FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

David Brooks’ God Is Not Your God

I set out to write about Fascism and was sidetracked by a piece of vacuous garbage by David Brooks in the New York Times. It goes without saying that pretty much everything Brooks writes is confused garbage; yet he keeps writing. Generally I avoid reading him and he doesn’t so much speak for a distinct ideology as for a confusion of things in his apparently thick head— but I do respond now.

The latent, misplaced Islamophobia in his latest column is indicative of the pervading and growing sense of Islamophobia in the culture and especially elite circles.

Interspersed throughout the general pseudo-babble comprising the piece, some quotes:

Obama is using language to engineer a reaction rather than to tell the truth, which is the definition of propaganda.

It seems blindingly obvious to say, but the spirit of religion begins with a sense that God exists. God is the primary reality, and out of that flows a set of values and experiences: prayer, praise, charity, contrition, grace and the desire to grow closer toward holiness. Sincere faith begins with humility in relation to the Almighty and a sense of being strengthened by his infinite love.

[Note the masculine his infinite love— perhaps the most revealing line in here].

The spirit of dominion, on the other hand, does not start with an awareness of God. It starts with a sense of injury and a desire to heal injury through revenge and domination.

For the terrorist, a sense of humiliation is the primary reality. Terrorism emerges from a psychic state, not a spiritual one. This turns into a grievance, the belief that some external enemy is the cause of this injury, rather than some internal weakness.

For the religious person it’s about God. For the terrorist, it’s about himself. When Omar Mateen was in the midst of his rampage, he was posting on Facebook and calling a TV station. His audience was us, not the Divine.

I originally picked every quote apart; a lot can be said about each, but that’s not really necessary: the dim-witted, confused, strung-together abstractions are not so important as the underlying sentiment, namely, Brooks’ relative morality, the vapid projected sense of a categorical difference between us and these people, a vain and false suggestion that increasingly defines this sort of Islamophobia.

He says: “these people are Godless; they come from a religion that obviously carries some unique trait for godlessness.” This moronic tribalism, masquerading as reasoned response to horror, is appalling and shameful. Moreover it— as everyone in Brooks’ world does— completely misunderstands the nature of the conflict, and terrorism itself. Where is any mention of the bombing and/or occupation of Seven Muslim Countries over the last decade and a half, which is what if not State Terror? (Not to mention— the general impoverishment of these regions at the expense of the West, and a dire and worsening ecological crisis). No, to Brooks and co it’s something distinct: we are enlightened, and these people are backwards and they carry within them both the possibility for reformation, and the capability of thoughtless primal violence.

Such sheer uninformed stupidity & arrogance— and while not outright stated, here— Racism, it makes my blood boil.

Will Solomon lives and works in Vermont and is on Twitter, @wsolol.
More articles by:
April 24, 2018
Carl Boggs
Russia and the War Party
William A. Cohn
Carnage Unleashed: the Pentagon and the AUMF
Nathan Kalman-Lamb
The Racist Culture of Canadian Hockey
María Julia Bertomeu
On Angers, Disgusts and Nauseas
Nick Pemberton
How To Buy A Seat In Congress 101
Ron Jacobs
Resisting the Military-Now More Than Ever
Paul Bentley
A Velvet Revolution Turns Bloody? Ten Dead in Toronto
Sonali Kolhatkar
The Left, Syria and Fake News
Manuel E. Yepe
The Confirmation of Democracy in Cuba
Peter Montgomery
Christian Nationalism: Good for Politicians, Bad for America and the World
Ted Rall
Bad Drones
Jill Richardson
The Latest Attack on Food Stamps
Andrew Stewart
What Kind of Unionism is This?
Ellen Brown
Fox in the Hen House: Why Interest Rates Are Rising
April 23, 2018
Patrick Cockburn
In Middle East Wars It Pays to be Skeptical
Thomas Knapp
Just When You Thought “Russiagate” Couldn’t Get Any Sillier …
Gregory Barrett
The Moral Mask
Robert Hunziker
Chemical Madness!
David Swanson
Senator Tim Kaine’s Brief Run-In With the Law
Dave Lindorff
Starbucks Has a Racism Problem
Uri Avnery
The Great Day
Nyla Ali Khan
Girls Reduced to Being Repositories of Communal and Religious Identities in Kashmir
Ted Rall
Stop Letting Trump Distract You From Your Wants and Needs
Steve Klinger
The Cautionary Tale of Donald J. Trump
Kevin Zeese - Margaret Flowers
Conflict Over the Future of the Planet
Cesar Chelala
Gideon Levy: A Voice of Sanity from Israel
Weekend Edition
April 20, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Paul Street
Ruling Class Operatives Say the Darndest Things: On Devils Known and Not
Conn Hallinan
The Great Game Comes to Syria
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Mother of War
Andrew Levine
“How Come?” Questions
Doug Noble
A Tale of Two Atrocities: Douma and Gaza
Kenneth Surin
The Blight of Ukania
Howard Lisnoff
How James Comey Became the Strange New Hero of the Liberals
William Blum
Anti-Empire Report: Unseen Persons
Lawrence Davidson
Missiles Over Damascus
Patrick Cockburn
The Plight of the Yazidi of Afrin
Pete Dolack
Fooled Again? Trump Trade Policy Elevates Corporate Power
Stan Cox
For Climate Mobilization, Look to 1960s Vietnam Before Turning to 1940s America
William Hawes
Global Weirding
Dan Glazebrook
World War is Still in the Cards
Nick Pemberton
In Defense of Cardi B: Beyond Bourgeois PC Culture
Ishmael Reed
Hollywood’s Last Days?
Peter Certo
There Was Nothing Humanitarian About Our Strikes on Syria
Dean Baker
China’s “Currency Devaluation Game”
Ann Garrison
Why Don’t We All Vote to Commit International Crimes?
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail