FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Media Blackout on Nuit Debout

One of the fastest growing social and political movements in recent history has been sweeping across France, spreading through Europe and now developing in North America and elsewhere. In the space of just over a month, it has transformed countless public and private spaces, in nearly 300 cities, by making them into dynamic centers of non-violent protest and political experimentation. Although the future is unpredictable, it has the potential to significantly transform the horizons of social and political possibility.

This is probably news to anyone watching the mass media in the Anglophone world. In spite of the fact that the movement, aptly named Nuit Debout (‘Night on Your Feet’ or ‘Night Uprising’), aims at reclaiming the night hours by standing up 24/7 against the non-stop global onslaught of neoliberal capitalism, it has been kept in the shadows by the major news outlets. In fact, there has been a virtual blackout on what might well be one of the most significant stories of 2016.

CNN, which bills itself as “among the world’s leaders in online news” with a 24/7 staff and worldwide reach, has not run, to my knowledge, a single story. A search for “Nuit Debout” on their website—as on the websites of CBS, CNBC, MSNBC, SBS World News, India Today and The Times of India—provides no results.[1] Although this massive movement recently celebrated its one-month anniversary, there are only a tiny handful of stories on it that I have been able to uncover in the Anglophone mass media, such as on Aljazeera English (1 story) and on the BBC (3 stories). Unfortunately, alternative, publicly funded news platforms—which play a crucial role in providing counter-narratives that resist the corporate party line—do not fare much better. This is not to say that there has not been some important coverage in venues like Roar Magazine, CounterPunch, Wikipedia and the Guardian.

Although the length and extent of this blackout is remarkable, condemning Night Uprising to the night of nights that is media invisibility, the act of ignoring transformative social and political movements is nothing new. On the contrary, it is phase one in the standard mass media playbook. It intimates to spectators that the events in question are insignificant, marginal and not newsworthy, thereby potentially contributing to their decline or disappearance. If this first phase is unsuccessful, however, or the story begins to gain traction in certain sectors, then the for-profit media more or less mechanically move on to phase two: delegitimate. There is already a tiny trickle of stories that are moving in this direction, if it be in the New York Times (5 stories), the Wall Street Journal (2), on ABC news (2) or Fox News (3). The tenor, as well as the content, of these articles is similar. They point—from the right—to the failings of the socialist party and the ‘French Left,’ and they abound with adjectives such as incoherent, inchoate, unfocused, frustrated, restless, angry and violent.

There are also blatant misrepresentations, such as the following statement in what is arguably the article on the movement, which was released by the Associated Press and published simultaneously at the end of April by the New York Times, ABC, Fox News and numerous other outlets (a precise title search generates over 6,000 results on Google): “French protests are routinely marred by clashes as masked rioters smash shops or pelt riot police with projectiles.”

The corporate news has yet to fully embark on phase two, but we should anticipate—if the story finally garners some visibility—tales that ignore what is really at stake, belabor meaningless questions, spotlight individual acts of violence rather than structural and systemic state violence, deploy a sitcom logic of trivial conflict and dénouement, explain the movement as misguided or unsuccessful, belittle and infantilize the participants, and generally paint a picture that leaves spectators wondering why anyone in their right mind would actually be involved. This implicitly prepares for the third and final phase, which brings things full circle in an exasperated return to reality: ignore again.

Given the global reach and non-stop coverage of Anglophone media, they format people’s world-image in extremely powerful ways. They are reality makers in the sense that they dictate what is real and worthy of discussion, and they frame it in terms of a general understanding of the current state of the world. In the case of Nuit Debout, they have thus far transformed it into a night specter that barely arises in the liminal spaces of their administered reality. This is one more reminder that sleepless global capitalism works hand in hand with the soporific media machine insofar as the latter generates the somnambulists necessary for endless profit extraction sans glitches or resistance. Docile and uninformed subjects are thereby forged, unaware of global uprisings that seek to awaken defiance in the night of capitalist oppression and degradation.

And yet, there is pushback, as so many people recognize the deep complicity between for-profit media and a profit-driven economy and political system. Fully cognizant and wide-awake, participants in Nuit Debout have created their own news platforms in order to provide a worldview that punctures mass media ignorance and established scripts. Thanks to Radio Debout, TV Debout, Gazette Debout and other such outlets, immanent self-descriptions have been liberated from the storylines imposed by the commercial spin-doctors.

Against the official tripartite playbook (ignore – delegitimate – ignore again), alternative narratives have emerged, which can spawn a different operative understanding of the current situation and future possibilities. One of the interesting suggestions, which is found for instance in Frédéric Lordon’s account of Nuit Debout, is that it has the potential of generating results that surpass—or at least are significantly different from—the movements to which it has been compared, such as Occupy or the Indignados in Spain. If the former, according to some, led to a horizontal dispersion with major social and discursive gains but few material changes, the latter succumbed to vertical integration into the system of representational politics, in which it is more a question of moving the needle within institutions than of overthrowing them. The path charted by certain sectors of Nuit Debout is an oblique one, seeking to reanimate direct political action in such a way that there are deep institutional, structural and constitutional changes.

Although we should have no illusions about the ability of the corporatocracy’s PR machine to follow or even record alternative scripts such as this one, solidarity with the movement requiers waking up to its reality, mobilizing around it—such as on the Global Debout Day of Action planned on May 15—and opening ourselves to narratives other than those that have been repeated ad nauseam. When the future is at stake, it is imperative to recognize that there might be something at work that surpasses what we already presume to know. Nuit Debout is a powerful wake-up call: sleepwalkers of the world unite! It’s time to spend the night together.

Note.

[1] These calculations, as well as the others in this article, are based on searching “nuit debout” on the official websites of each news outlet on May 3, 2016. It is possible that there has been some coverage that did not refer to the movement’s name (as in this recent disparaging May Day report by CNN) or that was not tagged with it on their websites.

More articles by:

Gabriel Rockhill is a Franco-American philosopher and cultural critic. He is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Villanova University and founding Director of the Atelier de Théorie Critique at the Sorbonne. His books include Counter-History of the Present: Untimely Interrogations into Globalization, Technology, Democracy (2017), Interventions in Contemporary Thought: History, Politics, Aesthetics (2016), Radical History & the Politics of Art (2014) and Logique de l’histoire (2010). In addition to his scholarly work, he has been actively engaged in extra-academic activities in the art and activist worlds, as well as a regular contributor to public intellectual debate. Follow on twitter: @GabrielRockhill

Weekend Edition
July 20, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Paul Atwood
Peace or Armageddon: Take Your Pick
Paul Street
No Liberal Rallies Yet for the Children of Yemen
Nick Pemberton
The Bipartisan War on Central and South American Women
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Are You Putin Me On?
Andrew Levine
Sovereignty: What Is It Good For? 
Brian Cloughley
The Trump/NATO Debacle and the Profit Motive
David Rosen
Trump’s Supreme Pick Escalates America’s War on Sex 
Melvin Goodman
Montenegro and the “Manchurian Candidate”
Salvador Rangel
“These Are Not Our Kids”: The Racial Capitalism of Caging Children at the Border
Matthew Stevenson
Going Home Again to Trump’s America
Louis Proyect
Jeremy Corbyn, Bernie Sanders and the Dilemmas of the Left
Patrick Cockburn
Iraqi Protests: “Bad Government, Bad Roads, Bad Weather, Bad People”
Robert Fantina
Has It Really Come to This?
Russell Mokhiber
Kristin Lawless on the Corporate Takeover of the American Kitchen
John W. Whitehead
It’s All Fake: Reality TV That Masquerades as American Politics
Patrick Bobilin
In Your Period Piece, I Would be the Help
Ramzy Baroud
The Massacre of Inn Din: How Rohingya Are Lynched and Held Responsible
Robert Fisk
How Weapons Made in Bosnia Fueled Syria’s Bleak Civil War
Gary Leupp
Trump’s Helsinki Press Conference and Public Disgrace
Josh Hoxie
Our Missing $10 Trillion
Martha Rosenberg
Pharma “Screening” Is a Ploy to Seize More Patients
Basav Sen
Brett Kavanaugh Would be a Disaster for the Climate
David Lau
The Origins of Local AFT 4400: a Profile of Julie Olsen Edwards
Rohullah Naderi
The Elusive Pursuit of Peace by Afghanistan
Binoy Kampmark
Shaking Establishments: The Ocasio-Cortez Effect
John Laforge
18 Protesters Cut Into German Air Base to Protest US Nuclear Weapons Deployment
Christopher Brauchli
Trump and the Swedish Question
Chia-Chia Wang
Local Police Shouldn’t Collaborate With ICE
Paul Lyons
YouTube’s Content ID – A Case Study
Jill Richardson
Soon You Won’t be Able to Use Food Stamps at Farmers’ Markets, But That’s Not the Half of It
Kevin MacKay
Climate Change is Proving Worse Than We Imagined, So Why Aren’t We Confronting its Root Cause?
Thomas Knapp
Elections: More than Half of Americans Believe Fairy Tales are Real
Ralph Nader
Warner Slack—Doctor for the People Forever
Lee Ballinger
Soccer, Baseball and Immigration
Louis Yako
Celebrating the Wounds of Exile with Poetry
Ron Jacobs
Working Class Fiction—Not Just Surplus Value
Perry Hoberman
You Can’t Vote Out Fascism… You Have to Drive It From Power!
Robert Koehler
Guns and Racism, on the Rocks
Nyla Ali Khan
Kashmir: Implementation with Integrity and Will to Resolve
Justin Anderson
Elon Musk vs. the Media
Graham Peebles
A Time of Hope for Ethiopia
Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
Homophobia in the Service of Anti-Trumpism is Still Homophobic (Even When it’s the New York Times)
Martin Billheimer
Childhood, Ferocious Sleep
David Yearsley
The Glories of the Grammophone
Tom Clark
Gameplanning the Patriotic Retributive Attack on Montenegro
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail