FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Money, Gender Politics and Democratic Denial

One thing is abundantly clear. Hillary Clinton’s supporters are a loud and obnoxious group of crybabies, which is almost understandable given that so many of them are comfortably ensconced in lives of privilege and denial.

As a group they could give a damn about the poor and underprivileged, as Thomas Frank notes in his new book, Listen, Liberal.

When Bernie Sanders said Hillary was “unqualified” last Wednesday in Philly, he threatened to burst the little bubble of comfort and denial that surrounds the failed ex-Secretary of State and embittered loser to Obama in 2008.

Always Honest Bernie said something that needed to be said in this race. Walking it back was the wrong move. It’s unfortunate, but not something we should be surprised by given Bernie’s soft socialism and continuous waffling on whether he would support Hillary in the hour of his own personal doomsday. Walking back over the cliff, he finally admitted he would support Hillary.

That is so sad.

The push-back from the mainstream media and Hillary’s women and eunuchs came in the form of the worst kind of gender politics—the hue and cry of those angrily opposed to anyone who would state with conviction, including poor young women who support Bernie that putting a woman in office at this time shouldn’t be this election’s paramount goal.

Why isn’t Bernie speaking to and condemning the false narrative of gender?

Why are gender politics so misguided now?

Because Hillary is the wrong woman, that is why. But the liberals, as Frank notes, aren’t listening. They aren’t listening because gender politics and a cult of personality have hijacked a huge segment of the Democratic Party.

Even then, a larger problem looms. Many comfortable Dems really are content with the status quo. Another way of saying this is they have money and status.

As Hillary contemplated her job in Obama’s first administration back in 2008, she held her nose and accepted her less-than-ideal position in order to remain close to the halls of power, to stay in the game, and to immediately begin planning for her next run at the top job. Obama held his nose in a silly attempt to create unity in the country. That was just one of the stunningly efficient bad moves Obama made early on.

The naive women and emasculated men who cheer for old Hillary to finally achieve her lust for power—always a quid pro quo pact with her philandering hubby, I presume—are misinformed followers who couldn’t care less about the struggles vast swaths of Americans are facing under the thumb of neoliberalism’s survivalist—to-the-winner-go-the-spoils—ethos.

Shouldn’t the issue be about equality everywhere? Not in Hillary’s world, obviously.

Hillary’s sycophants are unconcerned with how Madam Secretary abused U.S. power in the Middle East by engaging with her elite friends there to overthrow Assad—a tiny number—while mobilizing her allies in Libya to produce regime change and oust Qaddafi, leaving a vacuum in that failed-state that exists to this day and is spreading like a bad disease.

Drownings in the Mediterranean, human trafficking, desperation—all of it deigned by the West in an ideological struggle of unchecked capitalistic survival, and all of it supported by Hillary.

She really is, as Diana Johnstone says, the Queen of Chaos.

Another reality neoliberals led by the Queen can’t seem to grasp is that they can no longer use the patronage of a friendly nation’s corrupt gang of elites to get the majority of oppressed to love them. That is nation-building, or humanitarian intervention as it is lately termed, is a dismal failure and has been for years. You see, that is why colonialism ultimately failed.

Iraq was a failed attempt at neocolonialism, as Tariq Ali has argued. None of the Bush crew had an historical understanding of Iraq’s deeply ingrained cultural imperatives. Pure hubris guided them. Our poor uneducated or corrupt—take your pick—Congress fell in line, with few exceptions.

Speaking of presidential qualifications, poor Hillary swallowed the pro-invasion bait. Bernie did not.

Unfortunately, arrogant capitalists don’t have time for history, which is one reason they’re so destructive and prone to war. These people simply do not understand that the old methods are futile.

They haven’t a clue, or they don’t care because global destabilization resultant of global economics doesn’t concern them until a bomb goes off in Boston or a mass shooting happens in San Bernardino and ruins their day.

They’ve shrugged off Senator Clinton’s Iraq vote because they too were hoodwinked by Bush and Cheney. That’s how much sense they have. While unprecedented numbers of people around the world who knew what was actually going on marched in the streets in 2003, Clintonites marched across the aisle and kissed “The Decider’s” butt.

Oh woe…

All of this gave rise to ISIS and Clinton’s bloody hands. But the Clintonites don’t care. They’re too wrapped up in careerism and the pursuit of wealth and gender politics and the cult of personality. Unthinking foreign policy dreams are not just the bane of Donald Trump these days. Overwhelming numbers of Dems don’t get it either, and in discouraging numbers they’re likely Clinonites.

As far as the bloated-speech fees and the Wall Street support of her campaign that Bernie always clumsily references, it is clear that Clintonites cheer the fact that Madam is so adept at making a lot of money. Everything in the money department is okay with them. These people love money, and they don’t have time for anyone who doesn’t—humanistic intellectuals and the unemployed and homeless particularly.

There’s nothing wrong with being rich, they exclaim, just learn to launder your assets properly.

Money envy has replaced penis envy with this crowd, I swear.

Oh well…at least the dictator is dead, ha, ha!

Yes, Bernie rattled some liberals’ cages last Wednesday in Philly. I’d like to hear him deepen his attack, broaden it, fight on. If he doesn’t, he’ll not only lose the election resoundingly, he’ll disappoint millions of his followers who have donated time and money to his campaign.

What if many of his supporters won’t vote for Hillary, despite Bernie’s, the former “outsider’s” exhortations to keep the Democratic Party whole?   What if they stay home on Election Day?

America will have its Trump or Cruz then. That’ll be as funny to Clinton as killing Qaddafi, I’m sure. And the rest of us will say, WTF?

More articles by:

Terry Simons is the founder of Round Bend Press Books in Portland, Oregon.  This story is excerpted from his memoir of growing up in Oregon, A Marvelous Paranoia.

Weekend Edition
August 17, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Daniel Wolff
The Aretha Dialogue
Nick Pemberton
Donald Trump and the Rise of Patriotism 
Joseph Natoli
First Amendment Rights and the Court of Popular Opinion
Andrew Levine
Midterms 2018: What’s There to Hope For?
Robert Hunziker
Hothouse Earth
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Running Out of Fools
Ajamu Baraka
Opposing Bipartisan Warmongering is Defending Human Rights of the Poor and Working Class
Paul Street
Corporate Media: the Enemy of the People
David Macaray
Trump and the Sex Tape
CJ Hopkins
Where Have All the Nazis Gone?
Daniel Falcone
The Future of NATO: an Interview With Richard Falk
Cesar Chelala
The Historic Responsibility of the Catholic Church
Ron Jacobs
The Barbarism of US Immigration Policy
Kenneth Surin
In Shanghai
William Camacaro - Frederick B. Mills
The Military Option Against Venezuela in the “Year of the Americas”
Nancy Kurshan
The Whole World Was Watching: Chicago ’68, Revisited
Robert Fantina
Yemeni and Palestinian Children
Alexandra Isfahani-Hammond
Orcas and Other-Than-Human Grief
Shoshana Fine – Thomas Lindemann
Migrants Deaths: European Democracies and the Right to Not Protect?
Paul Edwards
Totally Irrusianal
Thomas Knapp
Murphy’s Law: Big Tech Must Serve as Censorship Subcontractors
Mark Ashwill
More Demons Unleashed After Fulbright University Vietnam Official Drops Rhetorical Bombshells
Ralph Nader
Going Fundamental Eludes Congressional Progressives
Hans-Armin Ohlmann
My Longest Day: How World War II Ended for My Family
Matthew Funke
The Nordic Countries Aren’t Socialist
Daniel Warner
Tiger Woods, Donald Trump and Crime and Punishment
Dave Lindorff
Mainstream Media Hypocrisy on Display
Jeff Cohen
Democrats Gather in Chicago: Elite Party or Party of the People?
Victor Grossman
Stand Up With New Hope in Germany?
Christopher Brauchli
A Family Affair
Jill Richardson
Profiting From Poison
Patrick Bobilin
Moving the Margins
Alison Barros
Dear White American
Celia Bottger
If Ireland Can Reject Fossil Fuels, Your Town Can Too
Ian Scott Horst
Less Voting, More Revolution
Peter Certo
Trump Snubbed McCain, Then the Media Snubbed the Rest of Us
Dan Ritzman
Drilling ANWR: One of Our Last Links to the Wild World is in Danger
Brandon Do
The World and Palestine, Palestine and the World
Chris Wright
An Updated and Improved Marxism
Daryan Rezazad
Iran and the Doomsday Machine
Patrick Bond
Africa’s Pioneering Marxist Political Economist, Samir Amin (1931-2018)
Louis Proyect
Memoir From the Underground
Binoy Kampmark
Meaningless Titles and Liveable Cities: Melbourne Loses to Vienna
Andrew Stewart
Blackkklansman: Spike Lee Delivers a Masterpiece
Elizabeth Lennard
Alan Chadwick in the Budding Grove: Story Summary for a Documentary Film
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail