FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Cruz Reminds Us That Social Conservatism Has Roots in Prejudice

It’s well established that Ted Cruz’s wheelhouse is using the bigotry of the American social conservative movement to further his candidacy. To the surprise of nobody who’s been paying attention to his campaign thus far, Cruz has chosen to use the so-called “bathroom bills” spreading around the country as wedge issues to drive turnout in the remaining primary elections.

All Cruz is really doing is reminding Americans that social conservatism was born in anti-integration politics and anti-gay hysteria.

The similarities between denying Americans proper access to bathrooms due to their gender identity and due to their race should be clear. These similarities are only highlighted by the fact that many of the states moving forward with these repressive laws today are the same states that by and large enforced segregation by race in the first half of the twentieth century.

Even the visual representation of the repression is the same- old white men clinging to power passing laws to stop progress; angry policemen enforcing repressive laws; and uncanny-valley-faced politicians defending the bigoted laws in order to further their national careers.

For the latter, where Nixon, and later Reagan, used coded language to present political co-option of white resentment over integration, Cruz is going overboard in his appeal to the descendants of the silent majority

When Nixon made his “law and order” appeals to what became known first as the “silent majority” and later as the “moral majority,” he was making a careful political calculation. It would have been political suicide for him to use the kind of direct and blunt language that George Wallace was spewing to his right- but he still needed to tap into the potent resentment that had grown out of the Civil Rights Movement.

Therefore, Nixon used carefully selected language to signal his allegiance to the angry white right wing while allowing those with less extreme views to feel okay about voting for him.

At the same time that Nixon was manipulating the white backlash to the Civil Rights Movement for electoral gain, preachers like Jerry Falwell were moving from railing against integration from the pulpit to building a movement against the social changes of the prior two decades.

That movement of social conservatism would have repercussions for years to come.

Ted Cruz’s brand of hard-right conservatism was not formed in a vacuum. His father’s journey from alcoholic philanderer to fire breathing evangelist followed the typical path for many of a right wing and Christian persuasion- the fall before redemption.

Cruz’s drive for power is his real religion. Every move the Texan has made over the past two decades has been calculated to get him to this moment- where he is within spitting distance of the presidency if he can only steal it from Donald Trump and convince his entire political party to stop hating him.

And that might work if he wasn’t picking this particular toilet shaped hill to die on. Unfortunately for Cruz (and fortunately for the rest of us) the country has moved on over the past decade on social issues. It was only 12 years ago that George W Bush was able to use gay marriage to get out the vote for his re-election, now that issue is dead, its grave filled by the mention of the institution receiving an encouraging cheer at a GOP debate in late 2015.

This bathroom bill debacle won’t even pass the sniff test as an issue in 2016. Yes. It is possible that Cruz can use these bigoted attacks to peel some delegates off from Trump’s lead in states like Indiana. But in the long run, it’s a loser.

The futility of using gender specific bathroom segregation as a campaign issue for Republicans was exposed on television this Sunday on none other than FOX News.

“We actually tried to find out whether it is a public safety issue,” FOX News Sunday host Chris Wallace told the show’s panel. “This seems to be a solution in search of a problem.”

Instead of bringing the social conservative movement another victory, Cruz’s manipulation of the bigotry of his base will only serve to expose its roots in fear and hate. It will ensure that no matter who gets the nod for the Republicans in July, the nominee will be saddled with the ugly truth of the GOP’s last fifty years of prejudice.

More articles by:

Eoin Higgins has a master’s degree in history from Fordham University. He lives in New York.

January 17, 2019
Stan Cox
That Green Growth at the Heart of the Green New Deal? It’s Malignant
David Schultz
Trump vs the Constitution: Why He Cannot Invoke the Emergencies Act to Build a Wall
Paul Cochrane
Europe’s Strategic Humanitarian Aid: Yemen vs. Syria
Tom Clifford
China: An Ancient Country, Getting Older
Greg Grandin
How Not to Build a “Great, Great Wall”
Ted Rall
Our Pointless, Very American Culture of Shame
John G. Russell
Just Another Brick in the Wall of Lies
Glenn Sacks
LA Teachers Strike: Black Smoke Pouring Out of LAUSD Headquarters
Patrick Walker
Referendum 2020: A Green New Deal vs. Racist, Classist Climate Genocide
Kevin Zeese - Margaret Flowers
Uniting for a Green New Deal
Matt Johnson
The Wall Already Exists — In Our Hearts and Minds
Jesse Jackson
Trump’s Flailing will get More Desperate and More Dangerous
Andrew Stewart
The Green New Deal Must be Centered on African American and Indigenous Workers to Differentiate Itself From the Democratic Party: Part Three
January 16, 2019
Patrick Bond
Jim Yong Kim’s Mixed Messages to the World Bank and the World
John Grant
Joe Biden, Crime Fighter from Hell
Alvaro Huerta
Brief History Notes on Mexican Immigration to the U.S.
Kenneth Surin
A Great Speaker of the UK’s House of Commons
Elizabeth Henderson
Why Sustainable Agriculture Should Support a Green New Deal
Binoy Kampmark
Trump, Bolton and the Syrian Confusion
Jeff Mackler
Trump’s Syria Exit Tweet Provokes Washington Panic
Barbara Nimri Aziz
How Long Can Nepal Blame Others for Its Woes?
Glenn Sacks
LA Teachers’ Strike: When Just One Man Says, “No”
Cesar Chelala
Violence Against Women: A Pandemic No Longer Hidden
Kim C. Domenico
To Make a Vineyard of the Curse: Fate, Fatalism and Freedom
Dave Lindorff
Criminalizing BDS Trashes Free Speech & Association
Thomas Knapp
Now More Than Ever, It’s Clear the FBI Must Go
Binoy Kampmark
Dances of Disinformation: The Partisan Politics of the Integrity Initiative
Andrew Stewart
The Green New Deal Must be Centered on African American and Indigenous Workers to Differentiate Itself From the Democratic Party: Part Two
Edward Curtin
A Gentrified Little Town Goes to Pot
January 15, 2019
Patrick Cockburn
Refugees Are in the English Channel Because of Western Interventions in the Middle East
Howard Lisnoff
The Faux Political System by the Numbers
Lawrence Davidson
Amos Oz and the Real Israel
John W. Whitehead
Beware the Emergency State
John Laforge
Loudmouths against Nuclear Lawlessness
Myles Hoenig
Labor in the Age of Trump
Jeff Cohen
Mainstream Media Bias on 2020 Democratic Race Already in High Gear
Dean Baker
Will Paying for Kidneys Reduce the Transplant Wait List?
George Ochenski
Trump’s Wall and the Montana Senate’s Theater of the Absurd
Binoy Kampmark
Dances of Disinformation: the Partisan Politics of the Integrity Initiative
Glenn Sacks
On the Picket Lines: Los Angeles Teachers Go On Strike for First Time in 30 Years
Jonah Raskin
Love in a Cold War Climate
Andrew Stewart
The Green New Deal Must be Centered on African American and Indigenous Workers to Differentiate Itself From the Democratic Party
January 14, 2019
Kenn Orphan
The Tears of Justin Trudeau
Julia Stein
California Needs a 10-Year Green New Deal
Dean Baker
Declining Birth Rates: Is the US in Danger of Running Out of People?
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail