FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

From Paris to Mali: the Nightmare Continues

People in Paris are still leery of large crowds; think twice before walking into a department store or museum or taking the metro. But now, as I write, we look in shock at live TV coverage of yet another savage attack by Islamic jihadists. Today it’s Mali’s turn.

The outcome there will certainly stoke the already incendiary political debate going on here in France–and across much of the globe.

The Muslim radicals barricaded in the luxury Raddison Hotel in Mali’s capital, Bamako, held more than 100 people hostage. Reportedly, several hostages were freed because they were able to recite verses of the Koran. In the violent aftermath reportedly 28 people have already been killed.

Mali, in fact, was another front in Francois Hollande’s battle against radical Islam. He dispatched French troops there in January 2013, to prevent a takeover by extremist groups, some with links to al-Qaeda. He ultimately deployed more than 3,000 troops, with most of his European allies ignoring his request to send some of their own combat soldiers. In fact, French troops are still there, along with UN peacekeepers.

The scenes we’re watching in Paris from Mali are a reprise of the replays we’ve seen, over and over and over again, on French TV of last Friday’s carnage in in this city and the violent aftermath in a northern suburb.

The result of it all that fear and horror is that the liberal dikes of “political correctness” have been breached in France—and across Europe—as many had warned would happen.

Rightwing slogans that had once been dismissed as the demagogic ranting of Marine Le Penn’s Front National, are now being seriously considered in the “respectable” media and solemnly debated across the political spectrum

In virtual non-stop appearances on TV talk shows, she’s demanding an immediate halt to the intake of immigrants from Syria, says that the Schengen agreement, which allows free passage across European borders, is ‘madness’, and advocates Draconian measures against any of the thousands of French suspected of jihadist sympathies or contacts.

Conservative politicians, like Nicholas Sarkozy, desperate to keep their restive electorate, are scrambling to sound just as militant as Le Pen.

More appalling, is the mounting wave of Islamophobia. Following the attack on Charlie Hebdo last January, there was a concerted effort by France’s leaders and media to distinguish between the radical jihadists who carried out the killings, and the vast majority of France’s Muslim population, the largest in Europe.

No longer.

Why, thunders one op-ed piece this morning, does President Hollande keep referring to a war on “terrorism”, rather than “radical Islam?” Why does he call ISIL by its Arab name, Daech, rather than use the word “Islamic State?”.

“Why? Because his hand trembles.”

On the other hand, The French Council of the Muslim Religion–often divided among itself–has denounced the carnage of last Friday in the strongest terms. They’ve called for sermons in all 2400 mosques of France, warned of the modern Islamic “gangrene”—of “evil doers” who are “seducing young Muslims.” Daech, they say, is the “incarnation of an ancestral ideology of a group of dissidents which fought against the campaigns of the Prophet.”

But in today’s conservative Le Figaro, one of France’s major newspapers, there are two full pages devoted to detailing how the “salafists” are infiltrating France’s public services.  Reflecting their large numbers in France, thousands of Muslims have been  employed in all branches of the transport services, from busses and railroads to the Metro and Air France. Some of the most observant, it turns out, refuse to shake hands [a severe insult in France] with female colleagues or drive a train or a bus if a woman has just been sitting at the controls.

They sometimes ask–or demand–to be excused to attend Friday prayers, or interrupt their work to pray during regular work hours. Some refuse to join in company banquets if the meals are not halal, or attend year-end festivities, if the performers are not properly clothed. These issues have become more acute as some younger Muslims, born in France, become more observant and militant than their parents.

All this has been simmering for years in the ranks of the public workers. Now it’s been brought front and centre. Along with other traditional issues, like the demand that female patients be attended only by female doctors. or that only Halal meals be served in the schools.

But these issues are nothing compared to what may lie ahead.

With just a few dissenting votes, the French Chamber of Deputies has extended the state of emergency declared after last Friday’s attacks for another three months. The danger is that some of the measures—such as allowing warrantless searches, banning  groups considered dangerous, and prohibiting certain demonstrations—are measures which might make eminent sense in the immediate aftermath of the Paris attacks. But they could be improperly used down the road to permanently undermine basic liberties.

Francois Hollande is a highly unpopular president. Could he be tempted to turn these measures to his own political purposes? He has said they are vital to his war against terrorism. Sounds just like George W. Bush.

Who will declare when that war on terror is over?

It’s going to take many more than three months—probably years—before the Islamic State is defeated. Will that be it? Or won’t there almost certainly be other jihadists somewhere else in the world who will take its place.

What is also remarkable in the Paris aftermath is that the most extreme positions are being taken not by French politicians, still reacting from the horrific attacks in their own nation’s capital, but by America’s Republican presidential candidates, like Dr. Ben Carson, who says a Muslim should not be able to become president of the U.S.

And now Donald Trump has upped the ante, calling for a national data base for all Muslims living in the United States. He dodged a question about how he would enforce that law, nor how that would make America different from Nazi Germany, which demanded identity cards from all its Jews.

Trump’s proposal would be a stunning statement coming from a prominent American politician; in this case, it’s come from the leading Republican contender for President.

You can be sure the French are listening.

More articles by:

BARRY LANDO is a former producer for 60 Minutes. He is the author of  “Deep Strike” a novel about Russian hacking, rogue CIA agents, and a new American president. He can be reached at: barrylando@gmail.com or through his website.

Weekend Edition
September 21, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Alexandra Isfahani-Hammond
Hurricane Florence and 9.7 Million Pigs
Andrew Levine
Israel’s Anti-Semitism Smear Campaign
Paul Street
Laquan McDonald is Being Tried for His Own Racist Murder
Brad Evans
What Does It Mean to Celebrate International Peace Day?
Nick Pemberton
With or Without Kavanaugh, The United States Is Anti-Choice
Jim Kavanagh
“Taxpayer Money” Threatens Medicare-for-All (And Every Other Social Program)
Jonathan Cook
Palestine: The Testbed for Trump’s Plan to Tear up the Rules-Based International Order
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: the Chickenhawks Have Finally Come Back Home to Roost!
David Rosen
As the Capitalist World Turns: From Empire to Imperialism to Globalization?
Jonah Raskin
Green Capitalism Rears Its Head at Global Climate Action Summit
James Munson
On Climate, the Centrists are the Deplorables
Robert Hunziker
Is Paris 2015 Already Underwater?
Arshad Khan
Will Their Ever be Justice for Rohingya Muslims?
Jill Richardson
Why Women Don’t Report Sexual Assault
Dave Clennon
A Victory for Historical Accuracy and the Peace Movement: Not One Emmy for Ken Burns and “The Vietnam War”
W. T. Whitney
US Harasses Cuba Amid Mysterious Circumstances
Nathan Kalman-Lamb
Things That Make Sports Fans Uncomfortable
George Capaccio
Iran: “Snapping Back” Sanctions and the Threat of War
Kenneth Surin
Brexit is Coming, But Which Will It Be?
Louis Proyect
Moore’s “Fahrenheit 11/9”: Entertaining Film, Crappy Politics
Ramzy Baroud
Why Israel Demolishes: Khan Al-Ahmar as Representation of Greater Genocide
Ben Dangl
The Zapatistas’ Dignified Rage: Revolutionary Theories and Anticapitalist Dreams of Subcommandante Marcos
Ron Jacobs
Faith, Madness, or Death
Bill Glahn
Crime Comes Knocking
Terry Heaton
Pat Robertson’s Hurricane “Miracle”
Dave Lindorff
In Montgomery County PA, It’s Often a Jury of White People
Louis Yako
From Citizens to Customers: the Corporate Customer Service Culture in America 
William Boardman
The Shame of Dianne Feinstein, the Courage of Christine Blasey Ford 
Ernie Niemi
Logging and Climate Change: Oregon is Appalachia and Timber is Our Coal
Jessicah Pierre
Nike Says “Believe in Something,” But Can It Sacrifice Something, Too?
Paul Fitzgerald - Elizabeth Gould
Weaponized Dreams? The Curious Case of Robert Moss
Olivia Alperstein
An Environmental 9/11: the EPA’s Gutting of Methane Regulations
Ted Rall
Why Christine Ford vs. Brett Kavanaugh is a Train Wreck You Can’t Look Away From
Lauren Regan
The Day the Valves Turned: Defending the Pipeline Protesters
Ralph Nader
Questions, Questions Where are the Answers?
Binoy Kampmark
Deplatforming Germaine Greer
Raouf Halaby
It Should Not Be A He Said She Said Verdict
Robert Koehler
The Accusation That Wouldn’t Go Away
Jim Hightower
Amazon is Making Workers Tweet About How Great It is to Work There
Robby Sherwin
Rabbi, Rabbi, Where For Art Thou Rabbi?
Vern Loomis
Has Something Evil This Way Come?
Steve Baggarly
Disarm Trident Walk Ends in Georgia
Graham Peebles
Priorities of the Time: Peace
Michael Doliner
The Department of Demonization
David Yearsley
Bollocks to Brexit: the Plumber Sings
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail