Click amount to donate direct to CounterPunch
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $500
  • $other
  • use PayPal
DOUBLE YOUR DONATION!
We don’t run corporate ads. We don’t shake our readers down for money every month or every quarter like some other sites out there. We provide our site for free to all, but the bandwidth we pay to do so doesn’t come cheap. A generous donor is matching all donations of $100 or more! So please donate now to double your punch!
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Omens From Berlin

Berlin.

There is currently too much dramatic news abroad in the world, mostly bad.  What can an election in one single city mean, far from most fronts? Yet the voting in Berlin last Sunday (September 18th) was full of drama and meaning, also outside Germany. The results caused some to grieve, some to applaud and analysts like soothsayers to turn to arithmetic.

Angela Merkel’s party, the CDU, hitherto junior partner in the Berlin government with the SPD (Social Democrats), took one more painful beating in a growing series, with its lowest results in recent history, a measly 17.6%. Some of the blame rests on the beefy shoulders of the local party leader, whose campaign in a city full of problems – jobs, rent, fares, education – stressed more cops, the introduction of Tasers and greater repression generally. He will now almost certainly have to swap his handsome office as deputy mayor for a chilly opposition seat in the city legislature. And poor Ms. Merkel had to face his gloomy adherents, eat some crow, and say that her famous “We’ll manage it!” slogan had led to unexpected and difficult consequences. Indeed, a major cause for the CDU losses lies with the immigrant issue and with those  welcoming words of Merkel, among the few decent ones in her entire time in office, but which led to last year’s influx of a million refugees. Her welcome, however much she now dilutes and alters it, is being used against her by all those in politics or the media, whose constant  “straight, factual” accounts of every foreigner’s crime or misdemeanor are overfull of dog-whistle hints to the racists. Her sister party in big, rich Bavaria (the only such single-state party), fearful of further slipping from its usual majority rule, is foremost in attacking its presumed  sibling, always in proper suit-and-tie language but with the old lederhosen-dirndl distrust of outsiders visible underneath. Merkel is even being forsaken in her own party by further-right forces, and her sinking popularity ratings are already endangering her twin jobs as party leader and chancellor. She could well grieve at the Berlin results.

But there was not too loud rejoicing either at the headquarters of the SPD (Social Democrats), whose Mayor Michael Müller has been cultivating every possible difference with his till-now partners. They are indeed out, as desired, while he is still in and will remain in his prestigious office. But alas, although the SPD still stayed ahead of all the others, its results, 21.6% (2011: 28.3%)marked a bigger loss, the biggest in its history. With this grievous result, and with no two parties able to get the necessary 50% of seats in the legislature, the next ruling government (called the Senate in Berlin) will now require three parties to reach that number.

Aside from the conservative Free Democrats, who now squeeze back into the legislature with 6.7 %, the party which really rejoiced at the results was by far the most dangerous, the Alternative for Germany (AfD) which,  in this first electoral try in Berlin, got 14.2 % which gives them 25 seats out of 160. Though well under recent wins in bigger East German states, the number was higher than in Germany’s two other city-states, Hamburg and Bremen and was a nasty, frightening blow to a city which likes to boast of being open-minded and cosmopolitan. It was also an omen for the federal elections next year, when it may well get a similar vote. Indeed, it was an alarm call for the entire world. Based on hatred of foreigners, with a stress against Muslims, it was this platform plank which won it most votes, especially from worried, insecure and increasingly nationalist voters in some areas of East Berlin. What few of its supporters even noticed, it is also a party backing less taxes for the millionaires, less support for the needy, less equality for women, but more weapons and more aggressiveness outside German borders. Its rise is part of a wave, almost a tsunami, now engulfing one European country after the other; its ideas are established at the top in Poland, Hungary and the Baltic countries, are shared by coalition partners in most of Scandinavia, and threaten to win out in Austria, the Netherlands and France. It has not yet reached such strength in the strongest of them all, Germany, but it is gaining momentum.

Back in Berlin, it looks as if the SPD will, or almost has to choose both the Greens and the LINKE as government partners, especially after the LINKE surprised nearly everyone by gaining votes while others lost, with 15.6 % (2011: 11.7 %), even beating its Green rivals by a few hairs (they got 15.2 %).  All three strongly opposed the AfD, a key point in bringing them together. There are other points of agreement. But in all coalitions which the LINKE ever joined they diluted their positions so much that they were often undistinguishable from the other parties – and for the voters, who always punished them, sometimes turning to the right – and the AfD. Will they make too many compromises again this time or will they, though partners, take more aggressive positions and seek support in the population? It was interesting to note that the LINKE party gained most of all in working-class areas of West Berlin, where its members were more militant than in East Berlin, whose often elderly members, hold-overs from GDR days, were not too accustomed to demonstrating out in the streets.

These issues also matter on the national scene. It seems possible that after the elections next September, the SPD may there, too, break its current ties with the CDU – with or without Merkel – and seek the votes of the Greens and the LINKE, which could  perhaps add up to a majority with new, different scenery.

It would demand compromises from the LINKE in such a case, especially the approval to using German troops abroad – even when that clearly furthers German expansionist policies. The LINKE has hitherto said it will not agree to such a compromise, but will for its part make demands.  One of them is the rejection of the trade deals  with the USA – known as TIPP, and the equivalent deal with Canada, called CETA. Both are favorable only to big business, especially the ever smaller group of ever greater monopolies already dominating the world.

The head of the SPD, Sigmar Gabriel, formerly favored both treaties, like Merkel. Under great pressure from huge numbers of Germans he qualified his support for TTIP (or at least seemed to – much like a political candidate in the USA). But a CETA decision is due this year, and Gabriel insisted on approving it. Last Saturday, one day before the Berlin vote, there were demonstrations against CETA and TTIP in seven major cities, supported by many organizations on the left, ecological groups and, most important, at least the two biggest unions, IG Metall and Ver.di (with workers mostly in city and state jobs). It was a wonderful protest. I took part in Berlin, with about 70,000 others, starting off on the street in front of my house and marching off – all highly-motivated, determined – and happy that the pouring rain at the start quickly ceased. The similar marches in the other cities were not quite so big as in Berlin, of course, but all big for their cities – and adding up to over 300,000! Even the police estimated close to 200,000!

On Monday SPD leaders met in secret session  to decide on their party’s position toward CETA. Many grass roots groups and initiatives, even the affiliated Young Socialists, all demanded a No to CETA. Gabriel’s reputation and future status were on the line. And he won. The influence of big business was stronger than that of even the biggest unions and the hundreds of thousands who demonstrated. He promised a few changes in CETA, compromises to overcome opposition, and in the end his prayers were answered – he got the desired  Yes vote.

The question remained relevant – and not unrelated to similar questions elsewhere in the world. Could one agree to join a government headed by a man like Gabriel, with all that stood behind him? The question was not quite so easy to decide in light of the threat from the nearly-fascist danger from the AfD.  But it was certainly a question which will dominate German politics in the coming year and have unforeseeable results:

ELECTION RESULTS.

SPD—- 21.6 %—–(2011: 28.3 %)

CDU—-17.6 %—–(2011: 23.3 %)

LINKE–15.6 %—–(2011: 11.7 %)

Greens 15.2 %— (2011: 17.6 %)

AfD—–14.2 %—-(2011: 0.0 %)

FDP——6.7 %—-(2011: 1.8 %)

More articles by:

Victor Grossman writes the Berlin Bulletin, which you can subscribe to for free by sending an email to: wechsler_grossman@yahoo.de.

Weekend Edition
October 19, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Jason Hirthler
The Pieties of the Liberal Class
Jeffrey St. Clair
A Day in My Life at CounterPunch
Paul Street
“Male Energy,” Authoritarian Whiteness and Creeping Fascism in the Age of Trump
Nick Pemberton
Reflections on Chomsky’s Voting Strategy: Why The Democratic Party Can’t Be Saved
John Davis
The Last History of the United States
Yigal Bronner
The Road to Khan al-Akhmar
Robert Hunziker
The Negan Syndrome
Andrew Levine
Democrats Ahead: Progressives Beware
Rannie Amiri
There is No “Proxy War” in Yemen
David Rosen
America’s Lost Souls: the 21st Century Lumpen-Proletariat?
Joseph Natoli
The Age of Misrepresentations
Ron Jacobs
History Is Not Kind
John Laforge
White House Radiation: Weakened Regulations Would Save Industry Billions
Ramzy Baroud
The UN ‘Sheriff’: Nikki Haley Elevated Israel, Damaged US Standing
Robert Fantina
Trump, Human Rights and the Middle East
Anthony Pahnke – Jim Goodman
NAFTA 2.0 Will Help Corporations More Than Farmers
Jill Richardson
Identity Crisis: Elizabeth Warren’s Claims Cherokee Heritage
Sam Husseini
The Most Strategic Midterm Race: Elder Challenges Hoyer
Maria Foscarinis – John Tharp
The Criminalization of Homelessness
Robert Fisk
The Story of the Armenian Legion: a Dark Tale of Anger and Revenge
Jacques R. Pauwels
Dinner With Marx in the House of the Swan
Dave Lindorff
US ‘Outrage’ over Slaying of US Residents Depends on the Nation Responsible
Ricardo Vaz
How Many Yemenis is a DC Pundit Worth?
Elliot Sperber
Build More Gardens, Phase out Cars
Chris Gilbert
In the Wake of Nepal’s Incomplete Revolution: Dispatch by a Far-Flung Bolivarian 
Muhammad Othman
Let Us Bray
Gerry Brown
Are Chinese Municipal $6 Trillion (40 Trillion Yuan) Hidden Debts Posing Titanic Risks?
Rev. William Alberts
Judge Kavanaugh’s Defenders Doth Protest Too Much
Ralph Nader
Unmasking Phony Values Campaigns by the Corporatists
Victor Grossman
A Big Rally and a Bavarian Vote
James Bovard
Groped at the Airport: Congress Must End TSA’s Sexual Assaults on Women
Jeff Roby
Florida After Hurricane Michael: the Sad State of the Unheeded Planner
Wim Laven
Intentional or Incompetence—Voter Suppression Where We Live
Bradley Kaye
The Policy of Policing
Wim Laven
The Catholic Church Fails Sexual Abuse Victims
Kevin Cashman
One Year After Hurricane Maria: Employment in Puerto Rico is Down by 26,000
Dr. Hakim Young
Nonviolent Afghans Bring a Breath of Fresh Air
Karl Grossman
Irving Like vs. Big Nuke
Dan Corjescu
The New Politics of Climate Change
John Carter
The Plight of the Pyrenees: the Abandoned Guard Dogs of the West
Ted Rall
Brett Kavanaugh and the Politics of Emotion-Shaming
Graham Peebles
Sharing is Key to a New Economic and Democratic Order
Ed Rampell
The Advocates
Louis Proyect
The Education Business
David Yearsley
Shock-and-Awe Inside Oracle Arena
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail