FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Climate Deniers are More Dangerous Than Trump and More Deadly Than ISIS

So Rep. Lamar Smith (D-Tx.) finally got his NOAA emails.  What he really should get is a jail sentence for crimes against humanity.  He, and the other climate deniers like him who hold positions of power, are arguably more dangerous than Donald Trump and more deadly than ISIS.

It is true that the presidential campaign of Donald Trump feels frighteningly like the second coming of Adolf Hitler.  It is also true that the violence of ISIS is despicable.  Between them, they garner most of the news coverage, but thankfully also the lion’s share of our collective wrath and disgust.

But as villains they are the stuff of comic books compared to the very real criminals prowling the halls of Congress right now, like Smith and his Senatorial counterpart, James Inhofe (R-Okla.)

Trump, who incites acts of hatred, may soon have blood on his hands.  ISIS already has plenty.  But climate deniers like Inhofe, Smith and the oil companies and think tanks who support them, could ultimately be responsible for global genocide.  That makes them orders of magnitude more evil.

The Paris COP21 conference produced a global agreement on climate change mitigation that some sternly criticize, others celebrate and the rest of us are resigned to accepting as the best that was likely to emerge from such an otherwise factious world.

Smith and Inhofe want none of it.  The Republican-led House and Senate are determined to block anything that smacks of action on global warming.  All too eager to condemn “terrorism,” the GOP and its pathetic presidential stable will happily sign their names to inaction on climate.

Meanwhile, it is disturbing to see the American public shut the door on desperate refugees rather than slam it in the faces of its elected officials who would condemn the entire planet to gradual annihilation.

As the Washington Post noted on the eve of the December 15 clown show….er, Republican debate… the “terrorist attacks in Paris and California refocused voter attention.”  On terrorism.  But somehow the COP21 climate talks, also in Paris, did not refocus U.S. political or media attention back on an issue of far greater import.

So, global extinction?  No worries.  Death of not insignificant but still far smaller numbers of people due to a terrorist attack?  Major.  What color ties Trump prefers? Even more major.

Smith, the chairman of the House Science Committee, says that data show there has been “no warming for 18 years.”  Which is why he wanted to get the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration emails; to prove that it is in fact NOAA scientists who are in denial about the fantasy they insist is global warming.

If Smith believes global warming hit pause 18 years ago,  he is an idiot.  If he doesn’t, but is saying it for political expediency, then he’s a liar.  (Smith also called the Union of Concerned Scientists a “left-wing environmental activist group,” which I sometime wish was true.)  It appears Smith would rather hunt down climate scientists than ISIS and is really enjoying his current witch hunt against NOAA.

Inhofe apparently blames Barbra Streisand for fooling people into believing climate change is real.  (I know, I know.)  In 2009 he told Mother Jones writer, David Corn, that Streisand was, as Corn described it, “the devious force behind a completely phony global campaign to address climate change.”

Inhofe was also the author, in 2012, of the book, “The Greatest Hoax: How the Global Warming Conspiracy Threatens Your Future.”  Which probably qualifies as the greatest hoax in the literary world.  Unless you stock it on the fiction shelves.

After the Paris climate agreement was announced, Inhofe characteristically vowed to block any White House actions that would carry out the terms of the accord.  He claimed that only about “a couple hundred” people still think climate change is real.  And this science denier is the chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee!  That would have been like putting Bin Laden in charge of the Department of Homeland Security when it was first created in 2002.  More than daft.  Downright dangerous.

I once asked my Representative, Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) how anti-environment guys like Smith and Inhofe ever get chairmanships like that?  “Seniority,” he said rather ruefully.  No actual qualifications needed.  You just have to hang around long enough on Capitol Hill to be given some plumb job in a subject you not only know nothing about but actually despise.  Incredible.  Luckily, the real job world doesn’t operate like that.  Most of the time.

One of Inhofe’s battier contentions (yes, even battier than the Streisand theory) is that God, not CO2 emissions, determines global temperatures.  He told this to Tony Perkins who runs the homophobic Family Research Council which is listed as an extremist group by the Southern Poverty Law Center.  Perkins, an evolution denier and professional LGBT hater, is the guy who proclaimed on his radio show that “Climate change alarmists and those who are pushing population control … promote homosexuality.”  Completing the looney circle.

Inhofe’s views on climate aren’t suspect only because they are so wrong.  They also weren’t always his views.  In March 2012 he told Rachel Maddow on her eponymous show that “I was actually on your side of this issue when I was chairing that committee and I first heard about this.  I thought it must be true until I found out what it cost.”

Ah, so the more expensive something is, the more we should doubt its veracity?

Maybe Inhofe made his calculations on the back of a napkin while drunk in a bar (even if the beverage in question was Kool-Aid.)   Otherwise he would surely have concluded that not doing anything about climate change was the most costly choice of all.  In dollars, not just in lives.

But, as MSNBC’s Steve Kornacki  asked Senator Ed Markey (D-Mass.) after the Paris accord, “can the Republicans basically blow up this deal?”  No, Markey said, “they cannot.”  Citing the Clean Air Act and other standards, Markey explained that “the president is acting under existing legal authority to make promises to the world on behalf of the American people which are enforceable under U.S. law.”

In the end, the hypocrisy of people like Smith and Inhofe knows no bounds.  Because not only will the Republicans not act on climate change, which they don’t care about, they won’t act on terrorism, which they do.

Gun-loving House Republicans are lined up to block passage of the Denying Firearms and Explosives to Dangerous Terrorists Act that would prevent those on the “no fly list” from legally buying guns.  One of the co-sponsors is Rep. Pete King (R-L.I.), who said of his colleagues that “Anything which they feel restricts the use or the ability to retain a gun they’re opposed to.”

Republicans have also, since last April, stalled the confirmation of Adam Szubin as the Treasury Department’s under secretary for terrorism and financial crimes.  There is general agreement that cutting off the funding flow to ISIS is a key strategy in the “war on terror.”  It’s certainly  far more effective, and definitely less cruelly indiscriminate, than the 9,000+ bombs dropped to date on “ISIS targets” in Syria and Iraq.

Szubin’s nomination, like King’s bill, has bi-partisan support.  Therefore, the only logical explanation for this protracted inaction is that there is a coterie of hard line Republicans on the Hill who will block anything they suspect emanates from the Obama White House.  Even when they actually support it!

More articles by:

Linda Pentz Gunter is the editor and curator of BeyondNuclearInternational.org and the international specialist at Beyond Nuclear. She can be contacted at linda@beyondnuclear.org.

December 18, 2018
Charles Pierson
Where No Corn Has Grown Before: Better Living Through Climate Change?
Evaggelos Vallianatos
The Waters of American Democracy
Patrick Cockburn
Will Anger in Washington Over the Murder of Khashoggi End the War in Yemen?
George Ochenski
Trump is on the Ropes, But the Pillage of Natural Resources Continues
Farzana Versey
Tribals, Missionaries and Hindutva
Robert Hunziker
Is COP24 One More Big Bust?
David Macaray
The Truth About Nursing Homes
Nino Pagliccia
Have the Russian Military Aircrafts in Venezuela Breached the Door to “America’s Backyard”?
Paul Edwards
Make America Grate Again
David Rosnick
The Impact of OPEC on Climate Change
Binoy Kampmark
The Kosovo Blunder: Moving Towards a Standing Army
Andrew Stewart
Shine a Light for Immigration Rights in Providence
December 17, 2018
Susan Abulhawa
Marc Lamont Hill’s Detractors are the True Anti-Semites
Jake Palmer
Viktor Orban, Trump and the Populist Battle Over Public Space
Martha Rosenberg
Big Pharma Fights Proposal to Keep It From Looting Medicare
David Rosen
December 17th: International Day to End Violence against Sex Workers
Binoy Kampmark
The Case that Dare Not Speak Its Name: the Conviction of Cardinal Pell
Dave Lindorff
Making Trump and Other Climate Criminals Pay
Bill Martin
Seeing Yellow
Julian Vigo
The World Google Controls and Surveillance Capitalism
ANIS SHIVANI
What is Neoliberalism?
James Haught
Evangelicals Vote, “Nones” Falter
Vacy Vlanza
The Australian Prime Minister’s Rapture for Jerusalem
Martin Billheimer
Late Year’s Hits for the Hanging Sock
Weekend Edition
December 14, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Andrew Levine
A Tale of Two Cities
Peter Linebaugh
The Significance of The Common Wind
Bruce E. Levine
The Ketamine Chorus: NYT Trumpets New Anti-Suicide Drug
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Fathers and Sons, Bushes and Bin Ladens
Kathy Deacon
Coffee, Social Stratification and the Retail Sector in a Small Maritime Village
Nick Pemberton
Praise For America’s Second Leading Intellectual
Robert Hunziker
The Yellow Vest Insurgency – What’s Next?
Patrick Cockburn
The Yemeni Dead: Six Times Higher Than Previously Reported
Nick Alexandrov
George H. W. Bush: Another Eulogy
Brian Cloughley
Principles and Morality Versus Cash and Profit? No Contest
Michael F. Duggan
Climate Change and the Limits of Reason
Victor Grossman
Sighs of Relief in Germany
Ron Jacobs
A Propagandist of Privatization
Robert Fantina
What Does Beto Have Against the Palestinians?
Richard Falk – Daniel Falcone
Sartre, Said, Chomsky and the Meaning of the Public Intellectual
Andrew Glikson
Crimes Against the Earth
Robert Fisk
The Parasitic Relationship Between Power and the American Media
Stephen Cooper
When Will Journalism Grapple With the Ethics of Interviewing Mentally Ill Arrestees?
Jill Richardson
A War on Science, Morals and Law
Ron Jacobs
A Propagandist of Privatization
Evaggelos Vallianatos
It’s Not Easy Being Greek
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail