Click amount to donate direct to CounterPunch
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $500
  • $other
  • use PayPal
DOUBLE YOUR DONATION!
We don’t run corporate ads. We don’t shake our readers down for money every month or every quarter like some other sites out there. We provide our site for free to all, but the bandwidth we pay to do so doesn’t come cheap. A generous donor is matching all donations of $100 or more! So please donate now to double your punch!
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Poll Scam at TIME: Sanders Wins Online Poll, Gets Snubbed by Editors

Bernie Sanders was winner of the 2015 TIME magazine’s Person of the Year online poll, yet his name was absent from the shortlist prepared by TIME editors for the final winner of TIME Person of the Year. Sanders got 10.2 percent of the total online votes, five percentage points ahead of his runner-up, Malala Yousafzai.

Republican front runner, Donald Trump, was on the TIME shortlist as were seven other national and international personalities. Sanders’s closest contender for the title, Yousafzai, was also missing from the TIME shortlist. Eventually, the title went to Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, who, reportedly, was the unanimous choice of the TIME editors.

TIME’s the criterion for the nomination is “the person or persons who most affected the news and our lives, for good or ill, and embodied what was important about the year.” “So ideally,” TIME says, “we want our Person of the Year to be both a snapshot of where the world is and a picture of where it’s going. Someone, or in rare cases, something, that feels like a force of history.”

Unlike Sanders, Trump was on the shortlist of Person of the Year title. Indeed, Trump has been shaking things up in the presidential race, but the poll put him in the 14th position well behind Sanders. Doesn’t this show that voters do not attach as much significance to Trump’s message as they do to Sander’s?

Although well behind Sanders, Trump towered over the rest of the Republican field in the online poll. The Republican contenders that figure in the poll were not even close to him − Marco Rubio (37th position), Ben Carson (40th position), Carly Fiorina (53th position), Ted Cruz (55thposition), and Jeb Bush (56th position). The poll had Paul Ryan, who has been eying the presidency, in the 38th position.

Like Sanders, Hillary Clinton was not on the shortlist, but in terms of the online votes she got, she was not even near Sanders. Ending up in the 29th position, Clinton was behind even Trump. While Clinton is running ahead of Sanders in the race for democratic nomination, the voters in the poll seemed to say that she does not exemplify the kind of leadership that they expect from president of the United States.

Angela Merkel, the winner of the Person of the Year award, was 10th in the online poll. Other people on the TIME shortlist did not even make it to the top 10 in the online poll. These were Vladimir Putin: (14th position), Trump (19th position) Caitlyn Jenner (32nd position), Hassan Rouhani (45th position), and Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi (52nd position). Travis Kalanick, the founder of Uber, was on the TIME shortlist but did not figure in the poll. Also shortlisted were Black Lives Matter activists but they were not acknowledged in the poll possibly because they embody a movement, not a personality.

TIME acknowledged that Sanders has helped define the presidential race and mobilized the party’s liberal support. Indeed, if anyone feels like a force of history, it is Sanders who has attracted bigger crowds and gathered more small donations in the history of U.S. presidential elections. The agenda Sanders is proposing is bold and ambitious, and he has already changed the direction of the Democratic Party, forcing Clinton to embrace many of his ideas. In his respect, as David Axelrod said, he has already won.

While a chorus of mainstream media maintains that Sanders is not electable, the very fact that the online poll participants nominated to him for Person of the Year title reflects that a large segment of population believes that the Sanders campaign is consequential. In fact, Sanders might well win the 2016 elections, as many of his ardent supports believe.

While the TIME poll was unscientific, the selection process of TIME was also subjective. If TIME is asking Internet users to express their views by taking part in the poll, it is bizarre that it should ignore those views entirely when it comes to the final selection. In fact, TIME would be well advised to give more weight to opinions of the voters in the online poll since that could enhance the level of participation, giving greater credence to Person of the Year selection.

More articles by:
October 22, 2018
Henry Giroux
Neoliberalism in the Age of Pedagogical Terrorism
Melvin Goodman
Washington’s Latest Cold War Maneuver: Pulling Out of the INF
David Mattson
Basket of Deplorables Revisited: Grizzly Bears at the Mercy of Wyoming
Michelle Renee Matisons
Hurricane War Zone Further Immiserates Florida Panhandle, Panama City
Tom Gill
A Storm is Brewing in Europe: Italy and Its Public Finances Are at the Center of It
Christopher Brauchli
The Liars’ Bench
Gary Leupp
Will Trump Split the World by Endorsing a Bold-Faced Lie?
Michael Howard
The New York Times’ Animal Cruelty Fetish
Alice Slater
Time Out for Nukes!
Geoff Dutton
Yes, Virginia, There are Conspiracies—I Think
Daniel Warner
Davos in the Desert: To Attend or Not, That is Not the Question
Priti Gulati Cox – Stan Cox
Mothers of Exiles: For Many, the Child-Separation Ordeal May Never End
Manuel E. Yepe
Pence v. China: Cold War 2.0 May Have Just Begun
Raouf Halaby
Of Pith Helmets and Sartorial Colonialism
Dan Carey
Aspirational Goals  
Wim Laven
Intentional or Incompetence—Voter Suppression Where We Live
Weekend Edition
October 19, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Jason Hirthler
The Pieties of the Liberal Class
Jeffrey St. Clair
A Day in My Life at CounterPunch
Paul Street
“Male Energy,” Authoritarian Whiteness and Creeping Fascism in the Age of Trump
Nick Pemberton
Reflections on Chomsky’s Voting Strategy: Why The Democratic Party Can’t Be Saved
John Davis
The Last History of the United States
Yigal Bronner
The Road to Khan al-Akhmar
Robert Hunziker
The Negan Syndrome
Andrew Levine
Democrats Ahead: Progressives Beware
Rannie Amiri
There is No “Proxy War” in Yemen
David Rosen
America’s Lost Souls: the 21st Century Lumpen-Proletariat?
Joseph Natoli
The Age of Misrepresentations
Ron Jacobs
History Is Not Kind
John Laforge
White House Radiation: Weakened Regulations Would Save Industry Billions
Ramzy Baroud
The UN ‘Sheriff’: Nikki Haley Elevated Israel, Damaged US Standing
Robert Fantina
Trump, Human Rights and the Middle East
Anthony Pahnke – Jim Goodman
NAFTA 2.0 Will Help Corporations More Than Farmers
Jill Richardson
Identity Crisis: Elizabeth Warren’s Claims Cherokee Heritage
Sam Husseini
The Most Strategic Midterm Race: Elder Challenges Hoyer
Maria Foscarinis – John Tharp
The Criminalization of Homelessness
Robert Fisk
The Story of the Armenian Legion: a Dark Tale of Anger and Revenge
Jacques R. Pauwels
Dinner With Marx in the House of the Swan
Dave Lindorff
US ‘Outrage’ over Slaying of US Residents Depends on the Nation Responsible
Ricardo Vaz
How Many Yemenis is a DC Pundit Worth?
Elliot Sperber
Build More Gardens, Phase out Cars
Chris Gilbert
In the Wake of Nepal’s Incomplete Revolution: Dispatch by a Far-Flung Bolivarian 
Muhammad Othman
Let Us Bray
Gerry Brown
Are Chinese Municipal $6 Trillion (40 Trillion Yuan) Hidden Debts Posing Titanic Risks?
Rev. William Alberts
Judge Kavanaugh’s Defenders Doth Protest Too Much
Ralph Nader
Unmasking Phony Values Campaigns by the Corporatists
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail