, on September 13, the four original members announced Venezuela would not lead Mercosur until it followed the union’s treaties and regulations. Uruguay said there was “consensus support” for the decision. The members set a deadline of December 1 for Venezuela to follow the bloc’s rules or else it would be suspended and, possibly, kicked out.

In the meantime, a committee with a representative from each nation, sans Venezuela, would lead Mercosur.

Expectedly, Venezuela sharply denounced the ultimatum with Rodriguez rejecting the claims of the “Triple Alliance” and upholding its status as president-pro-tempore.

Beyond this, Venezuela cannot do anything. Most likely, judging by Venezuela’s woes this past year as well as this crisis, it would end up suspended. It is required to “approve an estimated 300 rules and regulations from the block, and must still incorporate some thirty international treaties which Mercosur has adhered.” Doing this in three months is not easy.

Can its allies do anything? Not really. Bolivia is still not a full member until Brazil approves it, its power is useless. Uruguay is focusing on attracting foreign investment and recently received support from Brazil’s Michel Temer for leading negotiations with the European Union. Frankly, for a center-left country, it is not politically viable to stand with Venezuela.

A New Phase

In June, Serra spoke about the direction of Mercosur and acknowledged the power it holds. His goal was not to eliminate the bloc, but demand “deeper investment policies and physical integration.” He sharply criticized the populist wave of the 2000s and blamed PT-led governments for acting as the “vanguard of backwardness.”

It does seem likely other conservative-led governments share this goal of reversing “de-industralization” from the populist era. Yet, it is difficult to see whether that’ll come true. After all, Temer’s government is unpopular and ruling after a coup against Dilma Rousseff.

There are positives that may signal change. China, a major consumer of Latin American products, signaled its support of Temer at the G-20 summit earlier this month. Furthermore, leftist parties are weak in waging a counter-offensive after being voted out.

Still, Mercosur faces a tough road ahead. The world economy is barely recovering with countries such as China worried about growth rates. Global trade is decreasing with World Trade Organization Director-General Roberto Azevêdo projecting it will continue to fall this year and even next year if nothing changes.

As the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development reported last year, “robust trade and global growth go hand in hand together.” It’s one way of ensuring growth, and Mercosur members know that.

Brazil and Argentina are recovering from their economic woes, and seek to become rising stars once again. Paraguay, years after capturing the presidency years ago in a coup, does not want to relinquish its power to the left. Uruguay is doing well so far, but the ruling coalition is concerned with keeping power.

Mercosur may have faced its gravest crisis yet, but the story is not over.

More articles by:

Brandon Jordan is a freelance journalist. He can be reached at bjordan7474[at]gmail.com.

Weekend Edition
April 20, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Paul Street
Ruling Class Operatives Say the Darndest Things: On Devils Known and Not
Conn Hallinan
The Great Game Comes to Syria
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Mother of War
Andrew Levine
“How Come?” Questions
Doug Noble
A Tale of Two Atrocities: Douma and Gaza
Kenneth Surin
The Blight of Ukania
Howard Lisnoff
How James Comey Became the Strange New Hero of the Liberals
William Blum
Anti-Empire Report: Unseen Persons
Lawrence Davidson
Missiles Over Damascus
Patrick Cockburn
The Plight of the Yazidi of Afrin
Pete Dolack
Fooled Again? Trump Trade Policy Elevates Corporate Power
Stan Cox
For Climate Mobilization, Look to 1960s Vietnam Before Turning to 1940s America
William Hawes
Global Weirding
Dan Glazebrook
World War is Still in the Cards
Nick Pemberton
In Defense of Cardi B: Beyond Bourgeois PC Culture
Ishmael Reed
Hollywood’s Last Days?
Peter Certo
There Was Nothing Humanitarian About Our Strikes on Syria
Dean Baker
China’s “Currency Devaluation Game”
Ann Garrison
Why Don’t We All Vote to Commit International Crimes?
LEJ Rachell
The Baddest Black Power Artist You Never Heard Of
Lawrence Ware
All Hell Broke Out in Oklahoma
Franklin Lamb
Tehran’s Syria: Lebanon Colonization Project is Collapsing
Donny Swanson
Janus v. AFSCME: What’s It All About?
Will Podmore
Brexit and the Windrush Britons
Brian Saady
Boehner’s Marijuana Lobbying is Symptomatic of Special-Interest Problem
Julian Vigo
Google’s Delisting and Censorship of Information
Patrick Walker
Political Dynamite: Poor People’s Campaign and the Movement for a People’s Party
Fred Gardner
Medical Board to MDs: Emphasize Dangers of Marijuana
Rob Seimetz
We Must Stand In Solidarity With Eric Reid
Missy Comley Beattie
Remembering Barbara Bush
Wim Laven
Teaching Peace in a Time of Hate
Thomas Knapp
Freedom is Winning in the Encryption Arms Race
Mir Alikhan
There Won’t be Peace in Afghanistan Until There’s Peace in Kashmir
Robert Koehler
Playing War in Syria
Tamara Pearson
US Shootings: Gun Industry Killing More People Overseas
John Feffer
Trump’s Trade War is About Trump Not China
Morris Pearl
Why the Census Shouldn’t Ask About Citizenship
Ralph Nader
Bill Curry on the Move against Public Corruption
Josh Hoxie
Five Tax Myths Debunked
Leslie Mullin
Democratic Space in Adverse Times: Milestone at Haiti’s University of the Aristide Foundation
Louis Proyect
Syria and Neo-McCarthyism
Dean Baker
Finance 202 Meets Economics 101
Abel Cohen
Forget Gun Control, Try Bullet Control
Robert Fantina
“Damascus Time:” An Iranian Movie
David Yearsley
Bach and Taxes
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail