FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Trump Rallies: the Case for Silent Protests

It is a mistake to shout down Trump and disrupt his rallies.  Outside the rallies, anything goes: as we used to chant, “The streets belong to the people.”  But inside, opposition to the horrific specter of Trumpism is best served by silent protest.

Trump is no longer just a “threat.”  He has transformed the political landscape by galvanizing a massive national constituency that thrives on racial hatred, sham phobias and nationalistic mania.   Of course, confronting Trump’s neo-fascist tidal wave is a moral imperative, but his ascendency also creates the opportunity for an even greater groundswell for a progressive forward-seeking alternative.  The attractiveness of that alternative runs the risk of being undermined by protest actions that alienate the average American or in any way play into the aspiring Fuhrer’s hand.

Comparisons to early Hitler rallies are not far-fetched.  There is no difference.  The passionate compulsion to engage in mortal combat with Trumpism is natural and understandable.  But shouting matches and scuffles at Trump rallies are not the way to win the hearts and minds of America’s great middle.  On the contrary, they disserve the competing and exciting promise of leading this country in a new and better direction.   Indeed, violence by Trump worshippers has already been contorted into a vilification of MoveOn, Black Lives Matter and the Sanders campaign.

Occupying Trump in silent protest rather than disruptiveness is now a matter of utmost urgency.  Events are unfolding on an hourly basis and anti-Trump activists of all persuasions need to unite around strategies that are reasoned, intelligent and not counterproductive.  There are several reasons that the confines of Trump rallies are not the place to duke it out:

1 anti-protest cops and Trumpite goons have no ground whatsoever for  removing protesters; they have no choice but to grin and bear every imaginable sign, written slogan or gesture directed at the podium;

2 not engaging in physical interactions with volatile Trumpies insulates protesters from the blame game over who is responsible for violent confrontations;

3 silent protest defuses the tendency to condemn the protesters for interfering with “the rights” of Trumpies who, however misguidedly, stood in line for hours to listen to hateful demagoguery;

4 disruptive tactics invite and legitimize the same conduct by Trump supporters at the rallies of other candidates.

As a child of the 60s protest era, I understand the passion that motivates us to put our bodies on the line and tempts us to incite violent overreaction.  Violence by police and racists has often served to advance the cause of protesters – from firehoses and snarling dogs to angry men in “Make America Great Again” hats.  In 1968, as a high school senior I demonstrated outside Madison Square Garden during a George Wallace rally and was chased by baton-waving NYPD on horses.  The police bore the brunt of adverse publicity.   But I differentiate taking to the streets from trying to shut down an opposition event.

This is not about “freedom of speech.”  It is about proper tactics for confronting an enormous evil and, at the same time, moving the country in a  progressive direction. True, the First Amendment does not regulate private conduct.  It prohibits the government from suppressing free expression, in particular speech that is critical of the government or perceived by it as a threat.  Trump and his followers have no constitutional right not to be shouted down and protesters have every “right” to do the shouting.

For now, there are many vehicles for fighting the Trump scourge in the media, the streets and inside his rallies.  For now, mass silent protest at his rallies is the heroism that is called for. But when and if, God forbid, Trump ever holds public office, I will be there shouting at him at the top of my lungs.

More articles by:

Jimmy Lohman is a musician and human rights lawyer in Austin.

Weekend Edition
September 21, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Alexandra Isfahani-Hammond
Hurricane Florence and 9.7 Million Pigs
Andrew Levine
Israel’s Anti-Semitism Smear Campaign
Paul Street
Laquan McDonald is Being Tried for His Own Racist Murder
Brad Evans
What Does It Mean to Celebrate International Peace Day?
Nick Pemberton
With or Without Kavanaugh, The United States Is Anti-Choice
Jim Kavanagh
“Taxpayer Money” Threatens Medicare-for-All (And Every Other Social Program)
Jonathan Cook
Palestine: The Testbed for Trump’s Plan to Tear up the Rules-Based International Order
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: the Chickenhawks Have Finally Come Back Home to Roost!
David Rosen
As the Capitalist World Turns: From Empire to Imperialism to Globalization?
Jonah Raskin
Green Capitalism Rears Its Head at Global Climate Action Summit
James Munson
On Climate, the Centrists are the Deplorables
Robert Hunziker
Is Paris 2015 Already Underwater?
Arshad Khan
Will Their Ever be Justice for Rohingya Muslims?
Jill Richardson
Why Women Don’t Report Sexual Assault
Dave Clennon
A Victory for Historical Accuracy and the Peace Movement: Not One Emmy for Ken Burns and “The Vietnam War”
W. T. Whitney
US Harasses Cuba Amid Mysterious Circumstances
Nathan Kalman-Lamb
Things That Make Sports Fans Uncomfortable
George Capaccio
Iran: “Snapping Back” Sanctions and the Threat of War
Kenneth Surin
Brexit is Coming, But Which Will It Be?
Louis Proyect
Moore’s “Fahrenheit 11/9”: Entertaining Film, Crappy Politics
Ramzy Baroud
Why Israel Demolishes: Khan Al-Ahmar as Representation of Greater Genocide
Ben Dangl
The Zapatistas’ Dignified Rage: Revolutionary Theories and Anticapitalist Dreams of Subcommandante Marcos
Ron Jacobs
Faith, Madness, or Death
Bill Glahn
Crime Comes Knocking
Terry Heaton
Pat Robertson’s Hurricane “Miracle”
Dave Lindorff
In Montgomery County PA, It’s Often a Jury of White People
Louis Yako
From Citizens to Customers: the Corporate Customer Service Culture in America 
William Boardman
The Shame of Dianne Feinstein, the Courage of Christine Blasey Ford 
Ernie Niemi
Logging and Climate Change: Oregon is Appalachia and Timber is Our Coal
Jessicah Pierre
Nike Says “Believe in Something,” But Can It Sacrifice Something, Too?
Paul Fitzgerald - Elizabeth Gould
Weaponized Dreams? The Curious Case of Robert Moss
Olivia Alperstein
An Environmental 9/11: the EPA’s Gutting of Methane Regulations
Ted Rall
Why Christine Ford vs. Brett Kavanaugh is a Train Wreck You Can’t Look Away From
Lauren Regan
The Day the Valves Turned: Defending the Pipeline Protesters
Ralph Nader
Questions, Questions Where are the Answers?
Binoy Kampmark
Deplatforming Germaine Greer
Raouf Halaby
It Should Not Be A He Said She Said Verdict
Robert Koehler
The Accusation That Wouldn’t Go Away
Jim Hightower
Amazon is Making Workers Tweet About How Great It is to Work There
Robby Sherwin
Rabbi, Rabbi, Where For Art Thou Rabbi?
Vern Loomis
Has Something Evil This Way Come?
Steve Baggarly
Disarm Trident Walk Ends in Georgia
Graham Peebles
Priorities of the Time: Peace
Michael Doliner
The Department of Demonization
David Yearsley
Bollocks to Brexit: the Plumber Sings
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail