FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Clinton Incorruptible: An Ideological Contrivance

Goldman got its money’s worth at the Convention, $700k for two speeches, more a promissory note on behalf of the entire Wall Street community for continued support when and if she is elected president. Clinton, an engine of self-promotion that never turns off, makes Trump’s self-promotion infantile, tiresome, and dyspeptic by comparison. A coinciding of personas, public and private, is difficult to hide, ambition-driven translating into hawkish militarism, the mutilation of national healthcare, friend to corporate and financial vested interests, outclassing Trump in service to monopoly capital.

Was the Democratic party hypocritical in nominating Clinton for the presidency? Hardly. Its own record on war, health insurance, corporatism stands out, with the exception of the New Deal, since Kennedy’s time with comparable stands going back to Wilson, and before that, Grover Cleveland—a sordid promotion of anticommunism and red-baiting to cover its sins of omission and commission in opposing a society of authentic human welfare. Now, somehow, a woman crashing the glass ceiling—never mind her reactionary bent and danger to world peace—fits perfectly the the scenario of constant obfuscation, as the concentration of wealth-and-power as a unified structural syndrome continues apace.

The desexualization of gender, as proving herself one of the boys (the Afghanistan surge) and continually in evidence wherever paramilitary operations, regime change, and provocative confrontation with Russia and China has been involved in recent years, gives her high credence in Pentagon circles. And her affinity for Clintonian economics, shoulder to shoulder with Bill, and in willing company with Geithner, Summers, and the neoliberal onslaught, adds a dose of steeliness, in the face of widespread poverty and economic class-differences, to her pseudo-masculinity when it comes to displaying reserves of, and readiness to use, power with impunity.

Game-changer, according to Bill? Quite possibly, if her ruthlessness becomes operable, as surely it would, in the advancement of public policy. But that is not what he meant, for as con man (only rivaled by Obama), he credits her with a softness, delicacy, caring-ness, devotion to the cause of children, motherhood, consoling voice to the grieved; he pulls out all the stops in fallacious image-building, a Mother Theresa in pantsuit. Goddess of War and Privilege is more like it, and positively appealing to an America itself increasingly authoritarian, so that in the coming election, it is not that she is a woman but that she shows greater determination and strength in full-scale resumption of the Cold War that proves her winning attraction.

Already the propaganda machinery is cranking out a Trump-Putin hidden relationship, not only to divert attention from her own deviousness (especially the content of the privately-retained emails), but to make her the only safe guardian of American security. Power-woman has little relation to gender-equality and –justice because it reduces identity to a nameless, sexless basis of raw destructiveness. (Children in American—what of the countless children murdered overseas via armed drone targeted assassination, with not a word of protest from her.) She plays the gender card the way Obama played the race card to gain office—utter cynicism, the cultivation of a non-menacing aspect, in both cases making identity politics an utter scam by which to further the worst features of plutocratic-militaristic capitalism in America.

And the masses shout hosannas. A Clinton-Trump election is an uncanny replication of the nation’s heartbeat, one that verges on nascent fascism proceeding quickly to a full-scale reproduction. Both Clintons are equally reprehensible to Bush II and Trump in that regard, as measured on that standard, and the major parties they respectively represent, likewise. Who is to blame? Not the candidates alone, and not even the parties as self-sufficient agents of causation. It is us, all of us, either directly engaged in, or directly and indirectly benefiting from, imperialism, militarism, privatization, and a spirit of nihilism (particularly as concerns climate change and the environment), that has thrust candidates and both parties alike into positions of legitimacy and prominence, despite—and actually because of—their contemptuous record on, and regard for, human welfare.

Measured by the stabilization and enlargement of capitalism, in America, but more important, also as an exclusive world system, free from socialism, peoples’ democracies, formal and informal colonial dependencies, indigenous peasant revolts, the US stands implicated in its un-budging posture of global counterrevolution. The Philadelphia convention merely drives further nails into the coffin of humanity.

More articles by:

Norman Pollack Ph.D. Harvard, Guggenheim Fellow, early writings on American Populism as a radical movement, prof., activist.. His interests are social theory and the structural analysis of capitalism and fascism. He can be reached at pollackn@msu.edu.

June 21, 2018
Ron Jacobs
Divest From the Business of Incarceration
W. T. Whitney
Angola in Louisiana: Proving Ground for Racialized Capitalism
Susan Babbitt
Assange and Truth: the Deeper (Harder) Issue
Kenn Orphan
Humanity vs. the Rule of Law
Mateo Pimentel
Why on Earth a Country of Laws and Borders?
Michael T. Klare
The Pentagon’s Provocative Encirclement of China
Howard Lisnoff
The Outrageous Level of Intolerance is Happening Everywhere!
Vijay Prashad
The People of India Stand With Palestine
RS Ahthion
Internment Camps for Child Migrants
Binoy Kampmark
Rocking the G7: Trump Stomps His Allies
Raouf Halaby
Give It Up, Ya Mahmoud
Lawrence Wittner
Getting Ready for Nuclear War
Patrick Cockburn
Kurdish Women Protest After Being Told by Turkish-Backed Militias to Wear the Hijab
Dean Baker
When Both Men and Women Drop Out of the Labor Force, Why Do Economists Only Ask About Men?
Bruce Lerro
Big Brother Facebook: Drawing Down the Iron Curtain on Yankeedom
June 20, 2018
Henry Giroux
Trump’s War on Children is an act of State Terrorism
Bill Hackwell
Unprecedented Cruelty Against Immigrants and Their Children
Paul Atwood
“What? You Think We’re So Innocent?”
Nicola Perugini
The Palestinian Tipping Point
K.J. Noh
Destiny and Daring: South Korean President Moon Jae-In’s Impossible Journey Towards Peace
Gary Leupp
Jeff Sessions and St. Paul’s Clear and Wise Commands
M. G. Piety
On Speaking Small Truths to Power
Dave Lindorff
Some Straight Talk for Younger People on Social Security (and Medicare too)
George Wuerthner
The Public Value of Forests as Carbon Reserves
CJ Hopkins
Confession of a Putin-Nazi Denialist
David Schultz
Less Than Fundamental:  the Myth of Voting Rights in America
Rohullah Naderi
The West’s Over-Publicized Development Achievements in Afghanistan 
Dan Bacher
California Lacks Real Marine Protection as Offshore Drilling Expands in State Waters
Lori Hanson – Miguel Gomez
The Students of Nicaragua’s April Uprising
Russell Mokhiber
Are Corporations Behind Frivolous Lawsuits Against Corporations?
Michael Welton
Infusing Civil Society With Hope for a Better World
June 19, 2018
Ann Robertson - Bill Leumer
We Can Thank Top Union Officials for Trump
Lawrence Davidson
The Republican Party Falls Apart, the Democrats Get Stuck
Sheldon Richman
Trump, North Korea, and Iran
Richard Rubenstein
Trump the (Shakespearean) Fool: a New Look at the Dynamics of Trumpism
Kevin Zeese - Margaret Flowers
Protect Immigrant Rights; End the Crises That Drive Migration
Gary Leupp
Norway: Just Withdraw From NATO
Kristine Mattis
Nerd Culture, Adultolescence, and the Abdication of Social Priorities
Mike Garrity
The Forest Service Should Not be Above the Law
Colin Todhunter
Pro-GMO Activism And Smears Masquerade As Journalism: From Seralini To Jairam Ramesh, Aruna Rodrigues Puts The Record Straight
Doug Rawlings
Does the Burns/Novick Vietnam Documentary Deserve an Emmy?
Kenneth Surin
2018 Electioneering in Appalachian Virginia
Nino Pagliccia
Chrystia Freeland Fails to See the Emerging Multipolar World
John Forte
Stuart Hall and Us
June 18, 2018
Paul Street
Denuclearize the United States? An Unthinkable Thought
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail