FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

What is “the War on Terror” and How to Fight It

The attacks in Paris linked to ISIS on November 13 provided a pretext for extended police measures in France, Belgium, and elsewhere and abundant opportunities for the bourgeois media and politicians to remind the world’s working-class populations of the “urgency” of the “war on terror,”

Whether or not agents of the US ruling class were responsible for those Paris attack, there is no doubt that the US government has fabricated “The War on Terror” to meet US imperialism’s long-term geopolitical goals. Either directly or through its vassal states, the US government is responsible for organizing armed terrorist groups across Asia and into Africa and has been for decades. This policy has led to the destruction of Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and now Yemen, and has already been extended into Africa. (1) US imperialist policy is clearly aimed at destroying nation states that were artificially created by British and French imperialists after past imperialist wars and eliminate the regimes there that exhibited even an ounce of nationalist independence. In other words, US imperial policy in recent years is aimed at redrawing the map to serve the interests of the current imperialist masters. A new map of these regions is being forged by new bloodletting.

These are not just “wars for oil,” as is the popular refrain. There is much more involved than just oil—although oil is a part of it. The underlying purpose of this policy is clearly to promote a state of barbarism that makes it easier to negate and preemptively remove any organized resistance to the unfettered exploitation of resources by the capitalist class, particularly the US capitalist class.

Furthermore, the ultimate aim—particularly as regards the regions of Asia and Europe–is to clear the way to finally retake for US imperialism and its allies, unlimited access to the resources of the former Soviet Union and China that were removed from their reach during the last century by the proletarian revolutions in those lands.

Who’s Helping?

The US imperialists are operating through the regimes in their flunky states in Pakistan and in the Persian Gulf region. The regimes in the Gulf region are controlled by local family dynasties accountable to no one except their imperialist sponsors. The regime in Pakistan relies on a petty-bourgeois, US-backed military elite and, like the Arab monarchies, is in no way accountable to the oppressed working class there, which is hard put to even organize unions.

The role of these retrograde regimes in creating and facilitating the violence that is tearing apart countries from Afghanistan to Libya has even been been reported by bourgeois media such as The New York Times, The Washington Post and The Guardian of London. It has also been acknowledged on occasion by some of US imperialism’s leading politicians, such as John Kerry and Hilary Clinton, who posture as if US imperialism is helpless to stop this.

The implementation of this plan requires the creation of groups of ruthless, anonymous mercenary armies who commit rampant atrocities, usually in the name of jihad holy war against infidels. Exactly who is building these armies? How are they funded and by whom? Where do they get their ideologies? We have clear evidence that the gangs of armed thugs that have been tearing Libya and Syria apart since 2011 were not only funded but created by and through the Gulf States to meet this need.

How do we know this?

The responsibility of the Gulf States—of both the governments themselves and “private donors” there–for the rise of the armed “religious fundamentalist” military brigades in Syria has been well documented by the prominent establishment “think tank,” the Brookings Institute back in December 2013. The report, entitled Playing With Fire: Why Private Gulf Financing for Syria’s Extremist Rebels Risks Igniting Sectarian Conflict at Home,” by Elizabeth Dickinson, was based on months of investigation in the Gulf states and conversations with individuals who had been directly involved in the process. (2)

According to the Brookings Institute’s study:

“Over the last two and a half years, Kuwait has emerged as a financial and organizational hub for charities and individuals supporting Syria’s myriad rebel groups. These donors have taken advantage of Kuwait’s …relatively weak financial rules to channel money to some of the estimated 1,000 rebel brigades now fighting against Syrian president Bashar al-Assad…”

The report opens with the conclusion of its findings: “This memo charts how individual donors in the Gulf encouraged the founding of armed groups, helped to shape the ideological and at times extremist agendas of rebel brigades, and contributed to the fracturing of the military opposition. From the early days of the Syrian uprising, Kuwait-based donors…began to pressure Syrians to take up arm. The new brigades often adopted the ideological outlook of their donors. As the war dragged on and the civilian death toll rose, the path toward extremism became self-reinforcing…Today, there is evidence that Kuwaiti donors have backed rebels who have committed atrocities and who are either directly linked to al-Qa’ida or cooperate with its affiliated brigades on the ground.” (Emphasis added-mjvd)

The flow of donations, which began under the auspices of charity in the spring of 2011, quickly morphed into a torrent of military aid. “By the fall of 2011, some Kuwaitis involved in charity work began to say they supported an armed uprising. And by the winter, Kuwaiti individuals and charities…began channeling a portion of their funding into the creation of armed groups.” Various donors created their own jihad armies. Infighting began among agents of the numerous armed groups as they competed for funds, funders sought to see their group outdo the group of their competitors, all of this “quickly became common” and was played out vigorously over the social media, precluding the unification of the resistance. The armed conflicts between groups escalated and–obviously– so did civilian deaths. (3)

“Although it is impossible to quantify the value of private Kuwaiti assistance to the rebels, it almost certainly reaches into the hundreds of millions of dollars. Donors based in Kuwait have also gathered contributions from elsewhere in the Gulf…”

And it was not only the donors from the Gulf who were involved in building these competing jihad armies. Dickinson goes on: “…a great deal of the money and supplies…passes directly through Turkey, Lebanon, or Jordan before crossing into Syria…At least half a dozen Kuwaiti donors also…travel to Syria personally.”

The report concludes that the Gulf donors have contributed to the ideological and strategic alignment of today’s [Dec. 2013] rebel groups, in which extremists have the military upper-hand.”(4)

‘It is unclear just how or when the decision to actually fund the armed brigades began, but witnesses in early meetings described an ‘implicit desire’ from the donors to create military resistance.” (5) (Emphasis added-mjvd)

The bourgeois media marvel at the social media proficiency of ISIS in relaying “studio quality” videos to publicize its atrocities. However, the use of social media for this purpose was fostered early on in the process of building these competing Islamic extremist jihad formations. According to Dickinson’s report, social media was widely employed early on in the fundraising process as an avenue through which the jihadi groups created via the donations through the the Gulf sought to promote themselves. Social media was a critical tool, used both by the donors and by all the armed groups to promote their feats and alleged conquests in competition with other groups.

“Witnesses…describe fighting among representatives of armed groups in Kuwait as they faced the perverse incentive of trying to prove their brigade had suffered more martyrs and fought more difficult battles.” Jealousies led to conflicts. “A flurry of brigades were thus created and ceased to exist in the span of months.”

“One way armed groups secured longer-term backing was by adopting the ideologies of their benefactors.” And their most zealous backers were advocates of the extreme Salifist branch of Wahhabi Islam akin to the Sunni sect that is the official religion of the monarchy ruling Saudi Arabia. From throughout the Gulf emirates–all of them Sunni religious states–and on through to Kuwait the funds flowed to Syria to foment bloody conflict—jihad against “infidels,” especially infidels of the Shia variety. (6)

Almost all of the groups “actively cooperate with al-Qa’ida’s Jabhat al-Nusra,” which had been one of the most notorious of the jihad groups until the appearance of ISIS on the scene. (7)

“The conflict metastasized into full-scale civil war by early 2012 when some Gulf countries also backed particular rebel groups…each brigade and political faction depended on an independent funding stream. (8)

This vast and disparate fund-raising network created “thousands” of armed brigades who expended a great deal of their resources attacking each other and a situation in which no group had sufficient force to actually prevail. Meanwhile, all the groups that were created were united in their opposition to a political solution to the Syrian crisis. The main victims of this bloody conflict were the civilians who were caught in the crossfire.

By the end of 2012, Dickinson reports, Kuwaiti-funded mercenaries had led offensives where hundreds of civilians were massacred. These offensives, along with the al-Assad government’s brutal bombing attacks led to mounting civilian casualties and death tolls. The ensuing war was destroying entire towns and/or sections of cities and causing populations to flee for their lives. Any secular nationalist or working-class opposition to the al-Assad regime that had managed to get organized was outgunned and outnumbered by the jihad armies created by the Gulf donations. One notorious jihadist donor openly called for the blood of his sectarian rivals: “Among the beautiful things inside Syria is that the mujahedeen have realized that they need to deeply hit the Alawites, in the same way they kill our wives and children.” (9)

In 2013, in an effort to appear to “crack down” on jihad donors, the Kuwaiti regime finally passed laws to “criminalize terrorist financing” and restrict money laundering. However, enforcement was virtually nonexistent. (10)

Meanwhile, in Qatar…

Nine months later, in a follow-up article in Foreign Policy magazine, Dickinson documented the even more critical role of another key Gulf donor: The Qatar regime had “pumped tens of millions of dollars … to hard-line Syrian rebels and extremist Salafists…” (11)

The Qatar regime uses another system: it channels state funds to build proxy armies through middlemen. Because there were no established rebels when the uprising in Syria started, Qatar backed businessmen and Syrian emigrants in Qatar who promised they could rally fighters and guns. We learn that the Qatar government employed the same plan of action in Syria that it employs with respect to other proxy armies it funds: “Taliban insurgents, the Somali Islamists, and Sudanese rebels.” “The same Qatari network has…played a major role in destabilizing nearly every trouble spot in the region and in accelerating the growth of radical and jihadi factions..Libya is mired in a war between proxy-funded militias, Syria’s opposition has been overwhelmed by infighting and overtaken by extremists…”

Applying “The Libyan Solution” in Syria

Dickenson quotes Andeas Kreig, an advisor to the Qatar Armed Forces, describing just what the Qatari monarchy did–and surely is still doing– to Libya, actions it has repeated in Syria with the same results:

“The first battlefield test of Qatar’s proxy chain was in Libya [in 2011] where there was a broad regional consensus—as well as U.S. support—to oust then-leader Muammar al-Qaddafi. Qatar, together with the UAE, had signed on to Western airstrikes against the regime. But Doha [Qatar’s capital, seat of the monarchy] also wanted to help build up rebel capacity on the ground.”

The Qatar regime had a job to do: “’They had to literally go to their address book and say “Who do we know in Libya?,” says Krieg ‘This is how they coordinated the Libya operation.’ Doha lined up a collection of businessmen, old [Muslim] Brotherhood friends, and ideologically aligned defectors, plying them with tens of millions of dollars and 20,000 tons of arms...After a months-long-war, the rebels took Tripoli and Qaddafi was dead. Doha’s clients found themselves among the most powerful political brokers in the new Libya. And long after the NATO strikes had ended, some Qatari-backed militias continued to receive support.”

The imperialists expected that the protests in Syria would “quickly topple the Assad regime” as protests had toppled the regimes in Tunisia and Egypt, Dickinson goes on, but that didn’t happen. “By August, Washington was calling on al-Assad to step down…Not long thereafter, Qatar began its Syria operation, modeled on [its] Libyan adventure.

“Like the tendering of a contract, Doha issued a call for bidders to help with the regime’s overthrow.”

Thus the tiny ruling clique of Qatar actually initiated the devastating armed conflicts that, supported by the hundreds of millions of dollars collected by “wealthy donors” in the Gulf through Kuwait, fueled a five-year war that has killed over 250,000 Syrians, turned half the population into refugees and entire cities into rubble. And there is no end in sight. (Emphasis added throughout-mjvd.)

Prelude to ISIS: Creating a Sunni-Shia Rift

The US government began its official, direct military intervention against Syria in September 2014, after the advancing conquests of the now-notorious ISIS, which stands for the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. Whence the soil that nourished ISIS?

ISIS began as ISI—Islamic State of Iraq–an offshoot of al-Qa’ida of Iraq (AQI), a Sunni jihadi group funded through/by the Saudi regime. AQI’s targets were allegedly the Shia-dominated governments imposed by the US government after its 2003 invasion and occupation of Iraq.

The governments imposed by US imperialism in post-2003 Iraq were clearly directed toward fueling a murderous Sunni-Shia warfare from the outset. It started with the “de-Ba’athification” of the government payrolls by the very first US occupation government under the imperialists’ proconsul L. Paul Bremer III. “De-Ba’athification” excluded from government jobs some 400,000 members of the Ba’ath political party, the party that ruled under Saddam Hussein.

Many Ba’ath members were Sunni. Therefore, so were most of these 400,000 dismissed workers who were suddenly without an income and banned from working for either the government or the military– virtually the only jobs available. This fed the growth of Sunni resentment against the US military occupation and the government it imposed. (The Ba’ath Party is also the party of the al-Assad government in Syria. The Ba’athist party is an Arab nationalist party that arose to resist the post-WWI imperialist-imposed monarchies. The Ba’ath party in Syria was dominated by the Shia Allawite sect while the Ba’ath Party in Iraq was dominated by Sunni Muslims.)

Turning a “Rift” Into Bloody Attacks

“De-Ba’athification” was accompanied by a surge of assassinations targeting hundreds of Iraqi professionals and intellectual, many of whom were Sunni. These horrors were followed by the rampant growth of Shia death squads after the mysterious bombing of the Golden Dome Shia Mosque in Samara in February 2006, for which no group took responsibility. Both the surge of assassinations and death squads activity against Sunnis are associated with 1) the US military’s deployment to Bagdad of James Steele, a notorious State Department death squad organizer with vast experience organizing death squads in El Salvador against the workers and peasants insurgency there in the 1980, and 2) the arrival in Iraq as a commander his collaborator General David Petraeus. (12)

Over the next several years, these US government sponsored death squads kidnapped, tortured, and executed tens of thousands of men in Bagdad and elsewhere, creating armies of widows and orphans.

The working-class neighborhoods where these killings took place were unable to organizing self-defense groups on a massive scale to defeat these death squads, however, because under the US Occupation government, it was illegal for civilians to own a gun! US Special Forces carried out ongoing night raids of homes. Those found to be in possession of a gun were dragged off to indefinite detention or worse. As a result: according to The New York Times of January 18, 2015, “tens of thousands of Sunni men [are] languishing in jails [in Bagdad], having never seen the inside of a courtroom.” (13)

The creation of these death squads targeting Sunnis–and certainly others– made it virtually impossible for the Iraqi workers to organize as a class across religious lines against the US imperialist occupation and its quisling governments, which was, of course, the purpose of the death squads. Moreover, the most talented, experienced and vocal activists were surely the first targets.

Despite the enormous obstacles, however, the Iraqi Sunnis did manage to organize a widespread protest against government corruption, for jobs, and for services, and set up encampments beginning in the winter of 2012. These were violently suppressed by the government, repression which was accompanied and followed by a string of car bombings that hit popular markets and meeting points, killing thousands of Iraqis of all religions. (14)

Who was ISI and What is it Doing?

The Islamic State of Iraq declared its existence in 2007 as a united front of Sunni jihad groups. By its name it declared that its goal was to set up a Sunni State that would rival and replace the Shia state ensconced in US imperialism’s “Green Zone” fortress in central Bagdad. However, by 2013, splits developed within it. But ISI gained in strength.

By 2013, ISI had begun invading and occupying Iraqi regions and cities with long motorcades of white trucks carrying hundreds of well-armed, masked men all dressed in black carrying the ISI flag, a tour de force that had never been seen before. Sometimes, the ISI invasions of a city came in the form of the entering into a town with vehicles equipped with massive explosive devices, that destroyed whole blocks when detonated. The Iraqi troops allegedly meant to defend the towns, dropped their weapons and fled the ISI invaders.

Then, ISI began to take over “rebel-controlled regions” of Syria and changed its name to ISIS–the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. By mid-2014, news of its atrocities—mass and individual beheadings and executions, raping of women, expulsions and murders of “infidels,” etc.—were widely advertised by ISIS on social media and sensationalized through the bourgeois media around the world, overshadowing other news from Syria. Stopping ISIS became the pretext for the US government to finally announce its official intervention into the war in Syria. In September 2014, the US along with Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, and Jordan—the very governments who had started the conflict–began bombing Syria allegedly “to stop ISIS.”

By the end of 2014, the flow of the populations from Syrian cities to escape the escalating conflict became a flood. Where the US-sponsored bombing campaign had assisted in “liberating” a city such as Kobani or Sinjar, the cities were abandoned and there was nothing left but rubble.

Since the events of November 13 in Paris, the French “socialist” government has authorized its air force to join the bombing campaign, targeting the Syrian city of Raqqa that was occupied by ISIS. ISIS took control over Raqqa in Syria after defeating rival Islamic jihadi groups.

On to Libya (Again)!

Now, ISIS has set up operations in the ruins of Libya, in the city of Surt, where it has already been advertising it presence and doing its job by committing various atrocities, such as crucifying an aged ultraconservative Muslim imam, beheading Christians, forcing residents to flee and creating even more refugees, etc. A Saudi “administrator” was sent in to preside over ISIS in Surt, and ISIS periodically rotates administrators,” who are—not surprisingly– “typically from the Persian Gulf.” Its recruits—some 2,000—are reportedly masked foreigners and ISIS is able “easily to transport fighters” in and out of Libya according to its needs. It is rapidly overpowering the other proxy armies creating even more havoc in Libya, and is expected to soon to take over 150 miles of Libyan coast.

Another point to take note of is the ISIS al Qa’ida—that is, its computer “database”–which is what “al Qa’ida means.” Two drivers kidnapped by ISIS and later released reported their experiences to a Times reporter: “The Islamic State seemed to command a strong intelligence network…They [the captives] marveled at an interrogator’s probing and well-informed questions about their families and personal histories. ‘If he said he was my own brother I would have believed him.’ one driver said.”(15)

And Afghanistan!

ISIS donors are also moving to have ISIS take on the Taliban in Afghanistan and create even more bloodletting and chaos there. “Western officials” inform that “in recent months the [ISIS] core group delivered several hundred thousand dollars to the Afghan fighters helping them gain ground and recruits. “ Yes, that WOULD probably help gain recruits in Afghanistan where US funded decades of wars have left that country in ruins, with many Afghans joining the flood of refugees fleeing to Europe. In fact, Afghanistan is such a dangerous and inhospitable place that the entire “government” has chosen to live elsewhere!(16)

Who is in Charge?

As US imperialism and its allies, along with France and possibly even Britain, are all joining in the frenzy to bomb Syrian cities into shambles, it is important to get a grip on what is happening so as to begin to make a plan to stop it.

Who is actually overseeing all this mad destruction? Who is really behind this plan to recruit armies of psychotic, psychopathic mercenaries to take over and destroy entire nations? Why are these “private donors” and the autocratic regimes in the Gulf states able to organize genuine, terrorist jihad armies without suffering any punishments from the US government. After all, young Muslim men in the US accused of the slightest connection with groups on the US “terrorist” list, face arrest and long prison terms.

Let’s think a minute:

The Gulf monarchies– Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, along with Saudi Arabia–are artificial political constructs totally beholden to imperialism for their creation and their very existence. The boundaries of all of them were established by the British imperialists after World War I. “Thus Britain—like France in her sphere of the Middle East …–established states, appointed persons to govern them, and drew frontiers between them…and did so mostly in and around 1922. As they had long intended to do, the European powers had taken the political destinies of the Middle Eastern peoples in their hands…. “ (17) The same is true of Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, and–of course–the initial Zionist State of Israel.

The US imperialists–like the British imperialists before them which carved out these authoritarian, theocratic fiefdoms on the Arabian peninsula—has always and continues to use these strategically located artificial, “nation states “ to advance its military, geopolitical and economic interests in the region.

All of these regimes are absolute family-run monarchies and police states based the same sharia law propagated by the jihad “terrorists” they organize, applying stoning, beheading, lashing, and amputation as punishments. None of them grants any rights to workers. In fact, overwhelming majority of the populations of the Gulf emirates are foreign indentured servants from impoverished lands who have no rights. It is this labor force that has built the garish “modern” eye-popping projects these emirates are notorious for.

So, these monster regimes are are being used to fund the brutal jihad armies that have been unleashed on the world.

The Dog Wags its Tails

All of them survive—despite the enormous wealth the monarchies have amassed through the exploitation of the oil under the ground they were given—at the behest of their US imperialist handlers, even if they are allowed independent posturing from time to time. They all serve as imperialist military outposts and agents and are not independent agents at all.

The Saudi Arabian monarchy has collaborated with British and US intelligence agencies since World War II to create and nurture the precursors of ISIS during the Cold War against “atheists and communists” and the Soviet Union. In fact, the current King Salmon is a veteran CIA collaborator: When head of the Saudi intelligence agency, he helped the CIA recruit foreign mercenaries for “jihad” in its “secret war” in Afghanistan in the 1970s and 80s, one of whom as Osama bin Laden. And–as stated above–he extremist, strict version of Islam that is espoused by ISIS and the “al-Qa’ida” is a politicized version of the fundamentalist Wahhabi Islam—the religion of the Saudi family and the official state religion. By 2013, according to some sources, the Saudi monarchy had taken the leading role in supplying money and arms to jihad groups fighting in Syria. (18)

As regards the role of the other Gulf monarchies:

Bahrain: This small island of is a US Navy base, the home of the US Naval Forces Central Command and the US Fifth Fleet.

Qatar is home of a vital Pentagon facility: “the highly classified …Combined Air and Space Operations Center.” This Center “coordinated all of the attack and surveillance missions for the [US government’s ]wars in Iraq and Afghanistan…It hosts liaison officers from 30 allies in Europe and the Persian Gulf…Inside this warehouse size command center, three giant digital maps [carry] tracking details of every aircraft—civilian and military—in the skies over three vital regions: Syria and its neighbors, the Persian Gulf and Afghanistan” and beyond. Qatar is also the location of the massive and strategic Al Udeid US military base, central to the Pentagon’s wars against Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria and from which it launches bombing missions against the region. (19) (Emphasis added-mjvd)

United Arab Emirates: Along with the other monarchical states, the UAE has been “allowed” to build its own air force, joining bombing missions to serve US military goals in Libya and Syria. UAE pilots, trained by the US Air Force, actually fly US planes on bombing missions against Syria, Iraq, and other targets in the region. In fact, the secret US base at Al Dhafra is the only overseas base for the US government’s F-22 Raptor! (20)

The air forces of these monarchies, like the rest of their military forces, serve as extensions of the Pentagon and carry out the Pentagon’s policy directives. The UAE regime is planning the purchase of 30 F-16s to add to the 80 it already has and—like the other Gulf regimes– is a major Pentagon customer..

Kuwait: This tiny place on the Arab peninsula at the tip of Iraq was created in by the British to provide an imperialist port and military base on the Persian Gulf and it has never been anything else. Today, “the US has at least 10 active military facilities in Kuwait, and Kuwait has been referred to by some analysts as the US government’s ‘unsinkable aircraft carrier.’” (21)

(Of the Gulf states, Yemen is the only one that does not have a US military base, and the US government–along with the other Arab monarchies–is not bombing Yemen to rubble. [22])

These entities, created to serve British imperialism, have now been taken over by the US imperialists. None of these so-called countries is independent. They are US military bases in the Gulf region.

Their autocratic monarchies provide amazing advantages for US imperialism. First, they are close to the countries that the US government wants to attack. These oil-rich regimes not only spend billions boosting US war industry profits and provide skilled military personnel to assist US military operations, but they are virtually immune from the class struggle because they have almost no indigenous proletariat. The “expats,” indentured workforce comprises nearly half—43%–of the population of the GCC in 2010. (23)

The conclusion is inescapable: These Gulf regimes created, funded, and armed the jihad forces that are destroying Syria and Libya because that was part of Washington’s plan.

(After reviewing a recent ISIS internet recruitment video, a The New York Times  revealed another culprit at hand. The reporter noted that “Nowhere in the hourlong production—full of threats, drive-by shootings, explosions and gunfights–does an ISIS fighter mention the United States or directly mention or threaten Israel…. (24) Humm…”How could that be?” one wonders.)

“Let’s You and Him Fight”

Bourgeois cretin Donald Trump on September 18 inadvertently articulated US imperialism’s policy in Asia and Africa: “Let them [the populations of these regions] fight each other and we [US imperialism] will pick up the remnants.” He was offering this as the US foreign policy solution to the problems in Syria and the region. However, this IS US foreign policy. The only part that Trump had wrong was the word “Let.” The US policy is not to “let” them fight, but to create sectarian divisions and then recruit, pay, arm, and train “them” and then deploy “them” to create bloody havoc—to make people fight each other.

Where are the jihadists trained? While reporting on the facility in Jordan where a Jordanian soldier allegedly shot to death five US and one South African military contract workers, The New York Times quoted a retired Jordanian brigadier general who “said that the training center where the shooting erupted—was a particularly sensitive site, having hosted thousands of foreign recruits since it opened in 2005.”(25. Emphasis added-mjvd) Obviously, this base has to be one of many such clandestine US-government-funded training sites across the region.

Who are the Real Terrorists and What are They Doing?

Al-Qa’ida was created by the CIA in collaboration with the Saudi regime and the government of Pakistan. (25)

The US government, working with the government of Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, created the Taliban in the 1990s, recruiting arming and training students–Taliban in Pushtu–from madrassas in Pakistan to send into to Afghanistan to battle the armies of warlords.

These very warlord armies had been organized, armed and trained by the US government, along with the governments of Pakistan and Saudi Arabia and others to fight along with the jihad armies of the al-Qa’ida against the Soviets and destroy the nationalist government in Kabul that the Soviet army had invaded Afghanistan to defend against retrograde and reactionary forces—also incited by US imperialism–who were resisting modernization.

Today, US imperialism’s political and military client state Pakistan actually sheltered and continues to shelter hundreds of Taliban top leaders, including the Taliban head Mullah Omar, who evidently died in a Pakistan hospital. His replacement Mullah Akhtar Muhammad Mansour, “has…benefited from a powerful alliance with the Pakistani military spy agency, Interservices Intelligence, the original sponsor of the Afghan Taliban insurgency.” (26) This new Taliban leader owns homes in several cities in Pakistan, one of which is in “an enclave where he and some other Taliban leaders…have built homes..” Moreover, he travels frequently to the UAE where also owns a home and owns several businesses, including a cellphone company.

The Pakistani military and the US drones have been allegedly attempting to destroy the “Haqqani Network” by relentless military and drone attacks for years killing hundreds of innocent people, destroying their homes and entire villages and creating thousands of refugees in Waziristan–a mountainous region between Pakistan and Afghanistan. Meanwhile, the head of that “network,” Jalaluddin Haqqani, lived comfortably in Pakistan and had dual Pakistan and Saudi citizenship and may have even died in a hospital in Saudi Arabia. The Haqqani network is also a product of the US-Pakistani-Saudi collaboration to create jihad armies in the 1980s. (27)

US military officials incited sectarian conflicts in Iraq after the US invasion and occupation in 2003, by organizing and training Shia death squads that rent the country apart. And now it has, through its Gulf minions—created the jihad armies of sectarian mercenary crazies who are destroying Syria, Libya and beyond: It was reported on November 25 that mercenaries from Colombia are being recruited through the UAE to fight in Yemen. (30)

But, it is the US government that launches a “war on terror” that can never end, perpetual orgy of violence squandering vast resources and tens of millions of lives! This is the world that capitalism has created by 2015.

The obvious goal of this destructive policy to redraw the map of the region not only can implement “regime change,” but insure that, perhaps, there is no regime at all. The working-classes of the nations will never have a chance to overthrow the ruling tyrants because the working class will be dispersed and degraded in the process and the remnants will become refugees, fleeing to Europe where they will help drive down the wages of all the workers. The only powers that will be armed and prepared to rule the wretched remains will be the gangs of mercenary psychopaths such as ISIS, who will have unlimited funding and support from imperialism and its agents.

In fact, John Bolton, death squad organizer in Honduras, when he was US ambassador there in the 1980s, welcomed this option. The destruction of Iraq and Syria should not be considered a problem at all. The US, he proposed, can just establish a new Sunni state in the ruins, which he says would pacify the region. (31

Who Can Save The World From Barbarism–Some Problems

The only power–today as ever– that can stop imperialist lunacy is the working class. However, because of the dire conditions US imperialism is creating in these foreign lands, the working class that must lead the way is the US working class. However, the US working class has been virtually silent on the subject, hardly even defending itself well from capitalist assaults.

Throughout the vicious wars imperialism has been waging, particularly since the attack on Iraq in 2003, there has been no massive antiwar movement. After hundreds of thousands—millions throughout the world—failed to stop that war from happening, there has been virtual silence. This is true despite the fact that it is common knowledge that US government officials deliberately lied to justify the multiple atrocities and crimes they committed. Known, key war criminals, such as George W. Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, and David Petraeus, write books, appear at public ceremonies, are interviewed as experts on TV, and live peaceful lives, in no way held accountable.

The US working class has been “sold a bill of goods,” as the saying used to go: It has been cheated, hoodwinked, lied to, fooled again, except for the fact that the really damaging “goods” in this picture are being produced right here by the US working class itself.

One of the few sectors of the US capitalist economy that has been doing very well during the latest world capitalist crises has been the war industry. Congress last year approved a war budget of over $653 Billion, according to the American Friends Service Committee. One reason Congress never says “No!” is because the key military contractors like Lockheed Martin engage in what is called “political engineering” to insure that the politicians will not vote “No.” This means that to produce one plane, say the white elephant F-35, Lockheed Martin spreads the work out through 1,400 contractors creating jobs in 46 states! Even though this plane should long ago been canceled for many reasons, Lockheed Martin’s threat that this will “end jobs” helps justify repeated Congressional approval. (32)

Lockheed Martin is not alone. All the major war industry giants, use the same “political engineering” to ensure they receive huge government handouts. And the war industry does create jobs, many of them high-paying jobs. Moreover, it involves not only the bombers and the bombs, but all the materials used in their production and all the weapons, uniforms, equipment, parts, and ammunition plus and all the electronics used in every phase of attack. Pentagon money is often welcomed by research departments in today’s underfunded universities where our scientists misuse their expertise to develop and perfect ever-new weapons and instruments of war. Then there are the transportation networks that rely on moving all the component parts to production plants and from the plants to the Pentagon or to the Pentagon’s customers. And then there are all the jobs that rely on the paychecks of the workers involved in everything listed above. We are talking about millions and millions of US jobs that rely on a thriving US imperialist war economy and imperialism’s plan to take over the entire globe and humanity’s resources.

The US government is not issuing ultimata to these Gulf regimes to stop supporting terrorism “or else.” It is not bombing the Gulf regimes “to defeat terrorists” like it bombs Libya, Iraqi, Syria, or Yemen. It is not even calling for economic sanctions against these regimes like it does against Russia or Iran.

Instead, the US government is stepping up funding for and sending ever more weapons to these sleazy and criminal Gulf entities and strengthening their military might.

What the US government is doing is rewarding these regimes for their cooperation.

How Must the Workers Organize to Stop Such a War Machine: Solutions

How can we even begin to take on such an incredible behemoth that is being created by our own working class, by ourselves, here in the “”belly of the beast?” It seems impossible, yet it not, and it must be done.

First, of course, the working class and its allies must organize serious public demonstrations demanding that Washington to stop funding jihad armies, stop funding Arab terrorist monarchies, to stop funding the Zionist terror state, and stop the phoney “war on terror!” However, to really stop all this, we need to shut down the entire imperialist war industry.

As a first step toward this end, we need to conduct a thorough analysis of what is going on around us. Workers need to start paying more attention to what is being produced and what they are producing and what it is for, where it goes, and how it gets there to where it is going, with the goal of establishing a national information center where all the data can be collected, processed, analyzed, and publicized. This will require a national network of collaboration. Workers and comrades on the job should form committees to investigate and report on what is being produced and where, how the tentacles of this war machine reach out to encompass entire industries, communities, towns, and cities, where workers may not even be aware—but often they must be!–of what role their labor power plays in this gigantic machine of death and destruction.

This work must be directed toward making completely public and understandable what is now arcane and secret. This could be facilitated by workers in some key industrialized sectors calling a national conference to begin discussion, implementation, and broadening of this process with the participation of workers from as many war-industry cites as possible so everyone involved can have a voice.

This is really the only way we can “Stop the Bombing” and all the other US imperialist aggression that squander and ravage humanity and our resources. The workers must also formulate an alternative plan to build our economy anew, offering new jobs and using resources in ways that serve life and and not death, human needs and not private profits. Seeing this process through to completion will require that the working class take over and run the country—the revolution.

While some industries will need to be completely eliminated, others may be converted relatively easily to useful and humane production. Where industries must eliminated completely—such as those producing cluster bombs, for example– we will need to make sure that the workers whose livelihoods depended on the war budget are able to live full and productive lives until they find another job. Confiscation of the vast war profits of the “masters of war” and all their collaborators will be the first step toward achieving that last goal. At the same time, we have the historic responsibility to assist workers everywhere else in making the working-class revolution in their countries and helping those who have already become victims of US imperialist aggression rebuild their economies.

Conclusion

This is not a matter of charity, pacifism or “good deeds.” It is a matter of survival. As Leon Trotsky put it simply in the Transitional Program for Socialist Revolution, “Under the menace of its own disintegration, the proletarian cannot permit the transformation of an increasing section of the workers into chronically unemployed paupers, living off the crumbs of a disintegrating society…” (33) This is the situation confronting us today. We are talking about the need for the working class to organize to take power, a socialist proletarian revolution. As Trotsky, Rosa Luxemburg and other Marxists warned a century ago: Humanity has a choice: It is either socialism or barbarism.

Notes:

  1. See Tomorrow’s Battlefield: US Proxy Wars and Secret Ops in Africa by Nick Turse, Haymarket Books, Chicago, 2015.
  2. http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2013/12/06-private-gulf-financing-syria-extremist-rebels-sectarian-conflict-dickinson
  3. Ibid. p.6
  4. Ibid. 1-2
  5. Ibid. p. 6
  6. Ibid. p. 9
  7. Ibid. p. 10
  8. Ibid. p. 11
  9. Ibid. p. 17
  10. Ibid. p. 21
  11. http://foreignpolicy.com/2014/09/30/the-case-against-qatar/
  12. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/mar/06/el-salvador-iraq-police-squads-washington
  13. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/18/world/sunnis-in-iraq-are-kept-waiting-for-reforms-and-word-on-loved-ones.html?_r=0
  14. www.truth-out.org/speakout/item/21046-is-the-us-government-behind-the-carnage-in-iraq
  15. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/29/world/middleeast/isis-grip-on-libyan-city-gives-it-a-fallback-option.html?_r=0
  16. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/24/world/asia/afghan-leaders-try-to-halt-exodus-but-pleas-ring-hollow.html?_r=0
  17. A Peace to End All Peace, David Fromkin, Avon Books, NY, 1989, p. 560
  18. http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/31/us-syria-crisis-saudi-insight-idUSBRE94U0ZV20130531#OPhPjHwsaTOYf3MQ.97
  19. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/12/world/middleeast/hagel-lifts-veil-on-major-military-center-in-qatar.html?_r=0.
  20. http://linkis.com/washingtonpost.com/In_the_UAE_the_Unite.html0
  21. Globalsecurity.org
  22. http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/interactive/2012/04/2012417131242767298.html
  23. http://sss.migrationpolicy,org/article/labor-migration-united-arab-emirates-challenges-and-responses)
  24. ISIS Commands Media, Boasting of Statecraft and Killing,” The           New York Times, August 31, 2014.
  25. Robert Dreyfus, The Devil’s Game,      Henry Holt and Company, NY, 2005
  26. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/11/world/middleeast/rampage-by-a-soldier-known-for-loyalty-shakes-jordan-and-a-family.html?_r=0
  27. Gerard Chaliand, Report From Afghanistan, Viking Press, NY, 1982.
  28. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/05/world/asia/kunduz-fall-validates-mullah-akhtar-muhammad-mansour-talibans-newleader.htmlown
  29. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/01/world/asia/founder-of-haqqani-network-died-nearly-a-year-ago-member-says.html
  30. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/26/world/middleeast/emirates-secretly-sends-colombian-mercenaries-to-fight-in-yemen.html
  31. “To Defeat ISIS, Create a Sunni State,” Op Ed, The New York Times, November 24, 2015.
  32. “The F-35’s History of Costly Problems,” NPR, September 29, 2013.
  33. Leon Trotsky, The Transitional Program For Socialist Revolution, Pathfinder Press, 1983, p. 116.

 

More articles by:

Marilyn Vogt-Downey was a Russian translator for many years.  She translated the writings of Leon Trotsky for the Pathfinder Press.Writings of Leon Trotsky series.  She also translated Notebooks for the Grandchildren, the memoirs of a Ukrainian Trotskyist who survived the Stalin era. A collection of her writings on the former Soviet Union appeared in a volume the USSR: 1987-1991: Marxists Perspectives.

April 24, 2018
Carl Boggs
Russia and the War Party
William A. Cohn
Carnage Unleashed: the Pentagon and the AUMF
Nathan Kalman-Lamb
The Racist Culture of Canadian Hockey
María Julia Bertomeu
On Angers, Disgusts and Nauseas
Nick Pemberton
How To Buy A Seat In Congress 101
Ron Jacobs
Resisting the Military-Now More Than Ever
Paul Bentley
A Velvet Revolution Turns Bloody? Ten Dead in Toronto
Sonali Kolhatkar
The Left, Syria and Fake News
Manuel E. Yepe
The Confirmation of Democracy in Cuba
Peter Montgomery
Christian Nationalism: Good for Politicians, Bad for America and the World
Ted Rall
Bad Drones
Jill Richardson
The Latest Attack on Food Stamps
Andrew Stewart
What Kind of Unionism is This?
Ellen Brown
Fox in the Hen House: Why Interest Rates Are Rising
April 23, 2018
Patrick Cockburn
In Middle East Wars It Pays to be Skeptical
Thomas Knapp
Just When You Thought “Russiagate” Couldn’t Get Any Sillier …
Gregory Barrett
The Moral Mask
Robert Hunziker
Chemical Madness!
David Swanson
Senator Tim Kaine’s Brief Run-In With the Law
Dave Lindorff
Starbucks Has a Racism Problem
Uri Avnery
The Great Day
Nyla Ali Khan
Girls Reduced to Being Repositories of Communal and Religious Identities in Kashmir
Ted Rall
Stop Letting Trump Distract You From Your Wants and Needs
Steve Klinger
The Cautionary Tale of Donald J. Trump
Kevin Zeese - Margaret Flowers
Conflict Over the Future of the Planet
Cesar Chelala
Gideon Levy: A Voice of Sanity from Israel
Weekend Edition
April 20, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Paul Street
Ruling Class Operatives Say the Darndest Things: On Devils Known and Not
Conn Hallinan
The Great Game Comes to Syria
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Mother of War
Andrew Levine
“How Come?” Questions
Doug Noble
A Tale of Two Atrocities: Douma and Gaza
Kenneth Surin
The Blight of Ukania
Howard Lisnoff
How James Comey Became the Strange New Hero of the Liberals
William Blum
Anti-Empire Report: Unseen Persons
Lawrence Davidson
Missiles Over Damascus
Patrick Cockburn
The Plight of the Yazidi of Afrin
Pete Dolack
Fooled Again? Trump Trade Policy Elevates Corporate Power
Stan Cox
For Climate Mobilization, Look to 1960s Vietnam Before Turning to 1940s America
William Hawes
Global Weirding
Dan Glazebrook
World War is Still in the Cards
Nick Pemberton
In Defense of Cardi B: Beyond Bourgeois PC Culture
Ishmael Reed
Hollywood’s Last Days?
Peter Certo
There Was Nothing Humanitarian About Our Strikes on Syria
Dean Baker
China’s “Currency Devaluation Game”
Ann Garrison
Why Don’t We All Vote to Commit International Crimes?
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail