FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Wanted: Daddy or Mommy in Chief

Imagine a want ad for the position of U.S. President: Seeking a Daddy or Mommy to perform the duties of the president of the United States. Based on what we’re witnessing—the venomous, venal, and vehement aspirants presently hard balling shit at one another as well as past and current office holders—I have an image of the ad and its contents.

Compulsory qualifications:

Candidates will have a sense of entitlement, limitless arrogance, an exaggerated sense of self-importance, be manipulative, exploitative, and deceive both with impressive solemnity and while smiling.

Candidates must have a facility for pitting groups of people against each other.

Candidates must be able to glamorize war, rally the masses to believe war is necessary, rally the young to enlist in the military, promote nationalism, and jackboot countries to join war coalitions.

Candidates must be proficient in pandering to fear, using the words “terror” and “terrorism” at precisely the right moments and especially when a majority of people expresses war weariness.

Candidates will be Oscar-worthy thespians, emoting lines such as:

“He could have been my son.”

“She could’ve been my daughter.”

“He died serving his country in a noble cause.”

“She died serving her country in a noble cause.”

Candidates will have the ability to let slide a tear, feigning emotion, perhaps while looking forward to that afternoon’s golf game or a swim, going out to dinner with friends, walking the dog, sizing up (or down) a woman’s tits, or thinking about what country to explode next.

Candidates will quote scripture and never conclude a speech without a “God bless America.”

Candidates will be able to vilify the opposition as “divisive and dangerous” and “unmoored,” unqualified for the assignment. Will be able to say the competition wants to bar Muslims from entering the U.S. while he or she advocates actions that kill Muslims. Will be able to say he or she will build a wall against border entry despite supporting trade agreements that render impossible a man or woman’s capacity to provide basic needs for family in countries where that wall prevents opportunity.

Candidates can make promises and change his or her position before or after taking the oath of office.

Candidates must lack a conscience and disregard the moral or legal standards in the culture.

Candidates will be exemplary in guaranteeing that Americans are inured to injustice and place blame for inequality squarely on the Other.

Candidates will be able to cause chaos, destroy civilizations.

Candidates must be sociopaths.

Candidates must sit comfortably on a pedestal.

Applicants will sign a code: On my honor as Daddy in Chief or Mommy in Chief, I will accede to the Military- Industrial-Security-Propaganda Complex.

Position offers lucrative taxpayer-funded benefits and post-tenure perks, including speaking opportunities paying as much as $500,000 each and book deals.

More articles by:

Missy Beattie has written for National Public Radio and Nashville Life Magazine. She was an instructor of memoirs writing at Johns Hopkins’ Osher Lifelong Learning Institute in BaltimoreEmail: missybeat@gmail.com

September 18, 2018
Conn Hallinan
Britain: the Anti-Semitism Debate
Tamara Pearson
Why Mexico’s Next President is No Friend of Migrants
Richard Moser
Both the Commune and Revolution
Nick Pemberton
Serena 15, Tennis Love
Binoy Kampmark
Inconvenient Realities: Climate Change and the South Pacific
Martin Billheimer
La Grand’Route: Waiting for the Bus
John Kendall Hawkins
Seymour Hersh: a Life of Adversarial Democracy at Work
Faisal Khan
Is Israel a Democracy?
John Feffer
The GOP Wants Trumpism…Without Trump
Kim Ives
The Roots of Haiti’s Movement for PetroCaribe Transparency
Dave Lindorff
We Already Have a Fake Billionaire President; Why Would We want a Real One Running in 2020?
Gerry Brown
Is China Springing Debt Traps or Throwing a Lifeline to Countries in Distress?
Pete Tucker
The Washington Post Really Wants to Stop Ben Jealous
Dean Baker
Getting It Wrong Again: Consumer Spending and the Great Recession
September 17, 2018
Melvin Goodman
What is to be Done?
Rob Urie
American Fascism
Patrick Cockburn
The Adults in the White House Trying to Save the US From Trump Are Just as Dangerous as He Is
Jeffrey St. Clair - Alexander Cockburn
The Long Fall of Bob Woodward: From Nixon’s Nemesis to Cheney’s Savoir
Mairead Maguire
Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era
Dean Baker
The Bank Bailout of 2008 was Unnecessary
Wim Laven
Hurricane Trump, Season 2
Yves Engler
Smearing Dimitri Lascaris
Ron Jacobs
From ROTC to Revolution and Beyond
Clark T. Scott
The Cannibals of Horsepower
Binoy Kampmark
A Traditional Right: Jimmie Åkesson and the Sweden Democrats
Laura Flanders
History Markers
Weekend Edition
September 14, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Carl Boggs
Obama’s Imperial Presidency
Joshua Frank
From CO2 to Methane, Trump’s Hurricane of Destruction
Jeffrey St. Clair
Maria’s Missing Dead
Andrew Levine
A Bulwark Against the Idiocy of Conservatives Like Brett Kavanaugh
T.J. Coles
Neil deGrasse Tyson: A Celebrity Salesman for the Military-Industrial-Complex
Jeff Ballinger
Nike and Colin Kaepernick: Fronting the Bigots’ Team
David Rosen
Why Stop at Roe? How “Settled Law” Can be Overturned
Gary Olson
Pope Francis and the Battle Over Cultural Terrain
Nick Pemberton
Donald The Victim: A Product of Post-9/11 America
Ramzy Baroud
The Veiled Danger of the ‘Dead’ Oslo Accords
Kevin Martin
U.S. Support for the Bombing of Yemen to Continue
Robert Fisk
A Murder in Aleppo
Robert Hunziker
The Elite World Order in Jitters
Ben Dangl
After 9/11: The Staggering Economic and Human Cost of the War on Terror
Charles Pierson
Invade The Hague! Bolton vs. the ICC
Robert Fantina
Trump and Palestine
Daniel Warner
Hubris on and Off the Court
John Kendall Hawkins
Boning Up on Eternal Recurrence, Kubrick-style: “2001,” Revisited
Haydar Khan
Set Theory of the Left
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail