Click amount to donate direct to CounterPunch
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $500
  • $other
  • use PayPal
DOUBLE YOUR DONATION!
We don’t run corporate ads. We don’t shake our readers down for money every month or every quarter like some other sites out there. We provide our site for free to all, but the bandwidth we pay to do so doesn’t come cheap. A generous donor is matching all donations of $100 or more! So please donate now to double your punch!
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Cruz Reminds Us That Social Conservatism Has Roots in Prejudice

It’s well established that Ted Cruz’s wheelhouse is using the bigotry of the American social conservative movement to further his candidacy. To the surprise of nobody who’s been paying attention to his campaign thus far, Cruz has chosen to use the so-called “bathroom bills” spreading around the country as wedge issues to drive turnout in the remaining primary elections.

All Cruz is really doing is reminding Americans that social conservatism was born in anti-integration politics and anti-gay hysteria.

The similarities between denying Americans proper access to bathrooms due to their gender identity and due to their race should be clear. These similarities are only highlighted by the fact that many of the states moving forward with these repressive laws today are the same states that by and large enforced segregation by race in the first half of the twentieth century.

Even the visual representation of the repression is the same- old white men clinging to power passing laws to stop progress; angry policemen enforcing repressive laws; and uncanny-valley-faced politicians defending the bigoted laws in order to further their national careers.

For the latter, where Nixon, and later Reagan, used coded language to present political co-option of white resentment over integration, Cruz is going overboard in his appeal to the descendants of the silent majority

When Nixon made his “law and order” appeals to what became known first as the “silent majority” and later as the “moral majority,” he was making a careful political calculation. It would have been political suicide for him to use the kind of direct and blunt language that George Wallace was spewing to his right- but he still needed to tap into the potent resentment that had grown out of the Civil Rights Movement.

Therefore, Nixon used carefully selected language to signal his allegiance to the angry white right wing while allowing those with less extreme views to feel okay about voting for him.

At the same time that Nixon was manipulating the white backlash to the Civil Rights Movement for electoral gain, preachers like Jerry Falwell were moving from railing against integration from the pulpit to building a movement against the social changes of the prior two decades.

That movement of social conservatism would have repercussions for years to come.

Ted Cruz’s brand of hard-right conservatism was not formed in a vacuum. His father’s journey from alcoholic philanderer to fire breathing evangelist followed the typical path for many of a right wing and Christian persuasion- the fall before redemption.

Cruz’s drive for power is his real religion. Every move the Texan has made over the past two decades has been calculated to get him to this moment- where he is within spitting distance of the presidency if he can only steal it from Donald Trump and convince his entire political party to stop hating him.

And that might work if he wasn’t picking this particular toilet shaped hill to die on. Unfortunately for Cruz (and fortunately for the rest of us) the country has moved on over the past decade on social issues. It was only 12 years ago that George W Bush was able to use gay marriage to get out the vote for his re-election, now that issue is dead, its grave filled by the mention of the institution receiving an encouraging cheer at a GOP debate in late 2015.

This bathroom bill debacle won’t even pass the sniff test as an issue in 2016. Yes. It is possible that Cruz can use these bigoted attacks to peel some delegates off from Trump’s lead in states like Indiana. But in the long run, it’s a loser.

The futility of using gender specific bathroom segregation as a campaign issue for Republicans was exposed on television this Sunday on none other than FOX News.

“We actually tried to find out whether it is a public safety issue,” FOX News Sunday host Chris Wallace told the show’s panel. “This seems to be a solution in search of a problem.”

Instead of bringing the social conservative movement another victory, Cruz’s manipulation of the bigotry of his base will only serve to expose its roots in fear and hate. It will ensure that no matter who gets the nod for the Republicans in July, the nominee will be saddled with the ugly truth of the GOP’s last fifty years of prejudice.

More articles by:

Eoin Higgins has a master’s degree in history from Fordham University. He lives in New York.

October 22, 2018
Henry Giroux
Neoliberalism in the Age of Pedagogical Terrorism
Melvin Goodman
Washington’s Latest Cold War Maneuver: Pulling Out of the INF
David Mattson
Basket of Deplorables Revisited: Grizzly Bears at the Mercy of Wyoming
Michelle Renee Matisons
Hurricane War Zone Further Immiserates Florida Panhandle, Panama City
Tom Gill
A Storm is Brewing in Europe: Italy and Its Public Finances Are at the Center of It
Christopher Brauchli
The Liars’ Bench
Gary Leupp
Will Trump Split the World by Endorsing a Bold-Faced Lie?
Michael Howard
The New York Times’ Animal Cruelty Fetish
Alice Slater
Time Out for Nukes!
Geoff Dutton
Yes, Virginia, There are Conspiracies—I Think
Daniel Warner
Davos in the Desert: To Attend or Not, That is Not the Question
Priti Gulati Cox – Stan Cox
Mothers of Exiles: For Many, the Child-Separation Ordeal May Never End
Manuel E. Yepe
Pence v. China: Cold War 2.0 May Have Just Begun
Raouf Halaby
Of Pith Helmets and Sartorial Colonialism
Dan Carey
Aspirational Goals  
Wim Laven
Intentional or Incompetence—Voter Suppression Where We Live
Weekend Edition
October 19, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Jason Hirthler
The Pieties of the Liberal Class
Jeffrey St. Clair
A Day in My Life at CounterPunch
Paul Street
“Male Energy,” Authoritarian Whiteness and Creeping Fascism in the Age of Trump
Nick Pemberton
Reflections on Chomsky’s Voting Strategy: Why The Democratic Party Can’t Be Saved
John Davis
The Last History of the United States
Yigal Bronner
The Road to Khan al-Akhmar
Robert Hunziker
The Negan Syndrome
Andrew Levine
Democrats Ahead: Progressives Beware
Rannie Amiri
There is No “Proxy War” in Yemen
David Rosen
America’s Lost Souls: the 21st Century Lumpen-Proletariat?
Joseph Natoli
The Age of Misrepresentations
Ron Jacobs
History Is Not Kind
John Laforge
White House Radiation: Weakened Regulations Would Save Industry Billions
Ramzy Baroud
The UN ‘Sheriff’: Nikki Haley Elevated Israel, Damaged US Standing
Robert Fantina
Trump, Human Rights and the Middle East
Anthony Pahnke – Jim Goodman
NAFTA 2.0 Will Help Corporations More Than Farmers
Jill Richardson
Identity Crisis: Elizabeth Warren’s Claims Cherokee Heritage
Sam Husseini
The Most Strategic Midterm Race: Elder Challenges Hoyer
Maria Foscarinis – John Tharp
The Criminalization of Homelessness
Robert Fisk
The Story of the Armenian Legion: a Dark Tale of Anger and Revenge
Jacques R. Pauwels
Dinner With Marx in the House of the Swan
Dave Lindorff
US ‘Outrage’ over Slaying of US Residents Depends on the Nation Responsible
Ricardo Vaz
How Many Yemenis is a DC Pundit Worth?
Elliot Sperber
Build More Gardens, Phase out Cars
Chris Gilbert
In the Wake of Nepal’s Incomplete Revolution: Dispatch by a Far-Flung Bolivarian 
Muhammad Othman
Let Us Bray
Gerry Brown
Are Chinese Municipal $6 Trillion (40 Trillion Yuan) Hidden Debts Posing Titanic Risks?
Rev. William Alberts
Judge Kavanaugh’s Defenders Doth Protest Too Much
Ralph Nader
Unmasking Phony Values Campaigns by the Corporatists
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail