FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Behind the Veil of Chinese Politics

Beijing.

Three stories in the first two weeks of May, the 50th anniversary of the launch of the Cultural Revolution, offered an intriguing peek behind the veil that usually covers Chinese politics. Two grabbed the headlines, the other was barely mentioned but it may cast a revealing insight on how China sees events unfolding.

The first story concerns President Xi Jinping’s warning of cabals, cliques and conspirators which came to light in the first week in May. The speech, delivered in January, confirmed what many suspected.

Xi chose his words carefully. “Some officials have been forming cabals and cliques to covertly defy the CPC [Communist Party of China] Central Committee’s decisions and policies,” which risked “compromising the political security of the Party and the country’’.

He also repeated comments, made during a state visit to the US last year, that the anti-corruption crackdown  that has resulted in 100 senior party, government and military officials being punished — was “not a ‘House of Cards’ power struggle” to settle old scores.

The crackdown against corruption has netted some big names. It would be surprising if Xi was not facing some determined opposition. Culturally, economically, socially China is changing. This change will feed into the political process at some stage, especially as the economy slows, which is why Xi believes that the party needs a firm hand at the helm. After amassing a number of titles to earn the moniker “Chairman of Everything”, Xi sees the greatest threat to the party as a muddled response, one that he is determined to avoid.

The second story sees Xi demanding that top-ranking officers, of major general and above in the People’s Liberation Army, must up their game and has ordered “inspection teams’ to monitor their work and ensure the integrity of the chain of command. Has Xi ruffled feathers? Yes.

Cabals, senior officers under scrutiny. None of this is happening in isolation. From Beijing’s perspective, there is a clear and present danger building up close to its borders. Major General Luo Yuan, (one of those presumably to be monitored) a researcher at the PLA Military Science Academy, said in May (third story) that the US is “building an encirclement of anti-missile systems around China and the only missing link is the Korean peninsula’’. He was referring to proposals by the US to deploy the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense anti-ballistic missile system in South Korea, ostensibly to deter North Korea.   This would complete the circle.  Its 2,000 km range would cover northeastern China as well as parts of Russia and the South China Sea.

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi warned in March after meeting with his Russian counterpart Sergey Lavrov that “the deployment will break the strategic balance of the region and spark an arms race’’.

Any arms race needs tension to feed the purchasing of weapons and that could be ratcheted up over the next few months. Judges at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Hague are set to rule on the Philippines’ challenge to China regarding the South China Sea. China has indicated it will not heed the ruling.  Asserting sovereignty over almost of the 3. 5 million square kilometers of the South China Sea, China’s behavior is not going down well with its neighbors. They view Beijing as acting in a high-handed manner resembling the tributary states system of the imperial era. It may be an old-fashioned and audacious sea grab, under the convenient guise of self-defense that also serves as a distraction from problems on the home front. But the three stories suggest the possibility, at least, of a different motive. If China actually feels threatened, then it must be acknowledged that different forces are at play.

The much-touted Thucydides trap, where a rising power challenges the established power, (Athens-Sparta, Britain-Germany and one that is often overlooked Russia-Japan in 1904) may not be as relevant as some suggest. What may be of greater significance, and sets a precedent, is the Not-In-My-Back-Yard mentality that underpins the Monroe Doctrine.

More articles by:

Tom Clifford is a freelance journalist and can be reached at: cliffordtomsan@hotmail.com.

December 13, 2018
John Davis
What World Do We Seek?
Subhankar Banerjee
Biological Annihilation: a Planet in Loss Mode
Lawrence Davidson
What the Attack on Marc Lamont Hill Tells Us
James McEnteer
Breathless
Ramzy Baroud
The Real Face of Justin Trudeau: Are Palestinians Canada’s new Jews?
Dean Baker
Pelosi Would Sabotage the Progressive Agenda With a Pay-Go Rule
Elliot Sperber
Understanding the Yellow Vests Movement through Basic Color Theory 
Rivera Sun
The End of the NRA? Business Magazines Tell Activists: The Strategy is Working
Kevin Zeese - Margaret Flowers
Historic Opportunity to Transform Trade
George Ochenski
Trump Trashes Sage Grouse Protections in Another cCollaboration Failure
December 12, 2018
Arshad Khan
War, Anniversaries and Lessons Never Learned
Paul Street
Blacking Out the Yellow Vests on Cable News: Corporate Media Doing its Job
Kenneth Surin
The Brexit Shambles Rambles On
David Schultz
Stacking the Deck Against Democracy in Wisconsin
Steve Early
The Housing Affordability Crisis and What Millennials Can do About It
George Ochenski
Collaboration Failure: Trump Trashes Sage Grouse Protections
Rob Seimetz
Bringing a Life Into a Dying World: A Letter From a Father to His Unborn Son
Michael Howard
PETA and the ‘S’-Word
John Kendall Hawkins
Good Panopt, Bad Panopt: Does It Make A Difference?
Kim C. Domenico
Redeeming Utopia: a Meditation On An Essay by Ursula LeGuin
Binoy Kampmark
Exhuming Franco: Spain’s Immemorial Divisions
ADRIAN KUZMINSKI
Democratizing Money
Laura Finley
Congress Must Reauthorize VAWA
December 11, 2018
Eric Draitser
AFRICOM: A Neocolonial Occupation Force?
Sheldon Richman
War Over Ukraine?
Louis Proyect
Why World War II, Not the New Deal, Ended the Great Depression
Howard Lisnoff
Police Violence and Mass Policing in the U.S.
Mark Ashwill
A “Patriotic” Education Study Abroad Program in Viet Nam: God Bless America, Right or Wrong!
Laura Flanders
HUD Official to Move into Public Housing?
Nino Pagliccia
Resistance is Not Terrorism
Matthew Johnson
See No Evil, See No Good: The Truth Is Not Black and White
Maria Paez Victor
How Reuters Slandered Venezuela’s Social Benefits Card
December 10, 2018
Jacques R. Pauwels
Foreign Interventions in Revolutionary Russia
Richard Klin
The Disasters of War
Katie Fite
Rebranding Bundy
Gary Olson
A Few Thoughts on Politics and Personal Identity
Patrick Cockburn
Brexit Britain’s Crisis of Self-Confidence Will Only End in Tears and Rising Nationalism
Andrew Moss
Undocumented Citizen
Dean Baker
Trump and China: Going With Patent Holders Against Workers
Lawrence Wittner
Reviving the Nuclear Disarmament Movement: a Practical Proposal
Dan Siegel
Thoughts on the 2018 Elections and Beyond
Thomas Knapp
Election 2020: I Can Smell the Dumpster Fires Already
Weekend Edition
December 07, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Steve Hendricks
What If We Just Buy Off Big Fossil Fuel? A Novel Plan to Mitigate the Climate Calamity
Jeffrey St. Clair
Cancer as Weapon: Poppy Bush’s Radioactive War on Iraq
Paul Street
The McCain and Bush Death Tours: Establishment Rituals in How to be a Proper Ruler
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail