FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Should Progressives Support Bernie?

In the past year, some progressives have explained why they are not supporting Bernie Sanders. Last summer, Bruce Dixon from Black Agenda Report presented a “sheepdog” theory suggesting that people who join the Bernie campaign will eventually be herded into supporting Hillary. More recently, Chris Hedges wrote “We must focus exclusively on revolt” and break with the establishment parties. Steven Salaita criticized Sanders’ lack of a radically different foreign policy, especially regarding Israel and Palestine. While there is some truth in all these criticisms, I think it’s important to support Bernie Sanders. Here is why.

Sanders is not just a “lesser evil”. His proposals and policies are good regarding economic inequality, health-care, education, and the judicial/criminal system. His ideas on foreign policy suggest a substantial shift away from interventionism and militarism. In addition, Sanders seeks to change the current electoral process based on money coming from corporations, political action committees and wealthy individuals. Changing this system is the first step toward breaking the strangle-hold of the military complex, Wall Street and reactionary lobbies such as AIPAC and the NRA.

While some people will be led from supporting Bernie to supporting Hillary, this is not a given. Many people pushing for Bernie now will not vote Clinton if she is the Democratic Party nominee. Why? Because there is a huge difference in policies and because campaigning for Bernie significantly involves criticizing and exposing Hillary Clinton’s history and policies.

The Democratic Party establishment has not been encouraging Bernie, as suggested by the “sheepdog” theory. On the contrary, it seems they have been trying to diminish or undermine his campaign. Sanders is rounding up new voters and activists, but they are coming for his message which is substantially different than that of the Party establishment.

Some people falsely assume one needs to commit to one candidate or one party. There is time to campaign for Jill Stein after the Democratic Party Convention if Clinton becomes the nominee. Elections in most countries start, continue and finish in less than three months. I personally support the campaigns of BOTH Bernie and Jill. But strategically, right now, Bernie Sanders has a small but real chance to win the Presidency which would result in huge change. Even if he does not win the nomination, millions of people are being educated and inspired by a message that directly criticizes our current economic/political system. Many of these newly inspired voters can and should be encouraged to vote for principles not party.

Following are specific reasons why Sanders is not simply a “lesser evil” candidate:

* He is not part of the Democratic Party establishment. Sanders was elected as an Independent.

* He has long history as left liberal mayor, congressman, and then senator with principles.

* He is not afraid to buck the tide. Sanders did a one-person filibuster trying to stop the Wall Street bailout.

* Unlike Obama, Sanders was not vetted by Wall Street. On the contrary, he is opposed by Wall Street.

* Sanders’ opposes the core US foreign policy of aggression and “regime change”. He opposed the invasion of Iraq and overthrow of the Libyan government. He opposes current calls for aggression via “no fly zone” against Syria.

* He is one of the few in Congress who openly questions or criticizes Netanyahu and US weapons trade to Israel. He is the only major candidate who did not speak at the recent APAIC convention. He is the only candidate who says he wants to be a friend of Palestine not just Israel.

* Sanders’ calls for audit of the Defense Department. This is the necessary first step toward dramatic military budget cuts.

* Sanders has energized and educated young people about systemic inequality, the domination of Wall Street and corruption in the US political process. Sanders explicitly calls for a “political revolution”.

* Sanders has called for working with Russia against ISIS and terrorism instead of promoting division and rivalry as pushed by neo-conservatives such as the Clinton appointed Victoria Nuland.

* Sanders has consistently opposed “free trade” agreements which have been disastrous for workers at home and abroad. He opposes the looming TPP (Trans Pacific Partnership).

* Sanders opposes the demonization and pervasive expulsion of refugees.

* Sanders will be more effective in countering Trump or whoever is the Republican nominee. He will increase voter turnout, especially among youth. In contrast, Hillary Clinton will increase Republican voter turnout.

Sanders’ policies are closer to those advocated by Green Party candidate Jill Stein than the policies of Hillary Clinton. But unlike Jill Stein, Sanders has a remote but real chance of winning the presidency.

It’s not only a question of how much better things would be if Sanders was President. It’s also a question of how bad things will be with either Trump or Clinton. Clinton is the single person most responsible for the disasters in Honduras and Libya. If she becomes President, she will likely continue her dangerous and aggressive policies against Iran and Russia. It is crucial to expose, denounce and do everything possible to prevent her or Donald Trump winning the presidency. As Cornel West, campaigning for Sanders, recently said: “Clinton is hawkish, right wing and imperial.”

Progressives in the US have a chance to join a populist campaign reaching millions of people. With enough grass roots effort there is chance for an upset victory. Some critics believe the contests have already been decided. But this is a year of surprises, as shown by the advances of both Trump and Sanders. It seems a big mistake to stand on the sidelines or give up without trying. While insuring there is a valid third party option, I believe progressives should do everything possible to support Bernie Sanders.

Screen Shot 2016-03-03 at 4.29.41 PM-1

More articles by:

Rick Sterling is a retired aerospace engineer who now does research/writing on international issues. He can be contacted at rsterling1@gmail.com.

September 24, 2018
Jonathan Cook
Hiding in Plain Sight: Why We Cannot See the System Destroying Us
Gary Leupp
All the Good News (Ignored by the Trump-Obsessed Media)
Robert Fisk
I Don’t See How a Palestinian State Can Ever Happen
Barry Brown
Pot as Political Speech
Lara Merling
Puerto Rico’s Colonial Legacy and Its Continuing Economic Troubles
Patrick Cockburn
Iraq’s Prime Ministers Come and Go, But the Stalemate Remains
William Blum
The New Iraq WMD: Russian Interference in US Elections
Julian Vigo
The UK’s Snoopers’ Charter Has Been Dealt a Serious Blow
Joseph Matten
Why Did Global Economic Performance Deteriorate in the 1970s?
Zhivko Illeieff
The Millennial Label: Distinguishing Facts from Fiction
Thomas Hon Wing Polin – Gerry Brown
Xinjiang : The New Great Game
Binoy Kampmark
Casting Kavanaugh: The Trump Supreme Court Drama
Max Wilbert
Blue Angels: the Naked Face of Empire
Weekend Edition
September 21, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Alexandra Isfahani-Hammond
Hurricane Florence and 9.7 Million Pigs
Andrew Levine
Israel’s Anti-Semitism Smear Campaign
Paul Street
Laquan McDonald is Being Tried for His Own Racist Murder
Brad Evans
What Does It Mean to Celebrate International Peace Day?
Nick Pemberton
With or Without Kavanaugh, The United States Is Anti-Choice
Jim Kavanagh
“Taxpayer Money” Threatens Medicare-for-All (And Every Other Social Program)
Jonathan Cook
Palestine: The Testbed for Trump’s Plan to Tear up the Rules-Based International Order
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: the Chickenhawks Have Finally Come Back Home to Roost!
David Rosen
As the Capitalist World Turns: From Empire to Imperialism to Globalization?
Jonah Raskin
Green Capitalism Rears Its Head at Global Climate Action Summit
James Munson
On Climate, the Centrists are the Deplorables
Robert Hunziker
Is Paris 2015 Already Underwater?
Arshad Khan
Will Their Ever be Justice for Rohingya Muslims?
Jill Richardson
Why Women Don’t Report Sexual Assault
Dave Clennon
A Victory for Historical Accuracy and the Peace Movement: Not One Emmy for Ken Burns and “The Vietnam War”
W. T. Whitney
US Harasses Cuba Amid Mysterious Circumstances
Nathan Kalman-Lamb
Things That Make Sports Fans Uncomfortable
George Capaccio
Iran: “Snapping Back” Sanctions and the Threat of War
Kenneth Surin
Brexit is Coming, But Which Will It Be?
Louis Proyect
Moore’s “Fahrenheit 11/9”: Entertaining Film, Crappy Politics
Ramzy Baroud
Why Israel Demolishes: Khan Al-Ahmar as Representation of Greater Genocide
Ben Dangl
The Zapatistas’ Dignified Rage: Revolutionary Theories and Anticapitalist Dreams of Subcommandante Marcos
Ron Jacobs
Faith, Madness, or Death
Bill Glahn
Crime Comes Knocking
Terry Heaton
Pat Robertson’s Hurricane “Miracle”
Dave Lindorff
In Montgomery County PA, It’s Often a Jury of White People
Louis Yako
From Citizens to Customers: the Corporate Customer Service Culture in America 
William Boardman
The Shame of Dianne Feinstein, the Courage of Christine Blasey Ford 
Ernie Niemi
Logging and Climate Change: Oregon is Appalachia and Timber is Our Coal
Jessicah Pierre
Nike Says “Believe in Something,” But Can It Sacrifice Something, Too?
Paul Fitzgerald - Elizabeth Gould
Weaponized Dreams? The Curious Case of Robert Moss
Olivia Alperstein
An Environmental 9/11: the EPA’s Gutting of Methane Regulations
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail