FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Who Sows the Wind?

by

Paris.

‘Islam – this is the enemy!’

Doesn’t this remind you of something? [Léon] Gambetta, the man who in 1870 left a besieged Paris in a hot-air balloon to organize resistance from the provinces declared in 1877 a war on clericalism “Le cléricalisme, voila l’ennemi!”. Gambetta subverted the catch cry (a ‘moral order’) of the then dominant reactionary forces who sought to embed Catholicism in the nascent Third Republic. Political men of this stamp are no longer with us. What a shame!

Yes, today, Islam is assuredly the enemy. But the question arises, is it the sole enemy?

1991: The first Iraq war, or rather, war against Iraq, a country on the road to significant economic development – Arab, but secular. A formidable coalition organized by Washington with ‘the West’ (as we say) on board and also the grand democracies of Saudi Arabia and other fabulously wealthy and Sunni principalities of the Persian Gulf. France under the socialist and humanist [François] Mitterand rallies to the call.

Iraq is to be taken back to the Stone Age, proclaims the Protestant and grand democrat James Baker in June of that year. The Stone Age for a country heir to one of the most ancient civilizations. 500,000 Iraqi children dead? The price to pay, according to Madeleine Albright in 1995.

2002: NATO, under US direction, charges into Afghanistan to unleash a war of ten years and still counting. France under [Jacques] Chirac doesn’t rush to join in. Well, not immediately, but a little later, yes, in particular with [Nicolas] Sarkozy. The Soviets came a cropper there. NATO will fare little better.

2003: The second Iraq war with ‘the democracies’ rallied under the star-spangled banner to finally usher Iraq into that paradise that is Western democracy. A triumph, as one well knows.

The France of Chirac and [Dominique de] Villepin, refuses to join the crowd. The ‘third’ world and some non-aligned countries voice their admiration. The ‘weapons of mass destruction’ lie propagated by Washington and London is exposed. With a group determined to prove the point, we take ourselves to Iraq. On my return, then Defense Minister, Mme Alliot Marie, has sent to me via her Cabinet Secretary a threatening letter to recall me to my duty to keep politically neutral. Is it possible that she had different views to that of the President on this subject?

2010: President Sarkozy, London and Paris unite to spread chaos in Libya and facilitate the pornographic assassination of President Qaddafi. A lovely military operation subcontracted by Washington to its two vassals, to which it provides logistic support as purveyor of arms and munitions. We know well all the consequences.

But that is insufficient. Another arena of chaos is brewing.

hollandesabre

2012: After the warmonger (the charming ‘va-t-en guerre’ in French) Sarkozy, here is [François] Hollande and his Minister of Foreign Affairs, [Laurent] Fabius, obsessed with engineering the deposition of a legitimate head of state and a war against a member state of the UN.

Syria, in its turn, is in chaos, attacked by Al Qaeda, the Islamic State and some other entities evidently christened as a ‘democratic opposition’. In the context of a deceitful media war – outrageous demonization – the Syrian army fights and resists, soon aided by Iran and Shiite Hezbollah forces and Russia. Washington takes a step back, at least publically, and the France of Hollande and Fabius is made to look ridiculous.

Thus we have the scenario of a neatly organized chaos in the Near- and Middle East. Conform to the American strategy built on the dollar and on a defense capability without peer, rooted in a dominating doctrine and ideology. Al Qaeda, Daesh – these are its children nourished by the petrodollars of Qatar and Saudi Arabia and armed by them as proxies for Washington. And what in all this is the role played by Israel? One both direct and indirect.

France, zealously subservient, commits itself to Atlanticism on all fronts. A France weak or weakened, a France secular as well, makes an ideal target for Islamism, the dark face of Islam, that has re-surfaced, courtesy of the strategy of chaos. Islamism reemerges among populations humiliated, showered by a hail of bombs, taken back to the Stone Age, with a devastated economy and a ‘development’ inevitably going backwards, targets of a war of religion, subject on a daily basis to murderous attacks that have long stopped evoking any compassion in the larger world.

These people have no other reference point left than religion and the young gravitate towards it with violence and fanaticism, not to say a hatred borne by people who have no other perspective, excluded as they are from the promises of a decent life. This is no excuse but it offers a background explanation.

Thus, yes, Islamism, here is the enemy! It’s there, arisen out of chaos, dangerous, murderous, and of course we have no other choice than to fight it with determination with all the arms we possess to pursue it, and with a will clearly demonstrated.

But I can’t prevent myself from thinking that Atlanticism for us French is also the enemy, the evil that has given free rein to the other evil. Whose politics, based on a clear strategy and deliberately chosen, is that of chaos. A strategy in which, no matter the parliamentary majority of the moment, France became an accomplice even in Europe, contributing to the breakup of Yugoslavia or the civil war in Ukraine, ignoring the Russian standpoint on these questions.

Sowing the wind, the Atlanticism of our leaders, whether from conviction or of convenience, today harvests the tempest on the soil of France.

To the politicians, men and women, and to all those who say that war is something too serious to be left to the military, it is appropriate to reply that it is the consequence of the incapacity of politicians to foresee it. The responsibility of deliberating on something so serious must be assigned to the French people, to the country consulted by referendum and not to a parliament whose members are too often limited to a short term perspective, and who must submit to a party discipline incompatible with a choice according to one’s conscience.

This article was published at Comité Valmy, 16 November, and translated by Evan Jones.

More articles by:
Weekend Edition
February 16, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Jeffrey St. Clair
American Carnage
Paul Street
Michael Wolff, Class Rule, and the Madness of King Don
Andrew Levine
Had Hillary Won: What Now?
David Rosen
Donald Trump’s Pathetic Sex Life
Susan Roberts
Are Modern Cities Sustainable?
Joyce Nelson
Canada vs. Venezuela: Have the Koch Brothers Captured Canada’s Left?
Geoff Dutton
America Loves Islamic Terrorists (Abroad): ISIS as Proxy US Mercenaries
Mike Whitney
The Obnoxious Pence Shows Why Korea Must End US Occupation
Joseph Natoli
In the Post-Truth Classroom
John Eskow
One More Slaughter, One More Piece of Evidence: Racism is a Terminal Mental Disease
John W. Whitehead
War Spending Will Bankrupt America
Dave Lindorff
Trump’s Latest Insulting Proposal: Converting SNAP into a Canned Goods Distribution Program
Robert Fantina
Guns, Violence and the United States
Robert Hunziker
Global Warming Zaps Oxygen
John Laforge
$1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and “Fake” Cleanups
CJ Hopkins
The War on Dissent: the Specter of Divisiveness
Peter A. Coclanis
Chipotle Bell
Anders Sandström – Joona-Hermanni Mäkinen
Ways Forward for the Left
Wilfred Burchett
Vietnam Will Win: Winning Hearts and Minds
Tommy Raskin
Syrian Quicksand
Martha Rosenberg
Big Pharma Still Tries to Push Dangerous Drug Class
Jill Richardson
The Attorney General Thinks Aspirin Helps Severe Pain – He’s Wrong
Mike Miller
Herb March: a Legend Deserved
Ann Garrison
If the Democrats Were Decent
Renee Parsons
The Times, They are a-Changing
Howard Gregory
The Democrats Must Campaign to End Trickle-Down Economics
Sean Keller
Agriculture and Autonomy in the Middle East
Ron Jacobs
Re-Visiting Gonzo
Eileen Appelbaum
Rapid Job Growth, More Education Fail to Translate into Higher Wages for Health Care Workers
Ralph Nader
Shernoff, Bidart, and Echeverria—Wide-Ranging Lawyers for the People
Chris Zinda
The Meaning of Virginia Park
Robert Koehler
War and Poverty: A Compromise with Hell
Mike Bader – Mike Garrity
Senator Tester Must Stop Playing Politics With Public Lands
Kenneth Culton
No Time for Olympic Inspired Nationalism
Graham Peebles
Ethiopia: Final Days of the Regime
Irene Tung – Teófilo Reyes
Tips are for Servers Not CEOs
Randy Shields
Yahoomans in Paradise – This is L.A. to Me
Thomas Knapp
No Huawei! US Spy Chiefs Reverse Course on Phone Spying
Mel Gurtov
Was There Really a Breakthrough in US-North Korea Relations?
David Swanson
Witness Out of Palestine
Binoy Kampmark
George Brandis, the Rule of Law and Populism
Dean Baker
The Washington Post’s Long-Running Attack on Unions
Andrew Stewart
Providence Public School Teachers Fight Back at City Hall
Stephen Cooper
Majestic Meditations with Jesse Royal: the Interview
David Yearsley
Olympic Music
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail