FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

The Great Rift

The State of Israel was still young, when two famous comedians produced a short act:

Two Arabs stand on the seashore and curse a boat carrying new Jewish  immigrants.

Next, two of the new immigrants stand on the seashore and curse a boat carrying new immigrants from Poland.

Next, two immigrants from Poland stand on the seashore and curse a boat carrying new immigrants from Germany.

Next, two immigrants from Germany stand on the seashore and curse a boat carrying new immigrants from North Africa.

And so on…

Perhaps this is the story of all immigration countries, like the US, Australia, Canada et al. But in Israel, with a nationalist ideology which includes all Jews (and excludes all others) this is a bit odd

The new Jewish community (called the Yishuv) in what was then Turkish Palestine was founded mainly by immigrants from Russia.

Before that, there was a small Jewish community consisting of ultra-Orthodox Jews from Eastern Europe and another small community of Sephardic Jews. These were descendents of Jews evicted from Spain (Sepharad in Hebrew) in the early 15th century. Many of them were quite rich, since they owned the only valuable property in the country: land.

It was the Russian immigration before World War I that shaped the Yishuv for generations. A large part of Poland belonged at that time to Russia, and was included in the Russian immigration wave. One of these, a young man called David Green, changed his name to Ben-Gurion.

In the 1920s, a wave of Jews from the newly independent and anti-Semitic Poland filled the ranks of the Yishuv.

When my family came from Germany to Palestine in 1933 it was this Russian-Polish community they found here. The “Germans” were treated with contempt by the old-timers, who called them Jeckes – no one knows for sure where that came from – and were routinely cheated.

This was quite a reversal of roles: in Germany it was the local Jews who treated the less-civilized immigrants from Poland and Russia – “Ost-Juden” – with contempt.

All this did not concern us, the children of that era. We did not want to be immigrants, and not German, Poles or Russians. We belonged to a new nation coming into being in this country. We spoke Hebrew, a very vivid language woken from the dead. We wanted to be farmers, pioneers.

We created a new ideal type, local, indigenous. He was nicknamed “Sabra”, the local cactus plant, prickly outside, sweet inside. This plant could be seen all over the country, though originally it was imported from Mexico.

Our idea was to get rid of all the attributes of the different Jewish communities and throw everybody into the melting pot, from which they would emerge as new-born Hebrews, a new race deeply rooted in the soil of this country.

On our 18th birthday we rushed to the British District Officer in order to change our foreign names into Hebrew ones. Who wants to go through life with a German or Russian name?

By the end of the 1930s, the new terminology unconsciously adopted by everybody made a clear distinction between Jewish and Hebrew. We dreamed of a Hebrew State, joined the Hebrew underground and spoke about Hebrew agriculture, Hebrew industry and the future Hebrew army. Jews were abroad: the Jewish Diaspora (generally called the “Jewish Exile”), the Jewish religion, the Jewish tradition.

This usage was natural or self-evident. We were busy building something completely new. We thought about the Diaspora Jews with condescension. Some tiny groups even preached a complete break with the Jews abroad and their history. But the Sabras had no patience with all this ideological nonsense. Even the word “Zionism” became a synonym for nonsense – “don’t talk Zionism” meant stop uttering highfaluting phrases.

We were busily, and quite consciously, creating a new Hebrew culture – poetry, literature, dance, painting, theater, journalism, reflecting our new reality in our new homeland.

Then came the Holocaust. When its full monstrosity became undeniable, in 1944, a wave of remorse swept the Yishuv. But by then we were already busy with creating the “state in the making”.

When the State of Israel was officially declared, in the middle of the 1948 war, we were about 650,000 Jews in the country. Within a few years, we brought in hundreds of thousands, then millions, of new immigrants.

From where? A few hundred thousand were brought from the camps in Europe, where the pathetic remnants of the Holocaust were waiting. But the great majority came from Islamic countries, from Morocco to Iran.

For us, they were all the same. Immigrants to be thrown into the melting pot, to become wonderful people like us.

Almost no one paid attention to the huge change in the demographic composition of the Jewish people caused by the Holocaust. Before, Oriental Jews were a small minority among the Jews. After, they were a larger part by far. This was bound to change their consciousness.

A very few old-timers (myself included) warned that a new reality had to be faced. That the ideals imported from Europe did not really suit the Oriental immigrants. People like Ben-Gurion and his colleagues were unperturbed. They were sure that things would sort themselves out by themselves. Hadn’t they always done so before?

Well, they didn’t.The first generation of new immigrants from the “East” (actually, Morocco is far to the west of us) was busy just making a living. They also venerated Ben-Gurion. But the second generation started to ask questions. The third is now in full rebellion.

The Zionist perception that all Jews are the same, with slight differences of language and skin color, is anachronistic. The “oriental” Jews show no inclination to being thrown into any melting pot. They are different in almost all respects.

The melting pot is broken. Oriental Jews (often falsely called Sephardis) are proud of their heritage. They rebel against European superiority.

This fight now dominates Israeli life. No area of life is exempt from it. It is social, economic, cultural, political – often hidden behind a different facade, but there all the time.

This is a social problem. Since most Europeans had time to attain some economic status before the arrival of the Orientals, they are as a rule more affluent, They also are installed in most key economic positions. The Orientals feel exploited, discriminated against, lower class.

Orientals are as a rule proud of being much more emotional, especially about national affairs. They accuse the Ashkenazim (from an old, disused Hebrew name for Germany) of being cold-blooded, less patriotic.

Those who had changed their names were determined to revert to their old Moroccan or Iraqi ones. Their adopted Hebrew names became suddenly symbols of Ashkenazi tyranny.

They also have a very different attitude towards religion.  Inhabitants of Muslim countries are generally modestly religious, neither atheists nor fanatics. Jews from Islamic countries are the same. Few are very religious, but even fewer would call themselves “secular”.

Ashkenazim are quite different. True, the ultra-Orthodox, anti-Zionist “haredim” (those who are “afraid” of God) are mostly Ashkenazim, as are the “Religious Zionists” who come close to fascism. But the large majority of Ashkenazim are “secular”, a polite way of saying atheist. Almost all the founders of Zionism were radical atheists. Now the national-religious community in the country is rapidly gaining ground.

The tragedy of present-day Israel is not that there are so many divisions, but that they all converge in one large rift.

The grandson of an immigrant from Morocco probably belongs to a lower social and economic class, is moderately religious, and is a radical nationalist. That means that he is bitter against “the old elites” (who are mostly Ashkenazi) , against the secular culture, against the “leftists” (who for him are all degenerate Ashkenazim). He is also a fan of certain Arab-hating football teams and a devotee of “oriental music” – a genre which is neither quite Arab nor quite Greek, but as remote from classical music as Teheran is from Vienna.

This means, in political terms, that this person almost certainly votes for Likud, irrespective of what the Likud does. Ahkenzis can point out to him that the Likud conducts a policy that is the very opposite of his vital interests, a neo-liberal, anti-social policy that favors the very rich. He will not listen. He is bound to the Likud by a thousand bonds of sentiment and tradition.

The same is true for the other side. The Left (what is left of it) will remain the party of the Ashkenazim, as will Meretz. Their members constitute the “old Elite”, though they may depend on social security. They will look down on the religious of all hues, listen to Beethoven (or pretend to), pay lip service to the “two-state solution” and curse Netanyahu – who, of course, is as Ashkenazi as can be.

The present rift between Europeans and Orientals is not the only one.

When the melting pot came crashing down, every part of Israeli society became autonomous.

The Arab sector of Israel – more than 20% – is practically separate. Arab citizens are represented in the Knesset, but this week the Knesset adopted a law that allows 90 (out of 120) members of the Knesset to expel any member. This is a direct threat to the deputies of the united Arab party, which now numbers 13 members.

The new immigrants from Russia (“new” means since 1989)  live a life of their own, proud of their Russian culture, looking down on us primitives, despising religion, hating socialists of any hue and – more than anyone else – hating Arabs with all their hearts. They have their own ultra-nationalist party, led by “Ivet” Lieberman.

And then there are the ultra-Orthodox, who do not belong, who hate Zionism and live in a world of their own, almost completely cut off. For them the religious-Zionists are non-believers, condemned to roast in hell.

This is the array, more or less. All sectors used to be united by the army (except the Arabs and the Orthodox) which was a sacred institution – until an Oriental soldier called Elor Azarya saw a wounded Arab attacker lying on the ground and shot him point-blank in the head.

For the mass of Orientals, he is a national hero. For the army command and the mass of Europeans he is an abomination. The split is becoming an abyss.

What can unite Israel now?

Well, a good war, for example.

More articles by:

URI AVNERY is an Israeli writer and peace activist with Gush Shalom. He is a contributor to CounterPunch’s book The Politics of Anti-Semitism.

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550

June 18, 2019
John McMurtry
Koch-Oil Big Lies and Ecocide Writ Large in Canada
Robert Fisk
Trump’s Evidence About Iran is “Dodgy” at Best
Yoav Litvin
Catch 2020 – Trump’s Authoritarian Endgame
Thomas Knapp
Opposition Research: It’s Not Trump’s Fault That Politics is a “Dirty” Game
Medea Benjamin - Nicolas J. S. Davies
U.S. Sanctions: Economic Sabotage that is Deadly, Illegal and Ineffective
Gary Leupp
Marx and Walking Zen
Thomas Hon Wing Polin
Color Revolution In Hong Kong: USA Vs. China
Howard Lisnoff
The False Prophets Cometh
Michael T. Klare
Bolton Wants to Fight Iran, But the Pentagon Has Its Sights on China
Steve Early
The Global Movement Against Gentrification
Dean Baker
The Wall Street Journal Doesn’t Like Rent Control
Tom Engelhardt
If Trump’s the Symptom, Then What’s the Disease?
June 17, 2019
Patrick Cockburn
The Dark Side of Brexit: Britain’s Ethnic Minorities Are Facing More and More Violence
Linn Washington Jr.
Remember the Vincennes? The US’s Long History of Provoking Iran
Geoff Dutton
Where the Wild Things Were: Abbey’s Road Revisited
Nick Licata
Did a Coverup of Who Caused Flint Michigan’s Contaminated Water Continue During Its Investigation? 
Binoy Kampmark
Julian Assange and the Scales of Justice: Exceptions, Extraditions and Politics
John Feffer
Democracy Faces a Global Crisis
Louisa Willcox
Revamping Grizzly Bear Recovery
Stephen Cooper
“Wheel! Of! Fortune!” (A Vegas Story)
Daniel Warner
Let Us Laugh Together, On Principle
Brian Cloughley
Trump Washington Detests the Belt and Road Initiative
Weekend Edition
June 14, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Michael Hudson
Trump’s Trade Threats are Really Cold War 2.0
Bruce E. Levine
Tom Paine, Christianity, and Modern Psychiatry
Jason Hirthler
Mainstream 101: Supporting Imperialism, Suppressing Socialism
T.J. Coles
How Much Do Humans Pollute? A Breakdown of Industrial, Vehicular and Household C02 Emissions
Andrew Levine
Whither The Trump Paradox?
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: In the Land of 10,000 Talkers, All With Broken Tongues
Pete Dolack
Look to U.S. Executive Suites, Not Beijing, For Why Production is Moved
Paul Street
It Can’t Happen Here: From Buzz Windrip and Doremus Jessup to Donald Trump and MSNBC
Rob Urie
Capitalism Versus Democracy
Richard Moser
The Climate Counter-Offensive: Secrecy, Deception and Disarming the Green New Deal
Naman Habtom-Desta
Up in the Air: the Fallacy of Aerial Campaigns
Ramzy Baroud
Kushner as a Colonial Administrator: Let’s Talk About the ‘Israeli Model’
Mark Hand
Residents of Toxic W.Va. Town Keep Hope Alive
John Kendall Hawkins
Alias Anything You Please: a Lifetime of Dylan
Linn Washington Jr.
Bigots in Blue: Philadelphia Police Department is a Home For Hate
David Macaray
UAW Faces Its Moment of Truth
Brian Cloughley
Trump’s Washington Detests the Belt and Road Initiative
Horace G. Campbell
Edward Seaga and the Institutionalization of Thuggery, Violence and Dehumanization in Jamaica
Graham Peebles
Zero Waste: The Global Plastics Crisis
Michael Schwalbe
Oppose Inequality, Not Cops
Ron Jacobs
Scott Noble’s History of Resistance
Olivia Alperstein
The Climate Crisis is Also a Health Emergency
David Rosen
Time to Break Up the 21st Century Tech Trusts
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail