Selective Attention to Diversity: the Case of Cruz and Rubio


Two of the three GOP front-runners in this presidential election cycle are Latinos. Yet, it seems like nobody is talking about this.

Contrast this with the sustained attention to the fact that Barack Obama is the first black president of the U.S., or the media buzz around Hillary Clinton’s potentially becoming the first woman president. Why this difference?

One possibility is that while most Latinos in the U.S. are from Mexico and Central America, Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz hail from a Cuban background. Hence their potential nomination would not be a victory vis-à-vis the Latino population in the U.S. as such. However, this is hard to sustain in light of the fact that Barack Obama’s father was from Kenya, whereas most African Americans are not recent immigrants from East Africa.

A second possible argument would claim that Obama and Clinton have done much to campaign for and improve the lot of African Americans and women respectively. On the other hand, Cruz and Rubio have not done this for the Latino population in America. Most importantly in this regard, neither candidate is pushing for a path to citizenship for undocumented workers.

This is a bad argument for many reasons. Surely, whether or not Cruz and Rubio are Latinos does not depend on what their political views are. Indeed, Hillary Clinton would not cease to be a woman if she changed her views on abortion.

More importantly, whether or not we should celebrate a person’s being the first of their relevant group to receive a position or award should not depend on what they are perceived as having done for the group in question. For instance, in 2014, Maryam Mirzakhani became the first woman to win the Fields Medal, the most prestigious award in mathematics. This is a cause for celebration.

Why? Because women have been historically underrepresented in the field, owing in part to discrimination as well as unjust social institutions. Mirzakhani’s winning the Fields Medal is thus worthy of celebration because it’s potentially a sign of improving social and professional conditions for women in mathematics, as well as the result of a person’s overcoming a variety of hurdles in pursuit of her achievements. We should celebrate this event regardless of what Mirzakhani’s social or political views are (within reason) and what she is seen to have done for other women in mathematics.

Therefore, the lack of attention to Cruz and Rubio qua Latino candidates – as well as the general lack of attention to the fact that this year’s GOP field is comparatively very diverse – might point to a troubling double standard on behalf of the media. It’s hard to allay the cynical worry that the media, being generally in favor of Democratic candidates, only care and talk about diversity when it promotes certain political ends.

None of this is to defend the GOP as a political party. But even if we think that the Republican candidates are much worse than the Democrats, we should celebrate the fact that Rubio and Cruz are doing as well as they are. That is, if we genuinely care about diversity as such.

More articles by:

Hrishikesh Joshi is a Ph.D. candidate at Princeton University, in the Department of Philosophy, focusing primarily in ethics and political philosophy.


June 25, 2019
John Feffer
Deep Fakes: Will AI Swing the 2020 Election?
Binoy Kampmark
Bill Clinton in Kosovo
Kenneth Surin
Brief Impressions of the Japanese Conjuncture
Edward Hunt
Is Mexico Winding Down or Winding up the Drug War?
Manuel E. Yepe
Trump’s Return to Full-Spectrum Dominance
Steve Kelly
Greed and Politics Should Not Drive Forest Policy
Stephen Carpa
Protecting the Great Burn
Colin Todhunter
‘Modified’: A Film About GMOs and the Corruption of the Food Supply for Profit
Martin Billheimer
The Gothic and the Idea of a ‘Real Elite’
Elliot Sperber
Send ICE to Hanford
June 24, 2019
Jim Kavanagh
Eve of Destruction: Iran Strikes Back
Nino Pagliccia
Sorting Out Reality From Fiction About Venezuela
Jeff Sher
Pickin’ and Choosin’ the Winners and Losers of Climate Change
Howard Lisnoff
“Bomb, Bomb, Bomb Iran”
Robert Fisk
The West’s Disgraceful Silence on the Death of Morsi
Dean Baker
The Old Japan Disaster Horror Story
David Mattson
The Gallatin Forest Partnership and the Tyranny of Ego
George Wuerthner
How Mountain Bikes Threaten Wilderness
Christopher Ketcham
The Journalist as Hemorrhoid
Manuel E. Yepe
Yankee Worship of Bombings and Endless Wars
Mel Gurtov
Iran—Who and Where is The Threat?
Wim Laven
Revisiting Morality in the Age of Dishonesty
Thomas Knapp
Facebook’s Libra Isn’t a “Cryptocurrency”
Weekend Edition
June 21, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Brett Wilkins
A Brief History of US Concentration Camps
Rob Urie
Race, Identity and the Political Economy of Hate
Rev. William Alberts
America’s Respectable War Criminals
Paul Street
“So Happy”: The Trump “Boom,” the Nation’s Despair, and the Decline of Joe Biden
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Ask Your Local Death Squad
Dr. Vandana Shiva
Fake Food, Fake Meat: Big Food’s Desperate Attempt to Further the Industrialisation of Food
Eric Draitser
The Art of Trade War: Is Trump Winning His Trade War against China?
Melvin Goodman
Trump’s Russian Problem
Jonathan Cook
Forget Trump’s Deal of the Century: Israel Was Always on Course to Annexation
Andrew Levine
The Biden Question
Stanley L. Cohen
From Tel Aviv to Tallahassee
Robert Hunziker
Permafrost Collapses 70 Years Early
Kenn Orphan
Normalizing Atrocity
Ajamu Baraka
No Dare Call It Austerity
Ron Jacobs
The Redemptive Essence of History
David Rosen
Is Socialism Possible in America?
Dave Lindorff
The US as Rogue Nation Number 1
Joseph Natoli
The Mad King in His Time
David Thorstad
Why I’m Skipping Stonewall 50
Michael Welton
Native People: Changing Our Ways of Seeing
Peter Bolton
The US-UK “Special Relationship” is a Farce
Ramzy Baroud
‘World Refugee Day’: Palestinians Keep Their Right of Return Alive Through Hope, Resistance