FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Behind the Veil of Chinese Politics

Beijing.

Three stories in the first two weeks of May, the 50th anniversary of the launch of the Cultural Revolution, offered an intriguing peek behind the veil that usually covers Chinese politics. Two grabbed the headlines, the other was barely mentioned but it may cast a revealing insight on how China sees events unfolding.

The first story concerns President Xi Jinping’s warning of cabals, cliques and conspirators which came to light in the first week in May. The speech, delivered in January, confirmed what many suspected.

Xi chose his words carefully. “Some officials have been forming cabals and cliques to covertly defy the CPC [Communist Party of China] Central Committee’s decisions and policies,” which risked “compromising the political security of the Party and the country’’.

He also repeated comments, made during a state visit to the US last year, that the anti-corruption crackdown  that has resulted in 100 senior party, government and military officials being punished — was “not a ‘House of Cards’ power struggle” to settle old scores.

The crackdown against corruption has netted some big names. It would be surprising if Xi was not facing some determined opposition. Culturally, economically, socially China is changing. This change will feed into the political process at some stage, especially as the economy slows, which is why Xi believes that the party needs a firm hand at the helm. After amassing a number of titles to earn the moniker “Chairman of Everything”, Xi sees the greatest threat to the party as a muddled response, one that he is determined to avoid.

The second story sees Xi demanding that top-ranking officers, of major general and above in the People’s Liberation Army, must up their game and has ordered “inspection teams’ to monitor their work and ensure the integrity of the chain of command. Has Xi ruffled feathers? Yes.

Cabals, senior officers under scrutiny. None of this is happening in isolation. From Beijing’s perspective, there is a clear and present danger building up close to its borders. Major General Luo Yuan, (one of those presumably to be monitored) a researcher at the PLA Military Science Academy, said in May (third story) that the US is “building an encirclement of anti-missile systems around China and the only missing link is the Korean peninsula’’. He was referring to proposals by the US to deploy the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense anti-ballistic missile system in South Korea, ostensibly to deter North Korea.   This would complete the circle.  Its 2,000 km range would cover northeastern China as well as parts of Russia and the South China Sea.

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi warned in March after meeting with his Russian counterpart Sergey Lavrov that “the deployment will break the strategic balance of the region and spark an arms race’’.

Any arms race needs tension to feed the purchasing of weapons and that could be ratcheted up over the next few months. Judges at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Hague are set to rule on the Philippines’ challenge to China regarding the South China Sea. China has indicated it will not heed the ruling.  Asserting sovereignty over almost of the 3. 5 million square kilometers of the South China Sea, China’s behavior is not going down well with its neighbors. They view Beijing as acting in a high-handed manner resembling the tributary states system of the imperial era. It may be an old-fashioned and audacious sea grab, under the convenient guise of self-defense that also serves as a distraction from problems on the home front. But the three stories suggest the possibility, at least, of a different motive. If China actually feels threatened, then it must be acknowledged that different forces are at play.

The much-touted Thucydides trap, where a rising power challenges the established power, (Athens-Sparta, Britain-Germany and one that is often overlooked Russia-Japan in 1904) may not be as relevant as some suggest. What may be of greater significance, and sets a precedent, is the Not-In-My-Back-Yard mentality that underpins the Monroe Doctrine.

More articles by:

Tom Clifford is a freelance journalist and can be reached at: cliffordtomsan@hotmail.com.

September 25, 2018
Kenneth Surin
Fact-Finding Labour’s “Anti-Semitism” Crisis
Charles Pierson
Destroying Yemen as Humanely as Possible
James Rothenberg
Why Not Socialism?
Patrick Cockburn
How Putin Came Out on Top in Syria
John Grant
“Awesome Uncontrollable Male Passion” Meets Its Match
Guy Horton
Burma: Complicity With Evil?
Steve Stallone
Jujitsu Comms
William Blum
Bombing Libya: the Origins of Europe’s Immigration Crisis
John Feffer
There’s a New Crash Coming
Martha Pskowski
“The Emergency Isn’t Over”: the Homeless Commemorate a Year Since the Mexico City Earthquake
Fred Baumgarten
Ten Ways of Looking at Civility
Dean Baker
The Great Financial Crisis: Bernanke and the Bubble
Binoy Kampmark
Parasitic and Irrelevant: The University Vice Chancellor
September 24, 2018
Jonathan Cook
Hiding in Plain Sight: Why We Cannot See the System Destroying Us
Gary Leupp
All the Good News (Ignored by the Trump-Obsessed Media)
Robert Fisk
I Don’t See How a Palestinian State Can Ever Happen
Barry Brown
Pot as Political Speech
Lara Merling
Puerto Rico’s Colonial Legacy and Its Continuing Economic Troubles
Patrick Cockburn
Iraq’s Prime Ministers Come and Go, But the Stalemate Remains
William Blum
The New Iraq WMD: Russian Interference in US Elections
Julian Vigo
The UK’s Snoopers’ Charter Has Been Dealt a Serious Blow
Joseph Matten
Why Did Global Economic Performance Deteriorate in the 1970s?
Zhivko Illeieff
The Millennial Label: Distinguishing Facts from Fiction
Thomas Hon Wing Polin – Gerry Brown
Xinjiang : The New Great Game
Binoy Kampmark
Casting Kavanaugh: The Trump Supreme Court Drama
Max Wilbert
Blue Angels: the Naked Face of Empire
Weekend Edition
September 21, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Alexandra Isfahani-Hammond
Hurricane Florence and 9.7 Million Pigs
Andrew Levine
Israel’s Anti-Semitism Smear Campaign
Paul Street
Laquan McDonald is Being Tried for His Own Racist Murder
Brad Evans
What Does It Mean to Celebrate International Peace Day?
Nick Pemberton
With or Without Kavanaugh, The United States Is Anti-Choice
Jim Kavanagh
“Taxpayer Money” Threatens Medicare-for-All (And Every Other Social Program)
Jonathan Cook
Palestine: The Testbed for Trump’s Plan to Tear up the Rules-Based International Order
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: the Chickenhawks Have Finally Come Back Home to Roost!
David Rosen
As the Capitalist World Turns: From Empire to Imperialism to Globalization?
Jonah Raskin
Green Capitalism Rears Its Head at Global Climate Action Summit
James Munson
On Climate, the Centrists are the Deplorables
Robert Hunziker
Is Paris 2015 Already Underwater?
Arshad Khan
Will There Ever be Justice for Rohingya Muslims?
Jill Richardson
Why Women Don’t Report Sexual Assault
Dave Clennon
A Victory for Historical Accuracy and the Peace Movement: Not One Emmy for Ken Burns and “The Vietnam War”
W. T. Whitney
US Harasses Cuba Amid Mysterious Circumstances
Nathan Kalman-Lamb
Things That Make Sports Fans Uncomfortable
George Capaccio
Iran: “Snapping Back” Sanctions and the Threat of War
Kenneth Surin
Brexit is Coming, But Which Will It Be?
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail