FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

The French Regional Elections: the Gang of Three

Paris.

The Front National of Jean-Marie [Le Pen père] used to denounce the ‘gang of four’ (1). The Front National of Marine [Le Pen fille] is part of the gang of three and serves as a side door for the other two. The oligarchy still commands the future.

This time, it’s certain. They have learned the lesson! On the Right as on the Left they have been shaken by the Frontist gale (2) and they promise to change their ways.

On the evening of 13 December, the oligarchies of the Right and of the Left flaunt their gravitas, their modesty and their high-minded resolve. Manuel Valls promises to bring to the French “the proof that politics will not carry on as beforehand”. Nicolas Sarkozy affirms that it is time to “confront fundamentally the big issues”. Alain Juppé [former Prime Minister under Chirac and Minister under Sarkozy] is determined to bring “appropriate responses to the genuine expectations of the French”. Xavier Bertrand swears that he will refashion the way he does politics.

On the morning of 14 December, readers of the dailies find however an unchanged political chessboard on which the 2017 Presidential election is the main game. Nothing changes. The Presidential election is decisive, whereas the departmental and regional elections are only strategic plays for the rank and file of the three major national political parties. The idea of decentralization is dead, if indeed it has ever been taken seriously by the Parisian party HQs.

Nothing has changed on the Right. Since the failed return of Nicolas Sarkozy, the personal ambitions have been unleashed. The former president [of the UMP, renamed Les Républicains, LR] Alain Juppé and François Fillon [Prime Minister under Sarkozy] clash sharply. Xavier Bertrand, Laurent Wauquiez, Nathalie Kosciusko-Morizet [variously Deputies, Party heavies and pretenders, with Bertrand and Wauquiez elected to presidencies in the just conducted regional elections] will seek their chance sooner or later.

Nothing has changed on the Left. The object is to gather as large a grouping as possible (3) around François Hollande – should he find himself trailing Marine Le Pen in the first round he will beat her in the second round by harnessing the ‘Republican front’ strategy which has been drummed up for the regional elections.

Nothing changes because nothing is permitted to change. No matter what is said about the impoverished regions or people living on the margin, the oligarchs will remain committed to the neoliberal norms decreed by Brussels and enforced by Berlin. In the face of anger and despair of innumerable citizens, they will advance new programs of ultraliberal reforms.

Why would they renounce this competition in submission and cynicism given that the Front National (FN) is integrated within the gang of three, serving as foil [for the big two]?

For the oligarchic factions of Right and Left, the lesson of the second round is in fact reassuring: given the Frontist threat, electors have mobilized in sufficient numbers to ensure, even if reluctantly, the victory in the regions of a ‘Republican’ or of a ‘Socialist’. This scenario will be reproduced in 2017. Even if the National Front collects in the first round 30 – 40% of the votes, it will lose the fight since it lacks allies and will continue to frighten 30 to 40% of the voters. Fear is the oligarchies’ only weapon but it works.

In participating in every election to win numerous seats at the departmental and regional levels, the FN has accumulated victories but the gains are made within local systems over which it has no control. This is a cozy situation in which the Front is trying to insinuate itself, but at the risk of letting itself be corrupted – a likely outcome given the scrappy Party apparatus.

Given that the FN is a component in a national game that it is not able to master, Marine Le Pen will remain the ‘coupon clipper of discontent’ [la rentière du Malheur in the original] (4) in 2017 and after, save for any seismic upheaval that she could well exploit with political finesse.

Contrary to what is being proclaimed loud and clear, the ‘Republicans’ and the “Socialists’ have no need to change direction: they can limit themselves to continue to instrumentalize LePenism. It is the FN that needs to look in the mirror.

Located in the centre of her Party, between Florian Philippot to her left and Marion Maréchal-Le Pen to her right, Marine Le Pen currently pulls all possible advantages from her privileged position.

But her catch-all Party can never be a political rallying force if it prefers to play wedge politics on potential ethno-religious conflict. My prediction is that Marine Le Pen will decline to choose between national unity and identity politics in order to avoid losing any component of her current electoral support. (5)

Translated by Evan Jones.

Translator’s notes:

(1) In 1989 Jean-Marie Le Pen railed against the then four major political parties as a ‘gang of four’, effectively all being much of a muchness – the Parti Socialiste, Rassemblement pour la République, Parti communiste français and Union pour la démocratie française.

(2) At the first round of the regional elections on 6 December, the Front National’s candidate placed first in 6 of the 13 new amalgamated regions, and garnered 28% of the vote nationally (from a voter turnout of 50%).

(3) Jean-Christophe Cambadélis, Deputy and First Secretary of the Parti Socialiste, has been charged with forging ‘l’unité du gauche’. The real object is to prevent the appearance of left-wing and ecolo candidates on the first round of the Presidential ballot in 2017, to get the wretched Hollande into the second round. The PS is haunted by the 2002 elections, in which then Prime Minister Lionel Jospin was just tipped out of second place in the first round by Jean-Marie Le Pen. Cambadélis also recently waxed hot and cold regarding a ‘front républicain’ with LR to marginalize the National Front at the regionals, but faced resistance from the LR. Cambadélis’ stratagem is realpolitik writ large, but one has to be thick-skinned for this project as the Hollande agenda has nothing left wing or Republican about it. The consistency of the mentality of Cambadélis (a Deputy from Paris since 1997) is evidenced by his 2006 proposal to unify the PS and leftists via a renovated ‘social democracy’ to be forged under the leadership of Dominique Strauss-Kahn (ahem!). Fortunately, the 2011 Sofitel incident ended the farce of this latter’s political pretensions.

(4) The phrase was coined by political scientist Gaël Brustier in October 2011 with respect to the Le Pen family.

(5) An informative analysis of the regional character of the FN’s electoral support appears in December’s French edition of Le Monde Diplomatique (subscriber only). FN voters are unified (and distinguishable) on the priority given to the migration question. However, the LMD article distinguishes three regional blocs. In the West and South-West, where the FN fares least well, FN voters are more typically petit bourgeois and middling white collar workers. In the South-East, original stamping ground of the FN, the bloc now extending into the South-West’s Garonne Valley, the FN attracts cross-class support from those in the private sector and the petit bourgeoisie but also those with precarious incomes or in sectors ‘fragilized’ by globalization and heavily dependent on tourism. In the North (experiencing decades of deindustrialization) and North-East, there is worker support but particularly support from the ‘precarious’ outside the workplace (the ‘inactivs’) – retirees, housewives and students. The FN’s policy agenda, previously highly centralized in Paris, is now subject to internal tension. In the first instance, this tension is driven by felt pressure to cater to the particularities of electoral support in each area but there is a push (‘néofrontiste’) to elevate the social-populist agenda in order to enhance the FN’s potential status as a representative party at the national level.

More articles by:

Bertrand Renouvin is the founder of Nouvelle Action Royaliste. He edits the NAR’s bi-monthly Royaliste and blogs at bertrand-renouvin.fr, where this article appeared on 15 December.

January 17, 2019
Stan Cox
That Green Growth at the Heart of the Green New Deal? It’s Malignant
David Schultz
Trump vs the Constitution: Why He Cannot Invoke the Emergencies Act to Build a Wall
Paul Cochrane
Europe’s Strategic Humanitarian Aid: Yemen vs. Syria
Tom Clifford
China: An Ancient Country, Getting Older
Greg Grandin
How Not to Build a “Great, Great Wall”
Ted Rall
Our Pointless, Very American Culture of Shame
John G. Russell
Just Another Brick in the Wall of Lies
Patrick Walker
Referendum 2020: A Green New Deal vs. Racist, Classist Climate Genocide
Kevin Zeese - Margaret Flowers
Uniting for a Green New Deal
Matt Johnson
The Wall Already Exists — In Our Hearts and Minds
Jesse Jackson
Trump’s Flailing will get More Desperate and More Dangerous
Andrew Stewart
The Green New Deal Must be Centered on African American and Indigenous Workers to Differentiate Itself From the Democratic Party: Part Three
January 16, 2019
Patrick Bond
Jim Yong Kim’s Mixed Messages to the World Bank and the World
John Grant
Joe Biden, Crime Fighter from Hell
Alvaro Huerta
Brief History Notes on Mexican Immigration to the U.S.
Kenneth Surin
A Great Speaker of the UK’s House of Commons
Elizabeth Henderson
Why Sustainable Agriculture Should Support a Green New Deal
Binoy Kampmark
Trump, Bolton and the Syrian Confusion
Jeff Mackler
Trump’s Syria Exit Tweet Provokes Washington Panic
Barbara Nimri Aziz
How Long Can Nepal Blame Others for Its Woes?
Glenn Sacks
LA Teachers’ Strike: When Just One Man Says, “No”
Cesar Chelala
Violence Against Women: A Pandemic No Longer Hidden
Kim C. Domenico
To Make a Vineyard of the Curse: Fate, Fatalism and Freedom
Dave Lindorff
Criminalizing BDS Trashes Free Speech & Association
Thomas Knapp
Now More Than Ever, It’s Clear the FBI Must Go
Binoy Kampmark
Dances of Disinformation: The Partisan Politics of the Integrity Initiative
Andrew Stewart
The Green New Deal Must be Centered on African American and Indigenous Workers to Differentiate Itself From the Democratic Party: Part Two
Edward Curtin
A Gentrified Little Town Goes to Pot
January 15, 2019
Patrick Cockburn
Refugees Are in the English Channel Because of Western Interventions in the Middle East
Howard Lisnoff
The Faux Political System by the Numbers
Lawrence Davidson
Amos Oz and the Real Israel
John W. Whitehead
Beware the Emergency State
John Laforge
Loudmouths against Nuclear Lawlessness
Myles Hoenig
Labor in the Age of Trump
Jeff Cohen
Mainstream Media Bias on 2020 Democratic Race Already in High Gear
Dean Baker
Will Paying for Kidneys Reduce the Transplant Wait List?
George Ochenski
Trump’s Wall and the Montana Senate’s Theater of the Absurd
Binoy Kampmark
Dances of Disinformation: the Partisan Politics of the Integrity Initiative
Glenn Sacks
On the Picket Lines: Los Angeles Teachers Go On Strike for First Time in 30 Years
Jonah Raskin
Love in a Cold War Climate
Andrew Stewart
The Green New Deal Must be Centered on African American and Indigenous Workers to Differentiate Itself From the Democratic Party
January 14, 2019
Kenn Orphan
The Tears of Justin Trudeau
Julia Stein
California Needs a 10-Year Green New Deal
Dean Baker
Declining Birth Rates: Is the US in Danger of Running Out of People?
Robert Fisk
The US Media has Lost One of Its Sanest Voices on Military Matters
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail